Britain’s departure from the European Union may not mean the
end of the EU, but it does mean the end of the EU as the way we, in the UK,
perceive our relationship with ‘Europe’. It means that we need to engage with
our neighbours in a way not mediated by EU institutions. It is striking how
people have been talking about ‘Europe’ as though that simply meant the EU, and
how the issue of human rights, connected with a treaty and court entirely
separate from the EU and covering a wider set of countries, as though it was
the same thing. (David Cameron, remember, wanted to withdraw from the European
Court of Human Rights. He did not want to withdraw from the EU.) The EU had
taken over our imaginative understanding of Europe.
The same people wanted to roll up the UK’s relationship with
the Republic of Ireland, our bilateral deal with France over the migrant camp
in Calais, and even our relationship with the United Nations and the USA as though
all these things were just aspects of our relationship with the EU. Perhaps
real life is too complicated for political sloganeering.
For better for or for worse, we will be leaving this
particular political structure. What is necessary now is to re-imagine the UK
in Europe. And that is something for which UK Catholics have a special
vocation.
The Catholic genius is a taking seriously the natural world,
not as untainted by the Fall but not as evil either. This understanding makes
science possible without making science a tyrant. It makes art possible without
making art an idol. It gives us an appreciation of nature, without an embrace of
paganism. Wherever Catholics are, there is an acceptance of the good things of
life and the interesting things of life, the achievements of humanity and the
glories of nature, alongside restraint, an openness to criticism, and balance.
It is this that lies at the basis of European culture. For
all the triumphs of European Protestant art and science—which as a Briton I
certainly cannot ignore—the conceptual framework which makes all of this
possible is Catholic, and the degree to which Protestantism has taken things
towards a Manichean rejection of matter, or anti-intellectualism, and the
degree to which reactions against such tendencies has given us Romantic neo-Paganism,
European culture has declined, disintegrated, or simply come to a halt.
This is the grain of truth in Belloc’s bombastic remark, the
Faith is Europe, and Europe is the Faith. And this is the positive thing, along
with many negative things, which Europe has bequeathed to the Americas, to
Africa, and to Asia: a model of how to work with nature, with natural reason
and human desires and strivings, without becoming enslaved by them. This is the
European genius, a genius which is at the bottom of much that is good and
organic and authentic in a world now more and more dominated by European
culture and its Holywood spin-offs.
That is why the Catholic Church does not flatten out local
cultures, but enables them to flourish in new ways. The monumental artistic achievement
of the Book of Kells expresses native, pre-Christian Irish artistic traditions,
but it would never have happened without the Catholic Church. The staggering Latin
American Baroque tradition gives expression to the passion, industry, and
inventiveness unique to Latin America, but it was made possible by the Catholic
Church. The delicacy and compassion of English medieval poetry and our early
modern composers is supremely English, and totally Catholic in a way that no
other nation’s Catholic art is Catholic. It is an expression of Catholic truth
through the English spirit. It is the English spirit at work in the Vineyard of
the Lord, alongside the spirit of every other nation, distinct, mutually influential,
and harmonious.
It is not just possible for a Catholic from one nation to
value and appreciate the culture of another; it is necessary. English Catholic
pilgrims to Europe have always marvelled at the glories of Rome and Jerusalem,
at Paris and Cologne and Santiago: Saxon Catholics, late Medieval Catholics, 18th
century Catholics, and Catholics today do so. Some of these Catholics bring
back important cultural ideas from these trips. But they don’t cease to be
English, and for their part our continental brothers do not expect us to do so.
Catholic thought not only lies at the centre of what it is
to be European, but it gives us a way of appreciating diversity, not of
tolerating it but of really valuing other traditions, of making them part of
our imaginative worlds without ceasing to be a party to the diversity
ourselves: without ceasing to be distinct.
The European Union has a problem with all this because it
rejects the Christian roots of Europe. This might seem a superficial thing, but
the argument about the wording of the European Constitution and halos on
commemorative coins symbolises something deep. The only way our rulers in
Brussels and Westminster can imagine maintaining harmony is to destroy diversity,
often in the name of diversity. The hysterical persecution of people selling
potatoes by the pound or rolling cheeses down hills is part of a mindset which
cannot understand how different ways of life can express universal values,
because it admits no universal values. Without real, substantive, universal values,
there is only uniformity, efficiency, and ‘elf ’n’ safety.
Not through the political machinery of a bureaucratic state
or super-state, but through friendship, mutual respect, and re-teaching of the
fundamental values of the Christian religion, will Europe be restored.
Well said.
ReplyDeleteA wonderful, thoughtful, hopeful essay-- thank you!
ReplyDeleteIn regards to the EU, it would seem that it does have universal values. It so happens that those values do not necessarily agree with what the Catholic faith teaches.
ReplyDeleteEven the Catholic Church of old, would rightly suppress the traditions and cultural aspects that are incompatible with the Catholic faith in various parts of the world. The EU seems to do the same in regards to anything and anyone who opposes its policies. The Christian roots for them is a target to to be eliminated because it just doesn't gel with their policies.
A timely and perceptive essay. Thank you.
ReplyDelete