![]() |
![]() |
skippy the bush kangaroo jon stewart says "when i want news, i turn to cnn...and they turn...to...skippy...the bush kangaroo." |
![]() |
![]() 24.9.05 it's not just the cia spooks that use ghost planes the navy, too. a branch of the u.s. navy secretly contracted a 33-plane fleet that included two gulfstream jets reportedly used to fly terror suspects to countries known to practice torture, according to documents obtained by the associated press.but we've been hearing of these ghosts jets for sometime...we just hadn't known the navy was somehow involved... we also know that the cia wasn't the only one using richmor aviation fbi knew terrorists were using flight schools - wapo 9/01rendition. kidnapping. tomaytos. tomahtos. let's call the whole thing off. | posted by cookie jill | 2:58 PM begorra we got an email from mainstusa, who brings our attention the patagonia, ny, where the st. patrick's four is on trial for protesting the war. truth, who writes main st. usa, has done an admirable job of researching this case. the gist of it is, four people protested the war (when it was still upcoming, before shock and awe back in '03) by pouring blood in and around a lansing, ny, recruiting office. the local da was not able to get a conviction from the local jury pool, so he handed it off to the feds...and the feds are prosecuting it to the hilt: the sore loser is tompkins county district attorney george dentes, who, having failed to get a conviction of the four in tompkins county court, persuaded the u. s. attorney for the region to file charges against them in federal court…
dentes originally offered the four a plea bargain that would have avoided jail time, but they refused, went to trial, which ended in a hung jury -- nine for acquittal, three for conviction -- and a mistrial. that should have been the end of it, but dentes, apparently feeling he'd been sandbagged when the judge allowed the four to make their anti-war motivation the focus of their defense, persuaded the feds to take the case, which was then moved to binghamton. the presiding judge, thomas mcavoy, has ruled that the four will not be able to use their antiwar beliefs as a defense, which seems a bit odd in that they did what they did out of conviction that the war is both illegal and immoral. apparently, that standard lawyer term: "it goes to motive, your honor" will not be allowed in this case. this case will be strictly about damaging government property… the guess here is that the four are going to find it more difficult to persuade a jury here than it was in ithaca, especially since the jury will be told to disregard their motives. they will be lucky to get another hung jury, let alone an acquittal. and if they are convicted, let's hope mcavoy is less draconian in sentencing than he was in setting the ground rules. putting these people in prison for several years would be excessive. but whatever the outcome, this trial proves one thing: dragging war protesters before the bar of justice is easier than calling war criminals to account. | posted by skippy | 2:22 PM
![]() remember the japanese termed a new phrase for "barfing"..."to busharoo"...perhaps there should be a new term for "lying" ...."to frist" think progress highlights some good facts about the bad doctor
and back to insider trading:frist on his blind trusts in 2003: right now, i don’t know if i own hca [stock] because it’s a qualified blind trust. [national journal, 1/4/03]this week, frist admited that he knew he owned hca. in fact, he directed his trustees to sell the shares. office of senator bill frist press statement, 9/22/05and then of course we know he's violated the medical code of ethics before.... crooks and liars reminds us of when he broke that code.....as does actupny senate majority leader bill frist, republican of tennessee, who is a physician, insists on being addressed as dr. frist. but his misstatements on abc news’ “this week” last sunday (december 5th, 2004) about hiv and aids caused the liberal oasis web site to claim that frist is in violation of the american medical association’s code of medical ethics that require doctors to “be honest in all professional interactions” and “make relevant information available to the public.”two of the nine principles that make up the foundation of the medical code of ethics are: 2. a physician shall uphold the standards of professionalism, be honest in all professional interactions, and strive to report physicians deficient in character or competence, or engaging in fraud or deception, to appropriate entities. | posted by cookie jill | 2:00 PM yes, he did... in the comments section to this post, kipling asked, "didn't bush say that 'just following orders' will not be an acceptable excuse (in the war on terror, i think it was)?" on march 17, 2003, forty-eight hours before the invasion of iraq, awol announced: ...all iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen carefully to this warning. in any conflict, your fate will depend on your action. do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the iraqi people. do not obey any command to use weapons of mass destruction against anyone, including the iraqi people. war crimes will be prosecuted. war criminals will be punished. and it will be no defense to say, "i was just following orders"...