Christian News Wire and WND.com show up in my Google News feed from time to time, and right now they are both talking about Ray Comfort's latest movie, "The Atheist Delusion". Comfort's press release to Christian News Wire touts "Atheism destroyed with one scientific question!"
The question isn't mentioned. Even the movie's website doesn't mention the question. Since there is so much smoke and noise about this movie, I decided to see where it is showing. I checked Fandango and got nothing. I searched the Internet, and got... nothing. This movie, as far as I can tell, isn't playing anywhere.
From the movie's website, I found that I can DOWNLOAD the movie for a mere $19.99! Which is insane, since for that price I can buy two tickets to Star Trek Beyond, and still have change left for a bag of M&Ms.
So I went looking for spoilers, and found them on Hemant Mehta's blog. So here's the spoiler, here's the question that Ray Comfort asks atheists that according to World Net Daily, "stuns" atheists...
Where did DNA come from?
Comfort points out that DNA is complex, that it contains information. It's like a book. And books have creators, therefore DNA has a creator. Right?
Are you stunned? Have you lost your atheism? Or are you remembering Paley's watch?
This is a slick trick that I see happen too often in apologetics - ask a professional a question that is not in their field of study. Ask a physicist about biology, ask a biologist about astrophysics. The answers you get are muddled and lacking any depth - then jump on THOSE answers and yell, "AHAH!"
It works even better if the person is not prepared to respond. And Comfort's "Living Waters" demonstrates the methods of 'ambush reporting' as its preferred style of asking questions.
In other words, "The Atheist Delusion" is tabloid journalism, or business as usual for Ray Comfort.
As for his question, "where did DNA come from?" I'll answer that.
I don't know. What does the deity of the Bible have to do with it?
The idea that information must have a creator is incorrect. I could go into information theory to show that information can happen if the process of creating information has a built in "ratchet" to keep the wheels spinning in one direction. In the modern theory of evolution this ratchet is called, "natural selection". And let's skip the entire field of machine learning...
Instead, as an electronic engineer, I'll bring up the example of Evolvable Hardware. More specifically, read about Dr. Adrian Thompson's experiment in evolving a circuit in an FPGA.
Circuits that exist inside FPGAs are usually created using a Hardware Definition Language of some sort. They are created by a creator - usually an electronic engineer with a software proficiency. But Dr. Thompson proved that FPGAs could be created using an evolutionary process based on artificial selection - the sister to natural selection that we see in evolution.
The resulting circuit meets the artificial selection requirements without ever having been created by a human.
Where did the information in this circuit come from? Dr. Thompson didn't write it.
Maybe God did it? Maybe we should ask Ray Comfort? Because what does he know about electrical engineering?
But having read several of Comfort's apologetics, I think I could answer for him. He would skip the question entirely, and ask me who built the FPGA. Which is a neat way to tap-dance away from the actual question that is asked.
Here is one simple question that will destroy Christians.
Can you prove that your deity created the universe?
Showing posts with label Engineering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Engineering. Show all posts
Steorn introduces salable product. Still no "Free Energy"
I just received a press release from Steorn. You might remember this company from my previous blog posts.
To summarize, Steorn dramatically advertised that they would demonstrate a mechanical "over unity" or perpetual motion machine back in July of 2007. Steorn announced that they would demonstrate this machine at the Kinetica Museum in London England, but the demonstration failed when it experienced "technical difficulties" due to the machine having an unforeseen sensitivity to light which caused it to fail. That was the last we heard about a public demonstration of their equipment.
Personally, I think their machine had an allergy to skeptical observation - but perhaps I'm too cynical? Seriously, I thought they were hyping impossible vaporware in order to attract gullible investors. I believed that they had no intention of creating any sort of real product.
Well, I was wrong, and I'm not afraid to admit it!
The press release from Steorn today has announced the foundation of a new laboratory. But better yet, it announced the availability of test equipment designed to support those "organisations developing rotary and magnetic systems." Here are Steorn's first two products in this lineup:
On the Steonlab website, the products look sleek and beautiful. They are easily of Tektronix quality in visual appeal. They also come with software packages that create reams of data and graphs automatically.
