data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfbba/bfbba4e8e15c6dea02f1f84600668740b526ff30" alt="Browser upgrade - uhoh!"
Fred Robinson: Four hundred one-acre home sites?
The
rural area where Fred lives consists mostly of orchards and fields
where grass is grown for seed. The narrow roads attract many cyclists
for the scenery and the lack of traffic. One Measure 37 claim could
change all of that. One of Fred's neighbors has filed to turn 400 acres
into 400 one-acre home sites.
Measure 37 Sprawl
Portland
Purple Areas on the Maps Represent Measure 37 Claims
Oregonians support Measure 49, maintain protections on forests and farmland
Voters say "YES" to a modification of Measure 37
PORTLAND, OR., Nov. 7, 2007 — The result of yesterday’s election marks an important point in Oregon—a majority of Oregonians voted "Yes" on Measure 49.
Oregon voters have said loudly and clearly that they think farmland, forests and areas where groundwater is limited should be protected from inappropriate development. At the same time, Oregonians have clarified rules to allow longtime landowners to develop a few homes on these lands.
In passing Measure 49, Oregonians rejected the extremism of Measure 49 opponents in favor of rules that acknowledge all property owners and restore certainty in Oregon’s land use system.
The campaign for Measure 49 involved thousands of Oregonians, many of whom stepped forward to talk about how Measure 37 affects them and how Measure 49 helps them. At the end of the day, it was this authenticity that resonated with voters.
With provisions of Measure 49, farms, forests and water win back protections granted decades ago by Oregon law.
"Although Oregonians certainly support the home-building rights Measure 37 granted to long-time landowners, they also recognize a need to support working farms, forests and water, which is exactly how Measure 49 works," says Bruce Chapin, a regional director of the statewide Oregon Farm Bureau Federation and a third-generation farmer who is manager of Chapin Orchards outside Keizer.
These lands became vulnerable to development proposed by upwards of 7,500 claims that were filed following the implementation in 2005 of Measure 37. Thousands of these claims propose something other than a few homes — subdivisions of dozens, hundreds and even thousands of homes are proposed, as are strip malls, destination resorts, gravel mines and other inappropriate developments.
Some of this development already is under construction. Without the protections of Measure 49, construction likely would begin in the coming year on hundreds of additional developments.
Under Measure 49, however, the massive development proposed via Measure 37 won’t be allowed to go forward.
"Measure 49 staves off what we know eventually would have become a crisis for Oregon’s farmland, forests and groundwater," says Russ Hoeflich, executive director of The Nature Conservancy in Oregon.
Measure 49 works by closing loopholes in Measure 37 that allow large-scale development and it clarifies the right granted by Measure 37 to develop a few home sites.
"Fairness and balance have been restored to the land use system in Oregon," says Bob Stacey, executive director of 1,000 Friends of Oregon, an organization dedicated to preserving land use planning here since 1973.
Latest News and Action Alerts
What will Measure 49 do? Read the ballot language.
» November 4, 2007
» Posted in: Front Page News
Statesman Journal: Restore fairness of property rights
Guest opinion by Brian Hines, Statesman Journal, November 4, 2007
There are many reasons to vote for Measure 49. Walk into your kitchen and you'll see one of the most important: Food.
We Oregonians are fortunate to live in a state that produces some of the healthiest, safest and best-tasting food on the planet. (Like Oregon strawberries, which beat the California variety hands down.)
But we're at risk of having our finest agricultural land asphalted over. Not someday — now. A study has found that 518,128 acres of Measure 37 subdivisions and other development have been proposed on farmland. These claims will be limited, not eliminated, by Measure 49.
Read more: Statesman Journal: Restore fairness of property rights
» November 4, 2007
» Posted in: Front Page News
The Oregonian: Building the house we'll live in together
Commentary David Oates, The Oregonian, November 1, 2007
Something awe-inspiring is happening in Oregon. People all over this state are joining in a common idea of what Oregon is and what we want it to be. Three years ago (on the eve of Measure 37), I finished my project of walking around Portland's urban growth boundary and talking to many who lived and worked there. I felt then that this consensus was possible — but not quite ripe.
It's ripe now. It can happen.
Measure 49 reflects a hard-won compromise. It guarantees fairness for individual property owners. But more than that, it expresses a strong commitment to making land-use decisions as a community (not just allowing isolated developers to make them for us). When the ballots are counted after the Nov. 6 election, my prediction is that we will see a clear majority in both rural and urban parts of the state in favor of continuing — and improving — Gov. Tom McCall's visionary system, our shared project of living together in a way that protects rural areas and strengthens urban ones.
Read more: The Oregonian: Building the house we'll live in together
» November 1, 2007
» Posted in: Front Page News
Baker City Herald: Yes on Measure 49
Editorial, Baker City Herald, October 30, 2007
The passage of Measure 37 three years ago was an important victory for Oregon property owners whose ability to divide or otherwise develop their land was limited, or outright prohibited, due to land-use laws.
Measure 49 would be an even bigger win.
Read more: Baker City Herald: Yes on Measure 49
» October 30, 2007
» Posted in: Front Page News
"Stop 49" Spokespeople Hide True Development Plans and Lie About Impacts of Measure 49
Opponents of Measure 49, some of whom are asking for up to 140 homes, issued a glossy 8-page brochure to Oregon voters this week making hysterical and often patently false claims about the effects of Measure 49.
Among the most egregious lies —
CLAIM: The Netters say: "If Measure 49 passes, we'll lose the value of our property. We want to see the tradition go on... we want to farm."
WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING YOU: The statement is patently false. The Netters filed a Measure 37 claim for a 60-lot housing subdivision on their 98 acres of exclusive farm use land. The state denied the subdivision because the land was already protected farmland when Fred Netter acquired it in 1977. Under Measure 37 they are allowed up to 3 houses — Measure 49 would preserve these rights.
Read more: "Stop 49" Spokespeople Hide True Development Plans and Lie About Impacts of Measure 49
» October 29, 2007
» Posted in: Front Page News