350 Updates

Bill McKibben on UP with Chris Hayes

Yesterday morning, Bill McKibben went on MSNBC with Chris Hayes to discuss the extreme weather throughout the world, and its connection to climate change. Take a peek and share it around!

 

Change of plans.

Below is the note we just sent out to our friends accoss the USA.


Dear Friends,

I think I screwed up.

Yesterday 350.org sent out an email, telling people that we were going to melt a big hunk of ice in the form of the word "Hoax?" in front of Capitol Hill. We asked for money for it, and also for relief efforts for victims of the heat wave. The idea was simple enough: if this epic heatwave gripping the nation has one small silver lining, it's that its reminding people that global warming is very very real. And the response was strong -- we raised the $5000 it would have taken to pull off the event, and far more than that for relief efforts.

But we also heard from old friends, especially in nearby West Virginia, who asked us not to do it. The sight of ice melting while they sweltered would be too hard to take; their region, they pointed out, is as hard hit as any in the country by the heat wave, and it would make people feel like their plight wasn't being taken seriously. Bob Kincaid, at Coal River Mountain Watch, said: "Our work in Appalachia is hard enough as it is, since we must ever contend with the well-funded coal industry PR machine." They'd use, he said, the sight of that melting ice to make people feel disrespected.

That makes sense to me.

It's sometimes hard to balance what we should do in one place with what we should be doing around the globe. Climate denial in the U.S. has huge implications for, say, the two million people in Assam, India, currently flooded out of house and home -- it's really important to fight people who deny science and hold up needed action. But it's not worth causing trouble to our friends in the process. And the people who fight mountaintop removal in Appalachia are some of our oldest friends; we've been, as it were, up and down the mountain with them. Movements only really work when they move together.

So: no ice melting on the mall this morning. We're sending out whatever the reverse of a press release is called. The money we collected will all go for heat and drought relief, and we hope it will do some good. If you'd like your contribution back, let us know (and we'll send a separate mailing to everyone who contributed to make sure they get that chance). It's been a long, hot, tough week everywhere east of the Rockies; let's hope the heat breaks soon.

Thanks,

Bill McKibben for 350.org

P.S. The note announcing this thing yesterday came from Jamie Henn, our communications director. But the idea was mine, not his. I'm a volunteer in this effort, and there are days when it definitely feels like you get what you pay for.

 

Climate deniers vs. Record-breaking heat wave

We just sent this email out to 350 supporters in the USA. Not getting our emails? Sign up for updates here. 


Dear friends,

This is exactly what the climate scientists have been telling us to expect.

Ice hoax sculpture (artists rendering) The last few weeks -- from the record rainfall in Minnesota and Florida to the epic fires in the West, from the crop-shriveling drought in the High Plains to the “land hurricane” that left five million without power across the East -- this is what climate change feels like in its early stages. We’ve heard from friends and colleagues who have fled their homes -- but our leaders still aren't connecting the dots. 

There should be no doubters left. But of course, thanks to the power of the fossil fuel industry, the denialists still reign in DC: last year the House of Representatives voted to reject the widely accepted scientific consensus that human activities are causing climate change. The mainstream media isn't helping much either: only 3% of the stories about the wildfires even mentioned climate change. 

So tomorrow we’re going to DC to deliver a message to the climate deniers. In fact, the sun is going to deliver the message -- we’re just going to help. We're planning on setting up gigantic blocks of ice that say "Hoax?" right in the heart of DC. We'll see just how long it takes to melt away. Not long, probably -- the forecast is for over 100 degrees tomorrow.

We're hoping to raise $5,000 to build a massive "Climate Hoax" ice sculpture in DC -- and we'll send half of the money we raise to the Red Cross to provide direct relief to people impacted by the recent climate disasters. >>

Two years ago, in the middle of Washington DC’s record snowstorms (made possible by our wet new atmosphere) Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma had his grandchildren build an igloo to make fun of global warming -- Inhofe is the guy who called global warming the “greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people." (Since then his home state has set the record for the warmest summer ever recorded in the United States.)

Inhofe's igloo stunt was silly and misleading -- but it captured the attention of the media and spawned legions of gloating climate deniers. Well, there's no reason climate deniers should have all the fun in DC. 

