Showing posts with label GOP Consolidation of Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP Consolidation of Power. Show all posts

The Trump Revisionism Begins

It was always only a matter of time before the revisionism about how Donald Trump won the 2016 election began in order to try to confer legitimacy on Trump's utterly illegitimate presidency, and to mask the fact that Trump was an inevitability behind which the Republican Party was eager to consolidate their power.

We are not meant to remember that Trump was elected only with significant assistance from foreign election interference, widespread GOP voter suppression efforts, possible voting machine hacking, the racist antiquity known as the Electoral College, and a political press that has hated Hillary Clinton for decades and dedicated more airtime to empty podiums awaiting Trump's arrival than serious discussions of urgent issues like climate change or the erosion of abortion access.

Instead, we are meant to understand that Trump was a unprecedentedly strong candidate, an anomaly of GOP politics who won over the conservative elite despite their distaste for him.

It's an argument designed to work two ways: Either Trump survives in 2020, and thus he is a legend who remade the Republican Party and won over his detractors; or Trump fails in 2020, and thus he was just an outlier and the Republicans who are hesitatingly claiming they objected to his Trumpness will be back in charge where they should be.

There's a forthcoming book trying to make this case. [Content Note: Sexual assault] Its rewriting of history is extraordinary.

Of course it needs to be. The history is not easily forgotten.

There are various Republican reprobates key to Trump's rise who were interviewed for the book, and naturally they used the opportunity to try to rehabilitate their own images, as well. It's all part of the Trump Revisionism.

I'm particularly disgusted by Paul Ryan, that craven shitwheel, pretending to be some kind of hero by saying now that Trump isn't fit for the presidency.


Anyway. Keep your eyes peeled for more evidence of Trump Revisionism. It's going to come fast and furious ahead of 2020. It's gaslighting on an epic scale, and, when you feel like you're being thrown off a spinning carousel by the bullshit you're reading that isn't remotely real, know you will not be alone.

Open Wide...

Some Good News from SCOTUS

The Supreme Court has issued two rulings that are good news for opponents of the GOP consolidation of power and Donald Trump's criminal enterprise.

1. Marianne Dodson at the Daily Beast: Supreme Court Reaffirms 'Double Jeopardy' Exception with Mueller Probe Implications.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday reaffirmed a 170-year-old exception to the Constitution's double-jeopardy clause, and left the door open for state prosecutors to prosecute Trump campaign officials regardless of whether federal officials have already done so.

The case, Gamble v. United States, has drawn attention for its potential effect on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's federal prosecutions on Russian interference in the 2016 election. Had the 'dual sovereignty doctrine' been repealed, states would not be able to pursue investigations parallel to the federal government, the National Law Journal reports.

State prosecutors in New York have brought charges against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort Jr., who was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison, in the event that [Donald] Trump pardons him.
2. Taegan Goddard at Political Wire: Virginia Democrats Win In Gerrymandering Case.
"The Supreme Court has ruled against the Virginia House of Delegates in a racial gerrymandering case that represents a victory for Democrats in the state," The Hill reports.

"In the 5-4 ruling, the justices found that the House didn't have the standing to appeal a lower court ruling that found that the new district maps must be used ahead of the 2020 election. Those new maps are already in use."
It represents a victory for Virginia Democrats and also for Black voters of Virginia, who will have fair(er) representation care of more fairly drawn districts.

Open Wide...

Today in Rampaging Authoritarianism

Donald Trump has "joked" (that is, projected precisely what he intends to do under the auspices of "humor" in order to accuse anyone who expresses alarm of being humorless and overreacting) on multiple occasions about staying in office longer than the two terms to which U.S. presidents are limited by law.

Yesterday, he did it once again.

Felicia Sonmez at the Washington Post reports:

[Donald] Trump on Sunday floated the possibility of staying in office longer than two terms, suggesting in a morning tweet that his supporters might "demand that I stay longer."

The president, who will kick off his reelection campaign on Tuesday with an event in Orlando, has previously joked about serving more than two terms, including at an event in April, when he told a crowd that he might remain in the Oval Office "at least for 10 or 14 years."

...Trump last month floated the notion of being given two bonus years as president to make up for the time former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III spent on his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign. The president shared a tweet in which Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. declared, "Trump should have 2 yrs added to his 1st term as pay back for time stolen by this corrupt failed coup."

Last year, Trump also joked about doing away with term limits in a speech to Republican donors at his Mar-a-Lago estate in which he praised Chinese President Xi Jinping for doing so.

"He's now president for life. President for life. No, he's great," Trump said, according to CNN. "And look, he was able to do that. I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot some day."
This latest "joke" about not leaving office also comes on the heels of Trump saying, "I don't leave."

