Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

February 23, 2023

In Case You Were Wondering:
Yes, Curt Schilling Is Still A Vile Person Overflowing With Hate & Mind-Numbing Stupidity

Have you been wondering if Curt Schilling is still a vile racist transphobic boneheaded Nazi sympathizer who harrasses school shooting survivors and thinks lynching journalists would be "awesome"?

Well, you're in luck because I have the answer.

Yes! The transphobic former ESPN employee, the welfare queen who was given $75 million of Rhode Island taxpayers' money and pissed it all away because he's a incompetent businessman, and the sedition-promoting cheerleader for white supremacists continues to broadcast his stunning ignorance into any available open microphone. 

And now this proud member of the QAnon Cult, who promoted Steve Bannon's plan to scam $25 million from MAGA donors, who publicly defended Trump after video surfaced of the serial rapist hitting on a 10-year-old girl (and appeared to admit to ogling his 14-year-old daughter's friends in the process), and the guy who is clueless and terrified of science and logic, is now posing as a historian and foreign policy expert on Fox.

Quoting a few comments to this tweet: "Zelensky is Mussolini seems a stretch" . . . "Did he go through a DeSantis school system?" . . . "Schilling shilling for Putin".

Outkick, which is owned by Fox Corp., has hired the guy who no longer trusts Fox's (his employer) news reporting because the network has "headed to the FAAAAAR left". He will host The Curt Schilling Baseball Show, which describes itself thusly: "Questioning the consensus and exposing the destructive nature of 'woke' activism, OutKick is the antidote to the mainstream sports media that often serves an elite, left-leaning minority instead of the American sports fan."

Maybe Aubrey Huff can be his guffawing sidekick cough-talking racial slurs in the background. 

So why has Schilling agreeed to work for a "FAAAAAR left" company? Isn't he a massive hypocrite for doing that? (Again, yes.)

On Thursday, Eric Hananoki of Media Matters posted a voluminous collection of hateful and stupid postings from Schilling, who self-identifies as a Christian (although when he recently tweeted "Biden is Hitler", he was a Jew).

When I first read these, I thought they were from the teachings of Jesus. You might be mistaken, too.

Schilling's conspiracy theories: QAnon, school shooting conspiracy theorist, "the global vaccine hoax"
Schilling endorsed and promoted the QAnon conspiracy theory in a 2018 Facebook post, writing of a QAnon video: "I started to research this about a month ago and was sent this today. You will not be able to stop watching once you start." He has also worn a QAnon shirt with its slogan while doing Facebook videos.

Schilling promoted the conspiracy theory that the mass shootings in Parkland, Florida, and Sandy Hook, Connecticut, were hoaxes. On February 26, 2018, he shared a link to a now-deleted article which embedded text that called Sandy Hook a "hoax" and purportedly included videos which "contain eyewitness testimony that prove the Parkland High School shooting did not happen as they told us." Schilling defended himself in the comments section from criticism, saying, "Tell me something doesn't seem weird?"

Schilling shared a now-deleted thread from a Parkland conspiracy theorist who claimed that "this stinks to high heavens" and "why are the interviews that do NOT agree with the one shooter or the narrative that CNN is pushing being heard?" On Twitter, he also promoted a conspiracy theory falsely claiming that Parkland mass shooting survivor David Hogg was a supposed crisis actor.

Schilling is an election denier who has defended the January 6 insurrectionists and called for the country to "Declare Martial Law, arrest the liars (Schiff, Pelosi, Shumer) the treasonous idiots (Schiff, Clinton) and put them on trial AND a complete re-vote." He has pushed the conspiracy theory that Dominion helped steal the 2020 election.

Schilling tweeted that the Democratic National Committee "murdered Seth Rich."

Schilling has promoted the conspiracy theory that the Clintons have murdered numerous people.

Schilling called the COVID-19 vaccine "the global vaccine hoax that's killing people."
Schilling repeatedly expressed dislike for Outkick's owners and corporate cousin Fox News
Schilling has frequently tweeted his dislike of the majority of Fox News and the Murdochs. Here are numerous examples from his Twitter account:

"I said it before, the Murdoch sons are HARD CORE Hollywood liberals. Once dad was out of the picture the transformation began." [September 16, 2020] "Not really considering the murdoch children are hard core hollywood liberals. Only a matter of time. IMO it's time we @BreitbartNews started our own news channel." [November 27, 2018]

"Tonight put me over the hump. Fox has joined the gaggle of things I cannot trust to be objective. No worries, just disappointing." [November 6, 2018] "Fox is also a very involved member of the Fake News crowd ICYMI." [September 14, 2018]

"Think about this conceit. Rupert Murdoch thinks he matters enough that him wanting someone gone from the WH is actually news." [August 15, 2017]

"I've pretty much stopped caring what they think. Outside of Kilmeade, Carlson and Baier they are headed to the FAAAAAR left." [August 23, 2017]
Schilling's bigotry: Anti-trans and anti-Muslim posts; blaming Black people for slavery in the U.S.
Schilling was fired from ESPN for promoting an anti-trans post in 2016 "which had a man in ripped women's clothes under a caption that read: 'Let him in to the restroom with your daughter or else you're a narrow minded, judgmental, unloving, racist bigot who needs to die!'"

Schilling has repeatedly demonized Muslims as killers and compared them to Nazis.

Schilling on slavery: "African slavery was created by blacks, on blacks, to blacks, for blacks. They were sold by blacks, to blacks, and to whites."

Schilling has called Jewish philanthropist George Soros "the puppeteer of the Democratic party." (There is a long and violent history related to the antisemitic puppet master trope.)

Schilling compared conservatives to Jewish people in 1930s Germany, tweeting: "Biden is Hitler mid 1930s rousing the German people on the evils of the Jewish people. With 'Jew' being the modern-day conservative American who believes in God and Country (regardless of sex, creed or color mind you)."

Schilling promoted a large collection of Nazi memorabilia on Facebook in August 2015.

June 28, 2022

January 6 Committee, Public Hearing #6: Eyewitness Ties Trump Directly To Sedition; He Knew The Mob He Called To DC And Incited Was Heavily Armed & He Demanded They Be Allowed To Keep Deadly Weapons (Including AR-15s) For Armed Attack On Lawmakers In Capitol

Tuesday, June 28, 2022, was a day unlike any other in the 246 years of United States history.

The Select Committee investigating January 6 attack on the US Capitol heard nearly an hour of in-person, jaw-dropping testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, the 26-year-old aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. It was unlike anything we have ever heard about the actions of a US president.

Numerous reports here.

May 27, 2022

"I Am Not Okay With The State Of This Country."
Giants Manager Gabe Kapler Will No Longer Join His Team On Field For Anthem, Denouncing The "Self-Congratulatory Glorification Of The ONLY Country" With Near-Daily Mass Shootings

San Francisco Giants manager Gabe Kapler said he will refrain from coming out on the field with his team for the playing of the national anthem "until I feel better about the direction of our country".

Kapler, a member of the Red Sox for four seasons, including 2004, wrote on his website today that his decision is not meant as a grand gesture. "It's just something that I feel strongly enough about to take that step.''

Kapler admitted he "felt like a coward" two days ago, standing on the field for a pre-game moment of silence for the 21 people massacred in the US's most recent school shooting, for abandoning his principles and allowing his "discomfort [to] compromise [his] integrity".

His post ("Home of the Brave?") can be read in full here:

The day 19 children and 2 teachers were murdered, we held a moment of silence at sporting events around the country, then we played the national anthem, and we went on with our lives.

Players, staff and fans stood for the moment of silence, grieving the lives lost, and then we (myself included) continued to stand, proudly proclaiming ourselves the land of the free and the home of the brave. We didn't stop to reflect on whether we are actually free and brave after this horrific event, we just stood at attention.

When I was the same age as the children in Uvalde, my father taught me to stand for the pledge of allegiance when I believed my country was representing its people well or to protest and stay seated when it wasn't. I don't believe it is representing us well right now.

This particular time, an 18 year old walked into a store, bought multiple assault rifles and hundreds of rounds of ammunition, walked into a school with an armed resource officer and its own police district and was able to murder children for nearly an hour. Parents begged and pleaded with police officers to do something, police officers who had weapons and who receive nearly 40% of the city's funding, as their children were being murdered.

We elect our politicians to represent our interests. Immediately following this shooting, we were told we needed locked doors and armed teachers. We were given thoughts and prayers. We were told it could have been worse, and we just need love.

But we weren't given bravery, and we aren't free. The police on the scene put a mother in handcuffs as she begged them to go in and save her children. They blocked parents trying to organize to charge in to stop the shooter, including a father who learned his daughter was murdered while he argued with the cops. We aren't free when politicians decide that the lobbyist and gun industries are more important than our children's freedom to go to school without needing bulletproof backpacks and active shooter drills.

I'm often struck before our games by the lack of delivery of the promise of what our national anthem represents. We stand in honor of a country where we elect representatives to serve us, to thoughtfully consider and enact legislation that protects the interests of all the people in this country and to move this country forward towards the vision of the "shining city on the hill." But instead, we thoughtlessly link our moment of silence and grief with the equally thoughtless display of celebration for a country that refuses to take up the concept of controlling the sale of weapons used nearly exclusively for the mass slaughter of human beings. We have our moment (over and over), and then we move on without demanding real change from the people we empower to make these changes. We stand, we bow our heads, and the people in power leave on recess, celebrating their own patriotism at every turn.

Every time I place my hand over my heart and remove my hat, I'm participating in a self congratulatory glorification of the ONLY country where these mass shootings take place. On Wednesday, I walked out onto the field, I listened to the announcement as we honored the victims in Uvalde. I bowed my head. I stood for the national anthem. Metallica riffed on City Connect guitars.

My brain said drop to a knee; my body didn't listen. I wanted to walk back inside; instead I froze. I felt like a coward. I didn't want to call attention to myself. I didn't want to take away from the victims or their families. There was a baseball game, a rock band, the lights, the pageantry. I knew that thousands of people were using this game to escape the horrors of the world for just a little bit. I knew that thousands more wouldn't understand the gesture and would take it as an offense to the military, to veterans, to themselves.

But I am not okay with the state of this country. I wish I hadn't let my discomfort compromise my integrity. I wish that I could have demonstrated what I learned from my dad, that when you're dissatisfied with your country, you let it be known through protest. The home of the brave should encourage this.

April 15, 2022

MLB: White-Washing And Diminishing Jackie Robinson's Career For 75 Years
(Because Honestly Reporting On Robinson's Circumstances Would Mean Admitting To & Exposing Its Decades & Decades & Decades Of Grotesque Racism)


My April 15, 2019 post ("Everything You Know About Jackie Robinson Is Wrong") was prompted by my partner Laura's review of Arnold Rampersad's Jackie Robinson: A Biography.

When she began reading Rampersad's book, she feared "learning some awful truth about Branch Rickey, perhaps that he was not the hero that I thought him to be". But the Brooklyn Dodgers president and general manager "turned out to be even better than I knew". There was a kicker, though: "I was surprised to learn that almost everything I knew about Jackie Robinson's baseball career was wrong."
Robinson learned his aggressive style of play from the Negro Leagues. . . . Wrong.

Robinson's promise to turn the other cheek against the racism he endured on the field lasted many seasons. . . . Wrong.

Robinson, a morally-upstanding Christian who did not drink, smoke, swear, or sleep around, was portrayed as a model citizen. . . . Wrong.

Robinson's health later in his life suffered because of the abuse he quietly absorbed. . . . Wrong.
For most of his 10 years with the Dodgers, Robinson was portrayed in the newspapers as aggressive and out of control. Once he began speaking out (after his rookie season) about the flood of racism he faced, he was permanently branded an angry complainer. New York Post columnist Jimmy Cannon wrote that Robinson's anger seemed endless ("the range of [his] hostility appears to have no frontiers") and claimed his "undisciplined protests" were driving Dodgers fans away from the team.

I ended the 2019 post:
MLB continues to whitewash its abhorrent treatment of Robinson in its annual lovefest for #42, presenting and remembering a highly-distorted version of reality. And the sports media has yet to outgrow its blatant double standard when it comes to athletes of colour. To this day, dark-skinned athletes are labelled aggressive and ill-tempered (or just plain angry) while their white counterparts are often referred to as tough, intense, and gritty.
The US media structure (of which MLB is a part) has white-washed Robinson's life and baseball experience in much the same way it has bleached all the radicalism and anger from Martin Luther King's life, his repeated condemnations of capitalism and militarism, his demand for a socialist revolution and universal basic income. The neutering of King's beliefs has been a second assassination.

