Join Email List | About us | AMERICAblog Gay
Elections | Economic Crisis | Jobs | TSA | Limbaugh | Fun Stuff

Thursday, May 06, 2010

White House not thrilled with Lieberman's citizenship-stripping proposal



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Well that's good news. I just feel like these are "feel good" vengeance proposals that do nothing to make us safer. I mean, really, how many lives is it going to save because a potential terrorist says, "hey, if they catch me, I'm fine with being executed, but I really don't want them to take away my citizenship too, so maybe I shouldn't go through with this." It's a dumb idea that won't accomplish anything other than making people FEEL like they've done something to make us safer, when they haven't.

From Jake Tapper:
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today indicated no one in the White House supports the legislation introduced today by Sens. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., that would give the State Department the power to revoke the citizenship of American terrorism suspects.

“I have not heard anybody inside the administration that's been supportive of that idea,” Gibbs said.

Gibbs said he had “not heard large enumerations on why, except that I don't think anybody would find that to be such an effective way.”

Lieberman offered the legislation today along with Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and Reps. Jason Altmire, D-Penn., and Charlie Dent, R-Penn, which would add to the existing federal statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1481, which identifies seven categories of actions for which U.S. citizens lose their citizenship. The legislation, called the Terrorist Expatriation Act, would authorize the State Department to revoke the citizenship of any U.S. national who provides material support or resources to a Foreign Terrorist Organization or who engages in or supports hostilities against the United States or its allies.
Read the rest of this post...

Live blogging of the British elections



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Not to go all English on you, but there seems to be considerable interest over on this side of the Atlantic in what's going on with the British elections. Greg Mitchell is live blogging it. And for live tweets, go here: @UKelection2010 Read the rest of this post...

British election exit poll: Tories (conservatives) to be 21 short of majority



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
BBC:
David Cameron will fall 21 seats short of a Commons majority, according to a BBC/Sky/ITV general election exit poll.

The Conservatives would have 305 MPs, up 95 on 2005, Labour would have 255, down 94, and the Lib Dems 61, down 1. Nationalists and others would have 29.

Downing Street sources have said Gordon Brown will try to form a coalition government - although initial results suggest he would struggle to do so.
Read the rest of this post...

GOP voter enthusiasm advantage of Dems shrinks, but still at 10 points



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Good news, but not good enough news:
Republican registered voters' enthusiasm about voting in this year's midterm elections has declined significantly in recent weeks. As a result, Republicans' advantage over Democrats on this measure has shrunk from 19 points in early April to 10 points in the latest weekly aggregate.
Give people a reason to be excited, give them something to vote for. And it can't just be "it would really suck if the GOP took over Congress." Read the rest of this post...

Interior suspends planning for Virginia offshore oil-and-gas lease sale



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
We shouldn't be surprised, considering - but still, it's good news. From The Hill:
The Interior Department is formally suspending its planning for the sale of oil-and-gas leases off Virginia’s coast, underscoring new uncertainties about expanded drilling in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Interior’s Minerals Management Service is canceling three public “scoping meetings” for the lease sale that were scheduled later this month, and indefinitely postponing the public comment period. The action will be announced in Friday's Federal Register.
Read the rest of this post...

Deficit Commission's closed-door meetings raises concerns about 'backroom deals' to undermine Social Security



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
If Dan Froomkin is concerned, I'm concerned:
Members of President Obama's deficit commission huddled behind closed doors Wednesday despite pleas from the left and right that they hold all their meetings in public.

The move only heightens suspicion that rather than forging a national consensus on future spending priorities, the commission's work will consist of backroom dealings in which members of the Washington aristocracy find high-minded excuses for cutting the social safety net.

Bruce Reed, the commission's executive director, assured the Huffington Post there is nothing sinister about holding working group meetings like today's in private. But he had no good reason why they shouldn't be held in public, either.

"The smaller working group meetings are not decision making meetings," he said. "It's not practical to have C-SPAN there anytime two or more fiscal commission members are gathered.... We're going to have some boring meetings in public -- and some boring meetings by ourselves."
And, Dan asked the right question:
But what's the harm of letting the public into the other meetings as well?
Bruce Reed couldn't really provide an answer. That's really worrisome. Read the rest of this post...

Stock markets are on a wild ride this afternoon, drop almost 900 points before rebounding



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Over the past hour or so, the Dow dropped almost 900 points. It's come back since then, but is still way down for the day. CNN's chryon reads "Dow Plummets over Greece Crisis." The afternoon has seen a wild ride. Via Google Financial, here's how things looked at 3:20 PM for the Dow:


Imagine if the Senate were currently debating Wall Street reform while this was happening..... Read the rest of this post...

