So, is the Los Angeles ‘German’ car arsonist a Muslim terrorist?
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: EnemyWithin-American 31 Comments »LA Police said arsonist suspect, Harry Burkhart, was a 24-year-old German national who carried travel papers from Chechnya. (FYI: Chechnya in Russia is 94% Muslim, from which several terrorist attacks have been launched on Russian citizens recently)
Chechnya, huh? Why would he have travel papers from Chechnya?
He had spent time in Germany, they said, but had lived in Southern California for the last several years. They weren’t clear on his alleged motives but speculated that he might have been furious over his mother’s pending deportation.
A senior LAPD official said the suspect had attended a recent immigration hearing regarding his mother’s case and erupted in a tirade, spewing angry anti-American statements. “I hate America” were the words he reportedly uttered after he was pulled out of his car during a traffic stop.
It was this incident that eventually led police to Burkhart. Several sources said the tip came from an official at the State Department…READ MORE: Sweetness & Light
TANZANIA, ZANZIBAR: Muslim leaders want to turn the tropical paradise into another Afghanistan ruled by the Taliban
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: Persecution of Christians 19 Comments »Although only about 3% of the population of Zanzibar is Christian (with 45% of Tanzanians Christian), Muslims want to purge the country of everything non-Islamic. They are teaching hatred for Christians who won’t convert and are burning down churches in order to help turn Africa into the first all-Muslim continent. Once you convert to Islam, you will never be allowed to leave….alive.
Zanzibar guarantees freedom of religion, but with Islam their constitution cannot protect them. In additions, the Muslims (ALL) are teaching to one another to HATE all Christians. Zanzibar’s mosques are fuller on Fridays, more women are wearing head scarves and more Muslim men are showing calluses created by frequently touching their foreheads to the ground in prayer. A growing number of Zanzibaris are turning toward a stricter form of Islam and possibly away from democracy. Fundamentalist clerics see an opportunity, offering Islamic law as an alternative to democracy, arguing that would bring discipline and moral values to political leadership.
Christians Live in Cloud of Fear in Zanzibar, Tanzania |
Published in 2011 |
Muslim Extremists Torch Churches in Zanzibar |
Published in 2011 |
Muslims Seize Christian Burial Sites in Tanzania’s Archipelago |
Published in 2011 |
Two Church Buildings Torn Down in Zanzibar |
Published in 2010 |
Evangelist Arrested in Zanzibar |
Published in 2010 |
Court Acquits Two Evangelists of ‘Illegal Preaching’ |
Published in 2010 |
Zanzibar Muslims, Officials Stop Church Building, Erect Mosque |
Published in 2010 |
Arrested Evangelists Say Muslims Colluded with Police |
Published in 2010 |
Two Church Buildings Burned Down in Zanzibar, Tanzania |
Published in 2009 |
Two Church Buildings Burned Down in Zanzibar |
Published in 2009 |
Zanzibar Evicts Congregation from Government Building |
Published in 2009 |
Radical Muslims Drive Church from Worship Place in Zanzibar |
Published in 2009 |
Radical Muslims Drive Church from Worship Place in Zanzibar |
Published in 2009 |
Isn’t “moderate Islamist” an oxymoron?
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: EnemyWithin-foreign 25 Comments »Are we supposed to be happy that the new leader of Morocco’s government and cabinet are all so-called moderate Islamists? I guess this fits in well with Barack Hussein Obama’s ban on putting the words ‘Islamic’ and ‘Terrorism’ together in the same sentence.
How long before Morocco loses its only real source of revenue – tourism?
[UPDATED] CAIR Tries to Blame Anti-Islamist Website ‘Bare Naked Islam’ for NYC Firebomb Attacks
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: CAIR Nazis 110 Comments »FAMILY SECURITY MATTERS take on Ibrahim Hooper of Hamas-linked CAIR who is on a crusade to destroy Bare Naked Islam.
