We've all seen cats on blogs but how about a cat that is actually reading one? AMERICABlog reader Jason sent in these pictures of his six month old liberal kitten with *impeccable* taste.
I believe it's trying to donate
PS - Excuse me for not introducing myself earlier. I'm AMERICABlog's so called "boy wonder" Kyle. I'll be filling in just for the next day or so while the team does a bit of traveling. I was sent by John to cover Katrina's aftermath back in September and blog occasionally at amipatriotic.com. I'm a Software Engineer during the day and a maverick activist at night.
Read the rest of this post...
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff
Follow @americablog
Friday, November 11, 2005
Pat Robertson says "Intelligent Design" is really about the Christian God
Well, at AMERICAblog reader Russ points out, Pat Robertson pretty much just destroyed any possible chance the intelligent design folks had, anywhere. Robertson said yesterday that since a Pennsylvania school district voted out all 8 of its school board members who support intelligent design, they can expect God's wrath to come down on them.
Now, call me crazy, but if intelligent design doesn't necessarily have anything to do with God, then why will God's wrath come down on a town that voted that ridiculous theory down?
Anybody out there fighting the intelligent design folks, please use this. Pat Robertson just admitted that intelligent design is about teaching our kids all about the Christian God in school.
Thanks Pat. You're the gift that keeps on giving. Read the rest of this post...
Now, call me crazy, but if intelligent design doesn't necessarily have anything to do with God, then why will God's wrath come down on a town that voted that ridiculous theory down?
Anybody out there fighting the intelligent design folks, please use this. Pat Robertson just admitted that intelligent design is about teaching our kids all about the Christian God in school.
Thanks Pat. You're the gift that keeps on giving. Read the rest of this post...
Open thread
Just arrived in in NYC. A guy was dressed as a cow on our train. He was really cute. Man I love this town.
Read the rest of this post...
More Bad News for Republicans - National Collapse in Polls
From our good friends at the DSCC:
- GOP Pollster: New Poll Should Worry '06 Republicans.Read the rest of this post...
"With the midterms a year away, these numbers could spell trouble for the GOP. 'These are not good times for Republicans,' says Republican pollster Bill McInturff. 'This is a very unhappy electorate that's going to be unstable, and they are terrifically unstable numbers for a Republican majority." [NBC News, 11/9/05]
- NEW PA POLL SHOWS SANTORUM LOSING 51%-35%.
According to a new Philadelphia Daily News/Keystone poll, Sen. Rick Santorum would lose to Democratic challenger Bob Casey Jr. by a whopping 16 points if the election were held today. In addition, Santorum's own job approval ratings are at a six-year low. Bush is exacerbating Santorum's problems: A September Morning Call/Muhlenberg College poll found that 54% of Pennsylvania voters disapprove the job President Bush is doing and, of those, only 9% would vote for Santorum in the upcoming Senate election. Christopher Borick, of the Muhlenberg Institute of Public Opinion said, "It will be a significant challenge for Santorum to show a divide between him and the White House." [Philadelphia Daily News, 10/10/05; Allentown Morning Call, 9/29/05]
Santorum: Bush Can Campaign for Him "Anytime." Explaining that prior commitmentÂ?s will keep Sen. Santorum from appearing with Bush at a Pennsylvania VeteransÂ? Day event tomorrow, a Santorum spokesman said, "The senator looks forward to having the president come to Pennsylvania as we get closer to next year's election." And this week, Santorum added, Â?He can come anytime he wants.Â? [AP, 11/9/05]
- BUSH APPROVAL SUFFERS 14-POINT DROP IN MONTANA.
In Montana, a state Bush won by twenty points last November, his job approval ratings are plummeting. According to a new Montana State University-Billings poll, 51% of Montanans disapprove of the job Bush is doing, while only 42% approve, a 14-point drop in approval since last year. Montana Sen. Conrad Burns is currently in the middle of a highly competitive 2006 re-election bid.[Billings Gazette, 11/10/05]
- NOVAK LAYS BLAME AT BUSH'S FEET
This morning, columnist Bob Novak wrote of congressional Republicans fearing for next year's elections after Tuesday's losses, "The antidote to avoid that fate is to keep as far away from President Bush as possible, a lesson underlined by the president's failed election rescue mission for former Virginia state Attorney General Kilgore. The consequences may be profound. As his approval rating dipped, Bush increasingly has been treated in Congress as a lame duck. Tuesday's Virginia outcome increases the propensity of Republican senators and House members not only to avoid their president on the campaign trail but also to ignore his legislative proposals." [Chicago Sun-Times, Novak Column, 11/10/05]
- SOME '06 REPUBLICANS ARE ALREADY TELLING BUSH TO STAY AWAY
Yesterday, Don Imus asked Rep. J.D. Hayworth if he would like President Bush to visit Arizona and appear in campaign ads for the Republican congressman. Hayworth quickly replied, "In a word, no. Not at this time." ["Imus in the Morning," 11/9/05]
Trickle Down Corruption As Far As the Eye Can See
Rob's Note: With John on travel, I decided to complete a piece that I've been working on for a bit. Long reading for a holiday Friday, but should give you something to chew on this Veterans Day weekend. Nothing better than utter government corruption to remind everyone why our Veterans fought and died.
