Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Another orchid shot



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Phrag. Fox Valley Fireball

Someone mentioned in the comments that I really ought to snap my orchid photos with a solid background. I totally forgot that I had bought some black velvet for this very purpose. So, here's the same flower as last night, with the better background. (The flower's true color is much redder, but as I mentioned last night, it's nearly impossible to capture the color with a digital camera - anyone up on why digital cameras have problems with some colors? I've noticed the same problem with either blue or purple flowers, it screws up their coloring as well.) Read the rest of this post...

Bangladesh 'Rice Revolution' and women



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Much too often the role of women in the developing world is dismissed or ignored in the Western media. On the ground you see a story that is stark contrast to the preconceived ideas people have about poor countries. It's often women tilling the fields in Africa or Asia. It's women working in factories, such as Bangladesh or Vietnam. It's women weaving carpets in the Middle East or Asia. Jobs that provide the backbone of family finance or food are very often women. Unfortunately, being the bread winner hardly equates with social equality. To that end, it's the women that are leading the "Rice Revolution" in Bangladesh.
Last month, about 20,000 garment workers defied a government ban on demonstrations to demand higher wages and protest skyrocketing food prices, especially on such staples as rice, which have doubled in price since last year. Some of the workers, mostly women, hurled rocks and bricks at police and vandalized factories in what the local media dubbed the start of the "Rice Revolution."

Troops from the Bangladesh Rifles, a paramilitary force that normally patrols the country's borders, now operate and guard the crowded government-subsidized rice shops. Dressed in fatigues, they send the stern message that the government wants to ensure stability.

Bangladesh is among at least 33 countries, many with shaky governments and destitute populations, that are at risk of serious political unrest if food prices keep rising, according to a recent World Bank study.
Read the rest of this post...

Homer, Bart and Marge, in Italian



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
It's one of those things I do when I travel. I just can't help but videotape American TV shows (or seemingly American TV shows, like Millionaire), in foreign languages. I just find it funny as hell. Here's a short snippet of the Simpsons, in Italian.

Read the rest of this post...

"Assassination" begins with an "Ass"



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Hillary is guilty as sin, and here's why. When you write or speak publicly for a living, sometimes you screw up, but there's still an internal censor that shuts you off when certain topics come to mind. One of those topics is death, particularly pertaining to political candidates. When Ted Kennedy fell ill last weekend, for example, I wanted to write about what would happen to his Senate seat if he died. But you don't do that in politics (even if, with an evenly divided Senate a lot of political insiders were understandably concerned about the day's events) - you don't do that in civilized society - so I referenced, politely, how succession would work in Massachusetts "if for any reason Kennedy were to step down from his post." I made it sounds as if Kennedy might choose to resign, rather than talk about the very real possibility that he might die.

There have been a number of posts, in the past, where I've wanted to write that Hillary was "dead wrong" about something, and Joe would ping me and say "you can't do that." Why, I'd ask. Because you just can't say anything that sounds like "death" surrounding a political candidate, especially a presidential one. An even more recent, and relevant, example happened only hours before Hillary invoked Bobby Kennedy's assassination yesterday. Joe sent me a paragraph from an MSNBC story in which Hillary's top advisers talked, again, about some unforeseen event bringing down Obama before the convention. The graf was creepy, it gave both of us a ghoulish feel, but we didn't write about it because it would have been equally ghoulish to even bring up the notion of something violent happening to a candidate, even if we were writing about Hillary having been the person to raise the notion.

I'm even having a hard time writing about what Hillary said now. I don't know what to title my posts. I'm not sure when I should even use the word "assassination." For Hillary to invoke Bobby Kennedy at all when talking about this race, let alone to use the word "assassination," is beyond creepy. It isn't done in politics. Even if it's just because of superstitious fears of jinxing things. In Europe, old Europe at least, you don't talk about serious illnesses of another, lest the mere mention bring the illness down on you and yours as well. In politics, we all have a bit of Old Europe in us. That is why what Hillary said is so startling, so offensive, and so horribly telling. You reference, if you must, "the horrible tragedy of Bobby Kennedy." (And even that is a stretch.) But you don't invoke assassinations, out of the blue, especially when there is a lot of fear, sotto voce, about the safety of the other guy in a country with an unfortunate history of political violence (see, even just now, I had written "assassination" and it so gave me the creeps, I changed the word to "political violence").

