"Slut" Firestorm Sends Limbaugh Into Crisis Management Mode
March 22, 2012 5:00 pm ET by Oliver Willis
In the wake of his misogynistic and sexist comments about Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh has lost advertisers and affiliates.
According to Limbaugh, this hasn't affected his business, and he claims that advertisers are still beating down the door to be on his show (despite a memo circulated by syndicator Premiere Radio Networks listing advertisers who specifically are asking to be excluded from Limbaugh and other controversial shows).
A closer look at the issue debunks Limbaugh's rhetoric.
The New York Times reported on March 13 that Premiere had lost "less than $2 million in revenue" as a result of pulled advertising, according to "a person with knowledge of the company." In the same article the Times reported that Premiere had told affiliates in an internal memo that they could pull barter ads that they are usually required to run in exchange for the program -- a major source of revenue for the company. Industry publication Radio-Info.com described the move as "unusual." The reported loss of revenue would have occured before any barter ads were pulled and within the two week period between Limbaugh's comments and the Times article.
Limbaugh also faces the loss of affiliates owned by Cumulus Media Networks, whose CEO said the ongoing controversy would be "very helpful" to the planned national launch of a radio show for Mike Huckabee. Huckabee's brand of talk is being sold as "more conversation and less confrontation." One of the stations that dropped Limbaugh in response to his comments has already said it will begin airing Huckabee's show when it premieres next month.
While he's publicly scoffed at the notion that the reaction to his misogyny is having an impact, he's quietly hired an expert in crisis management to handle the fallout.
Brian Glicklich has been acting on Limbaugh's behalf since at least March 8. Glicklich is a former vice president at Premiere Radio Networks, and currently heads the firm How Handy Is That, which specializes in reputation and crisis management and "gadfly defense." He previously worked as counsel to a firm that provides crisis management to clients like David Copperfield and Paris Hilton. Glicklich also has an extensive relationship with Glenn Beck, and is thanked in the acknowledgements of several of Beck's books.
The website for Glicklich's firm, How Handy Is That, describes his work:
My clients often find themselves under attack from outside advocacies or pressure groups. Sometimes these groups are little more than an individual Gadfly with strong digital organizing knowledge. Often, my client has previously underestimated their opposition, to their detriment, before calling me.
Effective management of these situation is based on a multiplex analysis of the opposition's business and reputational influence power, the strength of our position vis a vis our opposition, opposition research for motivation and weak spots, and a number of other factors.
Glicklich's Twitter account, which had been unused for a month, came back to life on March 15 and began promoting defenses of Limbaugh. Coincidentally, Limbaugh began using his official Twitter account on the same day. Politico noted, "Rush Limbaugh is mobilizing his army of dittoheads: on Twitter."
Facing an advertiser revolt, loss of affiliates and revenue, along with negative public relations and a challenge to his prime position on the airwaves, Limbaugh is fully engaged in an effort to push back on the story.
But in public, he insists that his listeners didn't think his comments were "that big of a deal to begin with."
The questionable habits of this woman were brought to light by her , therefore open to public opinion.
At some point people other then Limbaugh have made comments , are they to be boycotted ?
The beauty of boycotting is that it goes both ways , and those sponsors that chose that route , have lost business . They admitted it openly !
So capitalism is a beautiful thing , embrace it rather than railing against it !
"The questionable habits of this woman were brought to light by her , therefore open to public opinion." is completely erroneous and further you state that "boycotting goes both ways". Can you give me any kind of proof that Limbaugh listeners are boycotting the boycotting businesses--or is it more ditto-head speak from your idol?
you get my like
That is false equivalence. This is so creepy and filthy and that's why advertisers fled in droves.
And now you know. If you were curious.
He's apologized for two "poorly chosen" words, disappearing a three day onslaught, including 46 seperate attacks, and acting as if his overall point was still a valid one. He used mysoginistic language, to express a mysoginistic viewpoint. He has NOT apoligized for it, and to this day instists that he's done very littel wrong - and he's been saying and doing cr@p like this for YEAR; DECADES even, going back to his postinbg a picture a picture of the "White House Dog" - a then 13-year Old Chealsea Clinton.
I don't care much about Imus (count me as a Howard Stern fan) but HIS comment was more akin to "poorly chosen words." He WASN'T making a political point when he said then, and, oh yeah... HE WAS KICKED OFF THE AIR FOR AWHILE over it!