As I wrote on Twitter: "Note that in every one of Trump's 'jokes' about staying in office beyond two terms is the implicit certitude that he will be reelected to a second term."

The thing is: "When not if" is a pretty standard linguistic approach by incumbents. But most of them aren't using that trick within the context of suggesting that they will ignore term limits, nor against the backdrop of having colluded with a foreign government to win in the first place.

Relatedly, there was a major story in the New York Times this weekend about the U.S. attacking Russia's power grid, and I'll set aside for now the entire fuckery of the Times publishing that information, because, as Ryan Goodman noted on Twitter, there's a "blockbuster story" buried within the piece:
Two administration officials said they believed Mr. Trump had not been briefed in any detail about the steps to place "implants" — software code that can be used for surveillance or attack — inside the Russian grid.

Pentagon and intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with Mr. Trump about operations against Russia for concern over his reaction — and the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials, as he did in 2017 when he mentioned a sensitive operation in Syria to the Russian foreign minister.
So, the intelligence community is running the country, or at least part of it, without even telling Donald Trump.

Over two years ago, I warned that Trump's war on the intelligence community was leading to what is effectively dueling coups between the Trump administration and the national security bureaucrats — and that, if Trump fights back, it's going to get extremely ugly.

We must understand that Trump's comments about staying in office are situated within the context of a bureaucratic apparatus that is undermining his presidency. His "jokes" about not leaving office may well be shots across the bow at the intelligence community's threat to the Republican consolidation of power behind Trump.

And that is the best case scenario. A worse possibility is that the intelligence community is happy to let Trump go on being a figurehead while they run the show, because they've decided they have no use for democracy, either.

In any case, our democracy is in critical peril. And many of the people who swore oaths to protect it are the ones now endeavoring, for their own various ends, to destroy it.

Open Wide...

McConnell Says He'd Fill a SCOTUS Vacancy Next Year

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell led the obstructionism blocking the judicial appointments, including Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, in the last year of President Barack Obama's second term.

He justified the move with a transparently mendacious argument about how it wasn't respectful of voters to allow an outgoing president to make lifetime appointments, but the truth was that McConnell just wanted to hold open as many federal judgeships as possible in the hopes that an incoming Republican president and a retained Republican Senate majority would allow him to stack the judiciary with conservative jurists.

And that is precisely what has happened. Obama left office with over 100 federal judicial vacancies and an empty Supreme Court seat, every one of which carries with it a lifetime appointment. Which McConnell, Donald Trump, Mike Pence, and the Republican Senate majority are now filling as quickly as possible with young conservative judges who will spend their entire careers enabling and abetting Republican rule.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Naturally, when McConnell was asked yesterday what he would do if there were a Supreme Court vacancy next year, in the final year of Trump's term, he readily conceded he would not play by the same rules.

Speaking at a Paducah Chamber of Commerce luncheon in Kentucky, McConnell was asked by an attendee, "Should a Supreme Court justice die next year, what will your position be on filling that spot?"

The leader took a long sip of what appeared to be iced tea before announcing with a smile, "Oh, we'd fill it," triggering loud laughter from the audience.
McConnell went on to brag about how stacking the judiciary is the best and most important thing he's done: "What can't be undone is a lifetime appointment to a young man or woman who believes in the quaint notion that the job of the judge is to follow the law. That's the most important thing we've done in the country, which cannot be undone."

McConnell is one of the most despicable people ever to hold office in this nation's history. He boasts about rigging the game to consolidate and retain power, and then pretends he's doing it out of respect for the democratic process. Utterly reprehensible.

And what's important to understand is that McConnell is not merely a "hypocrite," as you will undoubtedly see him called a million times today. He is a strategic, conniving, shameless authoritarian for whom the asymmetry of the rules is the point.

That's why he's announcing it (with zero fear of consequence, I might add). He wants us to know about the double-standard. He wants to appall us with it.

It's a brazen flex.

McConnell just doesn't want to win. He wants to rub our noses in it. He wants us to know he cheated his way to victory. He wants to gloat about his domination.

He isn't confessing hypocrisy. He's doing a touchdown dance.

Open Wide...

The Check-In

image of white, femme hands pouring a cup of tea and a white wood table, with space opposite as if inviting someone to sit down

[Note: This is the thread formerly known as "Discussion Thread: How Are you?" I've just changed the title to reflect the label I've been using for it. Image via Pixabay.]

I am feeling increasingly anxious about the accelerating pace of the GOP's consolidation of power behind Donald Trump and the Democratic leadership's decision-making about how (or if?!) to address it.

It's extremely stressful to me to feel like we are on our own — and that it isn't just the United States whose leaders are abandoning commitments to long-held democratic norms and values.

I spend many days now feeling like the world is shifting out from under my feet and I'm about to topple over.