Like everything we do at 350.org, the ice sculpture will be people-powered -- your donations will help pay for it, and we've recruited 350 activists in DC to help with logistics on the ground. Even if we thaw some denial, though, it won’t matter if we don’t also melt away the laws that keep fossil fuel king. That’s why we’re campaigning hard this summer to end subsidies to the planet’s richest industry. In the coming weeks, we'll fan out across the country to town-halls and campaign events to ramp up the pressure on politicians who still haven’t committed to ending fossil fuel subsidies.

There's lots of work to be done -- but for now let's start a climate denial meltdown. Click here to donate to help build the sculpture: www.350.org/ice

Onwards,

Jamie Henn for the 350.org Team

P.S. Can you handle a little sarcasm? Check out Bill McKibben’s piece from the Daily Beast. Sorry if he’s a little pissed off -- it’s the heat.

P.P.S. The stories and images coming out from areas afflicted by this latest round of extreme weather are heart-wrenching -- you can make donations directly to The Red Cross for direct relief by texting "REDCROSS" to 90999 or by clicking here.


More Links and Info

STUDY: Media Avoid Climate Context In Wildfire Coverage - Media Matters: www.mediamatters.org/research/2012/07/03/study-media-avoid-climate-context-in-wildfire-c/186921

GOP-led House rejects science, 240-184 - ClimateProgress: www.thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/04/06/207842/gop-led-house-rejects-science-240-184 

 

People of Kivalina Fight ‘Refugee’ Status

This blog post was written by 350.org intern Meagan Tokunaga. Meagan is a freshman at Pomona College and has been working on the fossil fuel subsidies campaign this summer. Learn more about Meagan and her work here.

The Iñupiaq community of Kivalina, Alaska is determined not to join the millions of climate refugees already on the planet. Kivalina sits atop a barrier island, surrounded by a freshwater lagoon to the East and the Chukchi Sea to the West. Climate change is pushing back the formation of sea ice later into the fall every year, leaving Kivalina to be washed away with seasonal storms. The extreme weather patterns, exacerbated by climate change, threaten the indigenous people with floods and wavering hunting conditions. To make matters worse, Shell Oil will begin oil exploration in the Arctic within the month, which will alter food sources and migration patterns of the bowhead whale (an animal with cultural and spiritual significance to the Iñupiaq). 
 
As the US government fails to support any environmental relocation projects, the Iñupiaq have turned to the Episcopal Church. Rev. Enoch Adams Jr. and village elder Austin Swan Sr. will represent Kivalina at the 77th General Convention of the Episcopal Church in Indianapolis, Indiana from July 5 through July 12. They will propose their resolution, “Climate Justice for all God’s People and all God’s Creation” to ask for the Church’s commitment to the transition to a sustainable future. 
 

 

Oil in the Red Deer River

This post was written by Kristen Moe, and originally appeared on Profane Ecology

The dog greeted us by the river with his tail wagging, black shaggy fur matted and damp on his underbelly. “Hey, that dog is covered in oil!” one of us joked, and at the time, we laughed. We realized only later that it was true.

It was the oil we had come for. The four of us—two journalists, the Director of the local Sierra Club, and a grad student—wanted to see the latest in a long string of pipeline oil spills with our own eyes. It had been a week since hundreds of thousands of litres had been leaked into the Red Deer River in southern Alberta, a week since the men in hazmat suits had begun the long process of cleaning it up.

So what does progress look like?

When the pipeline ruptured, the river was already high from heavy rains and snowmelt, and it would get higher in the coming days. It would carry the oil in its quickening flows towards Glennifer Lake, from which the city of Red Deer, population 92,000, draws its drinking water.

Those who lived near the ruptured pipe knew first what was wrong. The air, which on a normal day smells like pines and plains and earth, had turned sour. Those who lived downwind didn’t need to be told what it meant; they’d been through this before.

The pipeline company, Plains Midstream, came in to assess the damage and brought in its emergency cleanup and containment crews. They set up booms on the lake to contain the oil and brought in vacuum trucks to suck up what they could. But much of the oil had already been absorbed into the soft earth and there was not much anyone could do. Government officials said that it might be less destructive to leave much of the oil rather than try to clean it up—to allow it to degrade “naturally.”

How long does that take? About three to five years.

In the meantime, the river’s ecosystem—the spawning fish, the insects, the muskox and beavers, the grasses and water plants—are quietly destroyed.

