Earlier tonight, John wrote a post titled, "Major momentum suddenly for the public option, in just the few hours - while Snowe tries to kill the bill." Finally, it seemed, the Democrats in the Senate are on a roll. The House has said it will have a robust public option in their plan, and finally Senator Reid is strongly hinting at the same. So what if Olympia Snowe still opposes the public option? She's only one GOP Senator. And nobody believes that one GOP Senator's vote will somehow convince the public that this legislation is bipartisan.
But guess who is reportedly still siding with Olympia Snowe, even at this late hour, despite the new-found momentum? Your president.
I first got wind of this tonight at Politico.com, and granted, I don't believe everything I read at Politico (but CNN follows):
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is leaning toward putting a public insurance option in the Senate health reform bill — a signal that Reid increasingly believes he can get the votes needed for a plan that would allow states to opt out of the program, senators said Thursday.Huh? If it were just Politico.com, I'd wonder. But, CNN has not "one Democratic source," but "two administration officials" telling the same story:
But President Barack Obama stopped short of endorsing the approach during a hastily called meeting Thursday with the Senate Democratic leadership at the White House, according to an administration official.
Instead, one Democratic source said Obama appeared to prefer a “trigger” option put forth by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), who has proposed allowing states to join a national insurance plan if affordable coverage was not widely available. This would suggest the president has not abandoned his goal of striking a bipartisan deal.
In recent days, two administration officials have told CNN that the prevailing White House opinion is for the Senate health care bill to include a so-called "trigger" mechanism proposed by Snowe that would bring a public option in the future if thresholds for expanding coverage and lowering costs go unmet in coming years.If these stories are true, then the White House is now undercutting progress on health care reform. It was one thing, though still unacceptable, for the White House to be less than enthusiastic about the public option when they thought it couldn't win (a little presidential pressure could turn that around). But it's quite another for the Democrats in Congress to tell the White House that they think they might now be able to pull this off, to get a public option as the president promised in the campaign, and for the White House to respond "nah, we still want the less effective, more expensive, plan because Olympia Snowe's vote is more important than the substance of the actual reform package." Is the White House that tone deaf? Or has the Obama brain trust cut some kind of deal with someone, promising to kill the public option no matter what?
The source familiar with Thursday evening's meeting said Obama "pushed for a so-called trigger, because it's the more bipartisan way to go," due to Snowe's support for the concept. A critical White House goal in passing a health care bill is the ability to call it bipartisan, so Obama officials are wary of doing anything to alienate Snowe.
And if the stories aren't true, if Politico and CNN got it wrong, if President Obama isn't trying to scuttle his own campaign promise when we're on the verge of success, then the White House needs to immediately repudiate these stories. And that has to happen fast. President Obama has to side with the Democrats on the Hill and declare his support for the public option -- and mean it. Read the rest of this post...