From BusinessWeek:
President Barack Obama said he is “agnostic” about raising taxes on households making less than $250,000 as part of a broad effort to rein in the budget deficit.
Obama, in a Feb. 9 Oval Office interview, said that a presidential commission on the budget needs to consider all options for reducing the deficit, including tax increases and cuts in spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
“The whole point of it is to make sure that all ideas are on the table,” the president said in the interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which will appear on newsstands Friday. “So what I want to do is to be completely agnostic, in terms of solutions.”
Yes, I get it. In a Spock "we're all mature adults, so let's be brutally honest" sense, we do need to put everything on the table if we're truly going to get the budget in order and address federal spending over the long term. But in a "do you really want every single Democrat to lose the next election?" sense, I'm not entirely sure that brutal honesty - and I mean, brutal - was the most appropriate response from the President.
I'm not saying he should lie. I'm saying that if the point of a commission is to take the heat off of Democrats, or any one political party or politician, and spread the blame around for the necessarily painful cuts we need to be facing (in order to spare any politician or party from the political damage they'd face embracing such cuts - and in the end, undermining the cuts themselves), then you don't start off the negotiation by quasi taking public responsibility for those very same cuts. And in a Spock sense, the President did not take responsibility for raising taxes on people making under $250k and cutting Social Security and Medicare. But in a real American sense, that's exactly how his words will be twisted by the Republicans, and perceived by the public.
Who is in charge of messaging at the White House? From the beginning of the Obama administration the White House's messaging has been quite poor. It's why lots of Republicans say the man is a socialist, and do so with impunity, it's why 75% of Americans think the stimulus was wasted (when it wasn't), and it's why health care reform is now a rather large mess. This White House kind of sucks at messaging. And this is another, rather horrifying, example.
Who is in charge of messaging at this White House? Why do we have to keep receiving "clarifications" telling us that the President, or some unknown staffer, didn't really mean what they very clearly said?
This interview today is going to be used against every single Democrat in the next election, and it's going to be used against President Obama in 2012. The Republicans won't be so kind as to tell the voters the truth about deficit reduction. They'll simply choose smart politics over smart policy - they'll reject any such budget cuts or tax increases and make us look like fools.
The President's instinct at the beginning of a hugely important negotiation was to go public and negotiate with himself, taking partial ownership of something incredibly dangerous. The entire point of the negotiations was to spread the risk around. Not to permit the Republicans to yet again hang this around our necks.
Seriously. Who is in charge of messaging at the White House? They need to be fired. And God help us if it's the President himself. It's been a year now. These mistakes are no longer forgivable nor acceptable.
Read More......