You have to be a specially accepted member of the Steorn website before you are allowed to view product pricing, so I don't know how much this equipment costs. However, I read the Steornlabs legal Terms and Conditions with interest:
I think Steorn has found a way to make a product that they can actually sell, without coming out and admitting that perpetual motion or energy machines don't actually work. I think that their product will be geared to those individuals who fervently believe in "over unity", but who don't have the foundational knowledge to realize that they can duplicate these sensors in their own labs using off-the-shelf parts. (Hint - buy a Hall Effect sensor, and hook it up to a Tektronix digital storage oscilloscope. Learn to use the basic skills you would learn in a freshman Physics lab to subtract environmental forces from the forces you intend to measure. Learn to use Excel to make your own graphs.)
If you don't have the training or ability of a competent electronics technician, I guess the Steorn equipment would be pretty valuable to you.
In this press release, Steorn also mentions the release of "ZeroF passive magnetic bearings" due out sometime this summer. But I'm not sure what that could be. The name seems to suggest that these bearings will be free of magnetic flux, which would be useful if your perpetual motion machine is allergic to unforeseen electromagnetic energy. (Light, for example.)
Steorn also announced that it's over unity machine, the "Orbo" is due out by the end of this year. Finally! I can't wait to get one. I plan on feeding the output energy from my Orbo into the input and create my own mult-megaton explosion!
But I guess I'll have to do that in a dark room.
To summarize, Steorn dramatically advertised that they would demonstrate a mechanical "over unity" or perpetual motion machine back in July of 2007. Steorn announced that they would demonstrate this machine at the Kinetica Museum in London England, but the demonstration failed when it experienced "technical difficulties" due to the machine having an unforeseen sensitivity to light which caused it to fail. That was the last we heard about a public demonstration of their equipment.
Personally, I think their machine had an allergy to skeptical observation - but perhaps I'm too cynical? Seriously, I thought they were hyping impossible vaporware in order to attract gullible investors. I believed that they had no intention of creating any sort of real product.
Well, I was wrong, and I'm not afraid to admit it!
The press release from Steorn today has announced the foundation of a new laboratory. But better yet, it announced the availability of test equipment designed to support those "organisations developing rotary and magnetic systems." Here are Steorn's first two products in this lineup:
- A Hall-effect based sensor to measure the amount of magnetism of an object.
- A torque sensor - designed to measure the magnetic force component of torque.
On the Steonlab website, the products look sleek and beautiful. They are easily of Tektronix quality in visual appeal. They also come with software packages that create reams of data and graphs automatically.
You have to be a specially accepted member of the Steorn website before you are allowed to view product pricing, so I don't know how much this equipment costs. However, I read the Steornlabs legal Terms and Conditions with interest:
Every order placed via our Website will be subject to acceptance by Steorn. We reserve the right to decline any order without providing a reason for doing so, regardless of whether payment has been received by us. Should we decline an order where payment has been received, the payment will be refunded in full.Wow, that's not creepy or paranoid at all is it? You don't see Tektronix doing something as silly as this.
I think Steorn has found a way to make a product that they can actually sell, without coming out and admitting that perpetual motion or energy machines don't actually work. I think that their product will be geared to those individuals who fervently believe in "over unity", but who don't have the foundational knowledge to realize that they can duplicate these sensors in their own labs using off-the-shelf parts. (Hint - buy a Hall Effect sensor, and hook it up to a Tektronix digital storage oscilloscope. Learn to use the basic skills you would learn in a freshman Physics lab to subtract environmental forces from the forces you intend to measure. Learn to use Excel to make your own graphs.)
If you don't have the training or ability of a competent electronics technician, I guess the Steorn equipment would be pretty valuable to you.
In this press release, Steorn also mentions the release of "ZeroF passive magnetic bearings" due out sometime this summer. But I'm not sure what that could be. The name seems to suggest that these bearings will be free of magnetic flux, which would be useful if your perpetual motion machine is allergic to unforeseen electromagnetic energy. (Light, for example.)
Steorn also announced that it's over unity machine, the "Orbo" is due out by the end of this year. Finally! I can't wait to get one. I plan on feeding the output energy from my Orbo into the input and create my own mult-megaton explosion!
But I guess I'll have to do that in a dark room.
