Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Friday, June 15, 2012

Utah Att. Gen. says Obama immigration move totally within his power



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
The President announced earlier today that he will be suspending deportations of illegal immigrants under the age of 30 who came here at a young age and have no criminal record, among other criteria.

Greg Sargent found a conservative GOP attorney general who says the President is fully within his authority to do this.
A number of Republican officials and conservatives have responded to Obama’s immigration announcement by attacking it on process grounds, arguing that the decision to circumvent Congress was an abuse of power, an affront to democracy, and even unconstitutional — and could encourage further lawbreaking.

But in an interview with me just now, Mark Shurtleff, Utah’s conservative Republican attorney general, dismissed those objections, arguing the move was perfectly within Obama’s powers, good law enforcement policy, and even a “conservative” solution.

“This is clearly within the president’s power,” Shurtleff said. “I was pleased when the president announced it.”
Read the rest of this post...

9 year old food blogger shut down by politicians



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Great values that are being taught by those in power. Who really wants a 9 year old kid doing something to help school kids eat well and then donate money to feed poor kids in Africa? How outrageous, right?

If the political class doesn't like being embarrassed by the terrible food that they're serving kids, they should fix the system rather than ban a kid from stepping up and trying to improve the system. Read the sad story at Wired. Read the rest of this post...

Video: BP is still in the Gulf! (funny, from Second City)



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Read the rest of this post...

Economic troubles continue in pro-austerity UK



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
In predictable fashion, the British economy took yet another hit. Exports and falling and thanks to austerity, fewer people at home have the money to buy as much as they did in the past. What should also be a concern is that the full impact of austerity has not yet been felt though it is increasingly hitting the country.

What does it take for people to admit that austerity doesn't work? Heaven forbid the Republicans take over Washington and bring this failed plan to the US.
Britain's goods trade deficit unexpectedly widened in April as exports plunged, raising the threat of a third quarter of economic contraction and adding urgency to new measures to foster growth as trading partners in the euro zone weaken.

The country slid back into recession around the turn of this year, and more pain looms as a relentless debt crisis in the euro zone - the main market for Britain's exports - hits trade and makes companies reluctant to invest and hire.

The Office for National Statistics said on Friday the goods trade deficit grew to 10.1 billion pounds ($15.70 billion) - the second-largest gap since records began in January 1998. That compared to a deficit of 8.7 billion pounds in March and confounded forecasts for a reading of 8.5 billion pounds.
Read the rest of this post...

Most whale meat in Japan failed to sell



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Outside of some vocal extremists who prefer tradition, whaling fails to make sense in modern Japan. The ships are (rightly) harassed at sea, driving up costs for the hunts and people at home don't even want the whale meat. On top of that Japan has to bribe poor countries who participate in the IWC, so they can win their votes.

Japan needs to cut its losses and move on because the whale hunts make no sense from any perspective.
Japan's failing appetite for whale meat left three-quarters of meat from whales caught in the north-west Pacific last summer unsold, according to a report.

Junko Sakuma, a freelance journalist, said the body responsible for selling meat from Japan's controversial "scientific" whaling programme had failed to sell 908 tonnes of the 1,211-tonne catch, despite holding 13 public auctions since last October.

The report, published on the website of the Tokyo-based Dolphin and Whale Action Network, said the Institute of Cetacean Research, a quasi-governmental body that oversees the hunts, had hoped to use sales from the meat to cover the costs of the whaling fleet's expeditions.
Well done by the Sea Shepherd for speeding up the death of the ugly annual hunts. Read the rest of this post...

Report: TSA hired child rapists, murderers & thieves



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Just another day at the TSA. Hopefully Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn's report is about reforming (or eliminating) the TSA and not a money grab like GOP Congressman Mica because it raises more serious problems at the agency.

We've all heard about the thefts by TSA agents and recently discovered the Philadelphia airport hired a child molester but the TSA being the TSA, there's always something else that defies logic. How does the TSA continue to be so untrusted and disliked yet have Congress calling for more fees to give the TSA even more budget?
Blackburn's report entitled "Not on My Watch: 50 Failures of TSA's Transportation Security Officers" shows photos and criminal records of the TSA's worst offenders, from statutory rape to murder.