The Guardian recently reported that for King's entire life (he was only 39 when he was murdered), there wasn't a single day when a majority of white Americans approved of him. (my emphasis)
In 1966, Gallup measured his approval rating at 32% positive and 63% negative. That same year, a December Harris poll found that 50% of whites felt King was "hurting the negro cause of civil rights" while only 36% felt he was helping. By the time he died in 1968, three out of four white Americans disapproved of him. In the wake of his assassination, 31% of the country felt that he "brought it on himself".

One does not have to reach back into the historical archives to explain why King was so despised. The sentiments that made him a villain are still prevalent in America today. When he was alive, King was a walking, talking example of everything this country despises about the quest for Black liberation. He railed against police brutality. He reminded the country of its racist past. He scolded the powers that be for income inequality and systemic racism. Not only did he condemn the openly racist opponents of equality, he reminded the legions of whites who were willing to sit idly by while their fellow countrymen were oppressed that they were also oppressors. "He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it," King said. "He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."

To be fair, King readily admitted that it was his goal to make white people uncomfortable. . . . [In A Letter from Birmingham Jail, he stated that nonviolent direct action] was an attempt to induce the white community to a point where marginalized people's desperate cries could no longer be ignored.

According to those polls, from 1966 to 1968, support for King among white Americans actually dropped, from 32% to about 25%. King believed most Americans were unconscious racists who refused to seriously examine their racist beliefs, ideas and practices. In 1967, he asked: "Why is equality so assiduously avoided? Why does white America delude itself, and how does it rationalize the evil it retains?" Those questions remain off-limits 55 years later – and will continue to remain taboo for many more years.

King's stinging, blunt rhetoric would have only gotten stronger and more pointed over time. I don't believe King would be well-loved today. If alive, he would be 93 years old. But let's pretend he was 65-70. He might have a majority of support (maybe), but a significant number of Democrats and liberals would be urging King to tone down the anger and take things a little slower. 

Last week, I read an article at The Daily Beast about the newspaper coverage of Robinson's major league debut, which happened on this day 75 years ago

Sidebar: In December 2020, MLB recognized seven Negro Leagues between 1920 and 1948 as major leagues. One of those leagues was the Negro American League, where Robinson played shortstop and first base for the Kansas City Monarchs. So . . .  isn't his major league debut now the date on which he played his first game for the 1945 Monarchs? May 6, 1945. Robinson's B-Ref page now lists 11 major league seasons (not 10); 1947 is his second season. Of course, MLB won't stop celebrating April 15, 1947 – which is the right thing to do, since at that time, that day was clearly his debut. But as of December 2020, Jackie Robinson's first major league season was two years before his recognized major league debut.

In "When Jackie Robinson Made History, The Sports Pages Shrugged", Theodore Hamm took a look at the New York papers before, on, and after April 15, 1947 (my emphasis)
Sportswriters had focused their attention in the run-up to opening day focused on the surprise full-season suspension of the Dodgers feisty manager, Leo "The Lip" Durocher, by baseball commissioner Albert "Happy" Chandler. Along with his close pal, Hollywood star George Raft, Durocher was known to consort with gamblers. . . . Early in 1947, Durocher—who clearly enjoyed the limelight—eloped with actress Laraine Day to Mexico . . . In response, the Brooklyn Catholic Youth Organization vowed to boycott the team's games. . . . [J]ust five days before the season started, Chandler suspended Durocher. . . .

On Opening Day, the Brooklyn Eagle, then a large-circulation paper with two daily editions, gave its most sizable front-page headlines to Joe Hatten, the Dodgers' starting pitcher against the Boston Braves. A sub-headline read, "Robinson, Jorgensen in Lineup"—thus equating the first Black player in the modern major leagues with a white fellow rookie memorable only because his nickname was "Spider."

The following day's Eagle coverage was found only in the sports section, although it did include a photo of Robinson shaking hands with Brooklyn Borough President John Cashmore and another with the first baseman in the dugout with his three fellow infielders. . . .

Such a reaction stood in contrast to what had happened a few days prior, when the Alabama-born [Dixie] Walker received a chorus of boos during an Ebbets Field exhibition game against the Yankees. Walker was one of a handful of Dodgers players who opposed adding Robinson to their roster. Noting that the jeers came from Robinson fans, the Eagle editorial board denounced the "mistreatment" of Walker, warning that it could imperil the "expansion of the Dodgers experiment in bringing a Negro into the national game." . . .
The front page of the April 16, 1947, Brooklyn Eagle was devoid of baseball news:


Harold Burr's game story on page 19 did not mention Robinson until the ninth paragraph – he "again went hitless against big league pitching". (The Dodgers had played a three-game exhibition series against the Yankees on Friday and the weekend; Robinson went 2-for-11. Friday's game was treated as his "big league debut". See below.)


Here is the Brooklyn Eagle of April 12, 1947, calling Robinson's appearance in an exhibition game at Ebbets Field his "debut" and "big league unveiling". Robinson is referred to as the "Black Meteor".


The New York Times, April 16, 1947:


New York Times, April 16, 1947, page 32:


In the Times's game story, Robinson is barely mentioned. We learned that he bunted, reached base and scored and then later grounded into a double play. (And, really, what else is there to say about his debut?)


Arthur Daley's Times column had a bit more about the "muscular Negro" who has a "ready grin" and "minds his own business" but "speaks quietly and intelligently when spoken to":


Another fact that is never discussed: major league teams moved at a glacier's pace to integrate.

I realize glaciers move much faster now; I'm referring to the really slow glaciers of the 1940s and 1950s.
1947: Dodgers [Robinson's debut], Cleveland, Browns
1948: —
1949: Giants
1950: Boston (NL)
1951: White Sox
1952: —
1953: Athletics, Cubs
1954: Pirates, Cardinals, Reds, Senators
1955: Yankees
1956: — [Robinson retires!]
1957: Phillies
1958: Tigers
1959: Red Sox
Note: Hank Thompson was the first black player for both the St. Louis Browns (1947) and New York Giants (1949).

Six years after Robinson's debut (after the 1952 season), only six of 16 teams had integrated (three in each league) and white players still made up 94.4% of major leaguers (2.9% black, 2.7% Latino).

Robinson was elected to the Hall of Fame in 1962, on the first ballot, but he just squeaked in. He needed 120 votes (out of 160) and he received 117 (77.5%).

A new four-hour documentary on Robinson from Ken Burns aired on PBS this past week. Burns calls Robinson
the most important person without a doubt in the history of baseball. I would argue that he is the most important person in the history of American sports and he is one of the greatest Americans who's ever lived – period.
At the time of Robinson's debut, according to The Daily Beast, more than a third of all major league players came from formerly Confederate states.

Teammate and pitcher Don Newcombe (the third black major league pitcher, the first black pitcher to start a World Series game, the first black pitcher to win 20 games in a season, and the first pitcher to win the NL MVP and the Cy Young in the same season): "I really don't know how he survived and performed the way he performed on the baseball field."

Robinson said the mistreatment was relentless. "I was overestimating my stamina and underestimating the beating I was taking." As was the pressure. Rachel Robinson, his wife: "He knew if he failed that social progress was going to get set back."

The second half of Burns's documentary examines Robinson's political activism (which was more varied than you might think; he supported social justice and racial integration, but he also spoke out against Paul Robeson before the House Un-American Activities Committee and supported Richard Nixon over John F. Kennedy (though he later admitted his mistake)).

MLB is extremely careful about revealing only the barest (and blandest) sliver of that side of Robinson. MLB avoids myriad topics, such as how Robinson refused to participate in a 1969 Old Timers game because MLB was not showing "genuine interest in breaking the barriers that deny access to managerial and front office positions" for black people and initially refused to throw out a pitch at the 1972 World Series for the same reason. And things like this:



April 8, 2022

G1: Yankees 6, Red Sox 5 (11)

Red Sox - 300 001 000 10 - 5  9  2
Yankees - 200 100 010 11 - 6  9  0
After taking a 3-0 lead in the top of the first before making an out, the Red Sox spent the rest of Friday afternoon doing a whole lot of nothing, watching the Yankees come back and win the opening game of the season in 11 innings.

Over a span of eight innings (from the second to the ninth), Boston got a man past first base in only one frame. Meanwhile, Alex Cora made some questionable decisions:
After the Yankees tied the game in the bottom of the eighth, he brought Matt Strahm out of the bullpen. The hirsute lefty finished the inning unscathed, but he threw only six strikes in 15 pitches.

When Xander Bogaerts came out of the game with a possible hamstring injury, after his bloop single gave the Red Sox a 5-4 lead in the 10th, Cora put Jonathan Araúz at shortstop instead of moving Trevor Story to his natural position (shortstop) and having Araúz at his natural position (second base) (rather than risk starting an X-or-Story-At-Shortstop debate?). Araúz then erred in going for a ground ball when he should have been covering second for a possible double play, and that mistake helped the Yankees tied the game in the 10th.

For the bottom of the 11th, Cora felt Kutter Crawford was his best option. Crawford lost the game in three pitches.
By the time Josh Donaldson singled off K-Craw, bringing in Extra-Runner Fuck You Rob Manfred ("ERFURM") Isiah Kiner-Falefa (and giving the Yankees their sixth walkoff in a season-opener and first since 1957*), the fun of the first inning seemed far more distant than the 3:56 time of game.

*: The Red Sox have not had a season-opening walkoff win since 1941, the longest drought of any major league team.

Gerrit Cole's first four pitches of the season were wide of the zone and Kiké Hernández walked. Rafael Devers took a strike before banging a two-run homer into the second deck in right field. Bogaerts followed with a line drive to the base of the wall in left; he was slow out of the box (on your first at-bat of the season?) and had to stop at first. J.D. Martinez doubled into the right-field corner and Bogaerts scored. 3-0 and no outs.
Then the offense went into a coma (it was serious). Cole (4-4-3-1-3, 68) got three weak outs (1-3, PF5, K) and then cruised through the next three innings. He hit Christian Vázquez with one out in the second, but Hernández hit into a first-pitch double play. A leadoff single in the fourth led to nothing.

Nathan Eovaldi (5-5-3-1-7, 76) nearly gave back the entire lead in the bottom half of the first. With one out, Aaron Judge dropped a single into right and Anthony Rizzo homered to right-center. He allowed a game-tying, cheap-ass dong by Giancarlo Stanton that barely cleared the wall in right-center.

In the fifth, New York had runners on first and second with two outs. D.J. LeMahieu lined a ball to left and Alex Verdugo made a diving catch to his right to end the threat (and Eovaldi's day).

Boston took the lead in the sixth off Clay Holmes. Bogaerts lined the ball down the left field line, hustling (this time) for a double. He took third on Martinez's groundout and scored on Verdugo's single to right-center. Story forced Verdugo at second and Bobby Dalbec singled. Miguel Castro relieved Holmes and walked Jackie Bradley, loading the bases. But Vázquez struck out.

The Red Sox went in order in the seventh and eighth innings on 16 total pitches. Garrett Whitlock relieved Eovaldi. He struck out three in the sixth, got the MFY in order in the seventh, and began the eighth by striking out Stanton. Then LeMahieu homered to right-center, another cheap-ass shot that (like Stanton's solo in the fourth) would not have been a home run in any of the other 29 major league parks.

Aroldis Chapman's first pitch of the ninth sailed to the backstop. Sadly, he did not, as he often does, pull a choke-job against the Red Sox. Dalbec popped to third and Bradley and Vázquez fanned.

Hansel Robles got the first two outs of the bottom of the ninth, but Judge doubled and Cora decided to intentionally walk the lefty Rizzo and have Robles (a righty) face the righty Stanton. The MFY's clean-up hitter must have been anxious because the first pitch was so in the dirt, it was practically underground, and he waved at it. After a foul, he chased another low pitch for an inning-ending K.

My hopes had been up for the ERFURM to be gone this season, but #FireManfred changed his mind and the Union agreed. My limited viewing of the 2021 regular season allowed me to never see a tenth inning. I was not so lucky in 2022.

Araúz began the top of the tenth at second. Hernández struck out and Devers was put on first. Bogaerts's flair dropped into left and Joey Gallo made a terrible throw to the plate. The run scored and Boston had a 5-4 lead. (Bogaerts was slow to run on this too, but it was likely his hamstring, as he also grabbed at it after sliding into second base when Martinez GIDP.)

Jake Diekman got the ball for the bottom of the tenth. He plunked LeMahieu and after a groundout, walked Aaron Hicks intentionally. That left the bases loaded for pinch-hitter Gleyber Torres. Ryan Brasier made Torres look horrible on a couple of swings (and fouls) at outside stuff before he lifted a fly to center. The runner tagged and scored. Brasier battled Kiner-Falefa for 10 pitches before striking him out (csffbbbffs).