Steorn's "Free Lunch" is tested today
Starting today, Steorn is displaying a scaled down version of a mechanical “over unity” or perpetual motion machine at the Kinetica Museum in London England. Dubbed the “Orbo” this device is supposed to use permanent magnets to generate a rotating motion that can then be harnessed in a way that defies conventional understanding of thermodynamics.
I’ve spoken about the Steorn device before in my blog, and what I’ve said before still stands. I think that they are either self-deluded, or an out and out fraud. I don’t think their demonstration in the museum will amount to much – it will either be a low friction device with source of motive power that is either hidden or not very obvious, or it will use stored power in some way. If they get it going at all - there seems to be a bit of confusion about that.
From Steorn’s website:
The Kinetica Museum website also said that the event would start at 6PM London local time, but that has already passed as I write this – the newest word from the Over Unity forums is that the demonstration will start at 6PM ET. 6PM ET is 11PM London local time, which seems like an odd hour to start the demonstration. I think that perhaps Steorn may have encountered some setup problems. Any engineer could tell you that the first demonstration of a prototype model is fraught with danger. Personally I like to have prototypes in place and running the day before a demonstration, and I test them obsessively.
My opinion is that Sean McCarthy is speaking in technobabble. I’ve seen no mathematics to back up his claims, and I think that his working prototypes will either be found to be faulty, or will never actually become widely available – depending on whether McCarthy is self-deluded or a fraud.
There have been hundreds of claims of perpetual motion or over-unity energy machines. The claimants have been, without fail, unsuccessful in getting their machines into the market place. Perhaps this is because the secret cabal of scientists and power-mongers who control the world’s energy supplies have actively suppressed these inventors. Perhaps it is because these inventors are self-deluded, poorly educated, or frauds bent on separating investors from their money.
Steorn’s website has this to say about the Orbo:
I think these are optimistic predictions. A pessimistic prediction is that Steorn will always be right on the edge of the distribution of a practical device, and will even patent it – but it will never, quite, be ready for sale to the public. Or perhaps they will sell devices to the public under a very specific license that limits device owners in the way that they publish research on these devices.
My safest prediction is that Steorn’s personal stock will increase while they never quite succeed in creating a practical application from their over-unity machines.
On a final note, I'd like to make the observation that the Steorn website is in constant flux, web pages disappear and links to the Steorn website are apt to become dead without notice. I find that to be a bit odd.
================================
6PM PT - July 4th update.
Well, the Steorn web page that talked about the demonstration has gone MIA. The live web feed has been showing a continuous picture of what looks like Big Ben. Endgadget is reporting that the event has been postponed due to technical difficulties. The Steorn web site says:
======================
10 AM PT - July 5th update
It seems like Steorn might not be online at all today. Text on the live stream link says:
On a side note, camera 3 from the live stream shows the sidewalk outside the Kinetica art museum's window, where it appears that a street market is doing business. Occasionally you see a curious shopper peeking into the window at the Steorn display, which as of right now is merely an empty transparent box.
Has Steorn violated any laws of Physics? Are they merely converting energy from a previously untapped source? Will "The Government" shut them down before they can prove their concept? Has the "Oil Cartel" already bought out Sean McCarthy?
Orac, over at Respectful Insolence has more on Steorn.
I’ve spoken about the Steorn device before in my blog, and what I’ve said before still stands. I think that they are either self-deluded, or an out and out fraud. I don’t think their demonstration in the museum will amount to much – it will either be a low friction device with source of motive power that is either hidden or not very obvious, or it will use stored power in some way. If they get it going at all - there seems to be a bit of confusion about that.
From Steorn’s website:
Orbo is based upon the principle of time variant magneto-mechanical interactions. The core output from our Orbo technology is mechanical. This mechanical energy can be converted into electrical energy using standard generator technology either by integrating such technology directly with Orbo or by connecting the mechanical output from Orbo to the generation technology. The efficiency of such mechanical/electrical conversions is highly dependent on the components used and is also a function of size.Steorn CEO Sean McCarthy is quoted at Silicon Republic as saying:
Orbo technology is subject to continuous development. This development is focused on improving the manufacturability of the technology, production costs and power density. Orbo was initially developed as using stop-start mechanisms (with a power density of 0.5 Watts per cm3), Steorn is currently finalizing the development of constant motion systems and a significant improvement in power density is anticipated
Orbo technology… was discovered accidentally (and) theoretically produces energy from nowhere using magnetics.Endgadget has a photo of the device that is supposed to be tested at the museum, (shown here) and has been keeping track of when the Orbo is supposed to be displayed via streaming video online. (link to streaming video site)
“The law of conservation of energy has been very reliable for 300 years, however it’s missing one variable from the equation, and that’s time,” said McCarthy.