Ed Schultz... What he said did surprise me. And I
was like "Wow, he should be ashamed of that!" And the difference being? He actually WAS, and acknowledged it being profoundly WRONG.
Bill Maher is a bit of a @$$h0le, and everyone knows it. Many Liberals (including this one) find him entertaining, but he doesn't speak for the Left, Liberals or Democrats (he's not even a deomcrat!) the way Limbaugh speaks for the Right, Conservatives and Republicans. And what's more... What exactly did Bill Maher say that was THIS offensive? What, just because he criticizes religion? The difference is that they're is some legitimacy, some bit of truth to what he says. Limbaugh was a personal attack resulting from the fact that he had nothing else to go with.
And MADDOW? REALLY?! What comments does SHE need to apologize for? WTF?
So no, you're wrong. I can evry easily write off a lying, hateful scumbag like Rush and accept the others, without a scrap of hypocrisy, becuase they simply did not do remotely the same thing, in the remotely same way for remotely the same reasons. We're comparing apples and canoes here.
Imus got what he deserved - and maybe deserved more. Schultz apologized genuinely and Maher and Maddow aren't anything like Rush in this regard. (If you find Maher that offensive, seriously, the problem is with YOU being way too sensitive about things.)
------------------------------
IMHO
UTOPIA
With the fact that she goes to Georgetown and at graduation she will began earning minimum $160,000, she now changes her story to say that its not her but for the poor. She is doing this for the poor..She may not be a s---, I don't know and I don't care because she is worse in my opinion, she is nothing but a fraud and a liar and I can't stand a liar. She makes me want to vomit with all her 1st poor me then i care attitude, she could care less about the less fortunate, she's just a spoiled rich kid with a political agenda.
How much do you have to drink to type this and imagine it makes sense? When I read it "Cops" immediately came to mind. Rush didn't apologize until it was too late, until it became clear that his terribleness wouldn't be paid for.
What did Rachael Maddow do? And when did a Democratic representative apologize to any of them?
This is how the outrage peddlers corral the simple minded like you. They sell you jingoes, jingoes like the "liberals are stifling our speech" when all we're doing is participating in the free market of ideas. C'mon, put your man pants on and say something interesting.
Accept not imitations.
Talk you not like an actual human being?
Oh hell, is "egb" just Yoda on a bender?
"why hello there, I'm rush limbaugh. Have you heard about using the internet? It's astounding. ALMOST as astounding as the new iPad's screen. (which, by the way, is better than my 1080p iMac display, its high definition and everything) The internet. So, if you're not on it, ask your kids. Maybe they are. It's like a big library in the sky. If you took me, your host, and put me up there and connected all the wireless connections, then it would be the internet. The internet is great, its like me. It's big, its powerful, and you love it. I'm going to tell you how to sign up. All you need to do is go to your cable company. No, first, make sure you've got electricity. We here at the EIB network have had it for a while now. After that, call your cable company. You can send them a letter too, if you want. So give them a call, and ask to be set up with an "All inclusive plan!" and mention my name, RUSH, if you want free doughnuts. They also have kool-aid, if you prefer that. Then, they'll set it up for you, and you can just pay a little bit every month, just like buying access to the ditto-cam. This way, you can get the latest updates on me, whenever you need them, over the internet. Amazing, how things work these days. And it looks like that's all the time we have. Its amazing how these things go by so fast. You know I'm the BEST talk show host ever, because, look how fast that 3 hours went. Tomorrow we'll get into how to set up your wireless computer. You can move it around, and go anywhere in your house to use it. It's wireless. People. It's wireless. And the dems don't want you to know this. They want it all for themselves. Don't forget to call the cable company, and get your doughnuts. You know, I was just surfing the internet, on my iPad the other day, when I got an email from LifeLock. It said I had a "MAGENTA ALERT!" So, I checked it out. Turns out, it was my ex-wife. She took my credit card to buy access to the internet, on my dime. Well, thanks to lifelock, my wallet is safe! Turns out it was only my ex-wife, and I was able to handle it, just like I handled her, back when we were married. You need the uranium plan today. Go, buy it. Buy some internet first, if you need to, but get the uranium plan. It's radioactive, just like me, and I'll tell you, it'll keep your money safe from baddies, and crazy iranians, and ex-wives, and the NAGs."