Arson attacks are always worrying events. When firebombs are thrown at homes, even when they are only intended to scare people, it is easy for the flames to getout of control and for family members to be trapped and killed. When accelerants are used on many carpets, not only do these ignite quickly, they also give off toxic smoke that kills long before a victim is aware of the fire. Therefore, Sunday night’s firebombings in New York City should not only be forcefully condemned. The perpetrators must be brought to justice, and be shown to be prosecuted with the full force of the law, as soon as possible.
Fortunately, no-one was killed in the arson attacks. The first of these took place at a convenience store which is run by Muslims, and caused some damage behind the counter. The second incendiary device was thrown at a private house. The occupants manage to flee but the house itself was severely damaged.
Around 8.44 pm on Sunday night, the mosque of the Imam Al-Khoei Foundation in Jamaica, Queens, was hit by a firebomb. At the time, 80 Shia worshippers were in the building. Imam Maan Al-Sahlani, assistant imam at the mosque, stated:
“We were very surprised. This has never happened here before.”
Another firebomb also hit the school attached to the mosque, but no-one was hurt. After the three attacks, a fourth firebomb hit a house where Hindu services are held.
The Al-Khoei Foundation is named in honor of an Iranian-born Shia scholar calledImam Abdul Qasim al-Khoei (1899 – 1992), who lived for some time in Najaf, in Iraq.
On the Al-Khoei Foundation website, an announcement states:
“We thank Allah (SWT) that no major damage or injury was caused by the blast. The Foundation reiterates its resolve to continue to serve the community and to strive to bring love where there is hatred, light where there is darkness and enlightenment where there is ignorance.”
The Associated Press mentioned that CAIR, the Council of American Islamic Relations, had condemned the firebombings, and urged police and Muslim establishments to do more to protect mosques.
Yet were these attacks as a result of religious bigotry or racial bigotry? The house where Hindu ceremonies are sometimes held is not a mosque, but an ignorant person may perceive the visitors to be Muslims. According to the New York Times, this home has a shrine in its window. Only a very naïve person could suggest that a Hindu shrine is “Muslim.” Conceivably, a bigot who disliked non-White individuals and “foreign” ideologies may deliberately target both a mosque and a Hindu site
The house that received the worst damage belonged to a black couple, who are Christian, Monty and Sonia Burnett. Monty Burnett told the New York Daily News:
“When I came to the front of the house it was ablaze already. It started on the front window and came into the house. His wife said: “We’re okay. But why me? Why my house? I didn’t do anything.”
Because a mosque is involved, CAIR is right to express concerns that Muslim places of worship may come under similar attacks. But is there any justification for him to bring up a website that was shut down by WordPress on Friday morning, to give animpression that this site in particular may have influenced the attacks?
According to Associated Press: Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the advocacy group, said CAIR recently called on the FBI to investigate threats targeting mosques posted on an anti-Islam blog called “Bare Naked Islam.”
One comment on the site read: “Throw 10 Molotov cocktails into these mosques and burn them down,” according to Hooper. By Monday, the comment appeared to have been taken down by blog operator WordPress.com.
For Hooper to bring up the Bare Naked Islam website in this manner is blatantly dishonest. The entire Bare Naked Islam website was suspended on Friday after WordPress received pressure from CAIR. The site went back up over the weekend.
The comment that led WordPress to initially remove the website from its servers was left by a visitor, and was not part of any editorial policy by Bonni, who runs the site.
The firebombing attacks are terrible, and could easily have cost innocent lives, be those lives Muslim, Christian, and/or Hindu. It is entirely right to draw attention to damage and vandalism against mosques after the deliberate firebombing of a mosque.
But though the NYPD police are convinced that the firebombings resulted from “hate” or “bias,” it is a step too far to attempt to suggest some causality between one comment on a blog and four attacks that could have placed people’s lives at risk.
Hooper is someone who converted to Islam, after a career in the media, therefore he should be aware of media bias, and not to promote it. He is quick to condemn Islamophobia, but his organization’s attacks against critics of Islam are often just propaganda of a very low level.