What Hillary said wasn't just sickening. The very fact that she said it broke a lot of unwritten norms in this town. And that's horribly telling about who this woman is. Read the rest of this post...

Stephanopoulos: Hillary's campaign is talking about taking the fight to the convention



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Tuesday is going to be a very bad day for any uncommitted superdelegates. It's going to be the day they get to tell us why they haven't pick a candidate yet. Whether it's for the same reason that Hillary Clinton is dragging out a race that she's already lost (hint: rhymes with "abomination"). Hillary is an idiot, we learned that months ago, but the real people to blame are the superdelegates and our party leaders who let this idiot continue her reign of terror long after she should have left the scene. And now we see more evidence that the Clintons were scheming to take their nomination battle all the way to the convention - here is what Stephanopoulos reported yesterday:
Before those comments today, there was a strong view inside the Clinton campaign that they should try to push this MAYBE EVEN BEYOND June 3rd or 4th, and take this fight over seating the Michigan and Florida delegations to the convention, if necessary. This was raising some hackles at the Democratic National Committee. IT'S A LOT LESS LIKELY to go forward now after these comments. As one Obama strategist put it, this could be the last straw.'
Could be? She basically invoked her opponent's assassination. What else does she need to do to convince the superdelegates that she ain't exactly presidential material?

So, Tuesday is the day that the uncommitted superdelegates will get inundated with questions about assassinations. (And perhaps it's time to pick off a few of Hillary's own superdelegates as well.) I can't wait to see them defend her comments when constituents start calling their offices. Read the rest of this post...

Clyburn's "outrage"



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
"This is beyond the pale," Rep. James Clyburn, an undeclared superdelegate and the third-ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives, told the New York Times.
Apparently not so beyond the pale. You're still undeclared. And Obama won your state, South Carolina, two-to-one. And you're African-American. And you still can't decide between Hillary and Obama? What is wrong with you? I have a feeling Mr. Clyburn is going to be getting a lot of phone calls inquiring about his views on "assassinations" on Tuesday... Read the rest of this post...

Don't forget, 'inevitable' Hillary said it would be over by February 5th



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Remember "inevitable" Clinton?:
Once upon a time (December) in a far away land (Iowa), the protector of Michigan, the defender of Florida, the savior of June... thought the campaign would end on February 5.
She planned on the campaign "being over" on February 5. She didn't care a lick about all the votes being counted. So much for all that feigned concern about everyone's vote counting, huh? What a fraud. Read the rest of this post...

Lindsey and Lieberman already breaking McCain's new conflict of interest rules



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Yesterday, there were several major developments about John McCain that got lost in the swirling drama surrounding Hillary Clinton. How many times has that happened already? And, she wants to drag this nomination battle out til the convention. There are people in the Democratic party who can stop this madness. They better do it soon.

This is yet another great find from Nico and Sam at Huffington Post:
Two of Sen. John McCain's top campaign chairmen are serving on the board of an independent organization that is behind a new attack ad against Sen. Barack Obama, an apparent violation of the Arizona Republican's new conflict of interest policy.

Sens. Joseph Lieberman and Lindsey Graham both hold chairs for the McCain camp as well as positions on the board of advisers of Vets for Freedom, an advocacy group that supports the Iraq war.

A week ago these titles may not have been a political issue. But under McCain's newly-implemented ethics policy, Lieberman and Graham's role with Vets for Freedom is now proving problematic.

According to the policy: "No person with a McCain Campaign title or position may participate in a 527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate."

On Friday, Vets for Freedom, an independent group, did just that. In a commercial released on its website, the organization directly took on Obama over his willingness to negotiate with Iranian leadership.
This is a big deal. We'll see if McCain stands by his new policy or sticks with his pals who violated the policy already. Given McCain's hypocrisy, my guess is he sticks with the pals who violated the policy. Read the rest of this post...

