Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Sunday, May 01, 2011

BREAKING: Bin Laden is dead



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
What this was about.

The view from my apt. window, the morn of 9/11 - the smoke is from the Pentagon.
Obama confirms, US has killed Osama bin Laden.
After a firefight, they killed bin Laden and took custody of his body.
That means it wasn't a drone, but an actual on the ground operation.

2500 people reportedly outside the White House, cheering.


11:34 PM Two minute warning to Obama address.

Join our live chat about this breaking news:



Flashback: Five months after September 11, Bush dismantled hunt for Bin Laden to prepare for war in Iraq:
That was December 2001. Only two months later, Bush decided to pull out most of the special operations troops and their CIA counterparts in the paramilitary division that were leading the hunt for bin Laden in Afghanistan to prepare for war in Iraq, said Flynt L. Leverett, then an expert on the Middle East at the National Security Council.

"I was appalled when I learned about it," said Leverett, who has become an outspoken critic of the administration's counterterrorism policy. "I don't know of anyone who thought it was a good idea. It's very likely that bin Laden would be dead or in American custody if we hadn't done that."

Several officers confirmed that the number of special operations troops was reduced in March 2002.
Flashback: Bush let Bin Laden get away at Tora Bora.

UPDATE: Bush's "Mission Accomplished" speech was eight years ago today.


CNN just confirmed.

President Obama will announce that Osama Bin Laden is dead. They've got the body.

Obama got him. He said he would get him. He got him.

Finally. They got the bastard.

Obviously, more to come...

CNN just reported that "George Bush would have loved to have delivered" this news.  Puhleez.  George Bush dismantled the CIA office in charge of going after Bin Laden so he could move the resources to being preparing for war with Iraq.

Here's Obama's statement:
Good evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who’s responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children.

It was nearly 10 years ago that a bright September day was darkened by the worst attack on the American people in our history. The images of 9/11 are seared into our national memory -- hijacked planes cutting through a cloudless September sky; the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground; black smoke billowing up from the Pentagon; the wreckage of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where the actions of heroic citizens saved even more heartbreak and destruction.

And yet we know that the worst images are those that were unseen to the world. The empty seat at the dinner table. Children who were forced to grow up without their mother or their father. Parents who would never know the feeling of their child’s embrace. Nearly 3,000 citizens taken from us, leaving a gaping hole in our hearts.

On September 11, 2001, in our time of grief, the American people came together. We offered our neighbors a hand, and we offered the wounded our blood. We reaffirmed our ties to each other, and our love of community and country. On that day, no matter where we came from, what God we prayed to, or what race or ethnicity we were, we were united as one American family.

We were also united in our resolve to protect our nation and to bring those who committed this vicious attack to justice. We quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda -- an organization headed by Osama bin Laden, which had openly declared war on the United States and was committed to killing innocents in our country and around the globe. And so we went to war against al Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies.

Over the last 10 years, thanks to the tireless and heroic work of our military and our counterterrorism professionals, we’ve made great strides in that effort. We’ve disrupted terrorist attacks and strengthened our homeland defense. In Afghanistan, we removed the Taliban government, which had given bin Laden and al Qaeda safe haven and support. And around the globe, we worked with our friends and allies to capture or kill scores of al Qaeda terrorists, including several who were a part of the 9/11 plot.

Yet Osama bin Laden avoided capture and escaped across the Afghan border into Pakistan. Meanwhile, al Qaeda continued to operate from along that border and operate through its affiliates across the world.

And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network.

Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice.

Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.

For over two decades, bin Laden has been al Qaeda’s leader and symbol, and has continued to plot attacks against our country and our friends and allies. The death of bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al Qaeda.

Yet his death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must –- and we will -- remain vigilant at home and abroad.

As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not –- and never will be -– at war with Islam. I’ve made clear, just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.

Over the years, I’ve repeatedly made clear that we would take action within Pakistan if we knew where bin Laden was. That is what we’ve done. But it’s important to note that our counterterrorism cooperation with Pakistan helped lead us to bin Laden and the compound where he was hiding. Indeed, bin Laden had declared war against Pakistan as well, and ordered attacks against the Pakistani people.

Tonight, I called President Zardari, and my team has also spoken with their Pakistani counterparts. They agree that this is a good and historic day for both of our nations. And going forward, it is essential that Pakistan continue to join us in the fight against al Qaeda and its affiliates.