King's second inning of work, the Boston eleventh, passed without incident. Verdugo struck out. Story struck out. Dalbec grounded to short.

Crawford threw a ball and a called strike to Donaldson in the home eleventh and then Donaldson grounded a ball up the middle to the left of second base. Araúz dove to his left but it went between him and Story for a game-winning single.

MLB continues to employ Laz Diaz.
Other Stuff:

The Yankees flew the Ukrainian flag and had a Ukrainian woman sing before the game. Why do they have to cram politics down our throats when all we want to do is relax and watch a game? Why can't they "stick to sports"? Oh, right, it's not political when it's the culture's dominant view. . . . Yes, the gesture is nice. I fully support the Ukraine people against this genocidal mass murderer (who tens of millions of Americans support (or, at the very least, who worship a guy who worships the mass murderer)). But the gesture is also off-the-goddamn-charts hypocritical and stupendously galling because, holy motherfucking drone strike, Batman, the horrific pictures of Ukraine streets strewn with dead bodies that have rightly disgusted a large majority of Americans and the US media could have been taken by photographers in Iraq at any time in the last 20 years. (I'm somewhat surprised there was not a military jet flyover after the Ukrainian women finished singing.) For all intents and purposes, no one in the US gave a single fuck about the US's war crimes in Iraq for two decades (and the numerous war crimes Joe Biden is committing right now in Syria (and the war crimes in so many countries during the US's entire existence (including the seven countries Barack "Cool" Obama was at war with at the same time))); in fact, they cheered the murder of innocents. It turns out it never really mattered to those millions of innocent dead people down through the ages whether they were murdered by a Democrat or a Republican.

Why did Yankees management play the "Evil Empire" theme as the Red Sox roster and lineup was being announced and the players lined up along the third base line? The Yankees used to play that music for themselves, gladly accepting the label Larry Lucchino put on them way back in December 2002. Google "yankees evil empire" and you'll see hundreds of examples of the MFY's idiot fans (and media) embracing the sobriquet. Are the Yankees now saying the Red Sox are the Evil Empire?

NESN's Dave O'Brien was in mid-season form when it came to saying stupid things and making mistakes. Which i expected. The first words I heard him say this season was this opening: "The Opening Week is brought to you by FTM, Major League Baseball's official crypto-currency exchange." That's not his fault; he had to read the commercials, but there are many things wrong with that sentence, the least of among them being that Opening Week is not a thing.

T2: O'Brien was saying good things about Cole' strikeout totals and ERAs, but then said that because he hasn't won a Cy Young, he has not started an All-Star Game, and he has not won a World Series game, there are "holes in his resume". He names three things that Cole cannot control at all and calls them holes in his resume.

T3: When Devers batted for the second time, O'Brien said he "hit the first pitch he saw for a home run". Actually, Devers homered on an 0-1 pitch in the first inning and O'Brien had noted the called strike because it was Cole's first of the game, coming after four balls to Hernández.

T4 & T6: O'Brien told us twice that Story "hits well against the Yankees". In fact, he has "hit nearly .400 for his career" against the Yankees. Story has played a grand total of seven games against the MFY and his batting average is .393. Four games in 2016 and three games in 2019. On June 14, 2016, he homered off Nathan Eovaldi, so that should help . . .. oh, wait. On July 20, 2019, Story had two hits off Masahiro Tanaka, who is no longer a major leaguer. I am afraid that OB thinks what Story did six years ago against someone with absolutely no connection to the 2022 Yankees is actually relevant and can predict what he will do this summer.

O'Brien asked Dennis Eckersley if Bogaerts's contract situation would be a "distraction" this season if Cora was not the manager. Has the Boston media acted any differently with Cora in the dugout? Did the media run roughshod all over Francona or Farrell? It's a stunningly stupid question.

Early in the game, Eckersley pointed out that you "don't see a lot of ground balls up the middle for hits". You don't? I am somewhat amused by the fact that the hit that won the game was . . . a ground ball more or less up the middle.

I had to work in the middle of the sixth, so I muted NESN. I'd prefer not un-mute it for the rest of the season. .  .. Why oh why are we cursed with Dave O'Brien and how long must our suffering last?

Finally (and please understand that this last comment has absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of today's game):

I FUCKING HATE HATE HATE MANFRED'S STUPID GODDAMN EXTRA-INNING RUNNER WITH THE HEAT OF 10,000 FUCKING SUNS!!! CHRIST! MANFRED! WHY ARE YOU SO INTENT ON RUINING EVERYTHING ABOUT BASEBALL, YOU USELESS FUCKING ASSHAT? 


Nathan Eovaldi / Gerrit Cole
Hernández, CF
Devers, 3B
Bogaerts, SS
Martinez, DH
Verdugo, LF
Story, 2B
Dalbec, 1B
Bradley, RF
Vázquez, C

Happy Opening Day!

The Red Sox's 122nd season begins in the Bronx – with the pitchers from last season's Wild Card game facing off again.

The Red Sox and Yankees last began the season playing each other in 2013. (That season ended well.) It was Jackie Bradley's major league debut and Boston won 8-2.

Rafael Devers was hotter than a two-peckered billy goat this spring (10-for-27, .370/.438/1.074 for a 1.512 OPS), with six home runs, three singles, and a double. He led the Red Sox in dongs, runs scored (8) and runs batted in (12). Bobby Dalbec also had a great spring (.333/.385/.667/1.052).

MLB teams will start the season with a 28-man roster and no limit on the number of pitchers. Rosters will shrink to 26 players on May 2 (about 3.5 weeks into the season). Alex Cora is carrying 15 pitchers on his Opening Day roster:

Starting Pitchers: Nathan Eovaldi, Nick Pivetta, Tanner Houck, Michael Wacha, Rich Hill
Relief Pitchers: Matt Barnes, Garrett Whitlock, Ryan Brasier, Kutter Crawford, Hansel Robles, Hirokazu Sawamura, Jake Diekman, Austin Davis, Matt Strahm, Phillips Valdez
Catcher: Christian Vázquez, Kevin Plawecki
First Base: Bobby Dalbec, Travis Shaw
Second Base: Trevor Story
Shortstop: Xander Bogaerts
Third Base: Rafael Devers
Outfield: Alex Verdugo, Kiké Hernández, Jackie Bradley
Designated Hitter: J.D. Martinez
Utility: Christian Arroyo, Jonathan Aráuz

Chris Sale begins the season on the injured list (for the third consecutive year). A stress fracture in his right rib cage will keep Sale out until at least June. (Also, let's hope he doesn't get Covid for a third time.) James Paxton is also out until June (TJ surgery). Reliever Josh Taylor is on the 10-day IL, retroactive to April 4.

More than 12,000 fans voted in The Athletic's Hope-O-Meter ("Are you optimistic about your team's chances in 2022?") and Stephen J. Nesbitt ranked teams by how many of their fans were optimistic. The Yankees ranked 21st (48%) and the Red Sox were 11th (88%). . . . In other words, 12% of Red Sox fans were pessimistic about this season versus 52% of MFY fans.


There's a bit of pressure on Cole today.



When we last saw "The Anti-Dent" . . . 


Yes, he does. It's Red Sox 6, Yankees 2!


To me, the most embarrassing part of the 2017 Astros cheating scandal is how bad they were at hiding it. . . . Banging on a trashcan to communicate what pitches are coming in real-time during home games is…not subtle? How embarrassing, I thought, to cheat and get caught! But somehow this whole scandal has become even more of an embarrassment a full four years later. . . .

Beltrán [now an employee of the YES Network] has been lying since the beginning of the investigation. . . . Beltrán still believes that this whole scandal wasn't fair, that they weren't doing anything wrong. The reason he can't seem to apologize earnestly for his role in the scandal is because he clearly doesn't believe he needs to. So far, that's worked out fine for him. None of the 2017 Astros players received a suspension from MLB.

January 29, 2022

Fat Billy Goes To Trump's Texas Whine-A-Thon/Public Therapy Session

More here.

January 27, 2022

Event Promotion Implies Dodgers And Angels Are Hosting A Fundraiser For January 6 Insurrection Organizer Who Courts Neo-Nazis (Both Teams Have Been Silent For 2 Days)

The flyer makes it look as though the Dodgers and Angels are hosting a fundraiser for a seditious neo-Nazi. However, it appears that Paul Gosar (six of his siblings called him a "traitor" and endorsed his opponent) has simply purchased a bunch of tickets that he hopes to give out to donors.

My question is: How quickly are the teams speaking out against their logos being used to promote this  racist garbage and forcing Gosar to remove the logos from his announcement?

Answer? Not fast enough.

As I publish this post, it has been close to 48 hours since AZ Right Wing Watch first tweeted the news. Numerous fans sent the tweet to both teams, but neither team has made a public announcement.

Sam Blum, The Athletic (Jan. 26 8:22 PM tweet):
This advertisement for an event w/ Rep. Paul Gosar (extremely controversial/conspiratorial politician) is posted on WinRed. It's a real ad.
IMPORTANTLY: The Angels tell me they have "no affiliation with this event & are working to have our marks removed from the advertisement."
There is also some confusion over the announced date of the event, since the teams do not play each other on February 27.

The slow pace at which MLB and the Players Union are working to end MLB's lockout likely means that nothing will be happening on either February 27 or March 27. The Dodgers and Angels should still made a very public announcement against Gosar using their trademarked logos to make his event look more legitimate.

November 10, 2021

Bobby Valentine Loses Stamford Mayor Race, Refuses To Congratulate His Opponent, Offers Half-Hearted Trumpian Excuses

Joe Erwin, New York Daily News, November 3, 2021:

Bobby Valentine's campaign for mayor of his hometown [Stamford, Connecticut] went into extra innings Tuesday night before he finally admitted defeat.

The former Mets manager was in a tight contest with Democrat Caroline Simmons in Stamford, Conn. — and told supporters there may have been some funny business at the polls. . . .

As he came to address his backers . . . Valentine [who ran as an independent] suggested some people may have cast multiple ballots.

"It makes my stomach turn to think that in our city, that they're actually telling me now, 'Oh, someone voted in person and they forgot they voted absentee,'" Valentine said.

He didn't say who the "they" were telling him about people voting more than once.

But finally, around midnight, Valentine announced he lost. . . .

"Someone says maybe I'm supposed to thank the media for all the lousy coverage that they gave us or maybe even compliment [Simmons's team] for the campaign they ran but I can't do that with an open heart and a clear mind, so I'm just going to say the campaign is over," he said. . . .

[Valentine] got back into managing with the Red Sox in 2012 . . . [Boston] won the World Series the year after he left.

Valentine is still as annoying and dooshy as he was ten years ago. We'll check back with him in 2031.

October 23, 2021

Atlanta Team Will Have Anti-Vaccine/Anti-Mask Country Star Sing National Anthem Before NLCS Game 6

The Atlanta major league baseball team has hired anti-vaccine and anti-mask country singer Travis Tritt to sing the national anthem before tonight's NLCS Game 6 against the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Tritt has proudly refused to perform in any venue with safety protocols against the coronavirus such as masks, proof of vaccination, or negative coronavirus tests. Earlier this month, he cancelled concerts in Indiana, Mississippi, Illinois, and Kentucky because of the venues' public health requirements.
This is trying to divide people. This is trying to shame people. This is trying to basically discriminate against people they don't feel are clean enough to be a part of enjoying a concert like that.
Tritt described himself as "a huge defender of basic human rights and liberty for all". He believes he is standing up against "the squelching" of freedom. He even quoted Martin Luther King Jr. in his August press release.

Fox's Tucker Carlson called Tritt "a credit to country music" and praised him for being "willing to lose money" based on his beliefs. However, Carlson is not willing to lose even one penny by leaving Fox  (and his multi-million dollar contract) for having far stricter vaccine requirements than the less restrictive government mandates he condemns nightly on his show.

Numerous hypocritical Fox hosts, including Carlson, have praised other people for quitting their jobs rather than submit to the "tyranny" of these "Jim Crow" vaccine mandate while refusing to quit their own jobs. They have also repeatedly lied on air that Fox has no vaccine mandate. But the the Fox mandate memos have been published online (the network even has a vaccine passport program).

The state of Georgia requires all children to receive multiple vaccinations "to protect them from any of 16 serious diseases" before attending school. Neither Tritt nor Carlson nor any other anti-vaxxer seems to be frothing at the mouth about all of that "tyranny", however.

The Atlanta baseball team's willingness to give its seal of approval to someone with anti-science and pro-death beliefs seems at odd with the fact that they were one of the first major league teams to open free vaccination clinics in its stadium. They also have first-hand knowledge of the devastating impact of COVID-19. First baseman Freddie Freeman contracted the virus last summer and suffered so badly he said he prayed to God, "please don't take me".