If Hooper thinks Bare Naked Islam should be closed down, because of a comment left on the website, he is implicitly suggesting that freedom of speech should be closed down altogether. The comment is not available now to examine, but I know that when blogs allow comments, it is sometimes hard to control the content that goes online. The particular comment that Hooper refers to additionally seems to be from an individual who is venting frustration, rather than seriously suggesting arson.
If a blog or website should be punished for the comments made by its readers, this would have serious ramifications on what Americans could say online. And if a blog should be judged by its comments, surely Ibrahim Hooper and CAIR should be judged for their close involvement with Iranian media, considering Iran’s media is openly anti-Semitic and the Iranian regime sponsors terrorism?
Already, Hooper is someone who assumes that the current U.S. Constitution is not ideal, and would like to see it changed to an Islamic Constitution. As reported on Discover the Networks, in 1993 in an interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Hooper stated:
“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future. But I’m not going to do anything violent to promote that. I’m going to do it through education.”
A decade later Hooper said that if Muslims become a majority in the United States, they will likely seek to replace the man-made Constitution with Sharia, which was considered superior by Muslims.
When an individual such as CAIR’s spokesman suggests that a blog site should be condemned, people should not get too alarmed. Intolerance of American institutions, including a desire to destroy a statue of Mohammed in the Supreme Court building, has been grist to CAIR’s mill since it was founded.
When MSNBC and other media outlets that use Associated Press for their news input can publish unfounded suggestions that one blogsite may have influenced a campaign of firebombing, without making any criticism at all, this is truly irresponsible.
We hope the perpetrators of these arson attacks are caught quickly and jailed before they cause a loss of life. But it is a shame that when the media allows itself to promote an obvious absurdity that there is little that can be done to prevent such activities being repeated.
Gee, I wonder if CAIR would like to issue a press release with an apology to BNI for slandering me?
NYPD arrest suspect in firebombings who had personal issues with people in each of his targets
TLC’s ‘ALL-AMERICAN MUSLIM’ loses 96% (101 out of 105) of its sponsors
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 24 Comments »On the Jan. 1st episode of All-American Muslim, there were nearly as many non-revenue-producing commercials for TLC’s other programs than there were paid sponsors. This show focused on the 10th anniversary of 9/11, and how Muslims are sick to death over having to apologize for the religion that inspired the hijackers who brought joy to hundreds of millions of America-hating Muslims around the world.
The following facts clearly indicate that The Learning Channel show All-American Muslim was not a winner in the American marketplace:
• NINETY SIX PERCENT (96%) of the companies that Florida Family Association targeted with emails did NOT advertise again during the January 1st and 2nd episodes of All-American Muslim. One hundred one (101) out of one hundred five (105) companies did NOT advertise again. Certainly some of the companies stopped their advertisements because of seasonal buys. However, those seasonal buyers make up the small minority of companies not returning to the show.
• Close to forty percent (40%) of the advertising space on the January 1st and 2nd episodes were devoted to The Learning Channel self-promotions of other shows and network trades.
• Numerous companies known for buying bargain (when there is a ratings dive) advertising space collectively purchased a large percentage of the remaining advertising space.
Florida Family Association will NO longer post the names of the companies that pull off the show because of intense scrutiny by opponents. Additionally, no email addresses will be posted for advertisers.
REPEAT ADVERTISERS during one or more of the January 1st and 2nd episodes of All-American Muslim included: Geico, Hershey’s Reese’s Cups, Kellogg’s Special K and SC Johnson’s Scrubbing Bubbles.
NEW ADVERTISERS during one or more of the January 1st and 2nd episodes of All-American Muslim included: Esurance, FreshPet, Lifelock, Lionsgate, Mylife, Turbotax and Zoosk.
If this show airs again whether in repeats or new episodes Florida Family Association will contact advertisers. The last episodes will air January 8th at 10 pm and January 9th at 12 am. There is a fair chance that some companies will advertise during these last two episodes believing there will be no repercussions. Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to the companies that advertised during one or more of the January 1st and 2nd episodes of All-American Muslim.