You know, oftentimes one can be tempted to use hyperbole to challenge one's opponents. Take this sentence for example:
This time it's different. This time it's far worse than anything we've seen in quite a while. You judge people in life on the company they keep -- who people choose to associate with tells you a lot about them. In politics, judge people on the leaders that they choose to follow -- the example set by political leadership sets a tone and an agenda.
So let's summarize where we are today. In the Executive branch, Karl Rove is STILL in charge. In any other White House (other than Nixon), Karl Rove would have been long fired for his ties to the Plame investigation where he sacrificed national security at a time of war because his petulant side needed to be fed. This is the man that the President wants his administration follow? What Bush tells the rest of the administration and the public as a whole by keeping Rove in charge is really simple: the rules don't apply to me.
As that attitude trickles down throughout the administration, we find that something like lying to investigators becomes de rigueur. From an old, but good article from Bloomberg:
Down the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, we have the Republican Congress. In the House, the exterminator, Majority Leader Tom Delay, has led quite an infestation of corruption. A reminder from the Washington Post:
What does this trickle down corruption mean to you and me? Well, first off it shows you that Republicans go to Washington not to make America a better place, but to enrich themselves and their cronies. That attitude leads to things like the war in Iraq, the gross incompetence of FEMA, and a budget deficit that you and I will be paying for the rest of our lives. Unlike these Republicans and their extra-curricular income earning potential, we'll be paying the bill.
More importantly, what it means is that our country is being run right now by a group of people who, literally, don't care about you and me. They don't believe in any particular philosophy - tax cuts and the like are really only about making themselves and their friends richer. It's got nothing to do with you and me. The biggest proponent of tax cuts is Grover Norquist, who we can see from above is really only about getting richer himself.
So they don't believe in anything other than self-enrichment. As a result, sending people off to war to die doesn't mean anything to them. Drowning poor grandmothers and children in New Orleans doesn't mean anything to them. If it doesn't put money in their pocket, it doesn't mean anything to them.
You and I, the American public, don't mean anything to them at all.
They don't care about us. They didn't care about those poor dying people in New Orleans. They don't care about the bodies coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan. THEY JUST DON'T CARE.
The only time we mean anything to them is when we vote in elections. Shame on the American public if they don't see this foolishness and wake up after the 2006 elections with a new direction for our country. Read the rest of this post...
You know, oftentimes one can be tempted to use hyperbole to challenge one's opponents. Take this sentence for example:
The corrupt cronyism of the Republican Party is utter and complete, encompassing the Executive Branch and both branches of Congress.Now, you might read that and think, oh, that's just a bit excessive, I'm sure that there are good people in the Republican party. Even if I disagree with their methodology, they are trying their best.
This time it's different. This time it's far worse than anything we've seen in quite a while. You judge people in life on the company they keep -- who people choose to associate with tells you a lot about them. In politics, judge people on the leaders that they choose to follow -- the example set by political leadership sets a tone and an agenda.
So let's summarize where we are today. In the Executive branch, Karl Rove is STILL in charge. In any other White House (other than Nixon), Karl Rove would have been long fired for his ties to the Plame investigation where he sacrificed national security at a time of war because his petulant side needed to be fed. This is the man that the President wants his administration follow? What Bush tells the rest of the administration and the public as a whole by keeping Rove in charge is really simple: the rules don't apply to me.
As that attitude trickles down throughout the administration, we find that something like lying to investigators becomes de rigueur. From an old, but good article from Bloomberg:
The widening investigation of lobbyist Jack Abramoff is moving beyond the confines of tawdry influence-peddling to threaten leading figures in the Republican hierarchy that dominates Washington.You lie to an investigator when telling the truth would be so much worse and you're terrified of what will happen if you do speak the truth. Well, the lead gives you a good sense of what might happen next - "threaten leading figures in the Republican hierarchy that dominates Washington". That's right, it's the entire Party. Mind you, this article is from Bloomberg, a BUSINESS wire service. When the business community is walking away from you, you know the stench is getting bad.
This week's arrest of David Safavian, the former head of procurement at the Office of Management and Budget, in connection with a land deal involving Abramoff brings the probe to the White House for the first time.