The Atlanta team supports the racist actions of its fans. While the team stopped handing out free foam tomahawks before games, it has remained utterly silent about the anti-Indigenous racism seen and heard in its stadium during each game. (Actually, that's not true. They encouraged fans to chop and chant in April 2021.) 

Sheryl Ring points out that the chop is often "used by racists to denigrate Indigenous people outside of the sports context".
That the Tomahawk Chop is racist is a fact. Indigenous people overwhelmingly consider it a slur, and we are obligated to defer to their judgment because this is an issue about them. . . .

There will be those of you who consider this "cancel culture" or "wokeness" or the like. That's interesting, however, seeing as I get more death and rape threats from posting about the tomahawk chop than I have from all of my other articles and posts combined, and that's saying something seeing as I'm a trans woman with a public platform. But frankly, Indigenous people have been protesting against the tomahawk chop for its entire existence. . . .

You don't honor a culture by donning a caricature of their identity like a costume for a few hours. But then, no racist ever believed themselves to be anything but beneficent anyway.
Ring also blasts MLB (my emphasis):
[L]et's be honest: it's the year 2021. Anyone who is doing or defending the tomahawk chop knows what profoundly harmful effects it has on Native and Indigenous people and wants to either perpetuate those harms or simply doesn't care. It's that apathy which is always, as writer J.M. Dilliard notes, the greater evil. . . .

It is absolutely galling that Major League Baseball will on the one hand remove the All-Star Game from Atlanta because of Georgia's new voter suppression law, and then on the other hand ignore that same team urging its fans to engage in racist cosplay. MLB could ban the chant tomorrow.
On Thursday, two days ago, all 30 major league baseball teams tweeted their support for Spirit Day, which raises awareness of the many bullying-related suicides of LGBTQ+ children. Here is the tweet from the Red Sox:
Two teams, Atlanta and Texas, deliberately removed any reference to LGBTQ+ persons before posting their tweets. Texas did not even include the link to the GLAAD Spirit Day website. 

Judging by the similarity of the team's tweets, each club was given a template and guidelines on what to say. But Atlanta and Texas chose instead to cater to their homophobic and hate-filled fans, not wanting to annoy or provoke them, rather than make a small performative gesture of tolerance to another group of human beings.

September 11, 2021

"An Interesting Day": A Look Back At President Bush's Movements And Actions On 9/11

On Monday, March 31, 2003, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, held its first hearings, at the U.S. Customs House in lower Manhattan. That same day, in the same building, a grassroots watchdog group known as 9/11 Citizens Watch held a press conference.

I spoke at that press conference, talking about the extensive work being done by numerous independent researchers and drawing attention to Paul Thompson's "Complete 9/11 Timeline". I had printed out and bound several copies; it was roughly 100-150 pages at that time and I handed out copies to various reporters in attendance. Around this time, I was also researching what President George W. Bush had been doing on September 11, 2001. After trying (and failing) to find detailed, reliable information online, I decided to compile it myself. "An Interesting Day" was published on May 9, 2003, and has since been cited in numerous books about 9/11 and the Bush presidency.

On the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, I'm reposting the article. While I wrote the entire 10,000+-word article myself, I listed Paul Thompson as my co-author because I had relied heavily on articles he had collected for his Timeline and because he kept after me to finish writing the damn thing. The following year, HarperCollins published Paul's book, The Terror Timeline: Year by Year, Day by Day, Minute by Minute: A Comprehensive Chronicle of the Road to 9/11—and America's Response. (I assisted with some writing and editing of entries.) The Terror Timeline remains essential reading, even after 17 years, for anyone even remotely curious about what happened before, during, and after the attacks. In the years since, I have used that book (and the Timeline, which now includes more than 7,300 entries, drawn entirely from "mainstream" news sources and books, as well as government documents) as a litmus test for any 9/11 researcher. If she does not cite it as one of the most important resources in 9/11 research, if not the most important, I am immediately highly suspicious of her credibility.

(As time has passed, some of direct links inevitably will no longer work. However, a search for a direct quote or the gist of the cite may help locate a relevant article at another news source.)

An Interesting Day: President Bush's Movements and Actions on 9/11
By Allan Wood, Paul Thompson

"It was an interesting day."—President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television. The news anchors, reporters, and viewers had little idea what had happened in lower Manhattan, but there were some people who did know. By that time, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the National Military Command Center, the Pentagon, the White House, the Secret Service, and Canada's Strategic Command all knew that three commercial airplanes had been hijacked. They knew that one plane had been flown deliberately into the World Trade Center's North Tower; a second plane was wildly off course and also heading toward Manhattan; and a third plane had abruptly turned around over Ohio and was flying back toward Washington, DC.

So why, at 9:03 a.m. – fifteen minutes after it was clear the United States was under terrorist attack – did President Bush sit down with a classroom of second-graders and begin a 20-minute pre-planned photo op? No one knows the answer to that question. In fact, no one has even asked Bush about it.

Bush's actions on September 11 have been the subject of lively debate, mostly on the internet. Details reported that day and in the week after the attacks – both the media reports and accounts given by Bush himself – have changed radically over the past 18 months. Culling hundreds of reports from newspapers, magazines, and the internet has only made finding the "truth" of what happened and when it happened more confusing. In the changed political climate after 9/11, few have dared raise challenging questions about Bush's actions. A journalist who said Bush was "flying around the country like a scared child, seeking refuge in his mother's bed after having a nightmare" and another who said Bush "skedaddled" were fired. [Washington Post, 9/29/01 (B)] We should have a concise record of where President Bush was throughout the day the US was attacked, but we do not.

What follows is an attempt to give the most complete account of Bush's actions – from Florida to Louisiana to Nebraska to Washington, DC.

Preparations

Bush's appearance at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, on September 11, 2001 had been in the planning stages since August [Booker web site], but was only publicly announced on the morning of September 7. [White House, 9/7/01] Later that same day, 9/11 hijackers Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi traveled to Sarasota and enjoyed drinks and dinner at a Holiday Inn only two miles down the sandy beach from where Bush was scheduled to stay during his Sarasota visit. [Longboat Observer, 11/21/01, Washington Post, 1/27/02]

On the night of September 10th, Bush stayed at the Colony Beach Resort – "an upscale and relatively pristine tropical island enclave located directly on the Gulf of Mexico, a spindly coral island . . . off Sarasota, Florida." [AP, 07/29/01] Zainlabdeen Omer, a Sudanese native living in Sarasota, told the local police that night that someone he knew who had made violent threats against Bush was in town and Omer was worried about Bush's safety. The man was identified only as "Ghandi." A police report states the Secret Service was informed immediately. [Hopsicker, 7/22/02]

After a private dinner with various Florida politicians (including his brother Jeb) and Republican donors, Bush went to bed around 10:00 p.m. [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01, Washington Post, 1/27/02] Surface-to-air missiles were placed on the roof of the resort [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02], and an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) plane circled high overhead. [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, p. 25] It's not clear if this type of protection was standard for the president or whether security was increased because of possible threats.

An Assassination Attempt?

Bush awoke a little before 6:00 a.m. on September 11, pulled on shorts and an old T-shirt and laced up his running shoes. [CBS, 11/1/02] At 6:30 a.m., Bush, a reporter friend, and his Secret Service crew took a four-mile jog in the half-light of dawn around a nearby golf course. [Washington Post, 1/27/02, Washington Post, 09/11/01]

At about the same time Bush was getting ready for his jog, a van carrying several Middle Eastern men pulled up to the Colony's guard station. The men said they were a television news crew with a scheduled "poolside" interview with the president. They asked for a certain Secret Service agent by name. The message was relayed to a Secret Service agent inside the resort, who hadn't heard of the agent mentioned or of plans for an interview. He told the men to contact the president's public relations office in Washington, DC, and had the van turned away. [Longboat Observer, 9/26/01]

The Secret Service may have foiled an assassination attempt. Two days earlier, Ahmed Shah Massoud, leader of Afghanistan's Northern Alliance, had been murdered by a similar ruse. Two North African men, posing as journalists from "Arabic News International," had been requesting an interview with Massoud since late August. Ahmad Jamsheed, Massoud's secretary, said that by the night of September 8, "they were so worried and excitable, they were begging us." An interview was arranged for the following day. As it began, a bomb hidden in the video camera exploded, killing the two journalists. Massoud was rushed by helicopter to a hospital in Tajikistan, but was pronounced dead on arrival (although his death was not acknowledged until September 15). [International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism, 10/30/01, Newsday, 10/26/01] The assassination is widely believed to have been timed to remove the Taliban's most popular and respected opponent in anticipation of the backlash that would occur after the 9/11 attacks. [BBC, 9/10/01, BBC, 9/10/01 (B), Time, 8/4/02, St. Petersburg Times, 9/9/02] The Northern Alliance blamed al-Qaeda and the ISI, Pakistan's secret service, for the attacks. [Radio Free Europe, 9/10/01, Newsday, 9/15/01, Reuters, 10/4/01]

Nearly three hours after the incident at the Colony, another Longboat Key resident reported a run-in with possibly the same men. At about 8:50 (when reports of the first World Trade Center crash were first broadcast), while standing on the Sarasota bay front waiting for the presidential motorcade to pass by, this man saw two Middle Eastern men in a dilapidated van "screaming out the windows 'Down with Bush'  and raising their fists in the air." The FBI questioned the man, but it's not known if this was the same van that had visited the Colony. [Longboat Observer, 9/26/01]

Later on the morning of September 11, the Secret Service searched a Sarasota apartment looking for further corroboration of Zainlabdeen Omer's report of an assassination threat. Three Sudanese men were questioned for about ten hours. The Secret Service also raided a beauty supply store in Sarasota, whose owner, identified as "Hakim," told the agents that "Ghandi" was a member of the Sudanese People's Liberation Army, a group fighting against the fundamentalist Muslim government in Sudan. [Hopsicker, 7/22/02]

Monica Yadav of Sarasota's ABC News 40 reported that a few days after the Secret Service visit, the beauty supply store was closed up and Hakim was long gone. Yadav also learned that Zainlabdeen Omer had suddenly quit his jobs and vacated his apartment. "All I know is he can't leave town," a friend of Omer's told Yadav. "Omer got in a lot of trouble with the law." The Special Agent in charge of the Presidential detail in Sarasota told Yadav that Bush was never in any danger and the various warnings and possible terrorist connections were all "just a coincidence." [Hopsicker, 7/22/02] Yet, as we will see below, there are more details of a threat against Bush before he left Sarasota.

Bush Is Briefed as the Hijackings Begin

After his jog, Bush showered, then sat down for his daily intelligence briefing around 8 a.m. "The President's briefing appears to have included some reference to the heightened terrorist risk reported throughout the summer, but contained nothing specific, severe or imminent enough to necessitate a call to [National Security Advisor] Condoleezza Rice." [Telegraph, 12/16/01]

While Bush was being briefed, the planes that would be hijacked began taking off. American Airlines Flight 11 was first, leaving Boston's Logan Airport at 7:59 a.m. The others soon followed, except for United Flight 93, scheduled to leave at 8:01, but which was delayed on the runway for about 40 minutes. [Boston Globe, 11/23/01] (For more information on the four flights, see Flight 11, Flight 175, Flight 77, Flight 93.)

At approximately 8:13, Flight 11 was instructed by air traffic controllers at the FAA's Boston Center, in Nashua, New Hampshire, to climb to 35,000 feet. The plane did not obey the order and its transponder was turned off. Air traffic control manager Glenn Michael said, "we considered it at that time to be a possible hijacking." [AP, 8/12/02, emphasis added] According to FAA regulations, that was the correct decision: "Consider that an aircraft emergency exists . . . when . . . there is unexpected loss of radar contact and radio communications with any . . . aircraft." [FAA Air Traffic Control Regulations, Chapter 10, Section 2-5 ]

If air traffic controllers believed Flight 11 had been hijacked at 8:13, NORAD should have been informed immediately, so military planes could be scrambled to investigate. However, NORAD and the FAA both claimed NORAD was not informed until 8:40 – 27 minutes later. [NORAD, 9/18/01, AP, 8/12/02, AP, 8/19/02, Newsday, 9/10/02; one NORAD employee said it took place at 8:31, ABC News, 9/11/02] Indeed, before contacting NORAD, Boston air traffic controllers watched Flight 11 make an unexpected 100-degree turn and head south toward New York City [Christian Science Monitor, 9/13/01], told other controllers of the hijacking at 8:25 [Guardian, 10/17/01], continued to hear highly suspicious dialogue from the cockpit (such as, "Nobody move, please, we are going back to the airport. Don't try to make any stupid moves" ) [Guardian, 10/17/01, New York Times, 10/16/01], and even asked the pilots of Flight 175 to scan the skies for the errant plane. [Guardian, 10/17/01, Boston Globe, 11/23/01]

Is NORAD's claim credible? If so, the air traffic controllers (including Mr. Michael) should have been fired and subject to possible criminal charges for their inaction. To date, however, there has been no word of any person being disciplined at any institution at any level for what happened on 9/11.