To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You cannot change the wording in the subject line or message anymore because some of the opponents of our efforts were using our email system.
If you have difficulty loading the above link please click here or go to http://floridafamily.org/issues.php and locate this issue on the main floridafamily.org web site.
Following are some of the many messages of support that LOWE’S received for their courage in going public with its decision to pull all advertising from ALL AMERICAN MUSLIM.
EDL’S TOMMY ROBINSON tells about the recent savage attack on him by a Muslim gang
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: Islamic Britain 43 Comments »Thank God for Michael Coren of Sun News, the only journalist who gives Tommy a fair interview. God Bless Tommy and keep his family safe.
PART 1
PART 2
“NO HALAL MEAT for us,” order British MPs.
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: Islamic Britain 42 Comments »The Palace of Westminster has rejected demands to serve halal meat in its restaurants. Muslim MPs and peers have been told they cannot have meat slaughtered in line with Islamic tradition because the method, slitting an animal’s throat without first stunning it, is offensive to their non-Muslim colleagues.
UK DAILY MAIL The stance has infuriated some parliamentarians who have eaten meat in the Palace’s 23 restaurants and cafes, having been assured that it was halal. Lord Ahmed of Rotherham said: ‘I did feel misled. I think a halal option should be made available.’
In 2010, the Mail on Sunday revealed schools, hospitals and restaurants were serving halal meat to unwitting customers.
Members of the Church of England have complained that the spread of halal meat was ‘effectively spreading Sharia law’ across Britain.
The Palace of Westminster has rejected demands to serve halal meat in its restaurants However, a spokesman for the House of Lords and the House of Commons confirmed that it was not served in their restaurants.
When the meat is slaughtered, Islamic verse is uttered before the animal has its throat slashed. At Halal slaughterhouses thousands of birds are killed every hour.
Waitrose, Marks & Spencer, Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Somerfield and the Co-op all said they stocked meat slaughtered according to Islamic tradition without letting customers know.
HARVARD UNIVERSITY now has an Islam(sharia)-compliant speech code
Posted: January 2, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 40 Comments »Harvard’s jihad against free speech started with an article in an Indian newspaper, by Harvard Professor and India’s former Commerce Minister, Subramanian Swamy, which has now snowballed into a major controversy related to the suppression of freedom of expression.
FAITH FREEDOM (H/T Susan K) In response to the article which dealt with wiping out Islamic terror, Harvard University’s faculty has acted like a lynch-mob and voted to cancel two of Swamy’s courses in Economics leading to outrage among free speech advocates around the world.
The ban on Swamy by Harvard for violating its blasphemy code is similar to the behavior of enraged Mullahs who punish others for speaking out against their beliefs. In fact, Harvard’s action came after Muslim groups demanded that the university retaliate against Swamy despite the article focusing on dealing with Islamic terror and having no connection to Harvard. With this action, Harvard has taken a huge step closer to becoming a Shariah-compliant university. Had Voltaire been alive today, it is certain that Harvard would not have tolerated him for writing the play Mahomet.
Harvard’s jihad against free speech strikes at the core of American values of free speech and liberty. Free speech should not be subject either to a peer reviewed process to approve or disapprove statements or to a halal-certified free speech code. Harvard’s arbitrary and reprehensible action subjects opinions to both of these and should be condemned in the strongest terms. By canceling Swamy’s courses, Harvard’s faculty has demonstrated that it does not think through issues or debate ideas in an intelligent manner. Instead, they have chosen to abuse its power and muzzle the freedom of expression. In countries where law enforcement is weak, it is people with this mindset who send out hordes of throat cutters and homicide bombers to kill people whose statements are not in line with their own.
There can be no excuse for curbing the rights of Swamy as Harvard has defended the rights of others in the past. A few years ago, an article by Harvard’s Alan Dershowitz in the Israeli newspaper Jerusalem Post called for a much stronger response to Islamic terror than Swamy’s suggestions and advocated evacuating and destroying Palestinian villages as retaliatory measures against terror attacks on Israel. That article led to an outcry against Dershowitz, but Harvard held fort and defended his right to free speech.