Safavian once worked with Abramoff at one lobbying firm and was a partner of Grover Norquist, a national Republican strategist with close ties to the White House, at another. Safavian traveled to Scotland in 2002 with Abramoff, Representative Robert Ney of Ohio and another top Republican organizer, Ralph Reed, southeast regional head of President George W. Bush's 2004 re-election campaign.
Down the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, we have the Republican Congress. In the House, the exterminator, Majority Leader Tom Delay, has led quite an infestation of corruption. A reminder from the Washington Post:
A grand jury in Texas indicted yesterday a state political action committee organized by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) for accepting $120,000 in allegedly illegal corporate campaign contributions shortly before and after the 2002 elections that helped Republicans cement their control of the House of Representatives.As the culture of corruption trickles down in the House, we find Bob Ney (self-proclaimed 11th most powerful Congressman), doing things like this:
Ney, 51, in 2002 agreed to insert language in federal legislation to allow an Abramoff client, the Tigua Indians of El Paso, Texas, to reopen a casino closed by state authorities. The provision didn't make it into the final measure.What is a Congressman from Ohio doing using the Congressional Record to support some casino deal in Florida?
In 2000, Ney placed two statements in the Congressional Record in support of Abramoff's purchase of SunCruz Casino Ltd., a casino ship company. Abramoff was indicted by a federal grand jury in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in August on wire fraud charges in connection with the purchase.
Abramoff also has a relationship with Ney, the Ohio congressman. Ney's former chief of staff, Neil Volz, worked with Abramoff at the Miami-based law firm of Greenberg Traurig LLP.Ah yes, there's the money shot - pun intended. (Both quotes from the Bloomberg article.) Actions like this lead us to the inevitable subpoena, of course. From Gannett:
Rep. Bob Ney said Friday that he has been subpoenaed by the U.S. Justice Department to hand over documents related to the government's investigation of indicted Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff.I'm smelling some serious rot over on the House side of Capitol Hill. Let's check out the Senate, maybe the air will be cleaner? From The Hill:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Justice Department are both investigating Frist's June 13 instruction to Scobey to sell off all HCA holdings in his qualified blind trusts, including the GST-exempt trust. Two weeks after the sale was completed, HCA released a negative earnings report that sank its share price.Ah yes, the very top of the heap in the Senate under investigation for a not-so-blind trust.
What does this trickle down corruption mean to you and me? Well, first off it shows you that Republicans go to Washington not to make America a better place, but to enrich themselves and their cronies. That attitude leads to things like the war in Iraq, the gross incompetence of FEMA, and a budget deficit that you and I will be paying for the rest of our lives. Unlike these Republicans and their extra-curricular income earning potential, we'll be paying the bill.
More importantly, what it means is that our country is being run right now by a group of people who, literally, don't care about you and me. They don't believe in any particular philosophy - tax cuts and the like are really only about making themselves and their friends richer. It's got nothing to do with you and me. The biggest proponent of tax cuts is Grover Norquist, who we can see from above is really only about getting richer himself.
So they don't believe in anything other than self-enrichment. As a result, sending people off to war to die doesn't mean anything to them. Drowning poor grandmothers and children in New Orleans doesn't mean anything to them. If it doesn't put money in their pocket, it doesn't mean anything to them.
You and I, the American public, don't mean anything to them at all.
They don't care about us. They didn't care about those poor dying people in New Orleans. They don't care about the bodies coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan. THEY JUST DON'T CARE.
The only time we mean anything to them is when we vote in elections. Shame on the American public if they don't see this foolishness and wake up after the 2006 elections with a new direction for our country. Read the rest of this post...
More posts about:
ralph reed
Army meets recruitment goal after slashing target by a third
When the numbers aren't working, you fix them...
Read the rest of this post...
The Defense Department opened its new recruiting year with good news: announcing yesterday that the Army met its goal for October. But officials also said that the Army lowered the October recruiting goal by about a third from last year's.
Army officials said that they recruited 4,925 soldiers into active duty in October, the first month of the new fiscal year, exceeding the monthly goal of 4,700. Last October, the Army slightly exceeded its goal of 6,935.
Pat Robertson says God is going to destroy Delaware Dover, PA
If God were really that vengeful, Pat Robertson would have a constant hurricane over his head.
More from ABC.
Rob's Note: John is traveling, so he couldn't correct this post. Thanks to all in the comments for the notice.
JOHN's NOTE: Oops :-) Read the rest of this post...
More from ABC.
Rob's Note: John is traveling, so he couldn't correct this post. Thanks to all in the comments for the notice.
JOHN's NOTE: Oops :-) Read the rest of this post...
We ♥ Markos
From the Wash Post, via DailyKos:
Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman fought back valiantly with a conference call to reporters. But for a time, the call was effectively diverted by anti-GOP interlopers who got on a call intended for invited reporters only.Read the rest of this post...