Seeing as you brought up the other people, if you've ever listened to Rachel Maddow's show you would realize how badly rush has been lying to you. DOCTOR MADDOW is intelligent, polite, well researched, and ethical. Having listened to limbaugh for years, I can tell you that he is NONE of the things to which I've seen attributed to Rachel.
Most of all, limbaugh is NOT funny, he's mean. Only morons, sociopaths and fools find limbaugh enjoyable.
only those facts that support her lazy conclusions.
(Zinn and Myers did that a lot!)
Rush is nasty to ideas he hates. Maddow is about attacking
people - she cannot deal with issues. Even I can challenge
any of her 'thinking' on Social Security or Medicare.
Ed, Ph.D. Physics
And I hope you're not claiming Limbaugh isn't an ideologue. By all means, post your definition.
You knew that, right?
Scaramouche! Scaramouche!
Will you do the fandango?
Thunderbolts and lightning,
Very very fright'ning
Me!
Excellent.
99.999% of Americans have no clue what you are talking about.
We are safe!
What's the ugliest part of your body?
is it your nose?
is it your toes?
I think it's your Mind!
your mind,
your mind...
Absolutely. I firmly believe in telling the truth, and backing it up with evidence.
I also believe letting provable lies go unchallenged is as bad as lying myself.
I'm living UP to these principles RIGHT NOW.
is really the truth? What if a Ph.D. in Economics disagrees with you?
Are you the "truth" authority?
How about just discussing facts that everyone can agree with. All the facts, not just those that that support your views. I'm betting you don't do that.
I do or I try very hard to do that.
THAN POST A DAMN LINK, COWARD.
How is telling Sandra Fluke that he wants to see a video of her having sex being "nasty to ideas?" And while you're at it, provide a link to Rachel Maddow attacking a person in anywhere near the vitriolic manner that Rush used against Ms. Fluke for three days.
You yourself said, on this thread, "quotes provided upon request." Well, I'm requesting them. Provide. And make it a good one--one that matches Rush's blatant lie that "Ms. Fluke said she's having so much sex she can't afford her birth control."
And while you're at it, try to prove to me, logically, that this quote is attacking an idea and not a person.
This is the guy who uses the myth of welfare queen. lol.
Why is the sky blue?
He's clearly not interested in being a part in any fair debate. He's a troll, doing exactly what the Urban Dictionary says trolls do.
Stop being drawn in by his troll posts. Mock him, then ignore him!!!!!!! Don't keep feeding him! That's what he wants you to do!
But even without that, he wanted your attention, he wanted you to keep giving him attention, and so while it might satisfy you to continue to mock him, it continues to satisfy him too. Making trolls happy isn't a good strategy, even if it makes you happy, because it's also making the troll happy.
She's clearly not interested in being a part in any fair debate. She's a /pa/troller, doing exactly the Urban Dictionary says /pa/trollers do.
Stop being drawn in by her /pa/troll posts. Mock her, then ignore her!!!!!!! Don't keep feeding her! That's what she wants you to do!
But hypocrisy is alive, as the radio station's language/text filter refuses to allow a word to be posted on its website, a word that the radio station itself airs on the radio.
Of course it is rush limbaugh who used that word, and it is the radio station who aired him using that word, and so that makes them the hypocrites, when they filter that word from their web page...
By the way, I cannot use the word myself in this comment, as Media Matters also filters it out and refuses to allow comments containing that word, despite that word appearing above, in the title to this item.
Seems like you are changing the subject.
Skip the 'words'. Every one knows the two words used.
WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
Local radio stations can have less skilled people running
operations. Don't give up on your local radio station just
because of one poor decision. Also, please don't change the
subject.
The subject is was and will continue to be, what rush limbaugh said.
you wrote "A lie is a lie." lets start with yours. "Sandra Fluke is a welfare queen who wants other people to pay for her pregnancy avoidance pills." and "Sandra Fluke is a welfare queen...." "...she wants free stuff for pregnancy avoidance." and "No thinking person doubts she was on the side of free pregnancy avoidance pills or was fighting a Roman Catholic University to force them to pay for them."
Liar.