McCarthy explained … that Orbo technology works on the basis that occurrences in magnetic fields do not happen instantaneously, and are therefore not subject to time in the way that, say, gravity is.
This time variance allows the Orbo platform to generate and consistently produce power, going against the law of conservation of energy which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed.
“This is as big a claim as you can possibly make in the world of technology and science,” said McCarthy.
The Kinetica Museum website also said that the event would start at 6PM London local time, but that has already passed as I write this – the newest word from the Over Unity forums is that the demonstration will start at 6PM ET. 6PM ET is 11PM London local time, which seems like an odd hour to start the demonstration. I think that perhaps Steorn may have encountered some setup problems. Any engineer could tell you that the first demonstration of a prototype model is fraught with danger. Personally I like to have prototypes in place and running the day before a demonstration, and I test them obsessively.
My opinion is that Sean McCarthy is speaking in technobabble. I’ve seen no mathematics to back up his claims, and I think that his working prototypes will either be found to be faulty, or will never actually become widely available – depending on whether McCarthy is self-deluded or a fraud.
There have been hundreds of claims of perpetual motion or over-unity energy machines. The claimants have been, without fail, unsuccessful in getting their machines into the market place. Perhaps this is because the secret cabal of scientists and power-mongers who control the world’s energy supplies have actively suppressed these inventors. Perhaps it is because these inventors are self-deluded, poorly educated, or frauds bent on separating investors from their money.
Steorn’s website has this to say about the Orbo:
Under the terms of a modified general public licence and for a nominal fee, Steorn's intellectual property will be made available concurrently to all interested parties, from individual enthusiasts to larger research organisations. Steorn is taking this bold move to accelerate the deployment and acceptance of its technology for both humanitarian and commercial products.I predict that the total combined energy added to power grids or used to power vehicles by Steorn devices will be easily measurable in watt-hours, and that all such energy will be consistent with conventional methods of energy storage and conversion. I predict that Steorn devices will amount to nothing, and that if these devices are made publicly available, the average person will never use one as more than a toy - a toy that eventually “winds down”.
I think these are optimistic predictions. A pessimistic prediction is that Steorn will always be right on the edge of the distribution of a practical device, and will even patent it – but it will never, quite, be ready for sale to the public. Or perhaps they will sell devices to the public under a very specific license that limits device owners in the way that they publish research on these devices.
My safest prediction is that Steorn’s personal stock will increase while they never quite succeed in creating a practical application from their over-unity machines.
On a final note, I'd like to make the observation that the Steorn website is in constant flux, web pages disappear and links to the Steorn website are apt to become dead without notice. I find that to be a bit odd.
================================
6PM PT - July 4th update.
Well, the Steorn web page that talked about the demonstration has gone MIA. The live web feed has been showing a continuous picture of what looks like Big Ben. Endgadget is reporting that the event has been postponed due to technical difficulties. The Steorn web site says:
Update 4/7/07 23:30Giving Steorn the benefit of the doubt - I'll say they merely had problems setting up their prototype, and this isn't a fraudulent event. But I'll make another prediction - I'll predict that Steorn's future will be plagued with problems where their products are almost ready to demonstrate.
Due to slight technical difficulties we will now be publishing the live stream as of Thursday 5th July.
======================
10 AM PT - July 5th update
It seems like Steorn might not be online at all today. Text on the live stream link says:
Important update on the Kinetica demo:Great, that's all we need. An electrical generator that is so sensitive that it breaks down due to unchecked ambient energy. Lights, leakage from your microwave oven, maybe even energy from your CB radio will kill it?
We are experiencing some technical difficulties with the demo unit in London. Our initial assessment indicates that this is probably due to the intense heat from the camera lighting. We have commenced a technical assessment and will provide an update later today. As a consequence, Kinetica will not be open to the public today (5th July). We apologise for this delay and appreciate your patience.