The access information for the call was posted -- unbeknownst to RNC officials -- on the well-known liberal Web log DailyKos.
So, instead of simply parrying the expected questions from reporters concerning the gubernatorial losses in New Jersey and Virginia, Mehlman also found himself ear-to-ear with one antagonist who asked sarcastically: "Given the results of the election, do you think Satan has taken over the country?"
"Next question," scolded Mehlman.
Is Bush/Rove Strategy to Divide America finally failing?
Bush said he was a uniter, not a divider. But, Bush is a liar, that was never true. The Bush/Rove political strategy has always been to divide and conquer. It worked for them last year when they still had many Americans duped in to believing that they would keep them safe.
Those days are over. The analysis of the 2005 elections is showing that the Bush/Rove strategy hit a brick wall:
Those days are over. The analysis of the 2005 elections is showing that the Bush/Rove strategy hit a brick wall:
Republican hopes for a quick morale boost had centered on conservative Virginia. Instead, the gubernatorial results there raised concerns among some Republicans that Bush's favored political strategy of mobilizing conservative voters by dividing the electorate on cultural and social issues may have prompted a backlash among voters in inner and outer suburbs who were vital to Bush's reelection in 2004.Interesting how the conclusion that Bush and Rove's game plan is tanking comes from both Democrats and Republicans:
"It's not just that they lost these elections," said Democratic pollster Geoffrey Garin, "but that none of their old tricks worked that they've relied on to give them the edge in close contests."Read the rest of this post...
Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.) said the GOP's reliance on cultural issues, popular with rural voters, "are just blowing up" in suburban and exurban communities. "You play to your rural base, you pay a price," he said.
DeLay was ready to cop a plea
No surprise, but all the claims of innocence are basically B.S. DeLay was on the verge of pleading guilty to misdemeanor charges for two reasons: 1) he basically implicated himself in the crime and 2) he wanted to save his leadership job according to the Washington Post:
Lawyers for Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) tried unsuccessfully in late September to head off felony criminal indictments against the then-majority leader on charges of violating Texas campaign law by signaling that DeLay might plead guilty to a misdemeanor, according to four sources familiar with the events.The best part is that DeLay did it to himself in the end. He "slipped up" and admitted what really happened:
The lawyers' principal aim was to try to preserve DeLay's leadership position under House Republican rules that bar lawmakers accused of felonies from holding such posts. DeLay was forced to step down as leader on Sept. 28 after the first of two grand jury indictments.
The last-minute negotiations between the lawyers and Texas prosecutor Ronnie Earle were arranged after DeLay made what Earle considered a seriously damaging admission about his fundraising activities during an Aug. 17 meeting with the prosecutor in Austin.And this guy still has all the perks of his old job. He should be in jail. Read the rest of this post...
At that session, DeLay acknowledged that in 2002 he was informed about and expressed his support for transfers of $190,000 in mostly corporate funds from his Texas political action committee to an arm of the Republican National Committee in Washington and then back to Texas, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition that they not be named.
Friday Morning Open Thread
It's Veterans Day...one of those holidays that some people get, but not everyone....
Long weekend or not? Read the rest of this post...
Long weekend or not? Read the rest of this post...
Blair in major fight with his own party
After being soundly defeated earlier this week in Commons, Blair has lashed out against MPs who blocked his plan to hold terror suspects for up to 90 days and now they are fighting back. And of course, what kind of butt-kicking would be complete without attacking those who just defeated Blair, implying that they are soft on terror and love terrorists? Sorry Tony, but you've already played that card which is why you are where you are today. Time to step aside.
Cabinet ministers rallied to Mr Blair, but senior backbenchers were furious about his comments and warned he must "listen more" to secure planned changes to education, health and welfare. Some rebels privately likened him to an "out-of-touch" Margaret Thatcher in the period before she was ousted in 1990.Read the rest of this post...
David Winnick, a Labour MP who successfully proposed a 28-day detention limit on Wednesday, said: "The idea that those of us who voted for 28 days - the majority of MPs - don't understand the terrorist threat, that we are soft on terror and don't understand the menace from the mass murderers ...is poisonous nonsense. Not one single life of those innocent people murdered on 7 July would have been saved if it was 90 days."
Peter Kilfoyle, a former defence minister, said: "Any reality check should start at No 10. The Prime Minister is out of touch with his own party and both Houses. He can't keep playing the loyalty card. He said after the May election he had listened and learnt. If he listened, he hasn't learnt the right lessons."
AP-Ipsos poll: Bush not honest
And it ain't even close! 57% of Americans now say Bush is not honest and does not have high ethical standards. The real kicker here is that 82% believe that Bush is stubborn, so I guess we can count on more of the same from this lead balloon administration.
Read the rest of this post...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)