Here's George Will wiping the floor with Juan Williams, eating his lunch, drinking his milkshake, and then letting Williams escape with the last word.
Will starts by explaining why all rational people want to see ObamaCare defeated. That's easy.
Then Williams start in on Social Security, arguing that it's now incredibly popular, and that ObamaCare will soon achieve the same level of popularity. AND WILL LETS HIM GET AWAY WITH IT!!!
All you have to do, George, is stand on the table, bang your shoe on the rafters, and say "JUAN, YOU OVERPAID IDIOT, SOCIAL SECURITY IS BROKE!! THERE IS NO MONEY LEFT IN THE FUND!!! ENRON WAS POPULAR! LEHMAN BROTHERS WAS POPULAR!! WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT POPULAR!! THE WHITED SEPULCHRE WILL NEVER, EVER COLLECT WHAT HE PUT INTO THE FUND! IT'S F***ING BROKE!! BROKE AS THE TEN COMMANDMENTS!!!"
Go here to read about George Will's slow transformation from Conservative to Libertarian.
Go here to read about Barack Obama's slow transformation from opponent of gay marriage to gay marriage opponent. (He claims that his stance is evolving.)
Seriously, this is good news about George Will. Even when I totally disagree with him, I like his writing style.
I don't know how I missed this, but Joe Biden, using his own lips, teeth, tongue and throat, under his own free will, made the following statement a few weeks ago:
“Every single great idea that has marked the 21st century, the 20th century and the 19th century has required government vision and government incentive,” he said. “In the middle of the Civil War you had a guy named Lincoln paying people $16,000 for every 40 miles of track they laid across the continental United States. … No private enterprise would have done that for another 35 years.”
You can go here to experience a joyous rebuttal from The Cato Institute:
Early American railroads were built almost entirely with private funds. These railroads provided such superior transportation that by 1850 they had put most toll roads and canals out of business. Individual states still competed with one another for business—and may have offered various favors to the railroads serving those states…. For the most part, however, no federal and few state subsidies went to railroads in the eastern United States.
But what about other areas?
Whenever politicians interfered in the railroad business, however, corruption and inefficiency inevitably occurred.....There was no money to be made from operating a railroad through a desolate wasteland, yet the federal government rewarded railroad contractors with big subsidies: a thirty-year loan at below market interest rates; twenty sections (12,800 acres) of government-owned land for every mile of track; and an additional subsidy of $48,000 for every mile of track laid in mountainous regions.
Thomas Durant, Oakes Ames, and other officers of the Union Pacific Railroad, which went a thousand miles west from Council Bluffs, Iowa, started the Credit Mobilier company in 1867 and retained it to do the construction. Credit Mobilier distributed to shareholders profits estimated at between $7 million and $23 million, depleting the Union Pacific’s resources. In an effort to stop congressional investigations, the officers bribed Speaker of the House James G. Blaine and other congressmen with Credit Mobilier stock. Seldom modest about their thievery, congressmen voted themselves a 50 percent pay raise. The Union Pacific Railroad fell deep into debt, without enough revenue from passengers or shippers, and went bankrupt in 1893.
1872: The New York Sun exposes the Credit Mobilier scandal, perhaps the largest business subsidy scandal of the 19th century.8 Credit Mobilier is a construction company financially controlled by the leaders of the Union Pacific Railroad that makes huge profits at taxpayer expense. Congressman Oakes Ames (R-MA), who is an agent of Credit Mobilier and part-owner, distributes shares of the firm's stock to members of Congress at a discounted value. In return, those members treat Credit Mobilier favorably in a variety of ways, such as by voting to appropriate funds for the firm. The scandal illustrates the corruption that usually results when the government intervenes in the economy and subsidizes businesses.
If that's not enough, George Will opens a great column with Biden's quote. In this case, its about our next transportation-subsidy-scandal-waiting-to-happen....The Chevy Volt. You might think that you've never purchased a Chevy Volt. But you have. Yes, you have.
The federal government, although waist-deep in red ink, offers another bribe: Any purchaser can get a tax credit of up to 50 percent of the cost (up to $2,000) of an extra-powerful (240-volt) charger. California, although so strapped it recently issued IOUs to vendors, offers a $5,000 cash rebate for which Volt buyers are not eligible but purchasers of Nissan's electric Leaf are. Go figure.
In April, in a television commercial and a Wall Street Journal column headlined "The GM Bailout: Paid Back in Full," GM's then-CEO Ed Whitacre said "we have repaid our government loan, in full, with interest, five years ahead of the original schedule." Rubbish.
GM, which has received almost $50 billion in government subventions, repaid a $6.7 billion loan using other federal funds, a TARP-funded escrow account. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) called this a "TARP money shuffle." A commentator compared it to "paying off your Visa credit card with your MasterCard."
Meretricious accounting and deceptive marketing are inevitable when government and its misnamed "private sector" accomplices foist state capitalism on an appalled country. But those who thought the ethanol debacle defined outer limits of government foolishness pertaining to automobiles were, alas, mistaken.
And finally, Reason magazine jumps on the dogpile with this:
Though Biden is generally not to be taken seriously, the government-centrism of his comments are an accurate reflection of his boss, and part of the reason why next Tuesday is going to be an awkward day
of work at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
As it turns out, last Tuesday was an awkward day of work at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Unfortunately, Democrats were replaced by Republicans. Republicans who favor many of the same economic interventions but for different industries. Bummer.
Oh well. Joe Biden really did make that statement. No eggs were thrown and no one laughed because it went largely unreported and unanalyzed in The Mainstream Media. Go here to read about The Mainstream Media's quest for a journalism subsidy.