The American people did not choose this fight. It came to our shores, and started with the senseless slaughter of our citizens. After nearly 10 years of service, struggle, and sacrifice, we know well the costs of war. These efforts weigh on me every time I, as Commander-in-Chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one, or look into the eyes of a service member who’s been gravely wounded.

So Americans understand the costs of war. Yet as a country, we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda’s terror: Justice has been done.

Tonight, we give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who’ve worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome. The American people do not see their work, nor know their names. But tonight, they feel the satisfaction of their work and the result of their pursuit of justice.

We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country. And they are part of a generation that has borne the heaviest share of the burden since that September day.

Finally, let me say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 that we have never forgotten your loss, nor wavered in our commitment to see that we do whatever it takes to prevent another attack on our shores.

And tonight, let us think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11. I know that it has, at times, frayed. Yet today’s achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people.

The cause of securing our country is not complete. But tonight, we are once again reminded that America can do whatever we set our mind to. That is the story of our history, whether it’s the pursuit of prosperity for our people, or the struggle for equality for all our citizens; our commitment to stand up for our values abroad, and our sacrifices to make the world a safer place.

Let us remember that we can do these things not just because of wealth or power, but because of who we are: one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.
Read the rest of this post...

BREAKING: Obama to address nation soon. Rumors that Bin Laden is dead



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
We're updating this thread in the post above, and we have a live chat going on there as well.

WOW...UDPATE @ 10:38 PM: Via twitter from CBS reporter Mark Knoller:
CBS Congressional producer Jill Jackson reporting House Intelligence Committee aide says Obama will announce Osama bin Laden is dead.
CNN and other news outlets are reporting that the President will make a televised statement at approximately 10:30 PM ET. But, there's no indication yet as to what it's about.

Tweet from Sam Stein a few minutes ago:
white house is mum on topic. and rightfully so, only 15 min wait. but one official says its "Important enough that you shld pay attention"
UPDATE @ 10:19 PM: CNN now reporting the subject matter is "national security." Read the rest of this post...

NGO studies suggest "inhumane" work conditions for Apple factory workers



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
A controlling, draconian environment? Who ever would imagine anything connected to Steve Jobs might be portrayed in such a way? Maybe the engineering team can somehow find a way to improve it's quality because my personal experience (2 laptops, 1 iPod and 1 iPhone) suggest that it's crap. For the premium price that Apple wants, call me crazy, but I think products ought to at least be able to survive the warranty period. Crashing shortly after the warranty hardly inspires me to open my wallet to buy another.

How shocking.
Among the allegations made by workers interviewed by the NGOs – the Centre for Research on Multinational Companies and Students & Scholars Against Corporate Misbehaviour (Sacom) – are claims that:

■ Excessive overtime is routine, despite a legal limit of 36 hours a month. One payslip, seen by the Observer, indicated that the worker had performed 98 hours of overtime in a month.

■ Workers attempting to meet the huge demand for the first iPad were sometimes pressured to take only one day off in 13.

■ In some factories badly performing workers are required to be publicly humiliated in front of colleagues.
Read the rest of this post...

Texas House approves tax cuts for yachts over $250,000



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
It's especially curious since most of those yachts are now built in China. Why do Texas Republicans want to encourage new business in China as opposed to in the USA? Obviously they hate America.
The Texas House Ways and Means Committee has approved a tax break for those who want to buy yachts costing $250,000 or more.

In a vote late Thursday, the committee approved a bill by Houston Republican Rep. John Davis. The proposed law would cap the maximum sales tax the state would collect on the sale of a personal boat.

Davis says the measure is needed because Florida has a similar law and boat buyers are going there to make their purchases. The measure passed on an 8-3 vote along party lines.
Read the rest of this post...

Bankruptcy and other Trump failures



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
How exactly does one manage to bankrupt a casino? It must take a special kind of leader to do that. These stories take me back to the glory days of "Bush the CEO President" when most of the media ignored the reality that Bush had the reverse Midas touch on businesses that he ran. Bush was expensive enough for the US, so it sounds expensive to even consider a Trump presidency. Top 10 Trump failures, by Time:
"I don't like the B word," Donald Trump said in 2010 while testifying in a New Jersey bankruptcy courtroom about his gambling company, Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., which had filed for bankruptcy for the third time. Given the number of times Trump has flirted with bankruptcy, you'd think he'd be used to that word by now.

