10:32 am By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Immigration
1 Mar 2012Yesterday, a federal district court issued a ruling blocking Arizona from enforcing another portion of it’s anti-immigrant law, SB 1070. Specifically, the court found that parts of the law violated the first amendment rights of day laborers soliciting work on public streets.
In defending this portion of the law, the state of Arizona claimed that the purpose of the provision was to ensure traffic safety.
From the National Day Laborer Organizing Network’s Press Release on the decision:
“Not only is the exercise of free speech a crucial civil right,” declared the court, “Plaintiffs have shown that they and their members are being chilled from soliciting employment by the threat of enforcement” of the anti-day labor provisions.
This is the second recent victory for day laborers:
Last week, the Supreme Court declined to review a Ninth Circuit decision striking down on First Amendment grounds a Redondo Beach ordinance that criminalized day labor solicitation (Comité de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach). The court’s ruling in Redondo Beach struck down the City of Redondo Beach’s anti-solicitation ordinance as a “facially unconstitutional restriction on speech.”
11:35 am By Maegan La Mala · Media|VivirLatino
28 Feb 2012I was very surprised and humbled upon waking up to the news that I was nominated for a Revolucionario Award in the New Americano category.
I honestly don’t know who nominated me and I don’t even know much about the Social Revoluticion who is leading the effort and the award process. Apparently the outcome will be decided at SWSX Interactive on March 12. More information on the awards are below and como dicen por alli, it’s an honor just to be nominate.
So how do you define an award-winning Revolucionario?
They can be an individual, group, organization, or brand with the ganas to inspire change online and off. They seamlessly represent dos mundos and are constantly redefining what it means to be Latino as trendsetters and innovators. They utilize the newest online tools to engage la gente in their networks and mobilize them to take action. Whether they have 10 followers or 10,000 fans, The Revolucionario ignites change and, with that, embodies the cry of the The Social Revolución!
Nominations for the Revolucionario Awards fall under three categories:
The New Americano
These individuals, groups, organizations, or brand are trendsetters, impacting the Hispanic market online and off. By utilizing social media strategies they are recognizing the cultural shifts happening within the Latino community, are redefining what it means to be Latino, and are influencing their online community from their multicultural perspective.
The Innovator
Whether it’s a new app or website, this movement is redefining how we reach Latinos now and in the future. El Innovator can be an individuals, groups, organizations, or brand who has developed a new online tool to connect with the Latino comunidad. They’ve engaged their network with revolutionary ideas and technology that is authentic to the different facets of the Latino market.
The Mobilizer
Through social media tools and platforms, these individuals, groups, organizations, or brand mobilize their international and local causes online and off. Uniquely, they foster communities and spread positive change by connecting and educating an audience who they may have never met. Their social mission is to inspire people to take acción and spread change.
1:48 pm By Maegan La Mala · New York City|Police Violence
27 Feb 2012Courtesy. Professionalism. Respect. That is what CPR stood for when the New York City Police Department rolled out a public relations campaign in the mid-1990′s. The PR campaign was a response to growing protests and attention against a police force that was more violent and more racist by the day. The late mid-1990′s up until 2011 saw a rise in stop and frisks against young men of color. It also saw a rise in officers acting with impunity in neighborhoods of color, harassing, abusing, and killing. Amadou Diallo, Anthony Rosario, Yong Xin Huang are just three of the names from a long list of young men of color killed by the police. Prosecutors across the boroughs, with their long history of working alongside the NYPD, failed to bring justice to the families of the dead who followed then Mayor Giuliani and Police Chief Bratton with photographs of their own disappeared. In response people took to the streets, blocked bridges and the entrances to government buildings, and there were hearings held on the local, national, and international level.
Seems like now we are in the same place again in NYC. Stop and Frisks are at record numbers and again it is people of color who are stopped the most often. Since 1997, when the New York City Department took over school safety, over 90 percent of the young people arrested in the halls of learning are Latino or Black. We are seeing a rise in killings of unarmed people of color, most recently 18 year old Ramarley Graham in the Bronx. The difference between now and the late 1990′s however is that now the level of police surveillance is up. Watchtowers stand on street corners. Mobile command centers park outside supermarkets. The NYPD most recently had to come out about spying on Muslim communities inside the city and even in New Jersey. These tactics done in the name of “national security” are the new broken windows and Giuliani time has expanded under Bloomberg’s all seeing eyes.