If NORAD's claim is false, and it was indeed informed within the time frame outlined in FAA regulations that Flight 11 may have been hijacked, that would mean NORAD did absolutely nothing for almost thirty minutes while a hijacked commercial airliner flew off course through some of the most congested airspace in the world. Presumably, that would warrant some very serious charges. Again, no one associated with NORAD or the FAA has been punished.

According to phone calls made by fight attendants Betty Ong and Amy Sweeney, the hijackers had stabbed and killed at least one passenger and two flight attendants by about 8:21. [ABC News, 7/18/02, Boston Globe, 11/23/01, AP, 10/5/01, Los Angeles Times, 9/20/01] (One hijacker may have been riding in the cockpit and begun the hijacking earlier.) After 8:21, both women apparently remained on the phone with American Airlines' headquarters for 25 minutes, until their plane crashed into the World Trade Center's North Tower. [ABC News, 7/18/02, AP, 10/5/01] These calls make NORAD's supposed ignorance of a crisis even more dubious.

Bush Leaves for Booker Elementary

Around the same time the Flight 11 hijackers were stabbing passenger Daniel Lewin – at 8:20 a.m. – Bush's briefing ended and he said good-bye to the Colony's general manager. [Telegraph, 12/16/01, Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] The first event on Bush's schedule was what is known as a "soft event" – a photo-op with children at Emma Booker Elementary School – promoting his proposed education bill. [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/11/01] After spending about 20 minutes with the children, Bush was scheduled to give a short press conference at about 9:30. [White House, 9/7/01, Federal News Service, 9/10/01]

Accounts of when Bush's motorcade left for the school vary from 8:30 to 8:39. [8:30, Washington Post, 1/27/02, 8:35, Sarasota Magazine, 9/19/01, 8:39, Washington Times, 10/7/02] One account has the Bush party leave the Colony suite at 8:30 and drive away at 8:39. Whenever he left, the motorcade traveled quickly: "The police shut down traffic in both directions, leaving roads utterly deserted for Bush's long motorcade, which barreled along at 40 mph, running red lights with impunity." [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, pp. 37-38] At 40 mph, it would take about 14 minutes to travel the nine-mile distance to the school. Several accounts say the journey took about 20 minutes [New York Times, 9/16/01 (B), St. Petersburg Times, 9/8/02 (B), MSNBC, 10/29/02], which means that Bush arrived shortly before 9:00. [8:46, ABC News, 9/11/02, 8:55, Washington Times, 10/7/02, 8:55, Sarasota Magazine, 9/19/01, "just before 9:00,"Telegraph, 12/16/01, "shortly before 9:00,"Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02, "just before 9:00,"New York Times, 9/16/01 (B), 9:00, Albuquerque Tribune, 9/10/02]

When Did Bush First Learn of the Attacks?

Why does it matter when Bush left the resort and arrived at the school? Because this is the crucial time when Bush was first told, or should have been told, of the attacks. Official accounts, including the words of Bush himself, say Bush was first told of what was happening in New York City after he arrived at the school. [Telegraph, 12/16/01, CBS, 9/11/02] However, this statement does not stand up to scrutiny. There are at least four reports that Bush was told of the first crash before he arrived at the school.

Two accounts explicitly state Bush was told while in the motorcade. "The President was on Highway 301, just north of Main Street . . . [when] he received the news that a plane had crashed in New York City." [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] (See adjacent map for the location where he is told.) Another account states, "Bush was driving to the school in a motorcade when the phone rang. An airline accident appeared to have happened. He pressed on with his visit." [Observer, 9/16/01]

The first media reports of Flight 11's crash into the World Trade Center began around 8:48, two minutes after the crash happened. [New York Times, 9/15/01] CNN broke into its regular programming at that time [CNN, 9/11/01], though other networks, such as ABC, took a few more minutes to begin reporting. [ABC, 9/14/02] So within minutes, millions were aware of the story, yet Bush supposedly remained unaware for about another ten minutes.

Claims of Bush's ignorance become harder to believe when one learns that others in his motorcade were immediately told of the attack. For instance, Kia Baskerville, a CBS News producer traveling with Bush that morning, received a message about a plane crash "as the presidential motorcade headed to President Bush's first event." Baskerville said, "Fifteen minutes later I was standing in a second grade classroom [waiting for Bush's entrance]" – which means she got the news at about 8:47 – right as the story was first being reported. [CBS, 8/19/02] A news photographer in the motorcade overheard a radio transmission that Press Secretary Ari Fleischer would be needed on arrival at the school to discuss reports of some sort of crash. [Christian Science Monitor, 9/17/01] Another account notes Fleischer got the news that the crash had occurred "just minutes before," but notes that Bush was not in the same car as Fleischer. [CBS, 11/1/02] Senior presidential communications officer Thomas Herman said, "Just as we were arriving at the school, I received a notification from our operations center than [sic] an airliner had struck one of the towers . . . ." [Marist College Magazine, Fall 2002]

Meanwhile, CIA Director George Tenet was told of the crash a few minutes after it happened. A messenger gave him the news as he was eating breakfast with former Senator David Boren in a Washington restaurant three blocks from the White House. Boren says Tenet was told that the World Trade Center had been attacked by an airplane: "I was struck by the fact that [the messenger] used the word attacked." An aide then handed a cell phone to Tenet, and Tenet made some calls, showing that at least some at the highest levels of the Bush administration were talking about an attack at this time. Tenet then said to Boren, "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." [ABC, 9/14/02]

Some people at the school also heard of the news before Bush arrived. Around 8:50, Tampa Bay's Channel 8 reporter Jackie Barron was on the phone with her mother, who mentioned the first news reports. At almost the same time, Brian Goff, a Fox reporter from Tampa, heard the same thing on his cell phone. [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] Associated Press reporter Sonia Ross was also told of the crash by phone from a colleague. [AP, 9/12/01 (D)] Florida Congressman Dan Miller, waiting in front of the school as part of the official greeting party, was told by an aide about the crash at 8:55, before Bush arrived. [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01]

Given all this, how could Bush have remained ignorant? Could he have been out of the loop because he was in a car? No. The previous night, Colony Resort manager Katie Klauber Moulon toured the presidential limousine and marveled "at all the phones and electronic equipment." [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] Karl Rove, Bush's "chief political strategist," who presumably was riding with Bush, used a wireless e-mail device on 9/11 as well. [Newsweek, 10/14/02] There seems to have been ample opportunity and the means to alert Bush.

Another Warning

If Bush wasn't told while in his limousine, he certainly was told immediately after he got out of it. US Navy Captain Deborah Loewer, the director of the White House Situation Room, was traveling in the motorcade when she received a message from an assistant back in Washington about the first crash. Loewer said that as soon as the car arrived at Booker, she ran quickly over to Bush. "It's a very good thing the Secret Service knows who I am," Loewer later said. She told Bush that an aircraft had "impacted the World Trade Center. This is all we know." [Catholic Telegraph, 12/7/01, AP, 11/26/01]

Meanwhile, More Hijackings

Even though Flight 175 left about the same time as Flight 11, it appears to have been hijacked much later. At 8:41, its pilot was still talking to ground control [New York Times, 10/16/01], but at 8:42 it sharply veered off course, and a flight controller noted that its transponder had been turned off and communication cut. [Boston Globe, 11/23/01, New York Times, 10/16/01] One minute later, at 8:43, NORAD was notified the plane had been hijacked. [NORAD, 9/18/01] The hijackers turned the transponder back on but used a different signal code. This allowed flight controllers to "easily" track the plane as it flew toward New York City. [Washington Post, 9/17/01] At about 8:46, Flight 77 began to go severely off course. According to regulations, a fighter is required to be dispatched if a plane strays from its official course by more than two miles or 15 degrees [MSNBC, 9/12/01]. As the adjacent map shows, Flight 77 returned to its proper course for a time, but its last radio contact occurred at 8:50. [Guardian, 10/17/01] Supposedly, NORAD was not officially notified that Flight 77 has been hijacked until 9:24 [NORAD, 9/18/01], but the New York Times reported that by around 8:50, military officials at the Pentagon were already discussing what to do about Flight 77. [New York Times, 9/15/01] Note the difference in notification times: 27 minutes for Flight 11, 1 minute for Flight 175 and 38 minutes for Flight 77.

Flight 93 wasn't hijacked until about 9:16, but by about 8:50, it was clear that at least three planes had been hijacked. Vice President Dick Cheney, speaking on NBC's Meet the Press, said, "The Secret Service has an arrangement with the FAA. They had open lines after the World Trade Center was . . ." [Meet the Press, 9/16/01] Cheney never finished his sentence (interesting in itself – did he say too much?), but it seems safe to say that his next word would have been "hit." Cheney's statement makes it clear the Secret Service knew the extent of the situation well before 9:00 am.

An Accident?

Intelligence agencies were suffering "warning fatigue" from so many warnings of an al-Qaeda attack [Independent, 9/7/02], some specifically mentioning the use of hijacked airplanes as missiles (see this essay). Bush himself was given an intelligence briefing a month earlier entitled "Bin Laden to Strike in US," and it contained a warning from the British government that the US should expect multiple airline hijackings from al-Qaeda. [Sunday Herald, 5/19/02] So with the clear knowledge that three planes had been hijacked, with one of them already crashed into the World Trade Center, who would have possibly assumed that Flight 11's crash was an accident? Yet that is precisely what the official story claims. There are a number of different "official" accounts, but all of them stress that Bush wasn't told until after he arrived inside the school (contrary to the account of Captain Loewer) and that it was assumed to be an accident (contradicting Tenet being told that it was an attack).

In some accounts, "President Bush had emerged from his car and was shaking hands with local officials standing outside the school when Chief of Staff Andrew Card sidled up to him with the news." [CBS, 11/1/02] Bush later recalled that it was Card who first notified him: "'Here's what you're going to be doing; you're going to meet so-and-so, such-and-such.' Then Andy Card said, 'By the way, an aircraft flew into the World Trade Center.'" [Washington Times, 10/7/02] At a press conference later that day, Press Secretary Ari Fleischer also claimed it was Andy Card who first informed him, "as the President finished shaking hands in a hallway of school officials." [Knoxville News Sentinel, 9/11/01]

In other accounts, it was advisor Karl Rove who first told Bush. According to photographer Eric Draper, who was standing nearby, Rove rushed up, took Bush aside in a corridor inside the school and said the cause of the crash was unclear. Bush replied, "What a horrible accident!" Bush also suggested the pilot may have had a heart attack. [Daily Mail, 9/8/02] Dan Bartlett, White House Communications Director, says he was there when Bush was told: " [Bush] being a former pilot, had kind of the same reaction, going, was it bad weather? And I said no, apparently not." [ABC News, 9/11/02] A reporter who was standing nearby later said, "From the demeanor of the President, grinning at the children, it appeared that the enormity of what he had been told was taking a while to sink in." [Daily Mail, 9/8/02] One account explicitly says that Rove told Bush the World Trade Center had been hit by a large commercial airliner. [Telegraph, 12/16/01] However, Bush later remembered Rove saying it appeared to be an accident involving a small, twin-engine plane. [Washington Post, 1/27/02, MSNBC, 9/02]

In yet another account, Blake Gottesman, Bush's personal assistant, while giving the president some final instructions as they walked to the school, remarked, "Andy Card says, 'By the way, an aircraft flew into the World Trade Center.'" [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, pp. 41-42]

Told Again, Yet Still Clueless

Booker principal Gwen Tose-Rigell was waiting for Bush outside the school. "The limousine stops and the president comes out. He walks toward me. I'm standing there in a lineup; there are about five people. He walks over and says he has to make a phone call, and he'll be right back." [MSNBC, 09/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01] The phone call was with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. From a room with secure communications, Rice updated Bush on the situation. [Christian Science Monitor, 9/17/01, Time, 9/12/01] The fact that Bush immediately said he had to make an important call strongly suggests he was told about the situation while in the motorcade. But some accounts have Andrew Card saying to Bush as he gets out of his limousine, "Mr. President, you really need to take this phone call," thereby implying that Card knows what's going on, but Bush doesn't. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/8/02 (B)]

As National Security Advisor, Rice had to have had as much information as anyone. By the time she spoke to Bush, she must have known that three planes had been hijacked and that the country was under attack. We know very little about the conversation – only that Rice later claimed, " [Bush] said, what a terrible, it sounds like a terrible accident. Keep me informed." [ABC News, 9/11/02] One reporter noted: "Bush did not appear preoccupied [after the phone call] . . . There was no sign that Rice had just told [him] about the first attack [on the World Trade Center]." [Cox News, 9/12/01 (B)] Tose-Rigell was then summoned to a room to talk with Bush: "He said a commercial plane has hit the World Trade Center, and we're going to go ahead and go on, we're going on to do the reading thing anyway." [AP, 8/19/02 (D)]

One local reporter notes that at this point, "He could and arguably should have left Emma E. Booker Elementary School immediately, gotten onto Air Force One and left Sarasota without a moment's delay . . . But he didn't." [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/12/01 (B)] The only possible excuse is that Bush was completely clueless as to what was happening. Sure enough, at a press conference on the evening of 9/11, Press Secretary Ari Fleischer was asked by a reporter, "And then this morning, when Andy Card told him about the first accident, was Andy Card or Condi Rice or any of those aware of the hijackings? What did they know when they – ". Fleischer cut in and replied, "No, at that point they were not." [Knoxville News Sentinel, 9/11/01] So supposedly, 15 minutes after the first crash, none of Bush's aides, not even Rice back in Washington, DC, knew a thing about the hijackings that had been reported to NORAD 20 minutes earlier? This simply is not plausible.