A pipeline company VP expressed relief at their “luck”: luckily, the pipeline wasn’t flowing at the time. Luckily, the swift current concentrated much of the oil in Glennifer reservoir. Alberta Premier Alison Redford has agreed, adding that this was an “exception.”

Actually, it’s not: in Alberta alone, they happen almost every day.

We suited up, pulling on rubber boots and plastic gloves, and the friendly black dog circled us, coming up for a scratch behind the ears before plunging enthusiastically into the river. “No! Get out of there!” we called, and tried coaxing the dog back onto the bank. But he was enjoying himself, all the while lapping up the contaminated river water with his long tongue.

You know there’s oil because of the smell: it’s like fresh asphalt in the summer, like gasoline from the pump. Then the wind changes, and you wonder if you’ve imagined it. There it is, however, on the bank—a thick, black watermark as deep as your arm above the swiftly flowing river.

Oil sticks to everything. It collects in eddies and sheltered areas away from the rushing current, and swirls metallic, glinting in the sun. It collects in clumps of dry roots and grasses, like slick, matted hair. Along the river, wild strawberries, clovers, and a cluster of wild roses—Alberta’s official flower— were all painted delicately in oil. I crouched down to touch it with my bare fingers, rubbing the sticky black-brown syrup between two fingers. I couldn’t wipe it off, and my stained hands smelled like tar for a long time after.

The beauty of this spot was deceptive: the sky was brilliant blue, and the pines grew thick by the stream that sparkled and rushed. A butterfly skimmed the grass near my feet. But the black watermark stained the riverbank for miles and miles.

We took pictures and looked for signs of wildlife, documenting the damage as best we could, not sure what we’d do with the evidence but knowing that it was important to bear witness. Kelly, the grad student, had conscientiously brought along a trash bag and began pulling up fistfuls of oil-coated grass while the rest of us took pictures. The smell was nauseating. I joined her, and we worked for a few minutes until I stopped and sat back, staring off downstream at the unending ribbon of black tar.

The dog, fur still wet, followed us back to the car when we were finished, his tail still wagging, hoping for some treat or affection. “Do we take him?” one of us asked, uncertain. We deliberated, deciding in the end that we couldn’t, not knowing whether he belonged to some family nearby. When I backed the car out, he was still there, watching us go.

We should have taken him with us.

 

Slam Poetry from an Atoll Nation - Marshall Islands

In the continuation of 350 Pacific's Story-telling spotlight on the experiences of local 350 organisers, we turn to the atoll islands of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. 350 Pacific's Alejandra Jensen interviewed slam poet and local organiser, Kathy Jetnil-Kiljner.

Tell Them (extract from the poem)

by Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner

Kathy_2

…tell them about the water
how we have seen it rising
flooding across our cemeteries
gushing over our sea walls
and crashing against our homes
 
tell them what it’s like
to see the entire ocean level with the land
tell them
we are afraid
 
tell them we don’t know
of the politics
or the science
but tell them we see
what is in our own backyard
 
tell them that some of us
are old fishermen who believe that God
made us a promise
 
tell them some of us
are a little bit more skeptical of God
 
but most importantly
tell them
we don’t want to leave
we’ve never wanted to leave
 
and that we
are nothing
without our islands.

This extract from the poem Tell Them, outlines a reality that people are facing in the Republic of Marshall Islands (RMI). It is a heartfelt plea from one young woman speaking on behalf of her people. For Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner and many young people around the Pacific, they are faced with the reality that climate change could in the coming decades make their ancestral homes unliveable. That new reality is increasingly becoming apparent as storms become more intense, droughts lengthen and sea-level rise increases at pace. As the threats of climate change become more and more visible, so too does Kathy’s determination to become an advocate for change. Instead of feeling helpless, Kathy actively engages the public through her art of self expression; her medium of choice - words. For Kathy, poetry is more than just a way to generate awareness of these issues; it is a powerful tool for change:

“I've always understood poetry as not just an art but as a means for social change. Poetry reaches out and makes people feel something immediate and real - it doesn't waste words and it's not all statistics and numbers. It's real emotion, it gives a face to real issues, and it connects people and creates movements”.

To keep reading the story, click here.

 

3,000 North Carolinians Call for Climate Sanity!

Sometimes in North Carolina, it seems like our legislators have their eyes shut tight and both fingers in their ears, singing at the top of their lungs. How else could state representatives such as Pat McElraft ignore the news of rising sea levels, more intense tropical storms, record heat baking our soil, and the flames ripping through the Eastern Carolina forests?