In another case, UK-based lecturer Tom Paulin generated a controversy by stating in an interview to the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram Weekly that all Brooklyn-born Jews who had moved to Israel should be shot dead. Despite the shocking and open call for the genocide of Jews by Paulin, Harvard expressed its support for him and renewed its invitation as his statement was within the parameters of Harvard’s halal-speech standards.
Swamy is not new to controversies related to free speech. He built his reputation fighting for the freedom of expression in India during the years when the ruling Nehru family suspended free speech rights and arrested political opponents by invoking Emergency powers. His disappearance to evade arrest along with his dramatic reappearance and brief statement a few days later at the Indian Parliament is the stuff legends are made of and this legacy is sure to live on for hundreds of years. The public outcry in his support may now be the catalyst for strengthening the right to free speech in universities across the United States.
Harvard’s faculty members do not understand that the right to free speech includes the right to offend others no matter what their religion. No one, not even Muslims, should be a legally protected class from being offended on account of their religion. With this jihad against free speech, Harvard has become a persecutor of free people and joins despots like Ayatollah Khomeini, Papa Doc, Mullah Omar, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Stalin and a long list of others who oppressed their political opponents for expressing their views.
READ MORE FROM PAMELA GELLER HERE: Harvard sells out free speech or Islamic Supremacism
Despite the growing threat of war from its increasingly Islamofascist neighbors, 2011 was a banner year for Israel
Posted: January 2, 2012 Filed under: Islam and the Jews 17 Comments »The Israeli economy grew by 4.8% and unemployment fell to 5%. And unlike Barack Obama’s policy of paying more and more people NOT to work, Israel grants bonuses to working parents with small children.
DUBAI BEAUTY CONTEST won by 7-year-old female with big eyelashes and pouty lips
Posted: January 2, 2012 Filed under: Say WHAT? 34 Comments »The annual camel beauty contest is very popular, especially in Saudi Arabia, where there is also an annual goat beauty contest.
Saudi women have a ‘beauty’ contest, too, called the ‘Beautiful Morals’ contest for burqa-clad women.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
surprised-saudi-arabia-beauty-contest-winner-will-be-a-goat
saudia-arabias-miss-camel-contestants-vie-for-fame-and-fortune
tragedy-in-the-desert-she-was-part-of-the-camel-beauty-contest
muslim-mans-dream-come-true-goat-with-3-penises
BNI will be on RADIO JIHAD tonight at 6:15PM EST
Posted: January 2, 2012 Filed under: Just the Facts 53 Comments »On Our 1/2/2012 Show our special guest will be Bonni – creator of the Bare Naked Islam website. CAIR took credit this week for causing word press to shut down her website although WordPress denies they were influenced by CAIR.
On this show Bonni will be giving The Radio Jihad Network an exclusive interview on what really happened. We will also explore who CAIR is, how small they really are, why the FBI severed ties with them, and name several of the CAIR people who have been arrested and/or deported for aiding and abetting Islamic terrorist groups or general criminal behavior.
Corey Saylor and Ibrahim Doug Hooper of CAIR always have an open invitation to call in.
Tel: 347-857-1380
Listen Live or get podcast here: RADIO JIHAD
NEW YORK CITY: Four firebomb attacks, one on a mosque, no injuries
Posted: January 2, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 18 Comments »New York’s Mayor ‘Dhimmi’ Bloomberg expressed outrage after a mosque was hit by a firebomb in an arson spree that police said they were investigating as a hate crime. Notice how Bloomberg only expresses outrage over the mosque and not the bodega, the Christian home or Hindu priest’s residence that also were hit. The MSM follow suit, ONLY posting photos of the mosque.
AFP (H/T Frederick F) The Imam Al-Khoei Foundation building in the borough of Queens suffered damage to the front door from a Molotov cocktail thrown late Sunday, police said. Two similar attacks occurred in the same neighborhood.