(emphasis mine) i found the reference on my sixth or seventh try in the march 2003 archives of the white house press releases. in the process, i found several other ripsnorters as well. like this one: ...i want americans and all the world to know that coalition forces will make every effort to spare innocent civilians from harm... and this one: ...obviously, and any time one of our soldiers loses a life, i grieve with their parents and their loved ones. and if there is somebody captured, and it looks like there may be, i expect them to be treated humanely... compare that to this one: ...the world is getting a clearer view of the iraqi regime and the evil at its heart. in the ranks of that regime are men whose idea of courage is to brutalize unarmed prisoners... i could go on, but some people's heads may already be spinning, so i'll stop. (i'm feeling a little queasy myself.) in any event, you get the general idea... | posted by Mimus Pauly | 8:17 AM
![]() they are clearly delusional. awol didn't visit texas when rita was coming because it was sunny. yeah. really. stop the laughter. it's true. they thought it wouldn't "look" good with the sun out. president bush was supposed to land here on friday afternoon on the first stop of a tour intended to make clear that he was personally overseeing the federal government's preparations for hurricane rita's landfall. but the weather did not cooperate.oh, yeah...and his lack of leadership is laura's fault. a top republican close to the white house since the earliest days said the absence of a "reelection target" and pressure from first lady laura bush and others to soften his second-term tone conspired to temper bush's swagger well before katrina hit. "a reelection campaign was always the driving principle to force them to get things together," said the gop operative, who would speak candidly about bush only if his name was not used. he said the "brilliance of this team" was always overstated. "part of the reason they looked so good is democrats were so discombobulated." since the election, this official said, white house aides reported that laura Bush was among those counseling bush to change his cowboy image during the final four years. - wapo | posted by cookie jill | 8:15 AM if you voted for awol, you voted for torture
you also voted for the guy who oversaw the transformation of one the country's elite military units (which liberated prisoners from nazi death camps in wwii) into a 21st century s.s. squad. everything they touch turns to death. | posted by Pudentilla | 5:55 AM bush league for bagmen as many of you know, the culture of corruption promoted by the 527, the college republican national committe, has been a source of no little concern to pudentilla [here, here, here, here and here]. digby, this week, provides us with a historical perspective on the crs which connects the dots in a thoughtful and thought provoking way. his conclusion: since nixon, the crs have provided a training regime of anti-democratic morals and tactics - a minor league, if you will, for the criminal conspiracy that the national republican party has become. his conclusion - it will only end when the lot of them are serving time. | posted by Pudentilla | 5:23 AM okay, awol fans, listen up... it does not follow that understanding why people commit torture is the way to justify it. the former can be achieved; the latter cannot. you might pretend it can be justified and go on with your business if you want (hell, it helped al gonzales land the us attorney general slot), but you'll only accomplish two things: 1) paving the way for continued (and more extensive) torture, and 2) giving your enemies an excuse to do the same to our troops should a few of them find the tables have turned. and though you wouldn't stand for that for a second, your outraged cries would ring hollow. when it gets to that point, it's just too goddamned late. then again, having run out of patience with you people from expecting you to come to your senses over this, maybe i'm the one who's been unreasonable. if there's one thing awol has going for him, it's charisma, and he has lots of it. for everything i know, that may be all he needs to survive politically: after all, you've been duped by this guy for several years now, and not just over the prison torture disgraces. giving awol your support has become second nature to you, just as railing against him has for me. maybe my opinion of him has become so jaded, i couldn't switch sides if i wanted to. maybe your opinions of awol are too rosy to permit you to switch. and maybe, having pledged your allegiance to a fraud, even if you do eventually come to your senses, it's too painful to admit, even privately, that you've been gulled -- especially when the gulling has spanned years... (this is what that was all about...) | posted by Mimus Pauly | 3:38 AM 23.9.05 hurrican rita crosby we know it's a big story, and we wish the gulf coast residents well, but... wasn't there anything else in the news to report today? like, the sec investigating dr. sen. bill "here kitty kitty kitty" frist for dumping his hca stock a mere two weeks before the price plunged almost 10%? bloomberg: the u.s. securities and exchange commission and the justice department are investigating senate majority leader bill frist's order to sell all his shares of hca inc. a month before the price dropped on news of weaker-than- expected earnings, frist's office said.
