Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Sunday, November 01, 2009

The day Rahm met a real gay rights advocate



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
A funny thing happened to White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel during the reception for the hate crimes bill. Someone in Washington, DC finally stood up to him. And it was a lesbian mom from Newton, Mass... Read the rest of this post...

Privacy Policy



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Privacy Policy

This website is operated by AMERICAblog. We work hard to protect your privacy. We wrote this privacy policy to let you know how we treat your personal information – and to show you all the ways we work to keep it safe and private.

If you've participated in any of our campaigns, or joined any of our lists, AMERICAblog might send you updates by e-mail. You can unsubscribe from any and all of those emails by clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the email. We do not share the information you’ve given us with unaffiliated groups without your explicit permission. We may share some of your personal information with the following affiliated groups:

* Affiliated Third Parties – for example, our database administrators or organizations that provide extra organizers at an urgent time – for the sole purpose of helping Us do our work. These groups do not share your personal information or use it for any purpose other than as instructed by Us.

* Third Party Administrators, such as organizations we engage to facilitate large distribution of messages. The content of these emails will be from AMERICAblgo and these third parties do not have direct access to your personally identifiable information.

Please review this privacy policy periodically because we modify it from time to time. This privacy policy was last revised on November 9, 2009 Each time you visit this Site or provide us with information through the Site, by doing so you are accepting practices described in the privacy policy in effect at that time.

This privacy policy applies to transactions and activities in which you engage and data gathered only on the Site. This privacy policy does not apply to any other website or any offline contact.

Petitions and Surveys

For petitions and surveys you've signed or completed, we treat your name, city, state, and comments as public information - for example, we may provide compilations of petitions, with your comments, to the President and legislators, other targets, or to the press. We will not make your street address publicly available, but we may transmit it to members of Congress and to the President as part of a petition. This is a standard industry practice in such situations. In no such case will we disclose your email address or phone number without your permission. We may also make your comments, along with your first name, city and state available to the press and public online.

Financial Donations

If you choose to make a donation to AMERICAblog, your credit card information will be used only for this transaction through our secure online payment system. AMERICAblog does not retain credit card information.

Children

AMERICAblog does not solicit personally identifying information from children. Visitors who are under 13 years of age should ask their parent or legal guardian for assistance when using the Site and should not submit any personally identifying information to the Site.

Data Tracking

In order to better serve our members, we use cookies and periodically analyze web logs. We may also use third-party services such as Google Analytics. This helps us understand traffic patterns and know if there are problems with our website. We may also use embedded images in emails to track open rates for our mailings, so that we can tell which mailings appeal most to Americablog members.

Links to Other Websites

AMERICAblog may provide links to third party websites, and other websites may provide links to the Site. Third party websites operate according to their own terms of use and privacy policies. AMERICAblog has no control over such third party websites, and by using this Site, you acknowledge and agree that AMERICAblog is not responsible for the availability of such third party sites, and does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any content, advertising, products or other materials on or available from such sites. You further acknowledge and agree that AMERICAblog will not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with use of or reliance on any content, advertising, products, or other materials on or available from such sites.

Changes to the Privacy Policy

AMERICAblog may revise or amend this policy at any time at our sole discretion. If we make any substantive changes in the way we collect or use personally identifying information provided by users, we will post a prominent announcement on our website home page and post the changes on this page. We will never change our policies and practices to make them less protective of user information collected prior to the effective date of any changes without the consent of affected users. We encourage users to visit this page periodically to review our current policy.

Contact

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, your personal information, or the practices of this Site, you can contact us via the link on this page.

Email from AMERICAblog

AMERICAblog may send you updates on this and other important campaigns by email. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe from our email list, you may do so by clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the email. Read the rest of this post...

Boehner's latest lie: "We accept moderates in our party"



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
This doesn't pass the straight-face test:
"Clearly [Scozzofava] would be on the left side of our party," said Boehner, who had financially supported the campaign of the New York assemblywoman. "...We accept moderates in our party and we want moderates in our party."
Who is "we"? It's certainly not the base of the GOP. The teabaggers don't accept or want anyone who doesn't adhere strictly to their hard-core, extreme right-wing philosophy. As I wrote yesterday:
There is no room for different ideas in the modern day GOP. The teabaggers rule their world.
Read the rest of this post...

Frank Rich on the NY House race from hell



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
As always, spot on.
The same could be said of Beck, Palin and their acolytes. Though they constantly liken the president to various totalitarian dictators, it is they who are re-enacting Stalinism in full purge mode. They drove out Arlen Specter, and now want to “melt Snowe” (as the blog Red State put it). The same Republicans who once deplored Democrats for refusing to let an anti-abortion dissident, Gov. Robert Casey of Pennsylvania, speak at the 1992 Clinton convention now routinely banish any dissenters in their own camp.

These conservatives’ whiny cries of victimization also parrot a tic they once condemned in liberals. After Rush Limbaugh was booted from an ownership group bidding on the St. Louis Rams, he moaned about being done in by the “race card.” What actually did him in, of course, was the free-market American capitalism he claims to champion. Limbaugh didn’t understand that in an increasingly diverse nation, profit-seeking N.F.L. franchises actually want to court black ticket buyers, not drive them away.

This same note of self-martyrdom was sounded in a much-noticed recent column by the former Nixon hand Pat Buchanan. Ol’ Pat sounded like the dispossessed antebellum grandees in “Gone With the Wind” when lamenting the plight of white working-class voters. “America was once their country,” he wrote. “They sense they are losing it. And they are right.”
Great ending too:
To the uninitiated, the tea party crowd comes across like the barflies in “Star Wars.”