I am feeling worried about how the Democratic primary is going to go, and whether it will further break us apart. In hopeful moments, I am pleased that, among the expansive field of candidates, there are a few for whom I want to cast an enthusiastically affirmative vote, not just a vote against the rest.

I am deeply appreciative for some nice weather lately, cool enough that I have been able to spend some time outdoors.

The previous owners of my home (the only owners before we bought it from them) dropped by for a visit last week, and I was so happy to see them and spend some time with them. They are such lovely people.

I have plans to meet a friend for lunch and a movie soon, and I'm looking forward to it.

I am grateful for my dear husband, for our home, for my friends, for all the times they make me laugh, and for Dudley and Zelda.

I am also, as always, glad for this community. Anyone who wants to join me in another enormous virtual group hug is welcome.

How are you?

Open Wide...

An Observation

There is a lot of attacking the messenger going around at the moment. It's stunning, but there are lots of people who have more energy to attack women criticizing politicians who are failing us than they do giving what-for to the politicians who are failing us.

If you're spending way more time attacking me than you do saying anything about Mitch McConnell, you have derailed.

And I'm pissed as fuck about that. Not because I'm getting called names and yelled at and dismissed out of hand — I'm not thrilled about that, but I'm used to it — but because everyone needs to be marshalling their anger at the politicians with the power to do something but refuse to do it.

At the moment, that regrettably includes the Democratic leadership, but for several decades it has primarily been the Republican Party.

And yet there is appallingly little public condemnation directed squarely at them.

We went right from "Republicans are the REAL Americans, so they are beyond censure" to "Republicans are traitors, so they are a lost cause" in one easy step.

Both of them work to obfuscate that Republicans have been staging a coup for decades that culminated on Election Day.

In either case, the message is that none of this catastrophic collapse can be blamed on Republicans. They were unassailable patriots and now they are irredeemable traitors.

And it's just a big ol' coincidence that the failure of our politics, culture, and media has resulted in near-total Republican control of the three branches of government and most state legislatures.

Obviously the solution is to yell at the women who document how it happened, happens, is happening.

Open Wide...

Nancy Pelosi, What Are You Even Doing?

Listen, I give Speaker Nancy Pelosi a lot of leeway, because she has shown herself on many occasions to be a savvy strategist, but I draw the line at trying to justify the decision to not impeach Donald Trump because he's "goading us to impeach him."

Clare Foran, Ashley Killough, and Sunlen Serfaty at CNN report:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi argued Tuesday that [Donald] Trump is trying to provoke Democrats into proceeding with impeachment, using some of her strongest language yet on the issue.

"Trump is goading us to impeach him," she said at an event in New York City hosted by the Cornell University Institute of Politics and Global Affairs. "That's what he's doing. Every single day, he's just like taunting, taunting, taunting because he knows that it would be very divisive in the country, but he doesn't really care. He just wants to solidify his base."
This is fucking ridiculous.

Trump isn't going full fascist to goad the Democrats and solidify his base; he's going full fascist because that's the objective. He's the centerpiece around which the Republican Party is consolidating its power.

Animating his deplorable base and enraging anyone who still values our democracy and respects the rule of law are byproducts. They aren't the goals.

And talking about them like they are profoundly minimizes the threat we face as a nation.

Trump isn't doing anything he hasn't always done: Be as brazen as possible so that his opponents and the press can't believe he's actually as dangerous as he really is.


The response to that absolutely cannot be: "We'd better not try to check his power or he might get more powerful."

There's an inherent flaw in that approach. Can you spot it, Speaker Pelosi? IT'S THAT HE GETS MORE POWERFUL EITHER WAY.

I honestly don't know why Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are taking this absurd and impotent approach, but I don't believe that it is naivete, or cruelty, or concern about personal exposure for covert corruption, as many people have suggested.

I do wonder if there is some threat to the larger population being held over their heads — like, say, an attack on our infrastructure, which is hardly out of the question. I wonder if Pelosi and Schumer are trying to telegraph that threat to those of us paying attention by agreeing to work on infrastructure policy with Trump.

If something like that is driving their decision-making, it's not an insignificant consideration. But if the only way to avoid it is to allow Trump to go full fascist, then we've already lost either way. So they should name it. Expose the threat. Let us decide as a country what to do.

And if that's not what is happening, then they need to roll. Fast and hard and unrelenting.

Because — spoiler alert — Trump is going to do the worst thing whether Democrats "provoke" him by trying to hold him accountable or whether they try (futilely) to contain him.

We might as well try to stop him, or at least limit the scope of his harm.

Open Wide...

The Democrats Take Note (Cough) of Cohen's Plea

In case you're wondering if House and Senate Democrats have taken notice of Michael Cohen's guilty plea and its details and what those details actually reveal about Donald Trump, the answer is FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.