Biden hits back against Lieberman smears



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
In response to Joe Lieberman's risible Wall Street Journal op-ed attack on Senator Obama, Senator Biden hits back, hard and directly, against the mendacity and foolishness of the Bush/McCain/Lieberman worldview. The whole thing is an exceptional rebuke of failed policy and underhanded politics, and it's worth a full read. The closing point, though, is this:
The Bush-McCain saber rattling is the most self-defeating policy imaginable. It achieves nothing. But it forces Iranians who despise the regime to rally behind their leaders. And it spurs instability in the Middle East, which adds to the price of oil, with the proceeds going right from American wallets into Tehran's pockets.

The worst nightmare for a regime that thrives on tension with America is an America ready, willing and able to engage. Since when has talking removed the word "no" from our vocabulary?

It's amazing how little faith George Bush, Joe Lieberman and John McCain have in themselves – and in America.
It's nice to see some Democratic push-back against Lieberman, too. He has the potential to be a real problem in the fall, and it's important to start making sure people know his foreign policy views are completely and utterly bankrupt long before then. Read the rest of this post...

Saturday Morning Open Thread



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Good morning.

The poet at the poem of the week blog is having a little fun this weekend -- and gives us some insight into poet humor. He's giving us a poem from a guy "many consider to have been the worst poet ever." After yesterday, we could use a laugh. The poem is " The Tay Bridge Disaster." They're a tough crowd, those poets. Who knew?

Usually, on Saturday mornings, I try to be low key. But, yesterday turned out to be the quite the news day. I'm still a bit stunned by the callousness of Clinton's comments -- and her lack of a real apology. Team Clinton should be out in full force blaming all the rest of us for what she said. That's their M.O. -- it's never her fault. See, she was giving us all a history lesson because Hillary is the only smart person who knows history. And, the rest of us are idiots who can't fully understand just how smart she is. It'll be something like that. (Oh, and of course she's staying in the race, we'll be told like we are morons.)

Anyway, it is a beautiful day here in D.C. Read the rest of this post...

Saqqara and 'firsts'



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

So much of what we take for granted had to be started somewhere. In architecture/construction, this is what we believe to be the site of firsts. It's neighbor, Giza, tends to get the majority of the visitors and press but Saqqara and Dhashur are where the first pyramids were constructed. Saqqara is also where the first stone columns were built as well as the first stone frieze and the first stone arch that we know of today. The first stone building complex (that we know of) on the planet were constructed here.

The architecture throughout this site reminded me of Art Deco style, but perhaps there is a historian out there that knows more and could expand in the comments. More from Saqqara after the jump.


The main (current) entrance at Saqqara. It's hard to believe it's over 4000 years old.

A partially restored building inside the complex.


Another partially reconstructed building at Saqqara. Look at the beauty of those lines. This site is ancient yet the style could easily fit in the 20th century. The Greeks later borrowed heavily from the Egyptians though less from Saqqara and more from later sites.


Closeup of one of the columns.


Ongoing digs are everywhere though this was from August, so it's painfully hot and not as busy in the summer.

Modern graffiti on the newly restored temples. Nothing says world history appreciation quite like scratching graffiti onto a temple. The scratchings are in all languages proving yet again that ignorance and stupidity isn't limited to any one country.


View looking at the pyramid where we entered. From the ground level, it's not obvious just how high the entrance is. This was good news since I'm not keen on heights. The car is an old model that is refitted to run on natural gas. Egypt has very little oil though it does have large quantities of natural gas.

Instead of going in the pyramids at Giza we opted to go inside here where fewer tourist buses were around. The smell inside was terrible, like a mix of bat poop, four thousand year old sweat and ammonia. The following day our legs were in pain after the awkward angle (and stooping) to go down and back up from the tomb. Well worth the experience though.
Read the rest of this post...

Land of the free



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
And to think the rest of the world finds the US a gun crazy country. Where would they ever get such ideas?
Max Motors in Butler, Missouri, says sales have quadrupled since the start of the offer.

Customers can choose between a gun or a $250 (£125) gas card, but most so far have chosen the gun.

Owner Mark Muller said: "We're just damn glad to live in a free country where you can have a gun if you want to."

The dealership sells new and old vehicles, including General Motors and Ford cars and trucks, and its logo shows a cowboy holding a pistol.
Read the rest of this post...

The face says it all



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK

(From AP) Read the rest of this post...


Site Meter