the sec "contacted senator frist's office after the story appeared in the press about the sale," spokesman bob stevenson said in a statement. stevenson said later today that the u.s. attorney general in manhattan also inquired about the stock sale. hca, the biggest u.s. hospital chain said it had received a subpoena from the justice department and "intends to cooperate fully." the twin probes threaten to overshadow a possible 2008 presidential bid by frist, said tom mann, a congressional scholar at the brookings institution in washington. if the complaints are examined and dropped that would clear up the matter and remove it as an obstacle to a candidacy, mann said. any finding that the sale of shares was improper could doom frist's political aspirations, he said. "any hint that he did something wrong would be devastating," mann said. the probes into frist's stock sales are a historical first, said senate associate historian donald ritchie, because no congressional leader has ever faced a federal investigation of stock sales. | posted by skippy | 5:57 PM
![]() and guess it's a different matter if disasters strike in a blue state the bush administration friday denied a wisconsin request for disaster assistance for three counties hit by tornadoes.thanks to the "leftist grandpa" who reminds us that mother nature has been very busy. and he's links to video and photos. (oh...and grandpa...the gas prices were not a hoax. better look for a comfortable saddle!) | posted by cookie jill | 4:44 PM
![]() sfist had a camera.....and hopefully not a heartattack after gasing up. | posted by cookie jill | 3:44 PM no gays please, we're catholic so gays will be banned from becoming priestsfrom now on, in an effort to "purify" the church after the scandals. you want to purify the church? why don't you ban everyone who's been an accessory after the fact to the crime of child rape? you can start with the archbishop you brought to rome - far from u.s. jurisdiction. "gays" didn't molest those kids - "child molesters" did. any psychologist will tell you that child molesters exist among both gays and straights, and that their sexual behavior is driven by non-sexual motivations. it's about power and aggression. but hey, gays always make a handy scapegoat now that it's not fashionable to use jews anymore. even gay men (no women, remember?) who have never engaged in sex of any kind are forbidden. this exposes a huge contradiction in their logic: if being gay is innate, it's not a choice. if it's not a choice, it's not a sin. but if it's not a sin, where's that scapegoat when you need him? wonder if they'll purge historical gays from the church next? the great mystical writer julian of norwich has to go - she was a woman with a man's name. and i've always wondered about my favorite, st. francis. i mean, come on: all he liked to do was romp around in nature and make friends with the animals. sorry, st. francis, you've got to go. but this guy can stay. | posted by RJ Eskow | 1:22 PM when is the use of violence justified? this question came up as i was in an airport waiting to fly coast to coast ( i'm on the road, which is the reason i haven't posted lately) - because they were playing the old song by chicago called "does anybody really know what time it is?" you remember: "a man came up and asked me what the time was that was on my watch, and I said/does anybody really know what time it is?" the use of violence is a highly personal decision, involving both ethical and moral choices based on a spiritual ethos. for me, however, it would be justified if i asked somebody for the time and got this answer. but you'll have to search your consciences and ask yourselves: does anybody really know when it's time to take a swing at that guy from "chicago"? | posted by RJ Eskow | 12:55 PM this says it all: @$$#o!e. (courtsey of crooks and liars...) | posted by Mimus Pauly | 12:46 PM say hello to whatever the hell this is. | posted by skippy | 11:59 AM
setting the stage for the most sweeping restructuring of endangered species protections in three decades, the house resources committee yesterday approved legislation that would strengthen the hand of private property owners and make it harder for federal officials to set aside large swaths of habitat for imperiled plants and animals. - wapo signed by president richard nixon in 1973, the act has served as the primary force behind the recovery of many major species, including the bald eagle, the grizzly bear, and the gray wolf. - defenders of wildlife the endangered species act has been successful now for 30 years. without it, there might not be a single bald eagle or peregrine falcon in our skies; no manatees or cutthroat trout in our waters; no gray wolves or grizzly bears in our forests. and, the esa preserved our natural heritage during a time in which the u.s. economy grew at record rates. - congressman john dingell**update** this just in.... plans are underway to commercialize 15 national parks following is a statement by tom kiernan, president, national parks conservation association: | posted by cookie jill | 9:56 AM it's called dodging responsibility...not dodging the bullet that is what this administration excels at. (actully...i think we can call it criminal negligence.) wonder where those buses were for evacuation? well, you would think that the company our government is paying $100 million dollars annually to do just that would actually show up. but no, they were busy googling for subcontractors. while other busing companies were calling fema offering their services, fema ignored them. while thousands of americans suffered, companies were haggling over who to subcontract to. oh...yeah...it gets worse.