Many of the answers proposed to counter the threat that the NYPD pose aren’t new. City council person Jumaane Williams from Brooklyn wants police officers to give their card to every one they stop and frisk. There was a proposal in the 90′s that was similar in that it asked that officers give a paper document explaining to people why they were stopped and frisked. That proposal didn’t go anywhere and I doubt that the current proposal will go anywhere either. It seems the only union that Bloomberg seems to respect (fear?) is the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association (PBA). There are renewed calls for a special prosecutor for when police shootings end with criminal charges against the police. It is a worthy demand but without intervention from Governor Cuomo and the state Attorney General, we will continue with police not being prosecuted.
This week, a coalition of organizations who have been on the front lines of fighting police violence in NYC since the 1990′s, launched a campaign demanding police reform (their word, not mine). Communities United for Police Reform seek to end discriminatory policing practices in New York, and to build a lasting movement that promotes public safety and policing practices based on cooperation and respect– not discriminatory targeting and harassment.
8:46 pm By Maegan La Mala · arizona|Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Immigration|Politics
24 Feb 2012Originally I had no intention of watching the alleged last of the GOP debates . It was held in Mesa, Arizona which meant the anti-immigrant rhetoric would be amped up to pander to the local audience which included Sheriff Joe Arpaio. I ended up watching the debate because my partner said we should watch it together (how romantic).Also, Arizona is where the next big primary will happen this coming Tuesday.
I was right about the hateful narrative used against immigrants but I also watched and listened to a group of white men who seemed to be against everything, including each other.
The whole debate, poorly moderated by CNN’s John King, had a strange air about it. The Republican hopefuls appeared on stage and introduced themselves in a manner that would have been appropriate in a bad comic book. For example, Ron Paul knighted himself the “defender of the Constitution.” Someone get that man a cape.
The rest of the very long evening consisted of the candidates talking about everything they hate like spending money. Rick Santorum responded to the first question asked, regarding the national debt, saying that the only thing he wanted to spend money on was the defense department, everything else should be cut : medicaid, medicare, food stamps, and of course Obama Care, I mean healthcare, and education.
Applause followed by Mitt Romney and Santorum going back and forth at each other for a while about who was more fiscally conservative.
Ron Paul gets in on the Santorum bashing (the candidate, not the sexual liquid) by calling him a fake and especially targeting how Santorum was once a backer of No Child Left Behind and now was against it.
Mitt Romney mentioned his experience as head of the Salt Lake Olympic Organizing Committee so many times that I proposed a bobsled race instead of primary to determine the GOP candidate for president.
The most unsurprising portions of the night involved birth control and immigration, and within those topics, race.
All of the candidates made the issue of contraceptives one of choice, access, and liberties but for religious fundamentalists, not for people with a uterus. Access to contraception was blamed for the amount of children born out of wedlock, especially among “some people”. I wonder who those people could be?
:: looks around at her two kids with no daddy in sight::.
Oh wait. They mean me.
Those same some people,like me, are really poor, usually criminals,uneducated and a burden because of all the babies they had while not being married. Therefore the answer to poverty is marriage and no birth control. Sign me and my out of wedlock daughters up! Married people who use birth control are mythical creatures who must exist only in the realm of the liberal elites.
This discussion of the evils of birth control had one brief ray of light when Ron Paul clarified that the morning after pill is not the same as the abortion pill. I said that moment was brief right because then he entered into the bash Planned Parenthood portion of the evening.
Arizona, the home of SB 1070 and banned books, seemed to waiting for the four white men to unleash the anti-immigration vitriol. Governer Jan Brewer and Sherrif Joe Arpaio sat in the audience, almost as GOP guests of honor. All of the candidates spoke in favor of fences and more boots on the ground. All of the candidates lambasted Obama and his administration for suing Arizona and not doing enough to stop immigrants who were of accused draining the economy and coming for the welfare ride. Mitt Romney especially came down hard on the administration, which makes sense campaign wise, since the Democratic Party has been putting all of it’s eggs in the Latino vote basket hoping that they can keep or win support by making Romney the most anti-immigrant of all. Alternately, Florida GOP Senator Marco Rubio’s name was mentioned, as if to prove to any Latinos who were watching, that they were capable of acknowledging a Latino who they weren’t going to paint as the scapegoat for the U.S.’s ills.
Of course none of the arguments the GOP presidential wannabes presented are based in reality. No one mentioned how Obama has actually expanded Bush immigration enforcement policies and how thanks to those expansions there were more Border Patrol boots on the ground and record breaking deportation numbers. Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio’s name was mentioned, as if to prove that they were capable of mentioning a Latino and had some credibility. Newt Gingrich, who at one point was being praised for his “common sense” approach to immigration policy, which boiled down to saying that family unification was important for “good” undocumented people and proposing a limbo status of undocumented but not deportable, reverted back to the standard nativist arguments and when asked to discribe himself in one word, Newt Gingrich cockily answered, “cheerful”.