Garrett Haake, Frank Thorp V, Alex Moe, and Dartunorro Clark at NBC News: Democrats Pounce After Cohen Admits He Lied to Congress About Trump Tower Project in Russia. (Emphases mine.)

Top Democrats on Thursday excoriated [Donald] Trump after his former longtime personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about a project to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., said there is a "culture of corruption" surrounding Trump and renewed calls to protect special counsel Robert Mueller, who brought the bombshell charges against Cohen on Thursday morning in Manhattan federal court as part of his investigation into Russian election meddling.

...Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chairman of [the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence], said Cohen's admission is just another example of one of Trump's "closest allies lying about their ties to Russia and Russians."

"You've got all these close associates of the president, one after another, pleading guilty, often pleading guilty about their ties to Russia and Russians, and what are they covering up for?" Warner added.

He said Cohen was "obviously" one of the witnesses "we've always wanted to have come back" before the committee.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, called Cohen's deal a "very significant plea and statement" and suggested that there were others who possibly lied to congressional investigators.

"It means that when the president was representing on the campaign that he has no business interests in Russia, that that wasn't true," Schiff said. "This, I think, only underscores I think the importance of not only bringing Mr. Cohen back before our committee but also looking into this issue of whether the Russians possess financial leverage over the president of the United States."

...Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement on Thursday that Cohen's admission "raises serious questions about the president’s relationship with Russia and whether he and his family have been honest with the American people."

"Today's guilty plea clearly shows that we still don't know the full story and that Special Counsel Mueller must be allowed to complete his investigation without interference or delay," Feinstein said.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, said that Cohen's guilty plea is a serious offense and that he wants to know why he lied to Congress originally.

"He lied to Congress apparently about dealings between Trump and Russia. And that leads me to suspect that there are more dealings that the president wanted hidden," Nadler said. "And this raises all kinds of questions with respect to the question of how much — whether the Russian government has any kind of hold on the president because of his financial dealings and whether the president knew about the obvious collusion between his campaign and the Russians."

He said that he thinks it is a sign that Congress needs to step up and have "an honest investigation."
I hope you're all resting comfortably on your fainting couches before you read this next bit, but it turns out that Republicans DON'T AGREE with Rep. Nadler that it's time for "an honest investigation" into Donald Trump's collusion with and possible (ahem) personal compromisation by the Russians.

My favorite is the loathsome Sen. John Thune, who ran to Fox News to disgorge his execrable talking points:
"I don't think at this point that there has been anything that, in any way, changes the landscape, so to speak, where the president is concerned," Thune said in an interview with Fox News Thursday. "He has argued all along there wasn't any collusion on the part of his campaign team or his administration with Russia. And I haven't seen anything that disproves that."

Thune added that the Mueller probe should be thorough and complete, but can't go on forever. He said Trump has important work to do for the American people and it is time to "move on."

"And the longer these things drag on, it just, it gets, I think, very wearing on the American people," he said. "The report needs to come out. We need to know what happened, but I agree with my colleagues that the time I think has come to start drawing this to a conclusion."
The unmitigated temerity of this fucking guy! As if the Republican Party really gives two fucks about what wears on the American people. (If they did, they wouldn't spend their time passing massive tax cuts for the wealthy and destroying the social safety net.) The reason Thune wants the probe to end now is because it hasn't directly implicated anyone in the White House which would oblige the Republican Party to take down their own president or permanently implode their party in a refusal to hold accountable an Oval Office traitor from their ranks.

That the probe has lasted as long as it has, has only served Republicans, giving them egregious amounts of time to consolidate their power behind Donald Trump. They lost the House in the midterms, which was a big blow for them and a big success for us, but they continue to orchestrate their takeover via the federal courts every day.

They've wasted no time, despite their transparent complaints about the duration of Mueller's probe, and I sure hope to fuck that Mueller hasn't been wasting any time, either.

Open Wide...

Mike Pence Is a Scoundrel Who Won't Go Quietly

One of Donald Trump's most loyal stenographers, the New York Times' Maggie Haberman, has put this shit into the world on behalf of the president: [Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] "Is Mike Pence Loyal? Trump Is Asking, Despite His Recent Endorsement."

One. No. Mike Pence is not loyal.

Two. If Trump imagines that publicly questioning Pence's loyalty is going to make him more loyal, he doesn't understand his veep at all. This passive-aggressive shit categorically is not going to make Pence more loyal, because Pence has never been loyal. (And never will be.) Positioning himself proximate to Trump's power isn't loyalty. His objective is to seize that power for himself, as soon as possible.

Three. I suspect Trump will swiftly discover all of the above once arrives the day in January marking the halfway point of his term, at which time Pence can assume the presidency and still be eligible to serve two full terms as president himself.