(1) She was not asking for free anything. She pays her insurance premium. Each student pays their Insurance premiums.
(2) It's not free, their Insurance premiums are paid and the prescription should be covered.
(3) She did not ask or try to "force" the GU to pay her Insurance premium.
(4) She did not ask the tax payers to pay her Insurance premium.
She is not asking or expecting free anything. She and the other students pay their insurance premiums in good faith and expect to get coverage for that payment.
If!!! all of this does blow over, there will be little impact on the limbo empire. Money is all that matters and if morons will continue to listen to his tripe, then the advertisers will return and the stations will forget this whole unfortunate event.
The only way to stop limbo is to reduce the number of listeners. But as long as 25% of Americans still believe Obama is a Kenyan born Muslim, then I am not holding out any hope.
All you have to do is identify the corporate sponsors of rush limbaughs radio show, and then refuse to do business with those companies.
That's all, there's nothing more you should do and nothing more you'd want to do and nothing more really that you can do...
That's all there is to do, and that's enough.
Yes.
You've shown that with every post you've offered.
Run along, phony. Let the grownups discuss adult things in peace.
You are aware that Medicare and Social Security are not scientific problems, right?
it is impossible to take you seriously.
Right, he apologized for 2 words, even though he also said she was having sex in 6th grade, was having so much sex it was a wonder she could stand up, demanded that she post videos of herself having sex onlne, and kept insisting she wants taxpayers to pay for her birth control and was testifying about how much sex she was having, both of which are false. He lied about her multiple times and indulged in a creepy, rapey fantasy about her and acted like the only thing he had to apologize for was inappropriate language. And spare me the "NO U!" What has MMfA said that compares to calling a woman a prostitute and demanding that she post sex videos?
Because you sure as hell haven't condemned THAT part of his 3-day rant, HAVE you?
Wow, he really WON'T condemn that part of Limbaugh's rant, will he?
They don't rebuke his words because they aren't allowed to. Those tepid "Rusty is sometimes wrong" comments are supposed to placate us into thinking these trolls are reasonable people after all. But if you ever ask them, "name something specific about what you think he was wrong," you will never get a response.
People like egb won't type a single word that wasn't typed for them by someone else. They aren't paid to type their own thoughts.
Because it was the words people had an issue with, right? Not the outright lies, slander, abusive attitude or misogyny. It was the fact that he used two words.
Although maybe not, as that would require him being more skilled with words than he actually is. (Remember, this is a man who came up with the term "feminazi" a quarter-century ago, and is STILL running on the fumes...)
We're not talking about only "two words."
Rush spent three days attacking a private citizen, who'd had the temerity to use her 1st Amendment rights in a way he hated, in the most obscene and mendacious terms. He lied about her testimony, which you would know if you'd had the independence of thought to read what she actually said. Then he used those lies as a basis for a stream of obscene, personal attacks.
I challenged you above to provide a link to anything Rachel Maddow has ever said that approaches Rush's lie that "Sandra Fluke said that she's having so much sex that she can't afford her birth control."
You'll notice he's included Hannity on his list of evil, evil liberals.
These people are easily identified by their laughable adherence to the absolute dumbest positions ever. Such as: Rush Limbaugh is a great American who speaks his mind freely but Rachel Maddow is somehow a liberal parrot, Hannity does not advocate dishonesty and vitriol, blah blah blah blah blah.
It's as if you guys are just trying to play a joke on us, by acting deliberately stupid. Actually, it's as if you guys are actually plants designed to make Republicans look dumber than a box of rocks. I would think this, if I didn't deal with actual, real-life Republicans who behave the same way.
And there's not a damn thing you can do about it.
Randy
and we all know that rush wouldn`t lie or exagerate.
Is that VERY SPECIFIC enough for you?
And why would you compare anonymous people on the internet with Limbaugh? How about a comparison between posters here and on right-wing sites? That would make sense.
I challenged you above to provide links to anything Rachel Maddow has ever said about another human being that even approaches the obscenity Limbaugh unleashed on Ms. Fluke. Since you said above, "quotes upon request," get moving.
not being Jay Leno, apparently...
Here is the proof that Limbaugh lied. She said none of that. Have you actually even read her testimony? Here it is. It's four pages long and can be read in 10 minutes. No where there does she mention her sex life. Nowhere there does she say she want free birth control.