"Many of them have committed the crimes while in their TSA uniforms," said Congresswoman Blackburn.

The crimes date back to 2005 and include several offenders from the tri-state area.

One of the former TSA agents was recently convicted for stealing someone's laptop at the Memphis airport. The theft happened in the baggage claim area while the agent was on break.
Read the rest of this post...

Should families with kids still pre-board on flights?



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
You don't need to have kids to know that it takes time to do anything such as boarding a flight with them. Kids are easily distracted and they have a different sense of time than adults have.

Adding families with kids to normal boarding -- i.e., not letting them board early -- doesn't make sense to me (no kids) and sounds counter-productive, but maybe others see it differently. I'd rather they get it over with early, rather than having them blocking the isle and stressing everyone out even more than they're already stressed while boarding.

Since we're fast approaching peak summer travel season, what do you think of United Airline's new plan?
"We are now boarding those with special needs, and we here at United consider children your blessing, not a special need, so we ask that you board according to your boarding number."

Special needs or not, the incident, along with other industry developments, suggests that families getting ready to take off on their summer vacations may experience some bumps along the way.

The announcement Rubin heard was the result of United opting to discontinue the process of allowing families with small children to board before the general public, a procedure the airline had implemented earlier this year.
Note from John: If the airlines found an actuary who said throwing out the window would save more money, they'd do it. This sounds like yet another excuse to save money (though God knows how), and the fact that it downright inconvenience's United's passengers if simply icing on the cake.

I have never flown with ruder, more self-important flight attendants than on US airlines. I refuse to fly US carriers abroad if I have a chance. Yes, some US flight attendants are nice. And far too many are not.

I think of my recent flight on American from DC to Chicago, I was flying with my dog, as a carry on (for $125 each way, and she counts as a carry on), and I was in the last group boarding. They call my number, I get ready to board, and they tell me that they're out of overhead room, so I have to store everything but the dog in the hold. But I have my laptop computer, my ipad, all my prescription asthma meds, among others (totaling at least $750, if not more) and I don't even recall what else. Too bad, they tell me.

So I get down on the ground and am emptying out my carry on all of the expensive, breakable, stuff, and realize that with a dog and dog carrier in one hand, I have nowhere to put all the other stuff (not to mention, I have tendonitis, which was flaring up in that arm, so I can't carry more than a few pounds with that arm). While I'm doing this, the flight attendant is getting testy with me, suggesting that I'm holding up the plane. Keeping in mind I didn't want to be sent to Gitmo, I glared and kept unpacking.

In the meantime, after American's staff badgered me again about keeping their plane late, I asked why they don't do anything about people taking overhead space more forward in the plane than where their seat is. "What are we supposed to do, sir" he says to me. Oh, I don't know, how about tell people not to do it, and if you see people do it, tell them to stop? How about boarding the front of the plane first and then work to the back?

Finally, I was able to jam the meds bulging in my shoulder bag, and was juggling my laptop and ipad and camera in left arm, while my right hand was carrying the dog carrier. I board the plane, my arm aching, and ask the first flight attendant I see if she has a bag or something that I can put the computer, ipad, numerous bottles of meds, and whatever else I had that was breakable. She was very nice and got me a big bag.

I'm now making my way down the very narrow aisle - dog carrier in one hand, overstuffed satchel on my back sliding to my side, and other arm carrying a bag stuffed with my laptop, ipad and other stuff - trying to not hit other passengers in the head. The nice flight attendant says that maybe I can find some jackers or something in the overhead somewhere that I can slide over and put my computer/ipad bag there (which was a good idea, and nice of her). Of course, with the dog in hand, and the computer/ipad etc in the other, there's no way for me to reach up to the overhead and open it let alone move stuff around, so I asked very nicely if there was any way she could help me look for a place. She told me she had to stay up front, it was her station, she wasn't supposed to leave. I look at flight attendant number two who's just standing there silently and asked if maybe she could help. She gave me a look, then begrudgingly said yes.

