After describing a training exercise — a two-pronged assault on a "neo-Islamic command post" by the "Ohio Defense Force" — Gellman quotes one of the participants (my emphasis):
"I don't know who the redcoats are," says Brian Vandersall, 37, who designed the exercise and tried to tamp down talk of politics among the men. "It could be U.N. troops. It could be federal troops. It could be Blackwater, which was used in Katrina. It could be Mexican troops who are crossing the border."Here are the details that make it certain our guess about these groups is right. There's the story of James von Brunn, the guy who killed the guard at the National Holocaust Museum last year; his "other" target was David Alexrod. Or the tale of James Cummings, shot to death by her abused spouse Amber, who was assembling a dirty bomb:
Or it could be, as it was for this year's exercise, an Islamic army marauding unchecked because a hypothetical pro-Muslim President has ordered U.S. forces to leave them alone. But as the drill played out, the designated opponents bore little resemblance to terrorists. The scenario described them as a platoon-size unit, in uniform, with "military-grade hardware, communications, encryption capability and vehicle support." The militia was training for combat against the spitting image of a tactical force from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), FBI or National Guard. "Whoever they are," Vandersall says, "we have to be ready."
As militias go, the Ohio Defense Force is on the moderate side. Scores of armed antigovernment groups, some of them far more radical, have formed or been revived during the Obama years, according to law-enforcement agencies and outside watchdogs.
"His intentions were to construct a dirty bomb and take it to Washington to kill President Obama," Amber Cummings says. "He was planning to hide it in the undercarriage of our motor home." She says her husband had practiced crossing checkpoints with dangerous materials aboard, taking her and their daughter along for an image of innocence.He was smart, and he'd moved the project rather far along. And there's more. Horton calls this "essential reading":
Gellman has brought solid, nuts-and-bolts investigative journalism back to Time magazine. This piece is an eye-opener.Which brings me to the second story in this story. What's going on at Time? Have they decided to "commit journalism," to borrow Maddow's phrase? Newsweek is looking thinner and thinner, a kind of text-filled Penny Saver. If Time is bucking the trends — towards small and more Right — this is welcome news. I even found this in one of their teaser click-aways:
(Watch TIME"s video "WikiLeaks Founder on History's Top Leaks.")Where's the spitting vilification we've come to expect? If real journalism is emerging in the Print Bigs in this country, it's a trend worth watching.
GP Read the rest of this post...