White House tells liberals to wait to make financial reform stronger in conference



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Two words: Public option. We were repeatedly told the Senate health care reform bill could be "fixed," made better, in conference. Then Scott Brown happened. There is never a guarantee that things will be fixed in conference. Liberals shouldn't buy it. Let the administration, or whomever, try to water the bill down in conference if they feel the liberal's amendments are too strong.

From the NYT:
Liberal Democrats in the Senate, emboldened by a wave of populism, are trying to make financial regulatory legislation far tougher on Wall Street, potentially restricting or breaking up the biggest banks and financial companies.
White House officials noted that the administration supported some of the liberal amendments, though perhaps not in the precise form in which they are being offered, and would have ample opportunity to shape the final regulatory package when the Senate bill was melded with the version adopted by the House of Representatives last December.
Read the rest of this post...

You Think the Greek Economy is Scary... or 'Why Spain is Sort of Like Florida'



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Here at AMERICAblog we have higher than the average number of Greek Americans per blog. Though my last name doesn't show it, I am a proud descendant of a Greek restaurant owner in New York Cty. That means I pay somewhat more attention to the Greek economic mess than I might otherwise, and have at least as compassionate a view as you are likely to find among professional economists. Having said that, I think the Greek situation is a disaster, certainly for them and possibly for the Euro zone in general. The previous Greek governments did indeed play fast and loose with accounting, and Greece is indeed way too overburdened with unnecessary public sector workers.

But all that is no excuse to plunge the country into an economic disaster if it isn't necessary, or at least if it can be lessened somewhat. No question about it, the Greeks will have to undergo some austerity for a while, and if they are EVER going to pay off their mounting external debt they will need to export more and import less. Given prices and wages that are too high to be competitive with the rest of Europe, they have two options:

1. Leave the euro and devalue vis-a-vis the rest of Europe. This would, at a stroke, lower all the relative prices but at the cost of massive bank instability and credit contraction.

2. Stay in the euro zone, but force every price and wage in the economy to drop the necessary amount (maybe 25% just to guess at a number). This could work, but at the price of a massive depression and very possibly enough "civil unrest" to cause a government overthrow.

Either of these options would be very very unpleasant for Greece, but could well leave the rest of the Euro zone intact, if not the picture of economic stability and health. But what if other Euro zone countries got in to similar trouble? What then?

Once the unthinkable has happened it becomes much easier to think it could happen in more than one place - and Spain is likely to be a major firewall for the EU, since it is possible (though painful) to amputate smaller peripheral countries like Greece or Portugal, but much harder when we start talking about large countries more essential to the core of the union like Spain.

That there are problems at all in Spain helps to show that Greece's problems aren't all a result of spendthrift politicians, as the deficit scolds here would have you believe. Spain did everything it was supposed to - it had a sensible fiscal policy which resulted in surpluses and pretty much toed the line on everything the EU wanted it to. But Spain had a building boom much like Florida did in the USA - a massive influx of investment that built endless rows of condos on the Costa del Sol, and employed thousands of construction workers, pushing up wages and prices beyond neighbors in the EU. There, as in Florida, the bubble eventually popped.

Well OK you might say, Florida has a single currency with the rest of the US just like Spain does with the rest of Europe, so what is the problem? Well, for starters, all those unemployed Floridians can go look for work in Texas or New York or anywhere else in the USA without any problem at all, and many have done just that. It is much harder for a Spaniard to up stakes and move to France or Germany even if they are technically allowed to do so. Why? Among other reasons, many Spanish workers don't speak French or German, whereas the Floridian, the Texan and the New Yorker share a common tongue.

Equally important, as soon as Florida started hitting the skids, there were automatic fiscal transfers to Florida that kicked in without any debate or delay - unemployment checks were sent out, food stamps were issued, and because unemployment was so high, fewer taxes were collected. All of this amounted to an automatic transfer from relatively better off states to hard hit states like Florida.

No such transfers can happen in Europe - with the Germans balking at even their share of a Greek bailout, it is hard to imagine them doing more than a drop in the bucket of what Spain might need, should it come to that.

So what will happen? It is pretty much inevitable that there will be a period of fiscal austerity for all of the EU - and the credit contraction that is already happening because of the events of the past two years will get even tighter. Should Greece be followed by other countries into default, then we can expect the mother of all credit contractions to follow. And THAT should scare the crap out of all of us - the bank failures of the Great Depression started in Austria and spread worldwide. Nobody will be immune, including the USA, and especially including our nascent recovery.

There. I have it off my chest. That's my nightmare scenario. Read the rest of this post...