We walk to my seat, and what do you know, there's a big empty space in the overhead that could have easily fit my carry-on. In other words, they knew I was stuck outside the plane unpacking and no one bothered telling me that there was a big glaring space in the overhead over my seat that could have taken my bag.

Anyway, mean flight attendant found the open space above my seat, then stood there as I struggled to lift the computer/ipad/camera bag up to stuff it in, while holding the dog and carrier, and the meds are still in my overstuffed satchel. And mind you, this is my tendonitis arm. She does nothing to help. I finally asked if she can help. She sighs and takes the computer bag and puts it above.

I then go to get into my seat - it's a window seat (not by choice, I prefer aisle), and for anyone who's tried to put a dog carrier under a seat, it takes a bit more work than simply "woosh and it's in." You have to lift the seat cushion nowadays etc, even though my dog carrier is officially approved by American to be the correct size.

Then I discover a new problem. American has apparently decided to use the space under your seat for their new wifi boxes. As a result, the officially approved bags no longer fit under the seat. Nice. They only cost like $80 to $100, not to mention you can be kicked off the plane if your carry doesn't fit under the seat (and with a dog in it you can't put it in the overhead).

I finally get into my seat, we take off, get to know the neighbors and all is well.

On landing, the woman behind me taps me on the shoulder and informs me that she's really ticked off. Why, I ask. You see, she tells me, while I was trying to get the dog carrier under my seat, the mean flight attendant apparently gave me a look and said something disparaging about me. The passenger who told me said she was so upset she almost spoke up right there (I told her she should have).

And thus ends another typical flight for me on a US carrier. Whether it's American, United or whomever, the only carrier I've been on that's been glorious has been Virgin America, where the planes are new, the food is great, the TV and movie selection amazing (they charge for all of this, but good affordable prices), and the staff could NOT be nicer. (I also understand that people love Southwest, but they didn't until recently fly any routes I normally take.)

We all spend a lot of time talking about how we saved Wall Street and they continue to treat us like garbage. Don't forget that we saved the US airlines too, after September 11, and the attitude, and outright contempt, they show their passengers, is unparalleled.

This move by United is typical, and one more reason to avoid US carriers at all costs. There is very little we can do to protest their constantly increasing number of fees and their ridiculously in synch pricing, but we can do one thing - it's difficult to say "don't fly" when America doesn't have a real train alternative in most areas. But when we go abroad we certainly have a choice, when you can fly Southwest or Virgin America, do. And the next time a politician in Washington wants to bailout the airlines, remember how generous the airlines have been to you, then call your congressman and tell him to stuff it. Read the rest of this post...

Obama outlines two economic options for 2012 election



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
It sounds good on paper and in theory, the two options should be much more distinct than they are in reality. Obama is not wrong that the GOP is all about obstruction and continuing the extremist economic policies that got us here in the first place. Unfortunately those policies have Democratic hands all over them (Bill Clinton, for starters) and we've seen too little progress on economic reform since 2008.

There continues to be a strong sentiment that too little has changed and too little effort has been made to change the overall dynamics. There's also a sense that there's been too little support for agents of change, which is highly frustrating.

That said, going back to a GOP Congress and GOP White House should be a horrifying prospect for the country. The Republicans will surely explode with the "blame Bush" theme but of course, it's not incorrect. At least Obama is finally coming around to embracing what many have been saying for a long time.
“What's holding us back is a stalemate in Washington between two fundamentally different views of which direction America should take. And this election is your chance to break that stalemate,” Obama said. “At stake is not simply a choice between two candidates or two political parties, but between two paths for our country.”

For Obama, the GOP path – which, he said, Romney would advance along with unpopular congressional Republicans, hand-in-hand – represented a retread of the policies during the Bush administration. A Romney administration, the president warned, would award expensive tax cuts mostly to the wealthy and let corporations run amok of regulations, all while gutting support for education and infrastructure.

The speech was firmly ensconced in a kind of “Blame Bush” strategy that Republicans frequently decry as a political red herring, and Romney tried to keep the focus on the past three years.
Read the rest of this post...

