Democracy and Media Deregulation at the FCC
Media Ownership Chart. Click to view.
As many BoingBoing readers will know, the FCC is currently considering all-but-abolishing its vestigal rules limiting the number of media outlets a single company can own. This could have as large an impact on your everyday media experiences as the recent Eldred fiasco.
Prior rounds of similar FCC media deregulation have had a disasterous effect on radio, where the resulting concentration of ownership (by "roll-up" companies like ClearChannel Communications) has turned the airwaves in many cities into a cookie-cutter clonescape of formulaic pop stations. The corporate free-for-all hasn't just restricted listener choice among formats, but limited the diversity of what one hears on any given channel. That's because, in the face of fewer, less-distinctive outlets, music producers have been forced to push (read: engineer) pop musical 'acts' that they think the corporate media will buy, virtually sterilizing the dial. (And that, as much as anything else, is why CD sales have been declining.)
Now, under the infamously free-market-oriented FCC Chairman Michael Powell (actual quote: "My religion is the market.",
) the FCC is considering deregulating other, more vital media like newspapers and TV. Powell espouses making a decision based largely on a series of studies which he himself sponsored, and which conclude that removing limits to corporate ownership will have a positive or negligible impact.
Powell's FCC has been incredibly cagey about holding meetings with the public on this issue. They have announced (pdf) a public hearing in Virginia "sometime in February" although they have not announced a date, (or provided one in several email exchanges) and they then held an unannounced meeting at Columbia University in New York two days ago which was (surprise) poorly attended. Powell's own press releases read like exercises in Newspeak, and are worth comparing to those of another FCC commissioner, Michael Copps, the lone FCC dissenter at this point.
I'd like to encourage any BoingBoingers interested to read up on the issue, and consider attending the February meeting when it is announced; those who can't attend can file a public comment via the FCC Web site by following instructions here.
Discuss
posted by Andrew Zolli at 11:56 PM | permalink
"I poisoned P2P networks for the RIAA"
Like many, I tend to consider the (occasional) stories I read in the UK Register with the same bemused suspicion with which I read the contents of the New York Post.
With that caveat out of the way, I was fascinated by the recent Register story on 'Matt Warne', who claims to have inflected P2P networks with useless junk on behalf of the RIAA and its international cousin, the IFPI:
"I suggested that they should put out files with legitimate titles - and put inside them silence or random noise - and saturate the file sharing networks with those files. That did start the poisoning."
Is it true? Who knows... but it does jibe with reality. And it's worth a (sensationalistic, uncorroborated) read.
Discuss
posted by Andrew Zolli at 10:24 PM | permalink
Guestbar Archives