No he didn't. Saying what was essentially "I'm sorry for the words i used but i was right" and also saying "I was acting like [a liberal]" is not apologizing. An apology implies contrition.
THIS ISSUE IS BECAUSE LIMBAUGH ATTACKED A PERSON! Maddow does not "attack" people. She may make fun of them, but slander and defame them? No. She is one of the few pundits who not only makes sure to research what she's saying, but also corrects herself if she was wrong about it.
Of course she mentions names. It's not one or the other. It's both. That's how you journalism.
In order
-No he didn't
-For what?
-Yes he did. He also went on a voluntarily unpaid suspension (if you are talking about his jab Igraham)
-Yes he did. And unlike Limbaugh actual seemed honest about it.
-But then again Maher is kind off a d0u(#3. He also is on a premium subscription channel.
-For what?
-For what?
Yes progressives have the intellectual depth of Cobra Commander. We will take over the world just because.
For the record, it doesn't mean, "LOL I'm right!"
For bonus points please provide evidence of an anchor from CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS or any of the other news station publicly berating and insulting a private citizen for three days.
I'll wait...
at GU. As such, she claimed to speak for them.
Her message was for contraception and she used her friends
with real medical problems to further her mission of "free contraception" [which she thanked the government for in her
opening statement].
No thinking person doubts she was on the side of free pregnancy avoidance pills or was fighting a Roman Catholic University to force them to pay for them. The 'ovarian cysts' issue was tangential to her mission.
Fortunately for her, the ovarian cyst issue is actually relevant.
Had she focused on the needs of her friends with real health issues, she would have won her argument with 90+% of Americans.
Unfortunately, Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old freshman in dealing with real issues of health or maybe even real issues.
Ms. Fluke never said
"I WANT FREE PREGNANCY AVOIDANCE PILLS"
What she did do is thank the Obama Administration for giving
them to her and then went on a mission to explain why that 'gift'
was wonderful using issues that were totally irrelevant to the subject of the Congressional hearing. The subject of that hearing
was the legality of the HHS ruling. Ms. Fluke, a 3RD YEAR LAW STUDENT, mention zero legal issues zero constitutional issues.
Ms. Fluke is a 3rd year law student. She will be an excellent tort lawyer someday, but logic, law and morality are not her strong points just like John Edwards.
It's the same failed argument that Rush made - that women use birth control pills paid for by their health insurance provider instead of using condoms they'd pay for themselves because it'd cost too much to use condoms as compared to the pills.
It's a totally ridiculous argument. No one uses the pill instead of condoms because it'd be less expensive to use the pill! No one.
Wheras you'll notice the REST of us are STILL TALKING ABOUT RUSH.
You play that card? Is that you Rush?
They're getting nothing for free. They pay for their health care coverage. And, for women, the recent changes in the health care insurance mandates will include the option of receiving contraceptive coverage. And that coverage can include contraceptive medications for the treatment of ovarian cysts.
That makes her points quite relevant--unlike your unfounded guesses about her morality.
SHE DID. It was your hero Rush who changed the topic to sex.
She was on stage to win the future for the "Reproductive Rights" group for which she was president and as a member had no concerns for ovarian cysts. Were I wrong, her testimony would have been very different.
She was manipulated by Nancy to try to embarrass the House
committee. Nancy SOOOO much wants to be 'speaker' again.
Sandra is so naive that it is almost sad.
Good ole typing dyslexia.
Then why was it the primary focus of her testimony, O Amazing Mindreader?
Nothing she said should earn her any public rebuke for immorality, even from those who disagree with her. That is what is so outrageous about Limbaugh's statements.
And she isn't begging for her school to pay for her birth control. Students pay every dollar toward their insurance coverage, there is no contribution as there would be from an employer. The school simply serves as a channel to purchase group coverage (at a good price, as the students are young). Ms. Fluke simply believes these medications should be COVERED under what she is already paying for. How is it that somehow became a handout?
I am hearing impaired. Very few insurance plans offered by employers cover new hearing aids. A few years back I asked my employer if, when considering a new plan, they could see if they could stretch the budget to include such coverage. The answer was, unfortunately, no, but I was not reviled for asking. Nobody stated I was asking for a handout. Nobody called me any bad names because I had trouble affording hearing aids. If I were to be asked to testify about the necessity of hearing aid coverage before Congress, I would do so gladly.