On a side note, camera 3 from the live stream shows the sidewalk outside the Kinetica art museum's window, where it appears that a street market is doing business. Occasionally you see a curious shopper peeking into the window at the Steorn display, which as of right now is merely an empty transparent box.
Has Steorn violated any laws of Physics? Are they merely converting energy from a previously untapped source? Will "The Government" shut them down before they can prove their concept? Has the "Oil Cartel" already bought out Sean McCarthy?
Orac, over at Respectful Insolence has more on Steorn.
"God's wind" and Ray Comfort's modern parable
Ray Comfort, of banana and soda can fame, is not just an evangelist who turns Atheists into Christians by insulting them, he is also a prolific author who has written books intended to convert Atheists to Christianity by insulting them. These books include: “God Doesn't Believe in Atheists: Proof That the Atheist Doesn't Exist”, “How to Make an Atheist Back-Slide” and “Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution: Letters to an Atheist”. Comfort's latest soon-to-be-available book is published by the Christian publishing house Bridge-Logos, and is kindly titled, “The Atheist Delusion”.
Insults and not so subtle jabs seem to be Ray Comfort's standard MO – which were clearly displayed during his recent debate. It doesn't seem to matter how many degrees are under your belt; if you do not hold a belief in the Christian god then Comfort will surely treat you like an idiot. I'm fairly sure that Comfort would be willing to apply the same sort of ridicule to doctors Hector Avalos and Bart D. Ehrman.
Ray Comfort has given us all an advanced look at a few pages from “The Atheist Delusion” in an article called “Three Wise Fools”, which you can read in full on the Christian Worldview Network website.
This article uses almost a thousand words (including footnotes) to retell a favorite Christian fallacy. I've seen this argument fairly often, but I've never seen it labeled – so I will call this the “God's wind” argument, which is descriptive not only of the argument, but what I think of it.
In the “God's wind” argument a nonbeliever supposedly says, “I won't believe in something I can't see!” And the believer then pounces with, “You can't see the wind, but you know it's there!” The nonbeliever then is supposed to fall defeated in the dust as the believer struts off in triumph.
Comfort cleverly reworks this argument by telling a parable of three men who are told about “the miracle of electricity” for the first time. These men “who considered that they were very wise” (heh heh – get the subtle biblical reference?) were shown an electric lamp and a user's manual by a representative from Edison Electric. Of course the lamp merely needed to be turned on, but the men in Comfort's modern parable spent all their time nit picking the manual and refusing to “believe” in electricity. Finally they get up in disgust and leave. From the article:
In reality nonbelievers like myself are told that God exists, that the bible is true, and that this supernatural world is mixed in with the natural. So of course we do ask for the proof for these assertions, and we are unsatisfied when we are given “belief” as an answer. We also disagree that belief is the same thing as trust. Belief is synonymous with faith, not trust! Trust requires evidence.
How can I trust that wind exists when I can't see it? Because I can detect it through other means. I can feel it in my hair and across my skin. I can measure its speed and direction and combined with the proper media I can watch it stir up waves or dust storms. I don't need to “believe” or “have faith” in the wind. Instead I can accept that what I feel or measure is a natural phenomenon, as opposed to supernatural.
As an Electrical Engineer, I'm in a somewhat unique position that I can measure electricity in ways that most people are only passing familiar. I can measure electric potential, current flow and how it reacts to resistance, I can measure or calculate power. I design complex devices based on the things that scientists have learned about electricity through experimentation. I play with electricity as a hobby, causing it to run in little paths at my command in the small “brain” of my little robotic toys.
And you play with electricity too. This “miracle of electricity” is what you are using now, harnessed under your command and doing your will as you scroll down my blog before wandering off to another part of the Internet with your next mouse click. You don't require “faith” that your monitor will continue to work second by second, you only need to accept that it works by natural principles that people like myself understand and use to your benefit. If you want to learn more about these principles, you need only to study. It's somewhat difficult, but millions of people have degrees in electrical engineering, so it can't be that hard. I'll be glad to give you some pointers.
I would love to see proof of God, but instead what I get are illogical tautologies such as “All created things require a creator.” True believers point at bits of nature and say, “There's your proof!” But similar believers who lived centuries ago pointed out lightning and thunder as “proof” just as willingly.
