![](http://library.vu.edu.pk/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/000100A/http/web.archive.org/web/20130114080521im_/http:/=2f4.bp.blogspot.com/_h7i3bhX2b-4/SyGHN1PJkKI/AAAAAAAABd4/PAMl4OKYT2E/s320/baghdad-bob.jpg)
When you go to accept a prize for peace then glorify war in your
newspeak, you are bound to please
the intellectual warmongers.
Warsters tell us that war is peace
when we do it, war is just and holy
when we do it, because there is evil in the world (evil defined as whatever we are opposing) because we are real.
(Our
forefather was not real when he fathered the U.S. Constitution?)
Warsters say we are also exceptional, inerrant, and resistance is futile.
Whoopee doo hey la di la my BORG friend's back and there's gonna be trouble.
The Orwellian doublethink continues, only it is in a different colored package with "NEW" stamped on it:
And one of the striking features of the modern period is the institutionalization of that [propaganda] process, so that we now have huge industries deceiving the public — and they're very conscious about it, the public relations industry. Interestingly, this developed in the freest countries—in Britain and the US—roughly around time of WWI, when it was recognized that enough freedom had been won that people could no longer be controlled by force. So modes of deception and manipulation had to be developed in order to keep them under control.
And by now these are huge industries. They not only dominate marketing of commodities, but they also control the political system. As anyone who watches a US election knows, it's marketing. It's the same techniques that are used to market toothpaste.
(
Chomsky, emphasis added). Congratulations when
you are spreading insanity in the world
as if there was such a thing as a just, holy disease? No, no congratulations.
The question is
not whether or not there are just, holy wars in the abstract, the question is whether
the war one is fighting at a given time is a just, holy war or not.
As any war continues it becomes increasingly unjust, even if it began as a just war, so it is unlikely that any war, which had no exit strategy when it began, can be called a just war.
Somebody X kills 3,000 men, women, and children in
Somebody Y cities, so in what
Somebody Y calls a just, holy war
Somebody Y kills 10,000 men, women, and children of
Somebody X and Somebody Z for each 1 person killed of
Somebody Y? Because
Somebody Y is more just and holy than
Somebody X and Somebody Z?
Face up to it,
your endless wars are not endlessly just, are a mad cow disease that engenders doublespeak, newspeak, and all
the other germs dangerous to a free people as James Madison said.
Of course it does not matter in a
military oil complex governed nation, because freedom is simply nothing left to lose.