[cleaned up a bit to make, hopefully, clearer]
Part of the reason the
current frantic
scribbling about US journalism's prospects of
economic dissolution seems arid, tepid and inconsequential is that it takes place within the same tidy, unreal frame in which news is conventionally represented as taking place. Now that the framers of the journalistic gaze are turning it upon
itself their own predicament, they're missing the boat. (Sonderman good on this
here and
here. I attempt to describe the invisible vessel
here and
here).
Our hypothesis: Content providers have been working on the plantations without making a nickle from the plantation owners - the
ILECS - who rake in profits driven by the labor of the content creators.
What is noteworthy, and indisputable, is that very little of what is contained in the frames of the gazers listed below can be found anywhere in USian media (other than Democracy Now) - even now, after all the economic lies that have been exposed. What do USian journalists read, anyway? There's a form of transparency I'd love to see. Do they ever read actual critique?
A brief supplemental reading list, from
here:
Labels: Disaster Capitalism, ethical economy, gathering darkness of all USian culture, network economics, news, newspapers, these are the people purporting to know the news