Video: "Sweet Transvestite"

Read the rest of this post...

This just in: Two women accuse Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior

It's a long story, and obviously worth a read. Because the man is running for president, I think it's fair game to ask him to explain the details.

I do, however, worry that these kind of allegations are always presumed true, regardless of whether we have all the facts, and regardless of what the facts actually say. I remember being on a conference call once where I was informed that it was rude to ask a woman to prove a sexual harassment charge against a male coworker - I was told that her allegation was all you needed. And while I can appreciate that such cases might sometimes be hard to prove (even when true), I also appreciate that people sometimes lie in order to hurt others.

I have no idea what the truth is here. And it's admittedly not unpleasant watching a scandal unfold on the other side of aisle. Still, it worries me that there really is no way to live down an incendiary accusation like this, even if it ends up being false. After all, how do you prove what you didn't do to someone else in private?  Then again, it's equally hard to prove what someone did do while you were alone with them, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. Read the rest of this post...

Occupy brings out protesters in Germany

Berlin wouldn't be Berlin without protesters but Occupy is also camping in front of the European Central Bank in Frankfurt as well. Germany has hardly suffered from the economic crisis as badly as other countries in Europe or in the US, but the problem is still obvious.

According to police figures, about 2,500 people rallied in Frankfurt to march on a route that took them past the headquarters of both the German national bank and the European Central Bank (ECB).

The activist group Attac, which organized the event, said at least 5,000 had attended.

Members of the Occupy Frankfurt group, which has been camped outside the ECB for the past two weeks, have said they plan to remain at the site for two more weeks.

In Berlin, some 1,000 protesters gathered outside the main city hall carrying plaques bearing the message "Occupy Berlin."

Read the rest of this post...

Frank Rich on the Occupy Movement—"The whole system is screwed up"

Frank Rich, from his new perch at New York Magazine, has written another long, considered evaluation of the Occupy Movement, focusing on its Wall Street instance.

I disagree with the piece's title ("The Class War Has Begun"), especially since Rich is the man who previously coined the phrase "the Billionaire's Coup," which I have been co-opting ever since.

Nevertheless, the piece is well worth your time. One of its excellencies is that it takes the long view. Here's the opening:

During the death throes of Herbert Hoover’s presidency in June 1932, desperate bands of men traveled to Washington and set up camp within view of the Capitol. The first contingent journeyed all the way from Portland, Oregon, but others soon converged from all over—alone, in groups, with families—until their main Hooverville on the Anacostia River’s fetid mudflats swelled to a population as high as 20,000. The men, World War I veterans who could not find jobs, became known as the Bonus Army—for the modest government bonus they were owed for their service. Under a law passed in 1924, they had been awarded roughly $1,000 each, to be collected in 1945 or at death, whichever came first. But they didn’t want to wait any longer for their pre–New Deal entitlement—especially given that Congress had bailed out big business with the creation of a Reconstruction Finance Corporation earlier in its session. Father Charles Coughlin, the populist “Radio Priest” who became a phenomenon for railing against “greedy bankers and financiers,” framed Washington’s double standard this way: “If the government can pay $2 billion to the bankers and the railroads, why cannot it pay the $2 billion to the soldiers?”

The echoes of our own Great Recession do not end there. Both parties were alarmed by this motley assemblage and its political rallies; the Secret Service infiltrated its ranks to root out radicals. But a good Communist was hard to find. The men were mostly middle-class, patriotic Americans. They kept their improvised hovels clean and maintained small gardens. Even so, good behavior by the Bonus Army did not prevent the U.S. Army’s hotheaded chief of staff, General Douglas MacArthur, from summoning an overwhelming force to evict it from Pennsylvania Avenue late that July. After assaulting the veterans and thousands of onlookers with tear gas, ­MacArthur’s troops crossed the bridge and burned down the encampment. The general had acted against Hoover’s wishes, but the president expressed satisfaction afterward that the government had dispatched “a mob”—albeit at the cost of killing two of the demonstrators. The public had another take. When graphic newsreels of the riotous mêlée fanned out to the nation’s movie theaters, audiences booed MacArthur and his troops, not the men down on their luck. Even the mining heiress Evalyn Walsh McLean, the owner of the Hope diamond and wife of the proprietor of the Washington Post, professed solidarity with the “mob” that had occupied the nation’s capital.

The Great Depression was then nearly three years old, with FDR still in the wings and some of the worst deprivation and unrest yet to come. Three years after our own crash, we do not have the benefit of historical omniscience to know where 2011 is on the time line of America’s deepest bout of economic distress since that era. (The White House, you may recall, rolled out “recovery summer” sixteen months ago.) We don’t know if our current president will end up being viewed more like Hoover or FDR. We don’t know whether Occupy Wall Street and its proliferating satellites will spiral into larger and more violent confrontations, disperse in cold weather, prove a footnote to our narrative, or be the seeds of something big.

What’s as intriguing as Occupy Wall Street itself is that once again our Establishment, left, right, and center, did not see the wave coming or understand what it meant as it broke.

