Willard’s Tax Plan Would Blow Up Deficits and Give Millionaires $150K
Posted by Richard Warnick in 2012 Elections, Economic Exploitation, Federal Budget, Mitt Romney, National Politics, Tax Policy, This Blog on January 6, 2012
Via Think Progress.
Willard (“Mitt”) Romney’s plan would give millionaires a $150,000 tax cut, while raising taxes on many low-income families. Can you say “Reverse Robin Hood”?
According to the Tax Policy Center, Romney would raise taxes on 20 percent of the $10,000 to $20,000 income group, and about one-third of those in $40,000 to $50,000 group. Almost every millionaire would get a tax cut averaging roughly $150,000. As a group, those making $1 million or more would receive nearly half the benefit of Romney’s tax plan. Those in the richest 0.1 percent would get an annual tax cut of nearly half a million dollars.
The Romney plan hits hardest those making less than $40,000, and primarily those households with children, as he would undo President Obama’s expansion of the child tax credit.
In 2015 alone, this plan would add $600 billion to the deficit.
Remember that Romney himself still refuses to say how much he pays in taxes on the millions of dollars he gets every year as a retired partner in Bain Capital.
Evolution and the GOP (Again)
Posted by Nathan Erkkila in Conservative, Evolution, Neocons, Republicans on January 6, 2012
In either situation, that makes for a bad president who has to make decisions based off of facts every day. And if a president can deny facts or they are too uneducated to understand those facts, then that harms the nation.
Praise Jeebus! Everyone assume the Tebow position!
Posted by Shane Smith in 2012 Elections on January 4, 2012
“I think Tuesday night people are going to see a miracle.”
—Michele Bachmann
(CNN) — Michele Bachmann ended her bid for the Republican presidential nomination Wednesday, hours after a disappointing sixth-place finish in the Iowa caucuses.
To be fair, she also thinks the earth is 6000 years old, that there is scientific debate about intelligent design, and that global warming is a hoax. There was a miracle Tuesday night. People failed to drag her around back and eliminate her from the gene pool before she could do any more harm.
Is The Book of Mormon Really Just A Bad Novel?
Posted by Glenden Brown in This Blog on January 3, 2012
I the Book of Mormon good literature? I found this fascinating short article by Alan Wolfe at Slate when I was searching from something else.
The Book of Mormon has a complicated structure. It is divided into three major parts: the small plates of Nephi, the words and books of Mormon himself, and the additions and books provided by Moroni. Those who lean toward dismissing the Book of Mormon as the work of a confidence man point to its repetitive nature; the same stories are told over and over again because Smith, for all his wild imagination, was lacking in talent. Hardy offers an alternative interpretation: Read the rest of this entry »
A Piano Player With Guts
Posted by Larry Bergan in American History, American People on January 2, 2012
Time’s running out! You can only see this performance online until January ninth.
Sometimes I think George Gershwin tried to make his compositions impossible to play, but that can’t take away from the fact that they are musically perfect.
You’d have to be a madman to agree to play – not one – but two of the most complex piano pieces ever written LIVE on new years eve, but that’s what happened.
I caught only three mistakes.
Watch New York Philharmonic Bernstein and Gershwin New Year’s Eve on PBS. See more from pbs.
Posted sans comment
Posted by Shane Smith in Capitalism, Economy, Poverty, This Blog on January 2, 2012
Part something in the never ending series…
Ezra Klein asked economists and politicians to submit their favorite charts. Here’s Robert Frank’s submission:
My entry is the attached graph of what I call the Toil Index. It’s an index I constructed to portray the most dramatic element of the middle-class squeeze — the effort required to rent a house served by a school of average quality
America in a State of Institutional Breakdown: Anomie, Sclerosis and Atomie
Posted by Glenden Brown in This Blog on December 31, 2011
From Otto Scharmer’s Theory U:
. . . the three-part syndrome of anomie (loss of norms, values), sclerosis (lack of renewal), and atomie (destruction of community and structure) that seems such a familiar picture in both the Global North and South today.
