News that the most recent census results found more people renting in London than owning their own homes is not entirely unexpected. Even in the days when it was possible to get a 100% mortgage, when the housing market was more buoyant, private renting doubled in the capital.
There is, of course, much more that must be done to support people into owner occupation - a cut in stamp duty would help, as will the mayor's recent reductions in red tape and a £100m boost for more innovative models of home ownership. Nonetheless, it is time to recognise the vital role renters play in London's housing market and its economy. That's why the mayor recently outlined major proposals on the future of the private rented sector, which aim to build on the aspects which have made it successful.
The mayor's blueprint sets three key challenges. First, how the growth in renting can be harnessed to further boost house-building, creating thousands more homes and jobs; second, how to promote high standards that benefit landlords and tenants; and third, how longer tenancies could be piloted in recognition that many renters want greater security - especially families who represent a 20% growth in the sector.
Moving towards a stronger system of self-regulation for landlords and agents is the best way to protect investment in the sector, while at the same time improving standards. The alternative - more red tape, regulation and rent controls - is unthinkable given the disastrous impact it would have for the economic contribution that the sector makes.
The centrepiece is the mayor's London Rental Standard, with twelve core standards that should be consistent across accreditation bodies - ranging from making sure every tenant has a written contract, to rapid repairs and deposit security. It proposes a major expansion in the number of accredited landlords and agents, and its success will depend on the industry taking the standard and implementing it. It doesn't require new legislation. Local authorities have existing powers to stamp out the very worst landlords who blight the reputation of the sector, including those who have created the blight of 'beds in sheds'.
The other big issue is housing supply. We need to build more homes to buy and to rent. Most of the growth in the private rented sector has come from existing housing stock brought by 'buy to let' investors. This often means converting older houses where reception rooms become bedrooms and bathrooms are shared. It is time for a greater contribution to future growth which should come from purpose-designed 'build to let', offering services such as an on site concierge, where house builders can use build-to-let homes to accelerate delivery. To support this, the mayor is launching a design competition for the best custom-designed, purpose-built private rented accommodation. It could also help to unlock some of the 170,000 homes that have planning consent but which are not being built.
It is clear that top-down regulation will only serve to deter investors at a time when more, not less, investment is needed. Instead, the mayor's proposals aim to work towards an improved private rented offer by putting Londoners and landlords in the driving seat.
Natalie Bennett: An Historic Day - What Will MPs Do With the Welfare Bill?
London | Flats & Houses for Rent | Gumtree.com
Flats and houses to rent in London | Property To Let | PrimeLocation
Flats to rent in London. London Letting Agents.
Rental market in London and the south-east is 'overheating' | Money ...
David Beckham rents £20million South London home from Ghost owner
Families facing squeeze as rents rise fastest in the suburbs
London rental sector "needs greater regulation"
Soaring rents are forcing us out, say Brixton market traders
Previewing Your Comment.
This comment has not yet been postedwe just need rents to come down, tied to mortgage rates so no buy to lets get screwed, and to stop seeing homes as a profit making 'investment'. we cannot afford to buy and sell and rent for profit on a small island.
Sure, some profit if the mortgage is paid, or you get the mortgage paid by the tenant. But no more than that. That should be the maximum.
Strange, isnt it, how 'top down' economics wher the wealthiest get the tax breaks is 'good' but 'top down' regulation is bad...
another smokescreen, curing some symptoms, ignoring the cause.
not anymore.
if you cant work out a simple system for regulation, have a look at Denmark, they manage just fine, and have limited beaurocracy, as a rule.
so private landlords could no longer exploit the high levels of housing benefit available.......
Solving the housing crisis is not about building more housing it's about making existing stock more accessible. If landlords are concerned with rent arrears and or damage to property, there must be ways to satisfy those concerns via arrangements with the local council or by charging a waiver/excess insurance.
This needs to get sorted before changes to housing benefit, council tax, the bedroom tax and the universal credit comes into place this April 2013. Do nothing and rogue landlords will corner the private rented sector. I wrote to the then Housing Minister Grant Shapps about these issues but he wasn’t in the slightest bit interested.
These offer advice and support for renters regarding their rights and responsibilities.
As a renter, I initially felt like I was in an information blackout compared to the Landlords and Letting Agents. You can search online for advice, or go to the CAB, but there aren't the strong institutions that other European countries offer.
That tells you everything you need to know about the housing policy of Tory and Labour over the last 30 years.
The priority has been to see housing as an investment vehicle for capital, not as homes for people.
Just as the concept of 'full employment' as a political goal is no longer talked about, it seems politicians have completely given in to the idea that fewer and fewer people, especially the young, will ever be able to call a home their own.
Very sad and needs fighting.
welcome to Huff Post
Loading comments…