I have long said that I believe Pence has been working with the FBI since the campaign and with Mueller since he started his investigation, and I believe it still. And, as I have said many times, to really understand Mike Pence, you have to understand that he has wanted to be president virtually his entire life, and he will do anything to get it. (Besides being a decent human being with good policy, obviously.)

All of which means: Pence knows if Trump goes down in an election loss in 2020, his own last, best shot at the presidency goes down with it — meaning his best bet is to make sure that Trump goes down via resignation or impeachment. Even election rigging can't help someone who doesn't get nominated.

Four. About that "recent endorsement." Trump publicly asked Pence to be his veep again only after a reporter asked the question, seemingly out of left field, at a press conference. I had an instinct that Pence had planted the question, so I asked if anyone knew who the reporter was, and got the answer: Mark Meredith, who just so happens to have done a ridiculous softball interview with Pence in July.

And in trying to find out more about him, I saw this tweet, which led me to discover he works for Nexstar Media Group, the second largest media group after Sinclair.

So this kid reporter (who is terrible, by the way, if you watch that interview) somehow is a credentialed White House reporter for Nexstar, and just randomly decided to ask if Pence would be on the ticket again. The day after the midterms, in which Trump was delivered a staggering defeat.

And he explained it on Twitter thus: "I thought it was as good as [sic] time as any to ask."

Yeah. And it was just coincidentally the best time for Pence to get his boss to publicly commit to keeping him a heartbeat away from the presidency.

No wonder Trump is getting antsy. He should be.

Open Wide...

This Is a Display of Dominance

[Content Note: Sexual assault.]

One of the things that's getting lost in the Brett Kavanaugh nomination news is what this entire situation means in terms of the Republican Party's consolidation of their power.

Given that Kavanaugh has now been accused of sexual assault and lying to the Senate Judiciary Committee, it would be easier, frankly, to switch the nominee and ram that person through as quickly as possible.

Even allowing that the Republican Party is full of indecent wrecks of humanity who don't care that Kavanaugh is a liar or an abuser, they've still got a tougher road ahead if they press forward with him.

There is, of course, no shortage of conservative judges with similar qualifications to Kavanaugh and an equal willingness to be the Trump Regime's lackey on the Supreme Court.

So why go the harder route?

Because to back down, even for an easier road to the same destination, would concede that they are not yet all-powerful; that they can still be stopped.

By public pressure, if not rules, laws, norms, or ethics.

The only reason to dig in is to prove that their coup is virtually complete. To show that not only are they refusing to provide checks and balances on the president, but that there are no longer any checks or balances on them.

This is a display of dominance, a flick of the tail of a dragon who has just learned to breathe fire.

Keep up the pressure. Keep making noise. Keep resisting.

Open Wide...

Mike Pence Makes His Move

Mike Pence has been making moves to leverage Donald Trump's corruption into a Pence presidency since the moment Paul Manafort plucked him from his losing gubernatorial reelection bid in Indiana. But as some powerful Republicans signal that they have no more use for Trump's theatrics, Pence took a bold step this weekend, indicating that he is cooperating with Special Counsel Bob Mueller's investigation.

As I've noted many times previously, there has been no public disclosure about Pence working with Mueller, so the fact that Pence casually offered up this piece of information during the Sunday political news shows is significant.

Vice President Mike Pence said he would sit down for an interview with special counsel Robert Mueller if asked.

"I would. I would be more than willing to continue to provide any and all support in that," Pence said in an interview that aired Sunday on CBS' Face the Nation. "And we have outside counsel that will advise me accordingly."

..."He has not" asked for an interview, Pence said. "Although we've provided any and all information, and we'll continue to do that."
A couple of observations:

1. Pence is usually extremely cagey and does not volunteer extraneous information. He could have simply responded that he would be willing to sit down for an interview if asked, and that he has not been asked. But he additionally volunteered the information that he's been cooperating and that he will continue to cooperate. That sends a couple of important messages about which side he's on, in Trump vs. the traitors in his administration.

2. It's shocking that Mueller still has not asked Pence for an interview, given that Pence is not only the vice-president, but led the presidential transition, during which many of the things being investigated took place. That suggests either Mueller is totally incompetent — or Pence has freely given Mueller any- and everything he needs without necessitating a formal interview request.

3. I noted back in January that I thought Pence had long been cooperating secretly with federal investigators:
My speculative theory is that Pence, once he came aboard the Trump campaign, immediately saw evidence of their poorly concealed collusion with Russia and knew they would not get away with it. He also, however, knew that if he quit the campaign, his presidential ambitions were dead in the water. (Remember, he was about to lose the governorship in Indiana.) But he knew if he stayed with the campaign, he could go down with the rest of the rats.

So he decided to play both hands: Be Trump's running mate, and be Trump's betrayer. Trump would win unscathed, and take Pence one step closer to the presidency, or Trump would win (or lose) and find himself in the middle of an investigation, and Pence would feed the feds what they needed and take himself one step closer to the presidency.