Bush's Confused Recollection

Bush's own recollection of the first crash only complicates the picture. Less than two months after the attacks, Bush made the preposterous claim that he had watched the first attack as it happened on live television. This is the seventh different account of how Bush learned about the first crash (in his limousine, from Loewer, from Card, from Rove, from Gottesman, from Rice, from television). On December 4, 2001, Bush was asked: "How did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack?" Bush replied, "I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower – the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it." [White House, 12/4/01]

There was no film footage of the first attack until at least the following day, and Bush didn't have access to a television until 15 or so minutes later. [Washington Times, 10/7/02] The Boston Herald later noted, "Think about that. Bush's remark implies he saw the first plane hit the tower. But we all know that video of the first plane hitting did not surface until the next day. Could Bush have meant he saw the second plane hit – which many Americans witnessed? No, because he said that he was in the classroom when Card whispered in his ear that a second plane hit." [Boston Herald, 10/22/02] Bush's recollection has many precise details. Is he simply confused? It's doubly strange why his advisors didn't correct him or – at the very least – stop him from repeating the same story only four weeks later. [White House, 1/5/02, CBS, 9/11/02] On January 5, 2002, Bush stated: "Well, I was sitting in a schoolhouse in Florida . . . and my Chief of Staff . . . well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane . . ." [White House, 1/5/02]

Unfortunately, Bush has never been asked – not even once – to explain these statements. His memory not only contradicts every single media report, it also contradicts what he said that evening. In his speech to the nation that evening, Bush said: "Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government's emergency response plans." [White House, 9/11/01] It's not known what these emergency plans were, because neither Bush nor anyone in his administration mentioned this immediate response again. Implementing "emergency response plans" seems to completely contradict Bush's "by the way" recollection of a small airplane accident.

Inside the Classroom and the Second Plane Crash

Shortly after his call with National Security Advisor Rice, Bush entered Sandra Kay Daniels's second-grade class for a photo-op to promote Bush's education policies. [Daily Mail, 9/8/02] The event was to begin precisely at 9:00, but the call pushed it back to about 9:03. [Washington Times, 10/8/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01, Daily Mail, 9/8/02] Numerous reporters who were traveling with the president, as well as members of the local media, watched from the back of the room. [AP, 8/19/02 (D)] Altogether there were about 150 people in the room, only 16 of them students. Bush was introduced to the children and then posed for a number of pictures. Daniels then led the students through some reading exercises (video footage shows this lasted about three minutes). [Salon, 9/12/01 (B)] Bush later related what he was thinking at the time: "I was concentrating on the program at this point, thinking about what I was going to say [about the plane crash]. Obviously, I felt it was an accident. I was concerned about it, but there were no alarm bells." [Washington Times, 10/7/02]

At 9:03, Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center. News of this traveled extremely rapidly. In fact, some of Bush's Secret Service agents watched the second crash live on television in an adjacent room. [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02] Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, in the same room as Bush but not near him, immediately received the news on his pager. [CBS, 9/11/02] Other pagers were going off as well.

Chief of Staff Andrew Card was in a nearby room when he heard the news. He waited until there was a pause in the reading drill to walk in and tell Bush. [Washington Times, 10/7/02, Washington Times, 10/8/02] The children were getting their books from under their seats to read a story together when Card came in. [Daily Mail, 9/8/02] Card whispered to Bush: "A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack." [San Francisco Chronicle, 9/11/02] Another account has Card saying: "A second plane has hit the World Trade Center. America is under attack." [Telegraph, 12/16/01] Accounts vary as to when Card gave Bush the news. Some say 9:05 [Salon 9/11/01, New York Times, 9/16/01 (B), Telegraph, 12/16/01, Albuquerque Tribune, 9/10/02], and some say 9:07. [Washington Post, 9/11/01, Washington Times, 10/8/02] ABC News reporter Ann Compton, who was in the room, said she was surprised by the interruption and "wrote [the time] down in my reporter's notebook, by my watch, 9:07 a.m." [ABC News, 9/11/02]

The Reaction – Or Lack of One

Descriptions vary greatly as to how Bush responded to the news. It is said he "blanched" [Richmond Times-Dispatch, 10/1/02], "the color drained from the president's face" [AP, 9/12/01 (D)], he "wore a bemused smile" [Orlando Sentinel, 9/12/01], "because visibly tense and serious" [Time, 9/12/01], and so on. Watch the video and draw your own conclusions (the 11-minute video can be viewed at the Center for Cooperative Research, Buzzflash, Global Free Press, The Emperor's New Clothes, or Liberty DYNU). Bush later recalled his own reaction: "I am very aware of the cameras. I'm trying to absorb that knowledge. I have nobody to talk to. I'm sitting in the midst of a classroom with little kids, listening to a children's story and I realize I'm the Commander in Chief and the country has just come under attack." [Telegraph, 12/16/01, CBS, 11/1/02] Asked again what he thought after he heard the news, Bush said, "We're at war and somebody has dared attack us and we're going to do something about it. I realized I was in a unique setting to receive a message that somebody attacked us . . . [I]t became evident that we were, you know, that the world had changed." [CBS, 9/11/02]

So what did the Commander in Chief do with the knowledge that the United States was under attack?

He did nothing.

Bush did not say one word. He did not ask Card any questions. He did not give any orders. He did not know who (or which country) was attacking, whether there would be more attacks, what military plans had been taken, what military actions should be taken – indeed, he knew virtually nothing about what was going on outside the room. He just sat there. Bush later recalled: "There was no time for discussion or anything." [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, pp. 83-84] Even stranger, as one newspaper put it, although the nation was under terrorist attack, "for some reason, Secret Service agents [did] not bustle him away." [Globe and Mail, 9/12/01] Military pilots must have "permission from the White House because only the president has the authority to order a civilian aircraft shot down." [CNN, 10/26/99] But if retaliatory strikes needed to the authorized, Bush was not available. If one of the planes had to be shot down to save more lives on the ground, Bush was not available. Although several fighters had been dispatched to defend New York City, the pilot of one of the planes flying to catch Flight 175 later noted that it wouldn't have mattered if he caught up with it, because only Bush could order a shootdown, and Bush could not be reached in the classroom. [Cape Cod Times, 8/21/02]

Secret Service agents and other security personnel had set up a television in a nearby classroom. They turned on the TV just as Flight 175 crashed into the World Trade Center. According to Sarasota County Sheriff Bill Balkwill, who was in the room, a Marine responsible for carrying Bush's phone immediately said to Balkwill, "We're out of here. Can you get everyone ready?" [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02] But he must have been overruled by someone, because Bush did not leave.

Meanwhile, Secret Service agents burst into Vice President Cheney's White House office. They carried him under his arms – nearly lifting him off the ground – and propelled him down the steps into the White House basement and through a long tunnel toward an underground bunker. Accounts of when this happened vary greatly, from 9:06 [New York Times, 9/16/01 (B), Telegraph, 12/16/01] to after 9:30. [CBS, 9/11/02, Washington Post, 1/27/02] Cheney's own account is vague and contradictory. [Meet the Press, 9/16/01] The one eyewitness account, by White House photographer David Bohrer, said it happened just after 9:00. [ABC, 9/14/02 (B)] It's easy to see why the White House would have wanted this event placed at a later time (after Bush's initial statement to the nation rather than after the second crash) to avoid the obvious question: if Cheney was immediately evacuated, why wasn't Bush?

The Photo-Op Goes On

After Card told Bush about the second plane and quickly left, the classroom was silent for about 30 seconds or so. [Tampa Tribune, 9/1/02] The children were about to take turns reading from a story called The Pet Goat. [AFP, 9/7/02] Bush picked up the book and began to read with the children. [Tampa Tribune, 9/1/02] In unison, the children read out loud, "The – Pet – Goat. A – girl – got – a – pet – goat. But – the – goat – did – some – things – that – made – the – girl's – dad – mad." Bush mostly listened, but occasionally asked the children a few questions to encourage them. [Washington Times, 10/7/02] At one point he said, "Really good readers, whew! . . . These must be sixth-graders!" [Time, 9/12/01]

Who was really in control? Certainly not Bush. In the back of the room, Press Secretary Ari Fleischer caught Bush's eye and held up a pad of paper for him to see, with "DON'T SAY ANYTHING YET" written on it in big block letters. [Washington Times, 10/7/02] Some person or people had overruled the security who wanted Bush evacuated immediately, even as Vice President Cheney was taken from his White House office to a safe location. Bush's security overruled Bush on security matters later in the day on Air Force One, but who overruled them that morning?

When Did Bush Leave the Classroom?

Nearly every news account fails to mention when Bush left the classroom after being told America was under attack. Three mention 9:12 a.m. [New York Times, 9/16/01 (B), Telegraph, 12/16/01, Daily Mail, 9/8/02] Remaining in the classroom for approximately five to seven minutes is inexcusable, but the video of Bush in the classroom suggests he stayed longer than that. The video contains several edits and ends before Bush leaves the room, so it also doesn't tell us exactly how long he stayed. One newspaper suggested he remained "for eight or nine minutes" – sometime between 9:13 and 9:16, since Card's arrival is uncertain. [Tampa Tribune, 9/1/02]

When Bush finally did leave, he didn't act like a man in a hurry. In fact, he was described as "openly stretching out the moment." [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, p. 89] When the lesson was over, Bush said to the children: "Hoo! These are great readers. Very impressive! Thank you all so much for showing me your reading skills. I bet they practice too. Don't you? Reading more than they watch TV? Anybody do that? Read more than you watch TV? [Hands go up] Oh that's great! Very good. Very important to practice! Thanks for having me. Very impressed." [Transcribed from Booker video, Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, pp. 89-90] Bush still continued to talk, advising the children to stay in school and be good citizens. [Tampa Tribune, 9/1/02, St. Petersburg Times, 9/8/02 (B)] One student asked Bush a question, and he gave a quick response on his education policy. [New York Post, 9/12/02]

The only source to describe what happened next is Fighting Back by Bill Sammon. Publishers Weekly described Sammon's book as an "inside account of the Bush administration's reaction to 9-11 [and] a breathless, highly complimentary portrait of the president [showing] the great merit and unwavering moral vision of his inner circle." [Publisher's Weekly, 10/15/02] Sammon's conservative perspective makes his account of Bush's behavior at the end of the photo-op all the more surprising. Bush is described as smiling and chatting with the children "as if he didn't have a care in the world" and "in the most relaxed manner imaginable." White House aide Gordon Johndroe, then came in as he usually does at the end of press conferences, and said, "Thank you, press. If you could step out the door we came in, please." A reporter then asked, "Mr. President, are you aware of the reports of the plane crash in New York? Is there anything . . . ," But Bush interrupted, and no doubt recalling his order, "DON'T SAY ANYTHING YET," Bush responded, "I'll talk about it later." But still the president did not leave. "He stepped forward and shook hands with [classroom teacher] Daniels, slipping his left hand behind her in another photo-op pose. He was taking his good old time. . . . Bush lingered until the press was gone." [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, p. 90]

Think about that: rather than rush out of the room at the first chance, Bush actually stayed until after all the dozens of reporters had left! Having just been told of a Pearl Harbor-type attack on US soil, Bush was indeed "openly stretching out the moment." But he still wasn't done. Bush then turned to principal Tose-Rigell, who was waiting to take him to the library for his speech on education. He explained to her about the terror attacks and why he had to leave. [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, p. 90] Finally, he went to an empty classroom next door where his staff was based. [ABC News, 9/11/02] Given that Bush's program was supposed to end at 9:20, he left the classroom only a couple of minutes earlier than planned, if even that. [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/16/01]

Why Stay?