2:12 pm By Maegan La Mala · Alabama|Immigration|race
16 Feb 2012One of the many things that irks me about the way that social justice movements are promoted by nonprofits through to the masses is the use of the either/or lens. I have written extensively over the years about how this has played out in the context of immigration policy and practice struggles in the United States. Whenever a bill is up for discussion, the so-called “good” side, that is the Democratic Party, pushes this good immigrant/bad immigrant binary and non-profits, in an often misguided effort to keep themselves afloat and gain a victory, take this language as their own. We see it with the push for the DREAM Act and the various state in-state tuition namesakes. We see it with the push against criminalizing deportation programs like Secure Communities. Now we see it again in the fight against H.B. 56 in Alabama.
Passed in June of last year, the Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act, or H.B. 56 is considered one of the harshest anti-immigrant laws in the United States. It requires schools to check and report the immigration status of their students and bars undocumented students from postsecondary education. It instructs police to demand proof of immigration status from anyone they suspect of being in the country without documentation, even on a routine traffic stop or roadblock. It also invalidates any contract knowingly entered into with an undocumented immigrant, including routine agreements such as a rent contract, and makes it a felony for an undocumented immigrant to enter into a contract with a government entity.
Hollywood director Chris Weitz, journalist Jose Antonio Vargas along with the Center for American Progress recently launched a campaign to repeal H.B. 56 called “Is this Alabama”. The accompanying report to the campaign, Alabama’s Immigration Disaster, focuses on the economic and civil rights impact of the law:
Overall, as Professor Samuel Addy of the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Alabama’s Culverhouse College of Commerce and Business Administration has illustrated, because of H.B. 56, Alabama could lose up to $10.8 billion (or 6.2 percent of its gross domestic product), up to 140,000 jobs in the state, $264.5 million in state tax revenue, and $93 million in local tax revenue.
These costs will all be incurred to drive out an undocumented population that is estimated to be only 2.5 percent of the state—a population that paid $130 million into the state’s tax coffers in 2010.
Alabama’s agricultural industry and foreign investment are especially affected. Chad Smith, a tomato farmer, estimates that he could lose up to $300,000 in produce because of the lack of farmworkers who are now fleeing the state. And recent embarrassing incidents such as the arrest of Mercedes-Benz and Honda executives under the provisions of the new law jeopardize the presence of foreign companies, which give the state both a significant amount of money and a significant number of jobs—percent of the state’s workforce in 2009, the most recent year for which data are available.
The campaign also features videos reflecting the personal, human impact of H.B. 56, asking people in Alabama their feelings about the law and framing the law in the context of the long struggle against racism in the state.
Check out one of the videos:
While repealing H.B. 56 is certainly something I am behind, I am concerned with framing issues of racism against blacks as something belonging to Alabama’s past – the United States’ past. Calling the struggle for equality and justice for all migrants the civil rights issue of our times implies that there is no more work to be done in terms of racism against blacks and the legacy of slavery in one state and across the country. All people have to do is look at the recently aired documentary Slavery by Another Name and look at who is being incarcerated and how to see that there is a hell of a long way to go when it comes to fighting racism. When racism is framed as either black or brown, real solidarity work is watered down. The reality is that the prison industrial complex that uses people of color bodies as raw materials is connected to the immigration criminalization complex.
So yes H.B. 56 is Alabama. It is the United States whose new budget features more money for Secure Communities. Failing to make the connections means we will continue to spread our resources too thin and be divided and conquered.
Not everyone is a fan of this overly commercial holiday but I say why not have fun with it like Rio Yañez has.
Be sure to visit the website for more funny/sweet art en este dia de amistad y amor.
2:34 pm By Maegan La Mala · Entertainment|Media|Music
12 Feb 2012I covered the Latin Grammy Awards twice for VivirLatino. Once when they were in New York City and I was beside myself for being given official credentials (and honor I am no longer impressed by), and once when they were in Las Vegas where I went to every free event because I made myself broke just getting there. These were the Latin Grammy Awards, the equivalent of Latino History Month, a segregated space completely controlled by the major music labels and the Spanish language media. Media like me were essentially locked into a media room, watching the event on television, interrupted constantly by a parade of winners and hosts we could yell questions at but not video tape (in Vegas at one point a Univision employee actually stepped in front of my camera to block my taping). I’ll admit that at first I was star struck. As an up and coming blogger I liked seeing Shakira, Ricky Martin, and Calle 13 up close and personal. I am particularly struck by the memory of Gustavo Cerati, long before he became ill.