The foundation, which describes itself as the biggest international Shia Muslim organization, said on its website that two firebombs were “hurled at the main entrance” but that thankfully “no major damage no injury was caused by the blast.” The statement said the foundation “reiterates its resolve to continue to serve the community and to strive to bring love where there is hatred, light where there is darkness and enlightenment where there is ignorance.”
“Personnel from the NYPD’s Hate Crimes Unit and the 103rd Precinct’s Detective Squad are moving at full steam to investigate and also determine if there are any connections to incidents outside New York City,” Bloomberg said. In a statement Monday, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the three Molotov cocktail attacks “stand in stark contrast to the New York City of today that we’ve built together.”
Shortly before the mosque incident and in the same part of New York, a general store known here as a bodega was struck with a similar device, consisting of a still-undetermined inflammable liquid in a glass Starbucks cafe bottle, a police spokesman said. A third incident, occurring just one hour after the mosque attack, saw the same Starbucks bottle and accelerant weapon thrown at a private home used by a Hindu priest for ceremonies, police said.
Nothing outside the house indicates its dual use as a temple, police said. A fourth, more destructive attack on the same evening caused a major fire at a nearby private home, although there was no proof of links between this and the other incidents. “There were no injuries, but there was extensive damage,” a police spokesman said.
The source with the investigation said that in this case arson was suspected, but there was no indication of the same firebombs being used. The inhabitants, who were lucky to escape unharmed, were Christian and had no connection to the mosque or to the bodega, the source said.
Bloomberg has been a staunch defender of the city’s Muslim immigrant population, notably in the furor over plans to build an Islamic center and mosque two blocks from the former location of the Twin Towers, which were destroyed in the September 11, 2001 Al-Qaeda attacks. However, Muslim community leaders say their civil rights have been marginalized since 9/11, especially as a result of intrusive police surveillance.
VENICE: The city of canals but no mosques
Posted: January 2, 2012 Filed under: Laughing at Islam 69 Comments »There are no mosques in Venice, but in reaching out to the Islamic community, the Italian government now allows Muslims to pray in the streets.
H/T Henry P
Sometimes, you gotta love those Russians!
Posted: January 1, 2012 Filed under: Laughing at Islam 88 Comments »Muslim asslifters seethe as loud church bells drown out an Islamic prayer service in the streets of Moscow.
RELATED STORY/VIDEO:
must-see-why-somali-muslim-pirates-wont-be-attacking-russian-ships-anytime-soon
OH NO! Dutch mosques defaced 117 times in five years. Gee, I can’t imagine why?
Posted: January 1, 2012 Filed under: Islamization of the West 22 Comments »Between 2005 and 2010, mosques in the Netherlands were defaced 117 times, according to research by social researcher Ineke van der Valk. The acts of vandalism were motivated by a hatred of Islam, the researcher is quoted as saying on national radio.
RNW In 43 cases, the mosques were daubed with offensive symbols or slogans. In 37 instances, the mosques sustained material damage. In 99 of the incidents, the police failed to find any of the culprits.
In the United States there were 42 similar incidents during the same period. Most of the vandalised mosques in the Netherlands are located outside the major cities.
There are some 450 mosques in the Netherlands, which has a population of more than 16.5 million. Some five percent of the population is believed to be Muslim, some 44 percent Christian and over 41 percent agnostic.
As a percentage of the population, the Netherlands has Europe’s second-largest Muslim community, inferior only to France, which has a Muslim community of more than nine percent.
I dunno, maybe the Dutch are little upset at seeing Muslims protesting in their streets carrying signs as above? More than likely, it is Muslims themselves doing a little vandalism just to get the pity of the left wing media and local police and politicians. If you follow these kinds of stories, you’ll see that the extent of the damage is never serious. Pray for Geert Wilders to become the next Prime Minister.
READER COMMENTS here are not necessarily endorsed by BNI. ALL CAPS LOCK Comments will NOT be posted.