There is no technological way to defy the original intent of copyright without also violating the original "old fashioned" copyright laws. There never will be any such technological threat.

But it is possible to defy that intent by passing new laws, or by legitimizing Digital Restrictions Management systems. Government should not be creating new crimes by outlawing things that have been legal up to now.

Government should not be helping copyright holders to prevent their works from falling into the Public Domain by legitimizing the use of technological measures to keep works from being accessible in the future. This defeats the intent of copyright.

Government should not be helping copyright holders to prevent their works from falling into the Public Domain by continuously increasing the duration of copyright for indefinate periods. This defeats the intent of copyright.

Government should not change the implementation of copyright law in any way that is incompatable with its intent as described in the Constitution, unless a Constitutional Ammendment is passed to that effect.

Repeal the anticircumvention provision of DMCA, and do not enact any additional laws that mandate or legitimize Digital Restrictions. If the Senate feels it must take a stand on Digital Restrictions Management, then outlaw it, as it almost always violates the intent of copyright, in favor of the copyright holder. Remember that copyright has always been a quid-pro-quo arrangement where the holder gets special rights for a limited time, in exchange for something. Don't lose sight of what the public is supposed to get out the deal.