(If you click that link in the 2nd paragraph, you see a nice YouTube of actual 1932 footage; well worth two minutes of your time. And yes, I know that Fr. Coughlin is a seriously mixed bag, but early on he was as FDR–anti-banker as the best of them.)

Here are Rich's comments on class and "class war" — this is mainly right, though I'll leave my disagreement at the edges unexpressed (for now). His point about anger is exactly right.

These efforts to domesticate and contain the protests are unlikely to succeed. It is not frustration that’s roiling America but anger, the anger of a full-fledged class war. ... But the crisp agenda demanded of Occupy Wall Street will not be forthcoming. The inchoateness of our particular class war is central to its meaning. America is not Tahrir Square or the riot-scarred precincts of North London, where everyone knows at birth who is in which class and why. We pride ourselves on being a “classless” democracy. ... The often confusing fluidity of [our]class definitions, especially in an America as polarized as ours is now, may make our home­grown class war more volatile, not less.

He goes on to make his point about confused enemies by contrasting Tea Party Consciousness (my phrase) with the Occupy Movement. Point taken and well made.

Even Steve Jobs (yes, the most recent "tabloid saint" — one of whom no ill can be spoken) comes in for his share of nuanced comment. (Do click and read, if only for that. Rich is not stupid — or unobservant.)

Rich's prognosis is similarly nuanced and well-considered.

The whole system is screwed up. ... Elections are supposed to resolve conflicts in a great democracy, but our next one will not. The elites will face off against the elites to a standoff, and the issues animating the class war in both parties won’t even be on the table.

He's right. Read the part about the intersect of lobbyists and the Congressional Super-Committee, or the section about Obama (both near the end). He doesn't see a near-term resolution (I agree). But he hints that, just as the Bonus Army was a preview of coming (not so attractive) attractions, so could be the Occupy Movement.

At some point, this will have to resolve itself. Either the 99% will stand down and take it, or the 1% will, or there will be something that looks like war, whatever form it takes.

Class war? That started in earnest when the AFL-CIO failed to support the Air Traffic Controllers — and the right-wing race was on.

GP Read the rest of this post...

Christian ring of prayer to surround Occupy group in London, to protect them from cops

It's a great idea if they end up doing this.

Christian groups have drawn up plans to protect protesters by forming a ring of prayer around the camp outside St Paul's Cathedral, should an attempt be made to forcibly remove them.

As the storm of controversy over the handling of the Occupy London Stock Exchange demonstration deepened on Saturday, Christian activists said it was their duty to stand up for peaceful protest in the absence of support from St Paul's. One Christian protester, Tanya Paton, said: "We represent peace, unity and love. A ring of prayer is a wonderful symbol."

With senior officials at St Paul's apparently intent on seeking an injunction to break up the protest, the director of the influential religious thinktank Ekklesia, Jonathan Bartley, said the cathedral's handling of the protest had been a "car crash" and predicted more high-profile resignations from the Church of England.

Meanwhile, the morally bankrupt Church of England is still struggling to put their money where their mouth is and stand up for the people. Then again, the church has centuries of bad behavior under its belt. Read the rest of this post...

Fukushima radiation much worse than previously thought

What's even more difficult in a country like Japan is that it's already a geographically small country that is densely populated. It's hard to imagine the health studies that are in the works are going to deliver encouraging news but that's for another day. Bad news.

The Fukushima nuclear disaster released twice as much of a radioactive substance into the atmosphere as Japanese authorities estimated, reaching 40 percent of the total from Chernobyl, a preliminary report says.

The estimate of much higher levels of radioactive cesium-137 comes from a worldwide network of sensors. Study author Andreas Stohl of the Norwegian Institute for Air Research says the Japanese government estimate came only from data in Japan, and that would have missed emissions blown out to sea.

The study did not consider health implications of the radiation. Cesium-137 is dangerous because it can last for decades in the environment, releasing cancer-causing radiation.

Read the rest of this post...

GOP House majority vulnerable in 2012

HuffPost reports on a poll that came out earlier in the week, but it's important - it's from PPP, the polling firm that gets elections right more often than anyone else.

A new survey sponsored by a Democratic super PAC reveals that several Republican-held House seats could be competitive next year as Democrats look to gain 25 seats to take back the House of Representatives.

The poll, conducted by Public Policy Polling on behalf of the Democratic super PAC, "House Majority PAC," shows 12 Republican incumbents in a vulnerable position heading into their reelection campaigns: fewer than 50 percent of voters in their districts would vote to reelect them.

"These polls illustrate that Republican incumbents running in swing districts across the country are in serious trouble and Republican control of the House is in serious jeopardy," House Majority PAC Executive Director Alixandria Lapp said in a press release.

The poll comes as Democrats have retaken the lead on the generic House ballot question, which answers whether voters want to support a Democratic or Republican candidate in their district. An Oct. 10 Reuters poll showed Democrats ahead 48 percent to 40 percent over the Republicans, and an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll also on Oct. 10 found the Democrats with a 45 percent to 41 percent lead.

Read the rest of this post...