The reason given why Bush didn't leave as soon as Card told him the news is: "Without all the facts at hand, George Bush had no intention of upsetting the schoolchildren who had come to read for him." [MSNBC, 10/29/02] Advisor Karl Rove said, "The President thought for a second or two about getting up and walking out of the room. But the drill was coming to a close and he didn't want to alarm the children." [ABC, 9/11/02] This excuse is patently absurd, given the security risks and importance of Bush being informed and making decisions as Commander in Chief. Nor was the drill coming to a close: one drill had ended and another was about to begin – it was a perfect time to simply say, "Excuse me" and leave the room. Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport is only 3½ miles away; in fact, Booker was chosen as the location for the photo-op partly because of its proximity to the airport. [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/12/02] Hijackers could have crashed a plane into Bush's publicized location and his security would have been completely helpless to stop it. Remember, Bush's schedule had been announced on September 7 and two of the 9/11 hijackers came to Sarasota that same day. [White House, 9/7/01, Longboat Observer, 11/21/01, Washington Post, 1/27/02] Furthermore, the Secret Service was aware of the strange request for an interview a few hours earlier and the previous night's report of a person in town who had made violent threats against Bush.

Indeed, a few days after 9/11, Sarasota's main newspaper reported, "Sarasota barely skirted its own disaster. As it turns out, terrorists targeted the president and Air Force One on Tuesday, maybe even while they were on the ground in Sarasota and certainly not long after. The Secret Service learned of the threat just minutes after Bush left Booker Elementary." [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/16/01]

Bush Lingers On

Once he was out of the classroom, did Bush immediately leave Booker? No. He stayed in the adjacent room with his staff, calling Vice President Cheney and National Security Advisor Rice, and preparing a speech. [Telegraph, 12/16/01, St. Petersburg Times 9/8/02] Incredibly, even as uncertain information began to surface, suggesting that more planes had been hijacked (eventually 11 planes would be suspected) [CBS, 9/11/02], Bush was allowed to make his remarks at 9:30 – exactly the time and place stated on his advance schedule. [Federal News Service, 9/10/01, see the transcript of his speech here] Why hasn't Bush's security staff been criticized for their completely inexplicable decision to stay at the school? And why didn't Bush's concern for the children extend to not making them and the rest of the 200 or so people at the school terrorist targets?

At 9:16, NORAD was notified that Flight 93 had been hijacked, and at 9:24 it was notified that Flight 77 had also been hijacked and was heading toward Washington (though, as discussed above, the hijacking was known long before this). [NORAD, 9/18/01] No media report has suggested that the possible shooting down of hijacked airplanes was discussed at this time, however. It appears the discussion was not broached until after 9:55. [Washington Post, 1/27/02, CBS, 9/11/02] At about 9:26, it was either FAA head Jane Garvey or FAA administrator Ben Sliney (and not Bush) who decided to halt all airplane takeoffs in the US. [Time, 9/14/01, USA Today, 8/13/02] Additionally, no evidence has appeared suggesting Bush had a role in ordering any fighters into the skies.

Finally, to the Airport

By 9:35, Bush's motorcade was ready to take him to the Sarasota airport where Air Force One was waiting. [Telegraph, 12/16/01] At 9:37, Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. Bush was informed as his motorcade got near the airport. (Apparently Bush could be reached by phone in his limousine at this time.) [Washington Times, 10/8/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01] The motorcade arrived around 9:43 and pulled up close to Air Force One. Security conducted an extra-thorough search of all the baggage for the other passengers, delaying takeoff until 9:55. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/8/02 (B)]

A year later, Chief of Staff Andrew Card recalled that, "As we were heading to Air Force One . . . [we] learned, what turned out to be a mistake, but we learned that the Air Force One package could in fact be a target." [MSNBC, 9/9/02] This echoes the report mentioned above that "terrorists targeted the president and Air Force One . . . maybe even while they were on the ground in Sarasota . . . " [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/16/01] This only increases the strangeness that Bush wasn't immediately evacuated at 9:03 as some of his security had recommended.

Bush spoke by telephone to Cheney as the motorcade raced to the airport. [St. Petersburg Times 9/8/02] Supposedly, during this call Bush issued an order to ground all flights within the country. [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] The FAA did shut down the nationwide air traffic system at around 9:45. [MSNBC, 9/22/01, CNN, 9/12/01, New York Times, 9/12/01, Newsday, 9/10/02, Washington Post, 9/12/01] But other reports state that it was FAA administrator Ben Sliney who made the decision without consulting anyone. [USA Today, 8/13/02, USA Today, 8/13/02 (B)] For some time it was claimed that Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta had made the decision, but it was later revealed that Mineta didn't even know of the order until 15 minutes later. Apparently, "FAA officials had begged [the reporter] to maintain the fiction." [Slate, 4/2/02] The idea that Bush made the decision is even less plausible. In fact, there is no evidence at all to suggest that Bush had by this point made even one decision relevant to his security or that of the country.

Air Force One Takes Off Without Fighter Escort

Air Force One took off at either 9:55 or 9:57 a.m. [CNN, 9/12/01, New York Times, 9/12/01, Telegraph, 12/16/01, CBS, 9/11/02, Washington Post, 9/12/01, Washington Post, 1/27/02, AP, 9/12/01] Communications Director Dan Bartlett remembered, "It was like a rocket. For a good ten minutes, the plane was going almost straight up." [CBS, 9/11/02]

But, incredibly, Air Force One took off without any military fighter protection. This defies all explanation. Recall that at 9:03 a.m., one of Bush's security people said, "We're out of here. Can you get everyone ready?" [Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02] Certainly, long before Bush left the elementary school at 9:35 a.m., arrangements would have been made to get fighters to Sarasota as soon as possible. Not only would it have been advisable to protect Air Force One, but it would have been only sensible as another way to protect Bush on the ground from terrorist attack even before he left the school. In Florida, there were two bases said to have fighters on 24-hour alert, capable of getting airborne in approximately five minutes. Homestead Air Station, 185 miles from Sarasota, and Tyndall Air Station, 235 miles from Sarasota; both had the highest readiness status on 9/11. Presumably, as happened at other bases across the country, just after 9:03, base commanders throughout Florida would have immediately begun preparations to get their fighters ready. [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02] Fighters left bases on the same alert status and traveled similar distances to reach Washington, DC, well before 10:00, so why were the fighters delayed in Florida? [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 9/9/02]

Military planes should have been over Sarasota by the time Bush left Booker at 9:35 a.m. Yet, as will be described below, more than one hour after Air Force One took off, there were still no fighters protecting it!

An administration official claimed, "The object seemed to be simply to get the President airborne and out of the way." [Telegraph, 12/16/01] But without fighter cover this makes little sense, because the sky was arguably more dangerous than the ground. At the time, there were still over 3,000 planes in the air over the US [USA Today, 8/13/02 (B)], including about half of the planes in the region of Florida where Bush was. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/7/02] Recall, too, that the Secret Service learned of a threat to Bush and Air Force One "just minutes after Bush left Booker Elementary." Karl Rove, also on Air Force One, confirmed that a dangerous threat was known before the plane took off: "They also made it clear they wanted to get us up quickly, and they wanted to get us to a high altitude, because there had been a specific threat made to Air Force One . . . . A declaration that Air Force One was a target, and said in a way that they called it credible." [New Yorker, 10/1/01]

Shoot Down Authorized – Too Late

Once he was airborne, Bush talked to Cheney again and Cheney recommended that Bush "order our aircraft to shoot down these airliners that have been hijacked." [CBS, 9/11/02] "I said, 'You bet,' " Bush later recalled. "We had a little discussion, but not much." [Newsday, 9/23/01, USA Today, 9/16/01, Washington Post, 1/27/02] However, even though only Bush had the authority to order a passenger plane shot down [CNN, 10/26/99], the order was apparently given before Bush discussed it with Cheney. One flight commander recalled, "After the Pentagon was hit, we were told there were more [airliners] coming. Not 'might be' ; they were coming." A call from someone in the White House declared the Washington area "a free-fire zone," meaning, according to one of the responding fighter pilots, "we were given authority to use force, if the situation required it." [Aviation Week and Space Technology, 9/9/02] Extraordinary times can demand extraordinary measures, so having someone other than Bush give this order could be understandable. But Bush was available and talking to people like Cheney after 9:30 a.m. Around this time, officials feared that as many as 11 airliners had been hijacked [CBS, 9/11/02], so why weren't Bush and Cheney even considering this course of action until about 10:00 a.m.? Was Bush being kept out of the loop in reality, or only in the media reports? Is the lateness of this discussion merely political spin to reduce speculation that Flight 93 had been shot down? Flight 93 was still in the air after the Bush authorization, and fighters were given orders to shoot it down if necessary. [ABC News, 9/11/02] NORAD knew at 9:16 a.m. that Flight 93 was hijacked [NORAD, 9/18/01], but supposedly fighters weren't scrambled until minutes before it crashed at 10:06 a.m.

Going Nowhere as Threats Increase

Shortly after takeoff, Cheney apparently informed Bush of "a credible threat" to Air Force One. [AP, 9/13/01 (D)] US Representative Adam Putnam "had barely settled into his seat on Air Force One . . . when he got the news that terrorists apparently had set their sights on the plane." [Orlando Sentinel, 9/14/01] The Secret Service had received an anonymous call: "Air Force One is next." The caller allegedly knew the agency's code words relating to Air Force One procedures. Pilot Colonel Mark Tillman was told of the threat and he asked that an armed guard be stationed at the cockpit door. The Associated Press reported that the threat came "within the same hour" as the Pentagon crash (i.e., before 10:00 a.m., roughly when the plane took off). [AP, 9/13/01 (D)] Details suggest this threat was not the same as the earlier one, but it's hard to know for sure.

In his comments at Booker, Bush said he was immediately flying back to Washington, but soon after takeoff, he, Cheney and the Secret Service began arguing whether it was safe to fly back to the capital. [Telegraph, 12/16/01] Andrew Card told Bush, "We've got to let the dust settle before we go back." [St. Petersburg Times, 9/8/02] The plane apparently stayed over Sarasota until the argument was settled. Accounts differ, but until about 10:35 a.m. [CBS, 9/11/02 (B), Washington Post, 1/27/02], Air Force One "appeared to be going nowhere. The journalists on board – all of whom were barred from communicating with their offices – sensed that the plane was flying in big, slow circles." [Telegraph, 12/16/01]

Cheney apparently called Bush again at 10:32 a.m., and told him of another threat to Air Force One. Within minutes, the argument was over, and the plane turned away from Washington and flew to Louisiana instead. [Washington Post, 1/27/02] Bush recalled: "I wanted to come back to Washington, but the circumstances were such that it was just impossible for the Secret Service or the national security team to clear the way for Air Force One to come back." [CBS, 9/11/02] Given that the rocket-like takeoff was due to a threat, this must have been another threat, possibly even a third threat.

Around 10:55 a.m., there was yet another threat to Air Force One. The pilot, Colonel Mark Tillman, said he was warned that a suspect airliner was dead ahead. "Coming out of Sarasota there was one call that said there was an airliner off our nose that they did not have contact with." Tillman took evasive action, pulling his plane even higher above normal traffic. [CBS, 9/11/02 (B)] Reporters on board noticed the rise in elevation. [Dallas Morning News, 8/28/02, Salon, 9/12/01] The report was apparently a false alarm, but it shows the folly of having Bush fly without a fighter escort.

Were There Threats to Air Force One?

The threat or threats to Air Force One were announced on September 12, after mounting criticism that Bush was out of sight in Louisiana and Nebraska during most of the day and did not return to Washington until 10 hours after the attacks. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said there was "real and credible information that the White House and Air Force One were targets." [White House, 9/12/01] On September 13, New York Times columnist William Safire wrote – and Bush's political strategist Karl Rove confirmed – that there was an "inside" threat that "may have broken the secret codes [showing a knowledge of presidential procedures]." [New York Times, 9/13/01] Had terrorists hacked their way into sensitive White House computers? Was there a mole in the White House?