The revenge of Demon Sheep



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
From the California Democratic Party and the DSCC, one of the most brilliant political ads/stunts I've ever seen.

You may have seen a few months ago that Carly Fiorina, who's running for Barbara Boxer's Senate seat, launched an ad/YouTube movie attack against one of her GOP opponents, Tom Campbell. It portrayed Campbell as a sort of demon sheep. It was very weird. You can watch it here.

Well, the Democrats have struck back. Their video is brilliant.

Read the rest of this post...

Wellpoint's pathetic response to an article on how it drops coverage for women with breast cancer when they begin treatment



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
First, here's what Wellpoint did:
One after another, shortly after a diagnosis of breast cancer, each of the women learned that her health insurance had been canceled. First there was Yenny Hsu, who lived and worked in Los Angeles. Later, Robin Beaton, a registered nurse from Texas. And then, most recently, there was Patricia Relling, a successful art gallery owner and interior designer from Louisville, Kentucky.

None of the women knew about the others. But besides their similar narratives, they had something else in common: Their health insurance carriers were subsidiaries of WellPoint, which has 33.7 million policyholders -- more than any other health insurance company in the United States.

The women all paid their premiums on time. Before they fell ill, none had any problems with their insurance. Initially, they believed their policies had been canceled by mistake.

They had no idea that WellPoint was using a computer algorithm that automatically targeted them and every other policyholder recently diagnosed with breast cancer. The software triggered an immediate fraud investigation, as the company searched for some pretext to drop their policies, according to government regulators and investigators.
Here is part of Wellpoint's defense for dropping women with breast cancer from their health insurance coverage:
In fact, last year less than one-tenth of 1 percent of our individual members' policies were rescinded.
Wow, one-tenth of one percent. So Wellpoint just admitted that one out of every thousand policyholders will get dropped. Imagine how many policyholders Wellpoint has, and thus how many that adds up to. One in a thousand. If those were your odds at winning the lottery, you'd be ecstatic, because they're not small at all. Of course, it's not the lottery. Or is it? Read the rest of this post...

Obama called the teabaggers 'teabaggers' - controversy ensues



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Apparently there's a minor controversy over the use of the term teabagger to refer to members of the Tea Party movement.
ABC News’ Jake Tapper took heat from “some liberal bloggers” when he contrasted President Obama’s call for civility in politics with Obama’s use of the term “tea-bagger” in a November interview for Jonathan Alter’s new book. At issue was Tapper’s failure to point out that the term was originally coined by the Tea Party movement, which he addressed in an update.
The rest of the post goes on to say that the Teabaggers basically coined the term themselves, but it's silly, useless, and counterproductive to call them it anyway. Hmm. I think the Tea Party movement would have grown just fine without us calling them teabaggers -the term ahd nothing to do with the attraction of their movement to the far right of the GOP. As for it being juvenile and ineffective, the left needs to learn a thing or two from the right. They brand us and our ideas as silly and juvenile and ineffective all the time. They use wacky names for us and our proposals. And it works.

As for Jake's point about civility, it's a catch-22 that Obama has faced since the campaign. Because he wanted to run as a nice guy, he's never permitted to fight back against people who eviscerate him on a regular basis. If he does fight back, he's not civil. If he doesn't fight back, he's a wimp. At some point, we need to accept the fact that nice guys can throw a punch too, when merited.

For more laughter, here's Andy Cobb:



And Rachel:

Read the rest of this post...

The 'Drill, Baby, Drill' caucus is shrinking (for now)



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Politicians are running from their support of offshore drilling. But, one of the most delusional statements ever from a politico occurred this week when Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) said, "I am not a handmaiden to the oil industry." If anything, that's an understatement.

Rachel takes notice of other members of Congress who are backing away from their love of oil companies and drilling:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Read the rest of this post...

Thursday Morning Open Thread



View Comments | Reddit | Tumblr | Digg | FARK
Good morning.

It's election day in Great Britain. They're choosing a new Parliament, which will probably result in a new Prime Minister. But, it's a three-way race and the Liberal Democrats are expected to do better than ever before. So, it may even be inconclusive when the results come in later today.

The President is meeting with his full national security team today to discuss Afghanistan and Pakistan. That Pakistan part of the equation has taken on more significance now that the Pakistani Taliban may have played a role in the Times Square bombing.

In Boston, there's a hearing on GLAD's lawsuit against DOMA. The U.S. Department of Justice will be in court to forcefully defend that law. In a conference call on Tuesday, GLAD's lead attorney, Mary Bonauto said that DOJ is a "powerful adversary." Yes, indeed.

What else is happening? Read the rest of this post...


Site Meter