We've harnessed the lightning, and we create our own thunder. What next will we do with your “proof” of God?
Insults and not so subtle jabs seem to be Ray Comfort's standard MO – which were clearly displayed during his recent debate. It doesn't seem to matter how many degrees are under your belt; if you do not hold a belief in the Christian god then Comfort will surely treat you like an idiot. I'm fairly sure that Comfort would be willing to apply the same sort of ridicule to doctors Hector Avalos and Bart D. Ehrman.
Ray Comfort has given us all an advanced look at a few pages from “The Atheist Delusion” in an article called “Three Wise Fools”, which you can read in full on the Christian Worldview Network website.
This article uses almost a thousand words (including footnotes) to retell a favorite Christian fallacy. I've seen this argument fairly often, but I've never seen it labeled – so I will call this the “God's wind” argument, which is descriptive not only of the argument, but what I think of it.
In the “God's wind” argument a nonbeliever supposedly says, “I won't believe in something I can't see!” And the believer then pounces with, “You can't see the wind, but you know it's there!” The nonbeliever then is supposed to fall defeated in the dust as the believer struts off in triumph.
Comfort cleverly reworks this argument by telling a parable of three men who are told about “the miracle of electricity” for the first time. These men “who considered that they were very wise” (heh heh – get the subtle biblical reference?) were shown an electric lamp and a user's manual by a representative from Edison Electric. Of course the lamp merely needed to be turned on, but the men in Comfort's modern parable spent all their time nit picking the manual and refusing to “believe” in electricity. Finally they get up in disgust and leave. From the article:
"And they expect us to believe in this invisible force called 'electricity . . . .' That has to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard! I don't know about you, but I'm getting out of here."The whole of Comfort's parable is fallacious – an elaborate strawman argument set up by Comfort so that he can knock it down with a single punch to its grassy jaw. During the process, Comfort manages to work in little hateful jabs at nonbelievers.
His two friends heartily agreed. Electricity didn't exist. It seemed to make sense to them that the reason it didn't exist was because they believed that The Owner's Manual was filled with mistakes.
The three men stepped out of the room into the darkness, still wise in their own eyes. They even decided to form a club that was devoted to telling other people that electricity didn't exist.
In reality nonbelievers like myself are told that God exists, that the bible is true, and that this supernatural world is mixed in with the natural. So of course we do ask for the proof for these assertions, and we are unsatisfied when we are given “belief” as an answer. We also disagree that belief is the same thing as trust. Belief is synonymous with faith, not trust! Trust requires evidence.
How can I trust that wind exists when I can't see it? Because I can detect it through other means. I can feel it in my hair and across my skin. I can measure its speed and direction and combined with the proper media I can watch it stir up waves or dust storms. I don't need to “believe” or “have faith” in the wind. Instead I can accept that what I feel or measure is a natural phenomenon, as opposed to supernatural.
As an Electrical Engineer, I'm in a somewhat unique position that I can measure electricity in ways that most people are only passing familiar. I can measure electric potential, current flow and how it reacts to resistance, I can measure or calculate power. I design complex devices based on the things that scientists have learned about electricity through experimentation. I play with electricity as a hobby, causing it to run in little paths at my command in the small “brain” of my little robotic toys.
And you play with electricity too. This “miracle of electricity” is what you are using now, harnessed under your command and doing your will as you scroll down my blog before wandering off to another part of the Internet with your next mouse click. You don't require “faith” that your monitor will continue to work second by second, you only need to accept that it works by natural principles that people like myself understand and use to your benefit. If you want to learn more about these principles, you need only to study. It's somewhat difficult, but millions of people have degrees in electrical engineering, so it can't be that hard. I'll be glad to give you some pointers.
I would love to see proof of God, but instead what I get are illogical tautologies such as “All created things require a creator.” True believers point at bits of nature and say, “There's your proof!” But similar believers who lived centuries ago pointed out lightning and thunder as “proof” just as willingly.
We've harnessed the lightning, and we create our own thunder. What next will we do with your “proof” of God?
Electronics - or why I don't hate Mondays
Isn't this a neat sight? This is what was waiting for me this morning. The first-run prototypes of the board I designed last month arrived on Friday, so I spent part of Sunday, and most of Monday preparing them to be turned on for the very first time. And I have another day or two of work ahead of me.