If it were Pence, that would explain why there has been absolutely no indication that Bob Mueller is investigating Pence, and why Pence doesn't get but a passing mention in Michael Wolff's book.

Pence is not a patriot. He's just wildly ambitious — and undiluted conniving evil.

A guy who would do anything to be president. Including being Trump's veep. And possibly his foil.
Nine months ago, that may have seemed like a wildly far-fetched supposition. I daresay it does not look remotely so far-fetched anymore, based on the vice president's own words.

4. I have the same problem with Pence's machinations here as I do with the rest of the White House officials participating in Bob Woodward's book and announcing their coup in the New York Times and various other anti-democratic power plays.

Pence is an illiberal, authoritarian snake who isn't "resisting" Trump and participating with Mueller's investigation because he cares about this nation or its democratic institutions; it's because he cares about his own personal ambitions for the presidency more than anything else on the planet.

It's because he would like to be the one behind whom the Republican Party completes the consolidation of its power.

5. This was a very public betrayal of Donald Trump. For Pence to come out from behind his mask so brazenly and abruptly will surely shock Trump, because his colossal ego mistook Pence's gross obsequiousness for genuine loyalty.

Pence knew that. It was a move designed to jar Trump and isolate him even further. That will weaken Trump — which is good for these traitors, but terrible for everyone else, whose safety hangs in the balance as Trump becomes increasingly unstable as he's backed into a corner.

That tells you everything you need to know about Mike Pence, frankly. This disclosure was designed to do maximum damage to Trump, with zero regard for how rocking him might roil the rest of us.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 596

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Kavanaugh Open Thread and Queen of Cassandras: Hillary Clinton and Mitch McConnell Is Unintentionally Honest.

Here are some more things in the news today...


In Wednesday's We Resist thread, I shared an item about an Emirates airplane being quarantined at JFK Airport after dozens of passengers became ill on the flight. Two additional flights were quarantined after arriving in Philadelphia:
All passengers were later released after being checked by health officials, CBP said in a statement. None were taken to hospitals.

The passengers reported sore throat, cough and none were identified with fever, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spokesman Benjamin Haynes. CDC officers, working with local responders, checked the travelers for influenza and other respiratory illnesses.

"None of the passengers are severely ill, and they will be released and informed of test results in 24 hours," Haynes said in a statement. "Passengers from the two flights who were not ill continued with their travel plans."

Some 250 people in both planes were "held for a medical review," as a precaution, according to a statement from Philadelphia International Airport.

Officials on Wednesday quarantined more than 500 passengers and crew on Emirates Airlines 203 flight that landed at New York City's John F. Kennedy International Airport. At least 19 passengers from that flight were confirmed as sick, with symptoms including fever, coughs, and vomiting. Tests confirmed influenza among some of those travelers.

In both the Kennedy Airport and Philadelphia cases, passengers had recently traveled to Mecca for the hajj.
So, although it sounds scary, it's likely just a fairly routine contagion from lots of human beings in close quarters: "Outbreaks of flu and respiratory illness are common among the millions who gather for hajj."

In more alarming news...


I'll note that, without knowing the exact location, these bombers could have been investigating the Canadian coast.

* * *

Lachlan Markay, Asawin Suebsaeng, Spencer Ackerman, and Erin Banco at the Daily Beast: 'We See Ourselves as Rebels': Trump's Internal Resistance [Sic] Celebrates. "'If there are senior people in leadership positions and these are their observations and feelings, then their efforts can't just stop at the op-ed or move to mitigate the president here and there. They need to take steps that are more bold,' said a State Department official who was not cleared to talk to journalists. 'Publicly resign, en masse.' Without mass resignations, the official considered the op-ed little more than reputational insurance. 'Folks have been looking to pay premiums on that policy for a while now. Anyone from the outside can see how dysfunctional it is, and you're complicit' as a political appointee, the official continued." Yup.

Also: As long as they stay working within the administration, every single horrible thing that Trump does now gets filtered through the prism of questioning whether it was one of the things they support, or one of the things they supposedly tried to stop but failed. Are they really unable to stop Trump's ongoing and escalating war on the press, for example, or are they actually okay with it?

Aaron Blake at the Washington Post: Trump Crosses a New Threshold for Anti-Media Rhetoric, Jokingly Praising a Congressman for Assaulting a Reporter. "Trump on Thursday night ratcheted up his not-so-veiled attacks on the media, making light of an assault perpetrated by a Republican member of Congress on a journalist and suggesting it was done on behalf of his state. At a rally in Billings, Mont., Trump ran through the state's GOP elected officials before landing upon Rep. Greg Gianforte. 'I'll tell you what: This man has fought — in more ways than one — for your state. He has fought for your state,' Trump said. 'Greg Gianforte. He is a fighter and a winner.' It's possible the White House will try to offer an alternate explanation for Trump's comments. Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, for instance, has repeatedly said Trump never 'promoted or encouraged violence' — despite clear, objective evidence to the contrary."