In 1990, the banking institutions that backed his real estate investments had to bail him out with a $65 million "rescue package" that contained new loans and credit. But it wasn't enough, and nine months later the famous developer was nearly $4 billion in debt. He didn't declare personal bankruptcy, although his famous Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City, N.J., did have to file for it (bondholders ended up taking a 50% stake in the investment). Trump's economic troubles continued through the early '90s, while he was personally leveraged to nearly $1 billion. In 2004, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts also filed for bankruptcy. The company was only a small portion of Trump's real estate empire, but he did still have to personally cough up $72 million to keep it afloat. In 2009, the same company (by then renamed Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc.) filed for bankruptcy again. Yet during all of this, no one ever told Trump, "You're fired!" Probably because no one could.
Read the rest of this post...

Rupert Murdoch's Watergate?



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
In the May 2, 2011 issue of The Nation, Alexander Cockburn has a good analysis of the UK phone hacking scandal plaguing the Rupert Murdoch empire. It provides the back-story in easily digestible form, and concludes that this could easily bring down top management up to, and including, the heir apparent, James Murdoch.

Cockburn considers father Rupert to have serious dynastic ambitions; if so, that would be quite a blow. It would also be quite a blow to Murdoch's attempt to take over full control of "the enormously profitable BSkyB network" in the UK. (For more on Murdoch, David Cameron and BSkyB, see here. It tells you why this is not just a Murdoch story, but a Cameron story as well.)

Here's a taste of the Cockburn article (subscription required for the online version, though the print version is available; my emphasis). It opens:
What began in Britain in 2005 as “a third-rate burglary” of voicemails, supposedly limited to a criminal invasion of privacy by a News of the World reporter and a private investigator, has flowered beautifully into a Level 7 scandal that threatens the careers of two of Rupert Murdoch’s top executives, not to mention the heir apparent to the News Corp. empire, James Murdoch. It even laps at the ankles of the 80-year-old magnate, threatening the final financial triumph that was scheduled to usher him into Valhalla.
At issue originally are two people at Murdoch's New of the World, one a reporter, Clive Goodman, who "ran the royal beat," and the other a private investigator named Glenn Mulcaire. Both were convicted of "hacking into the phone messages of members of the royal family." News of the World is a sex-and-scandal rag, something that Cockburn describes as providing the "efficient distribution of raw sewage into the prurient hands of about 3 million Britons every Sunday".

Scandal-rag scandals are low-end stuff, so with the two perps in jail and Goodman's editor, a man named Andy Coulson, having resigned, most at News International (Murdoch's firm) figured the lid was firmly on the pot.

That was 2005; now Andy Coulson is media adviser to David Cameron (Hi, Rupert; kisses from David), and Cameron's culture minister is about to rule on whether the BSkyB deal "merits a full inquiry by the Competition Commission".

The interstitial pieces connecting the low-level 2005 events with the top of the Murdoch empire make great reading. They include actor Hugh Grant's car breaking down in the vicinity of a pub owned by a former NoW reporter Paul McMullan, and Grant's accepting the pub owner's invitation to come back. Grant did indeed go back — wearing a wire.

The ex-reporter told Grant that top executives at News International almost certainly knew about the bugging, all the way up to Rebekah Brooks, former editor of NoW and now chief executive of News Corp. Remember, the perps are in jail, so they can't say it's not a crime.

Cockburn concludes (my emphasis):
As [journalist Peter] Burden speculates on his blog, “If Ian Edmondson [a former NoW editor] was involved, so was Andy Coulson. If Andy Coulson was involved, so was Rebekah Brooks. If Rebekah Brooks was involved, so was Master James [Murdoch]. And if they were, it’s very likely that Les Hinton, CEO of [Dow Jones and Company] (the brightest bird in Rupert Murdoch’s bush), was involved, too, because he was Executive Chairman of News International at the time.”