So why would Ms. Fluke deserve such treatment because she supports the coverage of a category of medication? And for something that is being deliberately excluded for religious reasons rather than additional coverage that is more expensive.
2)What inflammatory comments is MMfA supposed to apologize for? They do offer corrections when they are due. Does Limbaugh?
3)Palin and Bachmann are criticized for their stupidity and insanity, respectively. Are all Republican women mistreated? If not, then it must be about behavior. What would you say about the treatment of Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi on right-wing sites?
4)Are we talking about MMfA or posters? And this place is remarkably polite compared to right-wing sites like the Blaze.
5)Funny how everyone who disagrees with the "socialist" agenda makes comments which can be easily classified as dishonest or, well, hateful.
Your assertions are noted, but I'm going to call for evidence that MMfA (that's the site) has said anything that comes close to Limbaugh's three-day rant about Fluke.
As for individual posters, again, it's idiotic to compare anonymous people on a website to someone who has a national audience. It's like saying an off-color joke is inappropriate at a bachelor party because you wouldn't say it during a eulogy. And since all your offering is your word, I can simply say right-wing posters are worse. Now where do you go from there?
I'm flagging this idiot as a troll. I encourage others to do the same.
He types those sentences then proceeds to call Ms. Fluke a "welfare queen" a number of times and then tells lie after lie about her.
I love his/her "I am one of those excellent scientists/engineers." and "Ed, Ph.D Physics."
LOL! Did those degrees come from Glenn Beck Chalkboard University or Glenn Beck Earn Your Degree From my Radio Clown Show?
He hooked me early in this thread with:
"All people attackers seem to lack principles."
And then he goes on to a lengthy, convoluted defense of Limbaugh--alpha "people attacker"--as a man of principle.
Yeah, that was was Cupid's arrow through my irony loving heart.
From that point on I sat here enthralled as we witnessed a textbook case of narcissistic personality disorder unfolding...one chapter at a time.
Now, to be honest the b could stand for breedbate - someone looking for an argument, or bampot - idiot, or bodewash - cow dung. But for sure that that phony degree he is gasconading about is in Eccrinology - the study of excretion.
E pluribus unum
I meant it kills me to call you Beck 'cause of that idiot Glenn. But if that is your name I am so sorry!
Hillsdale College of Tealiban Knowledge. Just look at their spokespersons.
At least he wasn't a native English speaker so I cut him some slack. Can't say the same for egb.
to think and consider all the facts. MMFA, over the past
4 years, has not done that ]
Yeah, all of those VERBATIM QUOTES of lies and hate-mongering by the Right do NOTHING to back up the arguement that right-wing media is full of lies and hate-mongering.
GROW UP, little boy.
MMfA criticizes behavior. I haven't agreed with every article they've ever done, but their batting average is pretty solid. And in case you didn't figure it out on your own, to admit that you're unaware of the nature of right wing sites establishes that you had no basis for your comparative claims above ("@MMFA is one of the most hate filled, bullying sites in America.
One only has to look at the progressives comments on this site to prove my assertion.")
If "egb" is the same kind of STAR WARS fan as he is a Limbaugh fan, he probably freaks out when you point out where Lucas stole HIS ideas from, too.
Put up or shut up.
You're farkakt. No more elegant way to say it.
Why can't I boycott rush limbaughs corporate sponsors if I want to?
Thank you for permitting me to boycott rush limbaughs corporate sponsors, appreciate it.
This is so ridiculous it made me literally laugh out loud. Sorry, Stormfront, you didn't make the cut. You're just not as scary and hateful as f--king Alternet. Dude, seriously, did you troll all of those sites and get told you were a moron? Because that doesn't make them "hate sites".
Poor Stormfront. They try so HARD...
I sincerly doubt it; if you look at many of the posters here, as much as Rush irritates him, they're not OBSESSED with him. (Look at how many request that the site put transcriptions under the clips, because they literally find him too irritating to listen to for extended periods of time). People who hate Rush don't want him DEAD; they want him to be called on his BS.
It's FAR more likely one of Rush's FANS (you know, the people who PROUDLY declare themselves "Dittoheads") will try to kill one of the subjects of Limbaugh's rants (Two words: Byran Williams).