Also from the same rally:


The serious part of the dais jokester, however, is this: Selection of who gets seated behind the candidate is generally a problematic tradition, but it's typically justified with securing safety for the candidate, to which there's obviously some truth. And it's troubling that the Trump Regime clearly isn't doing good vetting of people who will be that close to the president.

The country would explode if something happened to Trump live during a rally. And his security team appears to be failing to adequately prevent that.

Which should make all of us wonder: Are the security staff part of the "White House Resistance" and deliberately letting things slide? How can we even know the answer to that question, even if we're reassured it isn't the case? After all, the anonymous official disclosed they are willing to lie to "protect the country," and we're supposed to just trust them that whatever that means to them will mean the same thing to us.

I hope you're beginning to see, if you didn't already, the many problems with the "White House Resistance."

Again: It's a fucking coup.

* * *

Nicole Lafond at TPM: Papadopoulos Sentencing Coming Friday After Weeks of Waffling over Plea Deal. "George Papadopoulos, a former [Donald] Trump campaign adviser, will be sentenced for lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia on Friday, after pleading guilty to the charge nearly a year ago. The sentencing will be significant for special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into Russia interference in the 2016 election, as Papadopoulos was the first person associated with Trump to agree to cooperate with the investigation, a move he recently was reconsidering."

[Content Note: White privilege] Jason Johnson at the Root: With Great Power Comes...Less Responsibility? How New DNC Rules Hurt a New Generation of Black Officials. "I'm sure Bernie Sanders and his supporters, some of whom are African American, don't see the weakening of superdelegates as check on black power. I'm sure they think these new rules make the Democratic primary fairer and — by extension — more democratic. But that's usually how race and power work. It's not about intentions. It's about consequences. And as a consequence of these rules, intended or not, black elected officials will have less say in 2020 than at any point in party history."


I'm sorry, are we supposed to judge negatively a person who demonstrates patriotism as a bid for the presidency, especially in this particular moment? Oh.

* * *

[CN: Police violence; death; racism; video may autoplay at link] Erik Ortiz and Jareen Imam at NBC News: Dallas Officer Enters Apartment She Mistakes for Her Own, Fatally Shoots Man Inside. "A Dallas man was killed late Thursday when a police officer returning home from her shift entered the wrong apartment in her building and eventually opened fire, authorities said. Details surrounding the death of Botham Shem Jean, a 26-year-old native of the Caribbean island of St. Lucia, were not immediately available early Friday. His mother, Allie Jean, said in a phone interview that his family was stunned to learn of his death. 'He did no one any wrong,' she said. Dallas police in a statement said that preliminary information suggests the officer involved called for help, and told responding officers that 'she entered the victim's apartment believing that it was her own.'"

[CN: Police violence; misogynoir; child abuse] Casey Quinlan at ThinkProgress: Ohio Cop Faces Pre-Disciplinary Hearing After Tasering 11-Year-Old Girl at Grocery Store. "A Cincinnati police officer who used a Taser on an 11-year-old Black girl at a grocery store last month was placed on restricted duty and will face a pre-disciplinary hearing. Although the Cincinnati Police Department says officers are allowed to use a Taser on children over the age of 7 and adults under the age of 70, an internal review found that Officer Kevin Brown violated the department's use of force policy in using the Taser. ...The officer was doing off-duty security work at a Kroger's grocery store when he spotted the girl, Donesha Gowdy, attempting to leave with her friends. The officer said that he asked her to stop and she ignored him. Gowdy told NBC News that she was not 'aggressive' to the officer and did not try to fight him. Again, she is 11 years old."

[CN: Guns; racism; images of weapons at link] Kate Way at Mother Jones: A Firsthand Look at Teachers Training to Pack Heat. "So far, the majority of school districts that have said they are arming teachers have been in largely rural, mostly white communities. Yet schools serving low-income, black and brown students may feel the weight of misguided responses to school shootings. Since the Columbine shooting in 1999, concerns about school safety have often been met with an increase in police presence, metal detectors, and surveillance cameras, particularly in urban schools. The disproportionate effect of these security measures on students of color has been well documented. So far, the Trump administration's approach to mass school shootings would continue this trend."

[CN: Rape culture]


What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Honest People Don't Work for Donald Trump


The metrics by which people are guessing who wrote the op-ed don't take into account the context that all of the conceivable culprits already chose a path of breathtaking indecency when they signed onto the Trump Regime.

These aren't decent people. They're not honorable people. They're immoral garbage people.

