Archive for January, 2009


More executive bonuses, please

Showing the ridiculous extent to which Republicans’ opinions on anything are now determined by simply choosing the exact opposite of what Barack Obama says, Rudy Giuliani is now arguing that huge executive compensation unrelated to actual performance is good for the economy. Not only that, but if you try to do something to curb the $18 billion in executive bonuses, many of which came at taxpayer expense, “It really will create unemployment.”

Yglesias on Nelson’s stimulus opposition

What “Belongs” in the Stimulus?”

The stimulus bill is huge. It’s huge because the macroeconomic situation requires a huge stimulus. The stimulus bill is also multi-faceted. And it needs to be multifaceted because it’s so huge. Targeted tax cuts can be good stimulus, but you can’t do $850 billion of well-targeted tax cuts. Infrastructure can be good stimulus, but you can’t do $850 billion of good infrastructure projects. Long story short, the grab-bag character of the stimulus is a feature rather than a bug.

A context-free peek

Here’s a sneak peak at something I’ve been working on for a while. It was supposed to be done about three months ago, so I hope it’ll be worth the wait.

background_small

Everybody’s an economist

It was a busy week for national economic writing in San Diego’s alternative media world.

Voice of San Diego’s “Nerd’s Eye View” commentator Rich Tuscano wrote a two-part essay arguing against a coming deflationary period (Check out part one and part two). Voice contributor Seth Hettena responded with a lengthy rebuttal, “Why you should bet on deflation.”

Over at The Reader, Don Bauder’s “City Lights” column is on the futility of SEC self-probes, focusing on the case of and one-time SEC investigator (and fired whistleblower) Gary Aguirre and his attempted inquiry into the dealings of John Mack, former chairman of Pequot Capital Management.

Bad PR for the World-Herald

• There’s been a little backlash against the Omaha World-Herald after news broke that the paper refused to run a gay couple’s wedding announcement. Since that story ran in The Reader, the Daily Nebraskan ran an editorial, Nebraska StatePaper re-ran The Reader’s story (check those comments) and the Omaha TV News blog drew some attention to the issue as well (by way of my rejected cartoon).

GLAAD reported in August ‘08 that 1,049 U.S. newspapers publish same-sex marriage announcements, which is 72 percent of all newspapers. The World-Herald, of course, is not one of those.

One wonders how wise of a business strategy it is to cater to the most small-minded segment of the population. As with racism, sexism and anti-miscegenation, time tends to erase the fears that lead to bigotry, and we live in a society that is becoming increasingly tolerant of homosexuality. So when we reach a point where gay couples are treated with the same respect as straight couples, what will papers like the World-Herald have left? It’s a practice that will continue to alienate a growing portion of their audience in fear of upsetting a shrinking number of readers.

Still, we live in a fairly conservative state, so one could hypothetically argue that Nebraska will have to move slower than the rest of the country. Yet according to GLAAD’s Announcing Equality website, the Columbus Telegram, Fremont Tribune, Hastings Tribune, Lincoln Journal Star, North Platte Telegraph, Scottsbluff Star-Herald and the Sidney Sun-Telegraph all accept same-sex marriage announcements.
(more…)

Happy Inauguration - Jan 21, 2009

from the Lincoln Journal Star

barack obama inauguration health care pete stark stimulus infrastructure tax cuts

I found out about 10 minutes before I needed to have my final idea approved that I could submit an Inauguration idea, so this was a pretty extemporaneous and unfiltered collection of thoughts. Usually my LJS cartoons are pretty restricted to local issues, but my editor thought it was a unique enough occasion that I could step out of those usual confines.

I was motivated to respond — maybe too bitterly — to the gleefully ignorant cynicism that many seem to think is interchangeable with critical analysis. I’m sure I’ll disagree with a lot of what comes of the next four years in the name of compromise and inclusion, but what inspires me and fills me with hope about this administration is the willingness to discuss these issues as adults — and the desire to be the government for all Americans, not just the ones who voted for the winner.
(more…)