now here comes the real kickers. is it really a surprise that the company that our government pays $100 million a year for disaster transporation is run by a bush buddy? landstar express is a subsidiary of landstar system, a $2 billion company whose board chairman, jeff crowe, also was chairman of the u.s. chamber of commerce, one of the nation's premier business lobbies, from june 2003 until may 2004. and is it really a surprise that even though that company didn't properly do what it was paid to do, our government is going to give it more money? landstar's regulatory filing also said that because of hurricane katrina, the maximum annual value of its government contract for disaster relief services has been increased to $400 million.read the entire article at chicago tribune. (a big tip o' the kangaroo whiskers to the dimslev's kos diary for sinking our soul so early in the morning) | posted by cookie jill | 8:10 AM kleptocracy 101 – if it works, don’t use it; you might help someone limiting government's role - bush favors one-time fixes over boosting existing programs to help katrina victims.as president bush tackles the monumental task of easing the social problems wrought by katrina, he is proving deeply reluctant to use some of the big-government tools at his disposal, apparently out of fear of permanently enlarging programs that he opposes or has sought to cut. awol, our failed president, appears to be willing to let a lot of people suffer for the sake of the vision for america that grover norquist, friend of militant islam, promotes . | posted by Pudentilla | 7:27 AM the st. patrick's day 4 friend jazz at running scared has the story of the st. patrick's day 4, a group of 4 war protesters who dumped some blood in a recruiting office. they received a mistrial locally when most, but not all, jurors voted to acquit, so a year later the feds show up and put them on trial for additional conspiracy charges (forget the whole double jeopardy thing--they're making up the rules as they go these days). there's a petition, linked at jazz's site, for those of you who want to lend your support. | posted by G. D. Frogsdong | 5:54 AM 22.9.05 take a bottle, drink it down, pass it around*... there's a rumor going around that awol's started drinking again. can't say i blame him if he is -- he's just now finding out that he's the worst president america's ever had, and you know that's gotta suck. i wish i could get the secret service to drop awol off at my place for a while so i can serve him all the drinks he wants. my treat. get him buzzed, strike up a conversation with him, keep the booze flowin', and just let all those disturbing thoughts and negative emotions he's kept in a bottle (ooooo, awful pun, i'm very sorry about that) for goodness knows how long just take flight. he needs the therapy. sure, i'll most likely be found sprawled out with the shattered end of a whiskey bottle lodged in my chest, but this isn't about me. the economy continues its slow hemorrhaging; parts of america's infrastructure have been demolished (the twin towers four years ago and oil refining capabilities in the gulf region this year, to name two); the military is being bled white between the war in iraq and the cuts in soldiers' benefits; and osama bin laden is now officially in his second term -- we can't keep doing these things. and we can't afford to be led by a president who talks like this during q & a sessions, either: the president: ...bianca. nobody named bianca? well, sorry bianca's not here. i'll be glad to answer her question. q: i'll follow up. the president: no, that's fine. (laughter.) thank you, appreciate it. just trying to spread around the joy of asking a question. ... q: mr. president, could we talk more about -- the president: are you bianca? q: no, i'm not. anita -- fox news. the president: okay. q: just a quick question -- the president: okay, i was looking for bianca. i'm sorry... maybe he meant he was looking for binaca, who knows... (one source-credit hop for pam's house blend [the first link], and one for the heretik [the second]... *: pearl jam, "crazy mary"...) | posted by Mimus Pauly | 11:25 PM
![]() "dubya....you just don't fit in." but it was extremely interesting to hear martha say these words.... i watched martha's "apprentice", as i, ssshhhhh, don't tell anyone, am rather addicted to "the donald's", and i was delighted to find "women" in the cast...and not just "girls". it was refreshing to see women who just don't really exist in the media...women over 30. kudos to you, martha! however, some of the contestants were just a*holes. i don't think they would "fit in" in civil society. | posted by cookie jill | 9:10 PM
![]() the dots are beginning to connect....and...hey...has that guy been indicted yet...? republican lobbyist jack abramoff bragged two years ago that he was in contact with white house political aide karl rove on behalf of a large, bermuda-based corporation that wanted to avoid incurring some taxes and continue receiving federal contracts, according to a written statement by president bush's nominee to be deputy attorney general.the light has been turned on...the cockroaches are everywhere. | posted by cookie jill | 8:03 PM forget those offshore tax havens...it's the poor that are cheating on their taxes you've lost your house, job, family, belongings, faith....you have nothing let. but the government wants to make sure you are absolutely poor. yep. they want to "verify income of earned income tax credit participants" this appears to be a proposal to audit people who claim to be poor, to make sure they are truly poor and deserving of the tax credit. ...the gop apparently believes that massive fraud exists in this program, and that we could ease the federal deficit by aggressively collecting taxes from the not-truly-poor -- people who could be defined as the merely non-affluent, the not-doing-so-well, the just-scraping-by. but not "poor." the gop wants these posers to pay up. [and then the gop will eliminate the estate tax, but that's another matter entirely.] - wapooh..yeah...it's those poor people with nothing who are cheating and must be rounded up and punished by the irs.... the rich wouldn't do anything like that....