On April 10 Guardian columnist Steven Barnett expressed sentiments widely shared in Britain, writing in favor of a full review of the BSkyB deal: “The issue is that every aspect of Sky’s output will be driven by the same uncompromising corporate culture which has given us the News of the World’s criminality.” ... Will Rupert himself be enmeshed? Bruce Page, author of a fine book on Murdoch, suggests to me that what could drag the dirty digger into the swamp would be the disclosure of any deal he may have made to stem the scandal when Gordon Brown was still PM. Brown won’t confirm or deny that Murdoch approached him.
This could also blossom into a Cameron story. The pub owner, McMullen told Hugh Grant that he thought Cameron "probably knew as well." Remember, Cameron has hired Coulson, ex-NoW editor, as his media adviser.

As I wrote earlier about Murdoch and his business model:
We think of him as a propagandist, but he's so much more. And he's not primarily a propagandist; he's a media monopolist whose market product is propaganda. Here's his business model — he semi-monopolizes media in whatever country he gets into, and then sells propaganda services to government officials and hopefuls in exchange for increased monopoly control after they get elected.
He sells propaganda services to government officials in exchange for monopolies. The government official he's currently corrupting is David Cameron, who would probably deny that allegation. But the man before him, Gordon Brown, has not yet denied he cut a deal with Murdoch over the scandal. Stay tuned.

Articles like this make The Nation a good subscription, and they could use the help.

GP Read the rest of this post...

Yemen dictator refusing to sign exit document



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Dictators always have a hard time moving on. That's why they were dictators in the first place. Al Jazeera:
The Yemeni president has refused to sign a Gulf Arab-led agreement to give up power in exchange for legal immunity, sources say.

Saturday's development was a new blow to efforts to mediate the months-old crisis between Ali Abdullah Saleh and demonstrators inspired by protests sweeping through the Arab region to demand his overthrow.

Abdul-Latif al-Zayyani, secretary-general of the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC), which brokered the agreement, had flown to the Yemeni capital, Sanaa, on Saturday to urge Saleh to sign the deal.

Instead, he met high-level leaders of Saleh's governing political party and parliamentary bloc, where he was informed that Saleh had some reservations over the deal.
Read the rest of this post...

Grandmaster Flash - The Message



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

What a snapshot of the early '80s. Great music but they have to be looking back and chuckling with the stage costumes.

Our garden is really moving quickly since the weather has been so pleasant. The rhododendron looks better than it's ever looked. It's almost in full bloom so it livens up the entire garden. A few fuchsias that I thought were dead after the December cold have bounced back. Even the pot that burst from the freezing temperatures looks great. Lat night while watering the plants I even noticed a few flowers emerging on our wall of hydrangeas. We usually don't see flowers until May if not June. Read the rest of this post...

Report: Gaddafi's son, grandsons killed in NATO bombing



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
It will be interesting to see how old the grandchildren were, since the purpose of the NATO attacks is to stop the killing of innocent civilians. Sure, the news may please the bloodthirsty right wingers but the US and NATO should strive for higher ground than those knuckle-draggers. Unfortunately it also raises the question yet again of how limited the differences are between Republican administrations and Democratic administrations. The Guardian:
A Nato air strike in Tripoli has killed the youngest son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, a Libyan government spokesman has said.

Saif al-Arab Gaddafi, 29, was killed along with three of Muammar Gaddafi's grandsons, according to reports.

The Libyan leader was in the building at the time of the strike, but was unharmed. Several of Gaddafi's friends and relatives were wounded.

Libyan government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim said: "This was a direct operation to assassinate the leader of this country."
Read the rest of this post...

Washington demands $271 million from NJ for failing to deliver commuter rail project



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
So where will the GOP hero find this money? We haven't heard much from the previously-touted economic miracle governor but it must be because the state is doing so well thanks to his budget chopping. Drastically cutting spending always produces economic turnarounds, like we're seeing in the UK.
In a sharply worded letter, the U.S. transportation secretary said he was ordering New Jersey to repay $271 million after Gov. Chris Christie backpedaled on a plan to build a new rail tunnel under the Hudson River.

"The law is clear on this matter," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said Friday. The state had only received the money on the condition that it complete the multibillion-dollar project, he wrote in the letter explaining his decision.

"After the initial contract was entered into and later expanded at Governor Christie’s request, the state of New Jersey broke the terms," LaHood said. "The governor’s unfortunate decision will affect the commuters in New Jersey and the entire Northeast region for generations."
Read the rest of this post...


Site Meter