Five Questions: Marcy Wheeler at Netroots Nation 2012



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
This is another of the short interviews I made while at Netroots Nation last week. Our guest this time is Marcy Wheeler, who blogs at the invaluable emptywheel.net.

The series is called "Five Questions". I asked the same four questions of each respondent and tailored a fifth question to the person I was speaking with.

Except for my own performance, I like the way this turned out. I certainly like the intelligence and diversity of responses, and very much appreciate the time and care each person took to answer.

Marcy was especially interesting. I found her point about the "end of nation-states" oddly synchronistic, considering the about-to-be-leaked TPP trade deal document. (You can read about that here; the TPP trade deal is pretty frightening and needs to be stopped.)

The five questions are:
  1. Are we still in a time of pendulum swings in American history, or are we approaching a period in which things could change permanently?

  2. How should progressives think of Democrats — as "we" or "they"?

  3. What should progressive office-holders do differently to get a different, more progressive outcome (i.e., more progressive laws and policies)?

  4. What American future do you see as most likely, even if the likelihood is only marginally more likely than others?

  5. A question tailored to the interviewee.
This interview took place in what seemed like very early morning, considering how late the many conversations had gone the night before. I found that aspect of the conference excellent, by the way; a very good reason for attending next year.

We took a few minutes to chat prior to the appearance of Paul Krugman, Richard Trumka, Erica Payne and others for an on-stage discussion in the main hall. The Krugman video is here, if you wish to view it.

Five Questions: Marcy Wheeler with Gaius Publius, recorded at Netroots Nation 2012. Enjoy:



The full list of "Five Questions" interviews includes the following. Links to names will take you to previously-published interviews.
These interviews will be presented in some order in the upcoming days.

(If you have trouble with this audio, please let me know in the comments and I'll address it as quickly as I can. Thanks.)

GP

To follow or send links: @Gaius_Publius
  Read the rest of this post...

Revealed: 64 drone bases on U.S. soil



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Yikes. Hot on the heals of a story from Ari Melber about Obama's secret (but fully revealed) drone program comes this. Drone bases in the U.S. What could they be for?

From the Danger Room crew at Wired (my emphasis and much paragraph tweakage):
We like to think of the drone war as something far away, fought in the deserts of Yemen or the mountains of Afghanistan. But we now know it’s closer than we thought.

There are 64 drone bases on American soil. That includes 12 locations housing Predator and Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles, which can be armed.

Public Intelligence, a non-profit that advocates for free access to information, released a map of military UAV activities in the United States on Tuesday. Assembled from military sources — especially this little-known June 2011 Air Force presentation (.pdf) – it is arguably the most comprehensive map so far of the spread of the Pentagon’s unmanned fleet.

What exact missions are performed at those locations, however, is not clear. Some bases might be used as remote cockpits to control the robotic aircraft overseas, some for drone pilot training. Others may also serve as imagery analysis depots.

The medium-size Shadow is used in 22 bases, the smaller Raven in 20 and the miniature Wasp in 11. ...

”It is very likely that there are more domestic drone activities not included in the map, but it is designed to provide an approximate overview of the widespread nature of Department of Defense activities throughout the US,” Michael Haynes from Public Intelligence tells Danger Room.
Yikes. Scares me. As does this:
The possibility of military drones (as well as those controlled by police departments and universities) flying over American skies have raised concerns among privacy activists. As the American Civil Liberties Union explained in its December 2011 report, the machines potentially could be used to spy on American citizens. ... The drones’ presence in our skies "threatens to eradicate existing practical limits on aerial monitoring and allow for pervasive surveillance, police fishing expeditions, and abusive use of these tools..."
Remember, planned drone usage in the U.S. includes law enforcement, commercial and private flights. Get that — private. Think Blackwater has drones? Spook city, says this paranoid fool.

We've written earlier about drones, how the manufacturers have loaded the pockets of our eagerly-bought congressfolk, and what that money has purchased. Here are a few links to bring you up to speed:
Like the TSA, this program may be very hard to uproot, at least without some effort. We at La Maison are doing our small-time bit. Thanks for your ears.

Droning on,

GP

To follow or send links: @Gaius_Publius
  Read the rest of this post...


Site Meter