My board is designed to plug into a system motherboard, and since that motherboard is designed by another team and weeks away from completion, I've got to 'fool' my board into thinking it is where it belongs. Hence the current wonderful mess you see here - I'm creating a 'test jig'. (click to see the whole photo)
If I do it correctly, I'll prove that the basic concept works as I expected, and will then be able to move into the programming of the on-board microcontroller.
And I'm really happy with this particular little microcontroller! It is a Microchip PIC24FJ32GA002, which I know means very little to my regular readers. Using a car analogy, I would compare it to a dune-buggy hot rod. Street legal, full of power and ability and very rugged.
Also Microchip did a couple of neat things with this little device. They modified their standard Harvard Architecture into something that is optimized for a C compiler so that I can program it using ANSI C. They also jam-packed the device with specialized peripherals to allow me to use A/D converters, multiple communications protocols, Pulse-Width Modulated outputs, infrared communication and more. All of this into a chip with only 28 pins. And that is the neatest part of it all - the device is part Field-Programmable Gate Array - I can reconfigure which pin connects to which peripheral in software, in real time.
I'd have to stretch that dune buggy analogy to give it a dashboard full of indicators and peripherals, all in a buggy that could be reconfigured at a touch to allow driver to enter and exit from any door he wanted, including the trunk, with such reconfiguring happening seamlessly while he was jumping sand dunes.
This is the fun part of electrical engineering, (or of any "Make") watching something you designed start working for the very first time. I know that my first attempts will falter - but it will eventually work. Perhaps I'll find an error in my design, or more than one. This is only the "first run" of this board, so if there is an error I will correct it in the next revision. In which case the current version will be scrapped.
But if that happens, don't feel bad for the lost little microcontroller. I have a robotic dog on my bench at home that would be perfect for this device. My little robot doggie is looking for some new braaaaains!
So it's back to that old grindstone, soldering iron in hand, headphones on and listening to Skepticality, or Freethought Radio, or Point of Inquiry, or Seth Shostak. It's no wonder I work late, and on the weekend, when this sort of fun is to be had!
Oh, sorry. I meant, "stupid Mondays."
My board is designed to plug into a system motherboard, and since that motherboard is designed by another team and weeks away from completion, I've got to 'fool' my board into thinking it is where it belongs. Hence the current wonderful mess you see here - I'm creating a 'test jig'. (click to see the whole photo)
If I do it correctly, I'll prove that the basic concept works as I expected, and will then be able to move into the programming of the on-board microcontroller.
And I'm really happy with this particular little microcontroller! It is a Microchip PIC24FJ32GA002, which I know means very little to my regular readers. Using a car analogy, I would compare it to a dune-buggy hot rod. Street legal, full of power and ability and very rugged.
Also Microchip did a couple of neat things with this little device. They modified their standard Harvard Architecture into something that is optimized for a C compiler so that I can program it using ANSI C. They also jam-packed the device with specialized peripherals to allow me to use A/D converters, multiple communications protocols, Pulse-Width Modulated outputs, infrared communication and more. All of this into a chip with only 28 pins. And that is the neatest part of it all - the device is part Field-Programmable Gate Array - I can reconfigure which pin connects to which peripheral in software, in real time.
I'd have to stretch that dune buggy analogy to give it a dashboard full of indicators and peripherals, all in a buggy that could be reconfigured at a touch to allow driver to enter and exit from any door he wanted, including the trunk, with such reconfiguring happening seamlessly while he was jumping sand dunes.
This is the fun part of electrical engineering, (or of any "Make") watching something you designed start working for the very first time. I know that my first attempts will falter - but it will eventually work. Perhaps I'll find an error in my design, or more than one. This is only the "first run" of this board, so if there is an error I will correct it in the next revision. In which case the current version will be scrapped.
But if that happens, don't feel bad for the lost little microcontroller. I have a robotic dog on my bench at home that would be perfect for this device. My little robot doggie is looking for some new braaaaains!
So it's back to that old grindstone, soldering iron in hand, headphones on and listening to Skepticality, or Freethought Radio, or Point of Inquiry, or Seth Shostak. It's no wonder I work late, and on the weekend, when this sort of fun is to be had!
Oh, sorry. I meant, "stupid Mondays."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)