Showing posts with label SYGA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SYGA. Show all posts

Friday, July 31, 2009

Stand Your Ground Award: House Progressive Caucus

It's hard to know how long this victory will last, but for now, there's at least some hope that there will be a public option in the House's version of the health care reform bill:

The chairman of a pivotal House committee announced Friday that he had reached an agreement with other Democrats that would allow the panel to approve sweeping health legislation later in the day.
...
To avoid cutting subsidies for low-income people, [committee chairman Rep. Henry] Waxman said, Democrats would find additional savings elsewhere in the bill.

Representative Diana DeGette, Democrat of Colorado, said the Blue Dog deal would hold down costs. But she said, "It was paid for on the backs of people who cannot afford health insurance," so liberals raised concerns.

House Panel Reaches Deal on Health-Care Bill

Earlier in the week, Waxman had reached a compromise with conservative Democrats on the bill, which, as Rep. DeGette said, had the effect of making health care nearly as unobtainable for the poor as it is now. For once, progressives actually stood up and objected:

In a letter to be delivered to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House health care leaders, Congressional progressives will reject a compromise Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) forged with Blue Dog Democrats to advance legislation. "We regard the agreement reached by Chairman Waxman and several Blue Dog members of the [Energy and Commerce] Committee as fundamentally unacceptable," it reads.

This agreement is not a step forward toward a good health care bill, but a large step backwards. Any bill that does not provide, at a minimum, for a public option with reimbursement rates based on Medicare rates - not negotiated rates - is unacceptable.

...
Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus are hoping 50 or more members will sign on, to prove they have enough votes to kill the final bill.

In Letter, House Progressives Object To Blue Dog Public Option Compromise

The letter reads in part:

To offset the increased costs incurred by adopting the provisions advocated by the Blue Dog members of the Committee, the agreement would reduce subsidies to low- and middle-income families, requiring them to pay a larger portion of their income for insurance premiums, and would impose an unfunded mandate on the states to pay for what were to have been Federal costs.

In Letter, House Progressives Object To Blue Dog Public Option Compromise

Eventually, 53 57 signed on. This was enough get Pelosi's attention, and the deal was revised. As long as the Republicans continue to vote against any bill that has even a hint of Democratic Party involvement in it, the progressives can block legislation as effectively as the Blue Dogs can.

For (finally) standing up for progressive values, the House Progressive Caucus members who signed that letter, particularly Rep. DeGette, have won the first Stand Your Ground Award of 2009. This award recognizes members of Congress who stand up for principles of freedom and liberalism. It is by far the rarest award granted by this site. There's no value to this award beyond whatever satisfaction the notice brings to its recipients.

Congratulations to the Progressive Caucus. In the future, let's see more of this.

(h/t to Comrade E.B. Misfit for the TPM link.)

UPDATE: The original version of this article, entitled "Progressives Win One", was revised to include the award and the quote from the letter.

UPDATE 2: According to this page of the Progressive Caucus's letter, there are now 57 members of Congress who signed it. That list includes SnS Blue candidates Donna Edwards and Eric Massa.


Monday, December 17, 2007

Stand Your Ground Award: Chris Dodd



It's not often we give one of these away. I much prefer giving the "Stand Your Ground" away to giving one of this award or this award. Sadly, so few politicians earn this one. Today, though, Chris Dodd stood up and was counted.

As Senator Dodd's campaign site explains:

Majority Leader Harry Reid has just pulled the FISA bill from consideration in this session. It will be brought up at some point next month.

Without Senator Dodd's leadership today, it is safe to assume that retroactive immunity would have passed.

...

Throughout the day Senator Dodd stood on the Senate floor and spoke out against the Bush administration's abuse of executive powers. He spoke out against granting retroactive immunity for telecom companies who helped the Bush administration spy on Americans without warrant - noting that if we grant immunity now, we may never know the full extent of what happened behind closed doors and what arguments were used to justify warrantless surveillance.

Constitution Protected...For Now

With little outward help from his fellow Presidential candidates Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, Dodd stood up to this foolish bill. He has, with the help of many blogs, progressive groups, and previous SYG awardee Russ Feingold, shaken the Democratic "leadership" in Congress up enough that they've tabled the bill, at least for now.