There is only one political opponent whom Obama really has to worry about at this moment: Hamid Karzai. It’s Afghanistan and joblessness, not the Stalinists of the right, that have the power to bring this president down.
Read the rest of this post...

Joe Lieberman admits he prefers we don't pass health care reform at all



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
As someone tweeted on Twitter last night:
Got the Joe Lieberman costume ready. Gonna stand in front of porches and block kids from getting candy.
Joe Lieberman is now saying that he prefers no health care reform at all, if the choice is between a bill with the public option and no bill at all. The thing is, Lieberman just got caught in a lie. As ThinkProgress points out, Lieberman opposed Baucus' health care bill, legislation that didn't include the public option at all. Not to mention, three years ago when Lieberman was up for reelection, he was in favor of universal coverage. Now, not so much.

Joe Lieberman is in favor of being the center of attention, regardless of how many promises he has to break, or how many people he hurts. Lieberman owes his committee chairmanship, and his election in part, to Barack Obama. Perhaps this is another issue the President might some day choose to weigh in on. Read the rest of this post...

Republican endorses Democrat in NY House race



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Wow. Now that is the definition of a civil war. Brought to you by your local teabaggers. Read the rest of this post...

Why the President can't wait until conference to weigh in on health care



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
As you may know, for the health care bill to become law first a bill must pass the US Senate and the US House of Representatives. It doesn't have to be the same bill, they can be completely different. Once the Senate and House pass their own health care reform bills, somehow you have to reconcile the differences in the two bills. In order to do that, the Senate and the House each appoint their own negotiators to meet together in what is called a Conference Committee. They get together and go through both of their bills, line by line, difference by difference, and haggle over each provision. Finally, when the "conferees" have gone through all the differing provisions, and have agreed on a unified bill, that merged bill is sent back to the Senate and House for one final vote. If each body passes the bill, then it goes to the president for his signature.

As you also may know, there's been a lot of concern of late that the President hasn't weighed in with individual members of Congress in order to get their support for the strongest health care bill possible, and that this is a good part of the reason why the robust public option appears to have failed in both the Senate and the House. Joe posted some video below of Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner lamenting the fact that the President has refused to get involved, and explaining how it has hurt our chances to get a strong bill. The President's critics, the accusations that the President has refused to help us get a strong bill, are no longer anonymous.

A commenter who frequently defends the President's actions on health care reform, write this yesterday:
[The President will] get more involved when the bill makes its way to conference committee. It is silly to spend political capital right now when the Senate bill is not even going to be the final bill.
In fact, that's absurd. As it currently stands, the President's inaction has not only killed any chance of getting a single payer system, it has killed the robust public option in the Senate and the House. The robust public option is not going to be in the House or Senate health care reform bill. Once that legislation goes to conference, there is no way to improve it beyond what is in the two bills before it. The best we can get is the best that's included in the two bills, period. Now that the President's inaction has let the robust public option die on the vine, it's gone. And all the king's horses and all the king's men can't bring it back in conference.

The President's unwillingness to fight for his own campaign promises has already severely wounded health care reform. This is why we've been writing so much of late about the White House's refusal to get involved, refusal to lobby individual members to support a robust public option, to support Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi in their efforts to get as good a bill as possible. There is no "give him time," there is no "it's only his first year, give him a break." This administration is only getting one shot at health care reform. It's not coming back for another vote in a year or two when the White House finally gets its sea legs. The President's inaction has real consequences now.

The White House needs to stop fighting for mediocrity, and start fighting for its beliefs. Read the rest of this post...

Is Obama going to step up and actually advocate for the strong health insurance reform bill?



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
NOTE FROM JOHN: The sources are no longer anonymous.

With several of the top spokespeople from the White House on the talk shows today, it's important to hear what they have to say about the President's role in the health insurance reform debate. How much is he actually doing on Capitol Hill to get the strongest possible bill with the best public option? Because, indications from the Hill are that he's not doing so much. Rep. Anthony Weiner said as much on Rachel Maddow's show on Thursday. Taylor Marsh transcribed the key points and the video is below. Weiner's message:
You know, the idea that the President could have maybe come in and said, you know what, here’s ten guys that I can sway. If the President of the United States calls it’s tough to say no. We’ve kind of been left to do this on our own and you really need the full-throated support of a president at a moment like this when we’re having a big national debate. … But really, I don’t think we can close this out unless the President really helps us.” –
Read the rest of this post...

Sunday Talk Shows Open Thread



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
The White House is sending out its top dogs again this week: Valerie Jarrett, Axelrod, Geither and David Plouffe. Republicans are sending out their leaders, too: Joe Lieberman, Rush Limbaugh and House Minority Leader John Boehner.

Expected topics are the economy, health insurance reform and how the teabaggers now own the GOP.

Full listing after the break.

Here's the full lineup:
ABC's "This Week" — White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett.

___

CBS' "Face the Nation" — White House senior adviser David Axelrod; Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.

___

NBC's "Meet the Press" — Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner; David Plouffe, former Obama presidential campaign manager; author Jon Krakauer.

___

CNN's "State of the Union" — House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio; Gov. Haley Barbour, R-Miss.

"Fox News Sunday" _ Rush Limbaugh, conservative radio talk show host.

Read the rest of this post...


Site Meter