| posted by cookie jill | 7:48 PM coming up next...the apprentice, starring bill frist! why not? martha stewart got a tv reality show after serving prison time for insider trading, so it seems the only natural progression for sen. bill "more than one ways to skin a cat" frist. the washpost: senate majority leader bill frist (r-tenn.) has maintained for years that his stock holdings in the nation's largest for-profit hospital chain posed no conflict of interest for a policymaker deeply involved in health care matters. he even received two rulings in the 1990s from the senate ethics committee that blessed the holding of the stock in blind trusts. so when frist decided in june to dump all the stock, and later cited as the reason his desire to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, eyebrows went up among ethics experts and congressional watchdogs. why did he do it at that time? precisely a month later, after the stock was sold, its price tumbled 9 percent when executives in the company -- hca inc., which was founded by frist's father and on whose board frist's brother serves -- disclosed that hospital admissions of insured patients were lower than expected, depressing profits in the second quarter. whoops! but it was just a coincidence, right? the timing thus raised questions about whether frist had somehow traded on information he obtained in advance from the company. "frist has been in the senate for many years now, and the conflict is not new," said melanie sloan, executive director of the watchdog group, citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington. "why did he decide to sell it then? why not years ago? what's changed? did he know that the stock was about to take a fall?" but, it wasn't a real big deal, right? hca wasn't the majority of his portfolio, right? until the sale, frist's holdings in hca formed a significant source of his wealth. his political career was launched in part by a loan secured by the stock; in 1994, he valued his holdings at $13 million, and the following year he placed them in a blind trust. in 2000, he transferred the hca stock into a new blind trust, a transaction that could have given him insight into its value. frist's signed financial disclosure statements indicate that the overall value of his blind trusts did not substantially change from 2003 to 2004. as one of the senate's multimillionaires, frist has other non-hca-stock holdings outside of the trusts. several ethics experts and watchdogs said they found it odd that frist could intervene to order such a sale when the hca stock was ostensibly out of his reach in blind trusts. fred wertheimer, president of democracy 21, said, "the notion that you have a blind trust but you can tell your trustee when to sell stock in it just doesn't make any sense. it means you have a seeing eye trust and not a blind trust. it's ridiculous." it all harkens back to another coincidence back in the 90's. | posted by skippy | 11:16 AM
![]() it's not a warm and fuzzy little children's bedtime tale. it's the avian flu....a horror story that could come so very true. if an influenza pandemic struck today, borders would close, the global economy would shut down, international vaccine supplies and health-care systems would be overwhelmed, and panic would reign. to limit the fallout, the industrialized world must create a detailed response strategy involving the public and private sectors.nice to know that the house republicans are planning to cut $1.8billion dollars from the cdc - talking points memo | posted by cookie jill | 11:10 AM may we remind the voting public that republicans want you to pay for weather services and hurricane information. do you want a seven-day weather forecast for your zip code? or hour-by-hour predictions of the temperature, wind speed, humidity and chance of rain? or weather data beamed to your cellphone?mighty fine time to remind people that they might not have "rita" updates free of charge or popup tracking ads if certain folks on the hill had their druthers. | posted by cookie jill | 9:38 AM congress has decided how to pay for katrina cut pay and benefits from the military in the wake of hurricane katrina, president bush and republicans in congress have refused to consider rolling back the $336 billion in new tax cuts that the richest 1 percent are slated to get over the next five years. they say we need to pay for reconstruction not by asking the wealthiest to sacrifice just a little bit, but by massive cuts to spending. and now we see what that means: the navy times today reports that those cuts "include trimming military quality-of-life programs, including health care." this, while troops are in battle. -soo....let me get this straight....in order to have a strong military, they slowly dismantle the support system for military families and their health care while at the same time forcing them via "stop loss" to return again and again to a war without an exit plan? | posted by cookie jill | 8:41 AM you may now kiss the...take your hands off that woman! an Israeli couple was fined 1,000 rupees after an indian court found them guilty of obscenity for kissing during their marriage ceremony in a hindu pilgrim town, newspapers reported wednesday...the couple had decided to have a traditional hindu marriage while visiting pushkar town...but they infuriated the priest as they started to kiss and embrace while he was chanting vedic hymns." first of all, anyone who lives in a town named after something a peddler used to sell things from on the lower east side of new york shouldn't be so fussy. second of all, if indians are so stuffy, how'd they come to have such a large population? something sounds wrong in that story. | posted by G. D. Frogsdong | 5:00 AM |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
<!-- please keep a Blog |