I have no illusions that this is over, but it is a good sign. Hopefully, the pebbles will once again be allowed to vote.

(h/t Taylor Marsh)

UPDATE: Eli explains what would happen if we had a sane Congress:

I would love to see the Democrats now adopt a minimalist, take-it-or-leave-it position now, along the lines of, “Okay, Dubya, we’re going to pass a bill that resolves the foreign-to-foreign-via-the-US problem… and absolutely nothing else. If you don’t want to sign it, we’re perfectly happy to let the Protect America Act lapse in February, and we don’t think anyone will notice the difference. Your move, tough guy.”

FISA Update

That's about what should happen, but this Congress could screw up a sunny day. I think the best we can hope for is that they just forget what they were doing and go home.

UPDATE (Dec. 18): Matt Browner-Hamlin's blog at Sen. Dodd's website has several entries today about the FISA bill. Here he quotes the Senator as he was speaking on the floor of the Senate yesterday:

No more blowing through the laws. Not here. Not tonight. Not this member. Not on this bill. No more blowing through the bills. You don't get granted retroactive immunity - not as long as I can stand here and fight this. And I intend to do just that.

No More Blowing Through The Laws

Dodd spent ten hours on the floor yesterday to stop this thing. Without him, I think there's little doubt it would have passed.

In contrast to Senators Clinton and Obama, who have used their influence as candidates largely to bolster their own campaigns and have avoided taking difficult stands whenever possible, Dodd did something useful with his - he prevented a horrible bill from passing. Clinton and Obama had to be repeatedly goaded into making even tepid statements in support of this stand. That contrast alone makes this a special moment in what's been a very dark year.

As I've mentioned before, talk is often cheap in politics. Actions like Chris Dodd's, which back up those words, are the things that are really noteworthy.


Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Senator Feingold On Iraq



Jane Hamsher writes at Firedoglake:

Russ Feingold proves he’s maybe the only one in the Senate who can read a fucking poll:

One question that I keep getting asked by reporters is why Democrats aren’t reaching out to moderate Republicans to come up with some sort of consensus legislation. I also see stories criticizing the Democratic leadership for failing to bring in Republican moderates to pass legislation. My response is simple — what good is getting 60 or 67 votes to pass a nonbinding Sense of the Senate resolution on Iraq that doesn’t bring the troops home? When I hold my town hall meetings in Wisconsin, nobody is asking me to push for an empty compromise. They ask me how we can finally end this war. This summer we heard a growing chorus of Republicans call for change in Iraq but their words have proven to be empty. If members are serious about changing course in Iraq, Feingold-Reid is the surest way to do it.


No, Actually, Let’s Talk About the War Now

There are a handful of Senators who understand this, it would seem. Most of us can name them: Kerry, Dodd, Kennedy, etc. I don't know what smelly orifice the remaining Democratic Senators have their heads inserted into, but they'd better pull them out and smell the coffee, or damn few people will be showing up next election day.

I've been saying since well before I had this blog that the only strategy that makes sense is for the Democrats to resist this war any way they can. Passing the sort of useless resolutions that "moderate" Republicans will agree to isn't resisting. They need to make the Republicans say no to ending the war, and they need to make Americans aware that they're doing it. The more they do that, the worse it will be for the Republicans. Eventually, even the Republicans will get the message. Unfortunately, right now most Democrats are as clueless as their colleagues across the aisle.

Russ Feingold gets the "Stand Your Ground" award today. There's no more monetary value to this award than there is to the Roll Over and Beg Award, but it's considerably more prestigious, and you don't have to figure out which dog biscuit you like best.

UPDATE: I neglected to mention that this is also the inaugural Stand Your Ground" award. Just goes to show we don't do a lot of navel-gazing around here. At least, we try not to do it in print.

The Feingold-Reid amendment was defeated today, 68 to 28 with 4, including Barack Obama, not voting. See Taylor's article for a list of the Democrats who voted for it. No Republicans voted for it, of course. Here are the 21 Democrats who voted against it:

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Levin (D-MI)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Salazar (D-CO)
Tester (D-MT)
Webb (D-VA)

You'll note this list is very similar to this list. Pretty soon, those folks will have enough biscuits that they can open up a pet food store.