We are beginning to see the real impacts of climate change all over our state (I’ve been harvesting tomatoes since May), and yet, our legislators are working to dismiss a scientific panel’s recommendations that we begin to prepare our coasts for a meter of climate change-fueled sea level rise by 2100.

370 Instead, McElraft and other state reps are claiming the best available climate science isn’t scientific enough - that maybe, if we dig through ALL the available science, we will find a more convenient prediction for sea level rise--one that doesn’t necessitate planning now for a harsher future on our coasts, one that won’t require more insurance for the storms and rising waters that are bound to swallow our barrier islands, and most importantly, one that will keep the pockets of the real estate development thickly lined in the short-term.

That’s the premise of House Bill 819 - a bill (sponsored by Rep. McElraft) that would censor climate science, and put off safeguarding our coasts from climate change. But in the last few weeks, North Carolinians have been clamoring not for the convenient stories that allow us to dance as our ship steams straight for the rocks, but for the truth that allows us to see the dangers ahead, and change our course.

On Tuesday, I joined a group of Wilmingtonians and our friends at Forecast the Facts to deliver over 3,000 petitions to Rep. McElraft and Speaker of the House Thom Tillis. Our demand is that we incorporate the best available climate science as we plan development on our state’s islands, beaches and coastal plains.

As press gathered to ask us why we were walking the halls of the legislature with boxes stuffed with petitions, Wilmingtonian Nancy Sharp said it best:

"I've been practicing law for 25 years, so I know that you can't throw out evidence just because it's inconvenient. Now that I live on the coast, I depend on our government to be honest about the facts of global warming and rising sea levels so that my community can plan for the future and thrive. It's not fair for the legislature to prioritize short term profit for developers at the expense of the safety of coastal communities like mine."

It’s not fair, safe, or responsible for our legislators to put industry lobby interests before the safety of people. I, like the 3,000 rapid-responders who signed our petitions, am getting pretty tired of defending facts to a close-eyed legislature that prefers to drown out reality with its own wishful songs.

 

In Ohio, the People Push Back on Fracking

Tired of waiting for their leaders to ban the destructive drilling practice, citizens passed their own resolution—and took over the Statehouse to make it heard

Originally published by Yes! Magazine

Last week an estimated 1,000 people took over the Statehouse in Columbus, Ohio to protest the destructive practice of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking." Joined by others from neighboring states facing similar issues, this "People's Assembly" rallied and marched to the Capitol building—without a permit—to decide how they, the people, could end the practice in their state.

Jamie Frederick was one of them. She had been told by doctors that it was safe to drink her well water, despite the presence of gas wells surrounding her home. She later discovered the water was contaminated with chemicals used in the fracking process. As a result, she says, she has lost her gall bladder and can't risk having children because of fatal health risks and potential birth defects.

"If there had been solar panels and wind turbines surrounding my home instead of gas wells, I never would have gotten sick, and I would be called ‘Mom’,” she told the crowd. These days, she said, her mouth bleeds and it's difficult to talk: “I am losing my voice more all the time. But I seem to have found it today.”

As the Assembly convened, the rotunda, filled to capacity, thundered with stomping, clapping, and chanting that was hushed when families shared experiences of being devastated by the side effects of fracking, as Frederick was. Some had been invited to testify at the Statehouse in the past, only to find empty rooms and legislators who did not respect their concerns.

 

These stories had been shared throughout the lead-up to the action, with three full days committed to workshops, trainings, and cross-movement strategy sessions. Teri Blanton, of Appalachia, connected fracking to another highly destructive extraction process she has been fighting in her own neighborhood: mountaintop coal removal. "They're trying to do to you what they've done to us," she said. "'Regulation' just gives them permission to do it. If you think regulation works, take a look at the West Virginia strip mining."

The Ohio Assembly ended with the passage of a "people's legislation" to ban fracking. Though no actual law backs this resolution, it signifies a commitment by many in the state to oppose further development of fracking wells.

This July will see thousands more mobilize in Washington, D.C. for the Don’t Stop the Frack Attack rally. Grassroots communities across New York State are already speaking out against Governor Andrew Cuomo's attempt to turn the Southern Tier of New York into a sacrifice zone for fracking. This creative, nonviolent action bubbling across the United States may turn out to be the most powerful way of halting extreme energy development at the expense of both people and the planet.