But again those were the Latin Grammy Awards not the main event Grammy Awards being held tonight in Los Angeles and yet there is much talk and protest about the role of artists of color and exclusion.
With the sudden, untimely, and unexpected death of Whitney Houston, there is remembrance but also reflection on how the music industry, fed by the talents of many people of color, but manipulated mostly by white run music moguls, only allowed so many women of color success stories at a time and within a very specific imagined framework. Whitney was every woman, but as soon as pressure and the temptations that come with it unleashed their demons upon her, the industry’s support waned in favor of the next, more wholesome, marketable black woman. Whitney Houston was presented as a caricature, much in the same way that Michael Jackson was. The focus became her weaknesses, her failures and this at a time when media shifted from print and video music channels to the every vigilant internet. While the cause of Whitney Houston’s tragic passing are still unknown, we do know the road that brought us here. As media consumers, so many of us hungrily watched her fall but did we offer her a hand to get back up?
It has not been a good year for Latino images on television. Considering that the year hasn’t even completed two full months, this can’t be a good sign.
First, there was the transphobia and tired Rican stereotyping of the now cancelled ABC sitcom Work It. Then there is the not yet cancelled but should be CBS sitcom ¡Rob! centering around a white man’s (played by Rob Schneider) sudden marriage into a Mexican-American family. That family is filled with every Spanish accented caricature possible, weal attempts to counter those portrayals, and plenty of hot blooded innuendo. Two nights ago I watched Glee and the debut episode of The River, and I was reminded why I generally avoid television unless it’s the news and even that pisses me off.
1:26 pm By Maegan La Mala · VivirLatino
8 Feb 2012Before I start jumping right into posting analysis and commentary, I wanted to take a moment to explain the sudden extended silence on the site.
My dear aunt, who was fighting cancer for over three years, took a turn for the worse and transitioned from this world last week. She is the second of my mother’s sisters to pass away from breast cancer and the fifth death in our family within the last three years, making the loss more devastating to the family.
I felt the need to make the personal public since this occurred around the same time the Komen controversy broke (there will be a separate post on that mess) and because my Titi Migdalia was a fan and regular reader of VivirLatino.
In her honor and memory, I’m ready to jump back in.
Thank you for your understanding.
M. la Mala
11:48 am By Maegan La Mala · Casa Blanca Camino 2012|Con la Vista al Voto|DREAM Act|Florida|Immigration|Politics|Puerto Rico
27 Jan 2012I’m feeling a little dazed from the seemingly endless stream of GOP debates and the incumbent President’s non-statement statement on immigration policy during the SOTU. With the Florida primary just days away, both political parties are targeting the Latino vote that the state allegedly represents. Both parties are playing a spin game, ready to crown an opponent as the most anti-immigrant on one hand, while claiming that the Latino electorate in Florida doesn’t really care about immigration.
In last night’s GOP debate, on again off again front runner Newt Gingrich took a page from the Democratic National Committee, targeting Mitt Romney as the most anti-immigrant. Certainly this attack is related to Romney’s statements earlier this week touting “self-deportation” as a good solution to current problems. Romney, offended by Gingrich’s characterization, demanded an apology. As I pointed out in a piece I wrote for El Diario La Prensa last month, we are heading into dangerous territory when we try to find the “worst” among bad choices. Gingrich’s allegedly kinder, softer approach to immigration amounts to what the current Obama policy is on paper, allowing “non-threatening” immigrants with family ties and a long history in the U.S. to stay in a permanent limbo status.
A new/old Latino target is being pushed by one organization. Today, Presente.org launched a campaign targeting potential GOP Vice Presidential pick, Senator Marco Rubio. The campaign wittingly named “No Somos Rubios” (We are not Rubios/We are not Blondes), hones in on Republicans using a brown face with a brown name to earn Latino votes. This right wing strategy is being called into question not just based on Rubio’s anti-immigrant positions but also because Rubio represent such a specific facet of the Latino electorate. Rubio appeals to Cuban-American anti-Castro demographic. Rubio probably will not appeal to other Latinos, especially in the South West, who according to polls, played a critical role in Obama’s getting elected in 2008.
VivirLatino is a daily publication published by Mamita Mala Media, dedicated to featuring all the latest politics, culture, entertainment of interest to the diverse and influential Latin@ Community Across the Diaspora
About | Advertise with us | Contact | Twitter
All hours are UTC-5 (Eastern Time)