Hey can somebody from Media Matters take that comment down, as an obvious shill plant who wants to make it look like someone on these comments threads wants rush limbaugh shot... take that comment down please.
Look down just a few comments below ours, and you'll see this "egb" character jumping on the "shoot rush" comment.
Play fair; why don't we go to Rush's fans, suggest Obama be shot... and then wait to see if any of THEM ask for it to be taken down.
You know... after half of them give it a thumbs-up, of course.
However, believe it or not, Rush's demise would not really have an enormous impact in the Conservative Twilight Zone. Don't ask me why; that's just my intuition.
On the other hand...
There, is that what you want to hear.
Have you principles?
:::geez:::
Then find them and link to them or shut the f--k up.
Then you're the elite-est of them all.
Take a logic class, please.
Randy
Evidence? Nah.
You don't pay for someone's "right". I have no idea what this means or why you put a random ellipsis in it.
Where does it say that in the post you're responding to?
I don't think they said anything about Rush Limbaugh.
Says the guy who still clearly has no idea what Sandra Fluke's testimony was about.
Seriously. One link. one quote. NOT a rambling dissertive rant, about how bad "WE" are, just a piece of evidence.
I mean, you OBVIOUSLY have nothing better to do with your time; why NOT do the legwork to back up your words? It HAS to be better than coming off like a fool and a liar because you're too lazy to prove your words, right?
Or you can just slink off into the shadows and pretend YOU got bored. Either way's fine with me, as long as you quit dodging the issues.
Just put up or shut up.
this clearly
is
a
no
ther
atte
mpt
by fascists progressives who are fascists like Bork and Maddow
to shut down egb's
freespeechfreespeechfreespeech
which means you are A HATE SITE like
MoveOn, DailyKos and Alternet which
are the only sites I am allowed to access in the home.
The oyster owns a fine wristwatch
But he will not show you unless you sing.
Are we not men?
penis.
[/egb]
The oyster still awaits a dirge
from a broken future
Time escapes backward into
the squandered past.
RETURN!
Randy
I
can't
back
up
anything
I
said.
Why
do
I
type
like
this?
You've consistently refused to back up any of you wild claims with either evidence or logic, and blamed others for your own inadequacies.
I don't know what you mean by 'dealing with', but someone as mentally challenged as you've proven yourself to be should have no mentoring contact with any young person. God help any kids who are exposed to you.
It's like you've accused me of stabbing you, but have no evidence that I've touched you; indeed, you won't show anyone the wound. You just DEMAND that I somehow prove I didn't stab you, and ask everyone to take your word that it happened.
You know, if someone tried that in a court of law, they'd not only be laughed out of court... they'd probably be sent for psych. evaluation.
Seriously, as stated, your accusation requires your evidence. Assuming your opinion is genuine, you clearly have some experience here which has shaped it. Nobody knows what that is until you cite it. Having admitted above that you are unaware of hateful rhetoric on right wing sites, you have no business challenging anyone here.
QED.
egb is for Brian Glicklich, Esq., in (secret disquise) Professor Backwards-style.
egb = talent on hire from the Temp-troll Agency. An undergraduate snitch.
Look, Glicklick -- if that's your real name: Lamebrain is a dead man talking. Give it up, it's over.
Your mission is to limit who falls into the black hole vortex of Lamebrain's gravitas'ed self-destruction, you're not supposed to try to shove others into it.
Yeah, chain your guy Beck on a bling chain around Lamebrain's neck -- that's real smart. Not!
Abandon stupid, all merc trolls who enter here. And talk to the headlined topic: Crisis Management Mode. That's how endings begin.
Get your 'job' oblivion on.
Just, the business of the ad biz stops paying the ransom demands of Lamebrainers holding America hostage. pffffft! Here before, now he's gone.
-
I find it interesting that First Amendment defenders all consider criticism and challenge to be attempts to silence. It must be a reaction to their own inability to back up anything that they say.
He has the right to say whatever he wants!!
And his sponsors have the right to take their dollars elsewhere if they think he's a bad investment.
Actually the first amendment "prohibits the making of any law abridging the freedom of speech". It does not give him the right to say anything he wants, that is what libel and slander laws are all about. (amnong others)