The political class in the United States has been infected with Scharmer’s three part syndrome.
Anomie – the loss of norms and values, was clear in the 1990s and has become more so in the intervening years.
Sclerosis – the lack of renewal is made more apparent every day. There is a tremendous reservoir of energy, ideas and renewal available in the US yet our political leaders keep fighting over the same basic set of proposals they’ve been feuding over since 1980.
Atomie - the destruction of community and structure – is perhaps the most painfully undiscussed part of the problem. Congress has become so unable to deal with basic issues they create ad hoc committees, call them things like Super Congress, and expect them to solve the problems.
Unable to even discuss the real problems of the nation, Congress this year has played repeated games of brinkmanship, empty, caustic politics at the expense of the American people.
Voter ID = Voter Suppression
Posted by Richard Warnick in Authoritarianism, Elections, Equality, National Politics, Republicans, The Constitution, This Blog, Utah Politics, Voting Rights on December 29, 2011
Right-wing voter suppression is with us. Thirty states now have voter ID laws. There is no reason why anyone should be asked for identification on Election Day. There is no reason to hold up the line. Why not simply sign next to your name on the list of registered voters like we used to? Has there ever been a case in Utah of a voter using an assumed name?
Voter picture ID laws are designed to cause voter disenfranchisement. About 10 percent of eligible voters do not have any photo ID, and these are disproportionately low income and people who don’t own cars. That’s why Utah’s right-wing politicians made it a requirement for registered voters to produce ID before being allowed to cast a ballot.
In Utah, you must present a current valid Utah driver’s license, or current valid identification issued by the state or federal government (or a Utah concealed weapon permit). Some forms of non-photo ID are allowed, but you have to know the rules. If you can’t produce acceptable ID on the spot, you may cast a “provisional ballot” that will not count unless you provide valid voter identification to the election official within five days after the election (it takes three weeks to obtain a Utah ID card).
Those who say it’s no big deal to obtain a driver’s license or an official ID card might not have been to the DMV lately:
As a new resident of Utah, I have been attempting to acquire a Utah driver license. The Utah Driver License Division website lists the identification requirements: (1) legal status (birth certificate); (2) Social Security card; (3) residency verification (two statements proving your Utah address, such as a bank statement, utility or property tax bill); and (4) driving experience (valid driver license from another state).
First attempt: I was rejected because both my bank statement and utility bill had been printed from the Internet (only one Internet document is allowed). I then had my nearby bank print out a statement, and it was rejected because it had not been mailed to me.
Second attempt: I brought my property tax bill instead. It was rejected because it was older than 60 days, even though the website says property tax bills have to be dated “within one year.”
Third attempt: They took all of the above, but rejected me again because I did not have my 40-year-old marriage certificate. Is every married Utah woman required to show her marriage certificate?
Why doesn’t Utah simply accept two government-issued identifications (California driver license and Social Security card) as proof of citizenship and identity?
All this is of course unconstitutional because it’s a poll tax. The fee for a Utah ID Card is $18.00. A driver’s license costs $25.00. Forcing an American citizen to pay in order to vote is a clear violation of the Constitution’s 24th Amendment: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or the other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.”
Of course,Republicans claim that voter ID laws are designed to prevent voter fraud. This claim is easy to debunk. Brad Friedman:
[I]f “voter fraud” was truly a concern of the Republican Party, surely they would require that Iowa caucus goers present a photo ID before casting their vote. But, because such laws have never been about “voter fraud,” once again this year, the Party will not bother to require Iowa Republicans to present any such ID before voting in the all-important caucuses next week.
More info:
Wikipedia: Voter ID laws (United States)
Tennessee Agency Charges 86-Year Old Veteran An Unconstitutional Poll Tax To Obtain Voter ID
93-Year-Old Tennessee Woman Who Cleaned State Capitol For 30 Years Denied Voter ID
Republicans Require No Photo ID To Vote In Republican Iowa Caucus
Related One Utah Post:
ID-ocracy in Utah?
Recent Comments