So I don't really give a fuck if Mike Pence says he didn't write it, or if the preamble to the piece says the author's job could be at stake and Trump can't technically fire the vice president so therefore it can't possibly be Pence. That doesn't mean Pence didn't write it! Pence is a liar and Trump is unconstrained by the norms of our democratic institutions.

Whoever wrote it will lie about it and justify the lie, if they are ever so obliged, the same way they're justifying their coup — by claiming that they were protecting the nation.

But the only thing these shitbirds care to protect is themselves.

Never forget that. Never.

Open Wide...

The Republicans Casually Announce Their Coup

Last night, the New York Times published an op-ed authored by an anonymous White House senior official titled: "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration." The subhead reads: "I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations."

That alone is enough that every single one of us should be angry — because it is not the disclosure of a "resistance" within the White House; it is the casual announcement of a coup.

Just yesterday, on the subject of current and former White House staffers who participated in Bob Woodward's book about the administration, I wrote:

To whatever degree Trump is truly inept and dangerous (both of which he certainly is), the people who stick around in his administration, unless and until they are fired, aren't trying to protect the country or the world from Trump. They are trying to protect the conservative agenda from being derailed by him.

Over and over, we are asked to mistake as "keeping him in check" what is in actuality keeping him on track.

These are very different things. And we can't be fooled by traitors who want us to believe they are patriots.
Nothing could have more perfectly anticipated the anonymously-penned op-ed, and its author's mendacious and vainglorious attempt to frame their secret coup as an act of heroism.

The senior official makes plain, just as I observed, that they do not seek to derail Trump's vile agenda, but to protect it from him: "To be clear, ours is not the popular 'resistance' of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous."

Trump, they argue, is not a real Republican, however, and so they must intervene in his presidency. Here, then, is the justification for their "resistance": "Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets, and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright."

This, of course, has long been a popular argument with conservatives who want to distance themselves from Donald Trump's worst behavior, even as they exploit it to achieve their agenda. It has always been wrong and it is wrong now: Trump is not an anomaly of Republican politics, but its inevitable endgame.

But now that his exchange of dogwhistles for bullhorns has leapfrogged the GOP's consolidation of power exponentially forward in two years, and these "heroes" and the interests they represent (which does not include We the People) are ready to resume the veneer of a political party that prizes democracy and doesn't seek to destroy it at every turn, Trump has become less useful.

And so, writes the senior official:
The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren't for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.

It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what's right even when Donald Trump won't.

The result is a two-track presidency.
This is not of comfort to me, cold or otherwise. It should not comfort anyone who remains committed to democracy. If these "unsung heroes" truly value democracy, as they claim, then the way forward is not to undermine the sitting president, but to unseat him. To make a principled and visible exit. To argue for his removal. To persuade their colleagues in Congress to do their job and hold this president accountable.

But that would require actual risk and sacrifice. It would require losing their jobs, and it would require letting go of their ability to control the narrative via anonymous op-eds, and it would require risking the conservative agenda.

All of which any person who really cares more about this country than themselves and their political party would do. Especially if they're brazen enough to call themselves "unsung heroes" in the pages of the paper of record.

The fact is: The person who submitted this op-ed and their White House conspirators are not heroes. They are sinister authoritarians who are positioning themselves as defenders of democratic institutions even as they aggressively subvert them.

I loathe Donald Trump as much as any human can, but I love my country. Its stewardship doesn't belong in the hands of these reprobates any more than the president they are willing to undermine but not overthrow.

They want to keep him in place while the GOP consolidates power behind this presidency, whoever is running it. While elections are rigged, while districts are gerrymandered, while votes are suppressed, while dark money funds their candidates, while the judiciary is stacked with corrupt right-wingers, while state legislatures are gerrymandered and stolen, while marginalized people are oppressed, while babies are kept in cages, while class warfare is waged against the 99 percent, while unions are busted, while workers lose their rights, while public education is destroyed, while the environment is irretrievably fucked.

These are not people who value democracy. They are people who want to destroy it on their terms.

Who want to do it with civility.

They are hoping that the rest of us will be grateful — and, more importantly, be quiet — as they covertly take over the presidency as they see fit, until Trump is removed and replaced with someone whose vulgarity won't belie the obscenity of their agenda.

Let us understand this cynical and deplorable manipulation, and never trust a single person who has had anything to do with this administration, not ever again.

* * *

Note: People have naturally been speculating about the author of the piece. Vice President Mike Pence and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats seem to be the most popular suggestions. As I said on Twitter, I don't know if Pence wrote the piece; I do know that he's definitely the kind of person who would. Frankly, so is Coats.

Fun Fact: Mike Pence once wrote a paper about trash calling Dan Coats a Nazi! Really.

Open Wide...