[Kenwood] Re: Kenwood Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19
Radio Dude
hypergolic at comcast.net
Mon Oct 18 20:35:02 EDT 2004
unsubscribe please.
----- Original Message -----
From: <kenwood-request at mailman.qth.net>
To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:11 AM
Subject: Kenwood Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19
> Send Kenwood mailing list submissions to
> kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> kenwood-request at mailman.qth.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> kenwood-owner at mailman.qth.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Kenwood digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: BPL (Clark Savage Turner)
> 2. Re: BPL (Clark Savage Turner)
> 3. RE: BPL (Berry Griffin)
> 4. BPL (Ron Lape)
> 5. TS940 Lamps (jim best)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:05:36 -0700
> From: Clark Savage Turner <csturner at kcbx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] BPL
> To: "Dan Cotsirilos" <dcsfree at worldnet.att.net>
> Cc: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <E8A30CC6-2077-11D9-84BF-0003937A2CB6 at kcbx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Oct 17, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Dan Cotsirilos wrote:
>
>> the rules are there are no rules. if it involves big business or the
>> government the people stand no chance of winning in court.
>
> Not quite true. I understand that there are some cases that defy
> normal understanding, and that the scales are often tipped in favor of
> the "bigger" interests, there are some rules that are respected by all
> parties. Thank goodness there are still some of them. There are
> important Court (and legislative) cases that go different directions
> than just large special interests. I find the press would tell another
> story, but I don't usually believe the press has the complete story,
> especially when writing about the law :-) (or heck, amateur radio!)
>>
>> WHEN THE PEOPLE STOP USING THE GOV TO CONTROL THE CORPS THEN THE CORPS
>> WILL USE THE GOV TO CONTROL THE PEOPLE!
>
> I understand your sentiment here, as far as I can tell.
>
> I still think our efforts in BPL are well placed with our neighbors and
> with the ARRL, we can make headway in the long run.
>
> Clark
> WA3JPG
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:09:49 -0700
> From: Clark Savage Turner <csturner at kcbx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] BPL
> To: bcarling at cfl.rr.com
> Cc: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <7FE267DA-2078-11D9-84BF-0003937A2CB6 at kcbx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Brian Carling wrote:
>
>> On 17 Oct 2004 at 12:06, Clark Savage Turner wrote:
>>
>>> And, as someone else mentioned, we have no right to amateur radio. It
>>> is a privilege.
>>
>> Ah the concept of "rights."
>> OTOH we have no "right" to anything.
>> The Bill of Rights may assert things but if someone triumps
>> it that is then not a right either.
>>
>> We have no right to food clothing etc.
>> Might is right.
>>
>> That is sad but that is what we have come down to .
>>
>> Yes I do believe it is a downward negative trend.
>> Righteousness is slipping fast IMHO.
>
> I don't think this way, there is a difference in a "right" to freedom
> of speech (pretty good and possibly getting better under the so-called
> "conservative" judges) and a "privilege" to use the public airwaves.
> Think about it, the airwaves belong to the public, that makes perfect
> sense. No one has any special "right" to that, it should be used to
> the benefit of the public in general. Now, we can argue about what the
> public benefit really is, that might be interesting.
>
> As amateurs, I think we have a big responsibility to justify our use of
> spectrum. We have done so quite well in the past, and must continue to
> do so. I don't quibble with that principle. I just argue with some at
> the FCC who don't value amateur radio contributions to the public
> interest as much as I believe is due.
>
> Clark
> WA3JPG
>
> P.S. And I think I do it best with my Kenwood TS 850 !
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:02:18 -0700
> From: Berry Griffin <serazin at pacbell.net>
> Subject: [Kenwood] RE: BPL
> To: Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <4172DDDA.4070609 at pacbell.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Here is an interesting look at BPL from a technical standpoint from a
> technial viewpoint.
>
> http://www.technewsworld.com/story/37378.html
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:06:00 -0400
> From: "Ron Lape" <k3mi at atlanticbb.net>
> Subject: [Kenwood] BPL
> To: "KENWOOD" <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <000701c4b495$7cd5f520$0465ffcf at k3mi>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
> reply-type=original
>
> It's nice that everyone is so concerned but isn't it about time to use
> this
> forum for it's real purpose....Kenwood systems. 27 BPL's a day is enough.
> No flames needed. I have already sent a registered complaint to the FCC
> concerning BPL and have sent in messages for all but one of the requests
> for
> input.
>
> 73's Ron K3MI
> Why do I have to swear on a Bible in court when the
> Ten Commandments aren't allowed in the courthouse?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:04:37 -0600
> From: "jim best" <james9194 at bresnan.net>
> Subject: [Kenwood] TS940 Lamps
> To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <000e01c4b484$879fdc20$6501a8c0 at fireball>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> I have my sub display problem fixed. Clif was correct. I
> heated the joints
> on the voltage regulator and it works great. I'm still
> having the problem
> with the PLL when the radio is cold. After warm up it works
> fine.
>
> One other question for you 940 owners. I have a burned out
> lamp in
> the S meter and both lamps in the sub display are burned
> out. Does
> anyone have a good substitute part number and source?
>
> Thanks all for the help thus far.
>
> 73 de Jim
> WU7G
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
>
>
> End of Kenwood Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19
> **************************************
More information about the Kenwood
mailing list