No. It turned out the entire story was made up. [Washington Post, 9/27/01] The press expressed considerable skepticism about the story. For instance, one Florida newspaper thought Fleischer's disclosure was "an apparent effort to explain why the president was flown to Air Force bases" before returning to Washington. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/13/01] When asked on September 15 about the "credible evidence," Fleischer said, "we exhausted that topic about two days ago." [White House, 9/15/01] On September 26, CBS News reported: "Finally, there is this postscript to the puzzle of how someone presumed to be a terrorist was able to call in a threat against Air Force One using a secret code name for the president's plane. Well, as it turns out, that simply never happened. Sources say White House staffers apparently misunderstood comments made by their security detail." [CBS, 9/26/01] One former official who served in George Bush Sr.‘s administration told Human Events Online, which bills itself as "the national conservative weekly," that he was "deeply disappointed by [Bush's] zigzagging across the country." [Human Events Online, 9/17/01] At the end of the month, Slate magazine awarded its "Whopper of the Week" to Karl Rove, Ari Fleischer, and Dick Cheney. [Slate, 9/28/01]

No one knew exactly where the bogus story originated from, but "what can be safely said is that it served the White House's immediate purposes, even though it was completely untrue." [Telegraph, 12/16/01] What were those purposes? A well-informed, anonymous Washington official said, "It did two things for [Cheney]. It reinforced his argument that the President should stay out of town, and it gave George W. an excellent reason for doing so." [Telegraph, 12/16/01] When Bush was asked in May 2002 why he had flown to two Air Force bases before returning to Washington, Bush said, "I was trying to get out of harm's way." [White House, 5/21/02]

The most obviously bogus threat – the mole knowing secret codes – came from Cheney in a pivotal moment in his argument with Bush over where Bush should go. But were the other threats, for instance, the one made before Air Force One even took off, or the airline suspected of crashing into Air Force One, also bogus?

When Does the Fighter Escort Finally Arrive?

Much like the time when Bush left the Booker classroom, the time when fighters finally reached Air Force One is rarely mentioned, and when it is, the facts are highly debatable. According to one account, around 10:00 a.m. Air Force One was "joined by an escort of F-16 fighters from a base near Jacksonville, Florida." [Telegraph, 12/16/01] But one month later, it was reported that in Cheney's 10:32 phone call, he told Bush that it would take another 40 to 90 minutes [as late as noon] to get protective fighters up to escort Air Force One. [Washington Post, 1/27/02] Another account said, "Air Force One headed toward Jacksonville [at 10:41] to meet jets scrambled to give the presidential jet its own air cover," but it isn't said when the plane actually met up with the fighters. [New York Times, 9/16/01 (B)] We know that when Air Force One took evasive action around 10:55, there was no fighter escort. NORAD commander Major General Larry Arnold later said, "We scrambled available airplanes from Tyndall [note this is near Tallahassee, not Jacksonville, Florida] and then from Ellington in Houston, Texas," but he doesn't say when. [Code One Magazine, 1/02] In another account, the first two F-16s to arrive are piloted by Shane Brotherton and Randy Roberts, from the Texas Air National Guard, not from any Florida base. [CBS, 9/11/02] All that's known for sure is that by 11:30 there were six fighters protecting Air Force One. [Sarasota Magazine, 9/19/01]

It would appear that fighters arrived some time between 11:00 and 11:30. These fighters were supposed to be on 24-hour alert, ready to get into the air in about five minutes. If we assume the fighters flew at a speed of 1,100 mph, the same speed Major Gen. Arnold said fighters used to reach New York City earlier in the day when traveling a comparable distance [MSNBC, 9/23/01 (C), Slate, 1/16/02], the fighters should have reached Sarasota in about 10 minutes. Yet they took around two hours to reach Air Force One from when they were likely first needed, shortly after 9:00.

This clearly goes beyond mere incompetence, yet no newspaper article has ever raised the issue. Was Cheney able to prevent the fighters from reaching Air Force One, perhaps to convince Bush not to return to Washington? If so, why? Did Cheney assume (or know) that Bush was in no real danger? Like so many other questions surrounding 9/11, we do not know.

Barksdale Air Force Base

Air Force One landed at Barksdale Air Force base near Shreveport, Louisiana at about 11:45 a.m. [CBS, 9/11/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01, Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] "The official reason for landing at Barksdale was that Bush felt it necessary to make a further statement, but it isn't unreasonable to assume that – as there was no agreement as to what the President's movements should be it was felt he might as well be on the ground as in the air." [Telegraph, 12/16/01, CBS, 9/11/02] Ironically, the landing came only a short time after Bush's plane was finally protected by fighters.

There was quite a difference in the protection afforded Bush at Barksdale and what was in Sarasota. Bush was left unprotected at a known location in Sarasota for nearly 30 minutes. At Barksdale, a location that was at the time unknown, Congressman Dan Miller "was amazed at the armored equipment and soldiers with automatic weapons that immediately surrounded the plane." [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] Bush was driven to base headquarters in a Humvee escorted by armed outriders. Reporters and others remained under strict orders not to give out their location. [Telegraph, 12/16/01]

Bush was taken to a secret and secure place on the base. [Louisiana Life, Autumn 2002] Shortly after 12:30 p.m., Bush taped a short speech, which he wrote on a napkin. [Louisiana Life, Autumn 2002, Salon, 9/12/01, Washington Times, 10/8/02] The tape was broadcast on television at around 1:20 p.m. [Salon 9/11/01] He also "spent the next hour and a half talking on the phone," again arguing with Cheney and others over where he should go next. [Sarasota Magazine, 11/01] The Secret Service felt the situation in Washington was still unsafe. [CBS, 9/11/02] Bush told Karl Rove: "I want to go back home as soon as possible." Rove answered: "Our people are saying it's unstable still." [AP, 9/13/01 (D)] Bush was told he could get to the US Strategic Command center in Offutt, Nebraska, quicker than he could fly to Washington, so he agreed to go to Nebraska. [Telegraph, 12/16/01, AP, 9/13/01 (D)]

Just after 1:00 p.m., Bush supposedly "received an intelligence report from the base commander that a high-speed object was headed for his ranch in Crawford, Texas." It turned out to be another false alarm. [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, p.117] This may well be another bogus report designed to explain why Bush didn't return to Washington at this time, since US airspace was declared clear except for some military and emergency flights at 12:16 p.m. [USA Today, 8/12/02 (C)] By 12:30, the FAA reported that only about 50 of these flights were still flying in US airspace, and none were reporting problems [CNN, 9/12/01, New York Times, 9/12/01], so how could an unknown plane have been headed toward Bush's ranch 30 minutes after that?

Offutt Air Force Base

Air Force One left Barksdale for Offutt Air Force Base around 1:30 p.m. [CBS, 9/11/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01, Salon, 9/11/01, Washington Post, 9/11/01, MSNBC, 9/22/01, CNN, 9/12/01] The Air Force One entourage was pared down to a few essential staffers such as Ari Fleischer, Andrew Card, Karl Rove, Dan Bartlett, and Gordon Johndroe [White House, 9/11/01], plus about five reporters. [AP, 9/12/01 (D)] During the flight, Bush remained in "continuous contact" with the White House Situation Room and Vice President Cheney. [CNN, 9/11/01 (B)]

Air Force One landed at Offutt shortly before 3:00 p.m. [Washington Post, 9/11/01] At 3:06, Bush passed through security to the US Strategic Command Underground Command Center [Salon, 9/11/01, CBS, 9/11/02] and was taken into an underground bunker designed to withstand a nuclear blast. [Telegraph, 12/16/01]

There, he held a teleconference call with Vice President Cheney, National Security Advisor Rice, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, CIA Director Tenet, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, and others. [ABC News, 9/11/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01, Washington Times, 10/8/02] The meeting lasted about an hour. [Telegraph, 12/16/01, Salon, 9/11/01, AP, 8/19/02] Rice recalled that during the meeting, Tenet told Bush, "Sir, I believe it's al-Qaeda. We're doing the assessment but it looks like, it feels like, it smells like al-Qaeda." [CBS, 9/11/02]

By this time, people were anticipating and expecting another reassuring public statement from Bush. [Orlando Sentinel, 9/12/01] The White House staff was preparing for Bush to address the nation from the Offutt bunker, but Bush decided instead to return to Washington. [CBS, 9/11/02]

As a side note, Warren Buffett, one of the richest people in the world, was hosting an unpublicized charity benefit inside the high security Offutt military base at 8:00 a.m. With him were business leaders and several executives from the World Trade Center, including Anne Tatlock of Fiduciary Trust Co. International, who likely would have died had it not been for the meeting. [San Francisco Business Times, 2/1/02] They watched a lot of the television coverage that morning, but it's unknown if any of these people were still at Offutt by the time Bush arrived in the afternoon.

Back in Washington

Air Force One left Offutt around 4:30 p.m. [MSNBC, 9/22/01, CNN, 9/12/01, Telegraph, 12/16/01] and landed at Andrews Air Force Base at 6:34 p.m., escorted by two F-15 fighters and one F-16. [CNN, 9/11/01] Bush then took the Marine One helicopter to the White House [Salon 9/11/01], arriving shortly before 7:00 p.m. [CNN, 9/12/01, Telegraph, 12/16/01, AP, 8/19/02]

Bush gave a nationally televised speech at 8:30 p.m. [CNN, 9/12/01, White House, 9/11/01], speaking for about five minutes. [US News, 9/14/01] In what would later be called the Bush Doctrine, he stated, "We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them." [Washington Post, 1/27/02]

Around 9:00 p.m., Bush met with his full National Security Council, followed roughly half an hour later by a meeting with a smaller group of key advisors. Bush and his advisors had already decided bin Laden was behind the attacks. CIA Director Tenet told Bush that al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan were essentially one and the same. [Washington Post, 1/27/02]

Before going to sleep around 11:30 p.m., Bush wrote in his diary, "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today . . . . We think it's Osama bin Laden." [Washington Post, 1/27/02]

Rewriting History

The many accounts of what happened to Bush on 9/11 are riddled with disinformation of false threats, omitted details, fudged timing, and more. But around September 11, 2002, the heavily publicized first anniversary of the attacks, there was an obvious attempt to further rewrite the story.

Chief of Staff Andrew Card claimed that after he told Bush about the second World Trade Center crash, "it was only a matter of seconds" before Bush "excused himself very politely to the teacher and to the students, and he left" the classroom. Card also stated that Bush "quickly excused himself to a holding room." [San Francisco Chronicle, 9/11/02] In a different account, Card said, "Not that many seconds later the president excused himself from the classroom." [MSNBC, 9/9/02] The Booker school video shows these statements are lies – unless "a matter of seconds" means over 700 seconds!

Sandra Kay Daniels, the teacher whose second-grade classroom Bush visited on 9/11, told the Los Angeles Times that after Card informed Bush of the second crash, Bush got up and left. "He said, 'Ms. Daniels, I have to leave now.' . . . Looking at his face, you knew something was wrong. I said a little prayer for him. He shook my hand and left." Daniels also said, "I knew something was up when President Bush didn't pick up the book and participate in the lesson." [Los Angeles Times, 9/11/02] However, the Booker video clearly shows that Bush did follow along after being told of the second plane. [Video: Center for Cooperative Research, Buzzflash, Global Free Press, The Emperor's New Clothes, or Liberty DYNU]

The New York Post reported, "A federal agent rushed into the room to inform the president of the United States. President Bush had been presiding over [Daniels's] reading class last 9/11, when a Secret Service agent interrupted the lesson and asked, 'Where can we get to a television?'" Daniels then claimed that Bush left the class even before the second crash: "The president bolted right out of here and told me: 'Take over.'" When the second crash occurred, she claims her students were watching TV in a nearby media room. [New York Post, 9/12/02] This article is riddled with errors. As mentioned previously, the Secret Service was already watching the second plane crash live on television in an adjacent room at 9:03 – long before this supposedly happened. Nor did Bush "bolt" out of the room; in fact, even pro-Bush author Bill Sammon called Bush "the dawdler in chief" for taking so long to leave the room. [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism – From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, p. 90]

Bush himself took part in the historical revisionism. In an extensive video interview shown on CBS's "60 Minutes," he again repeated his bizarre belief that he was watching television when the first crash took place. CBS also revived the false story that terrorists had broken Air Force One's secret codes, even though it was CBS who debunked that same story nearly a year earlier. [CBS, 9/11/02]

Vital Questions Remain Unanswered

Needless to say, in the anniversary hoopla, Bush and other leaders were described as "resolute," "brave," "strong," and so forth. Even the minor level of media criticism just after 9/11 that led to several reporters losing their jobs was absent. The topic of Bush's behavior on 9/11 has been barely mentioned in the media since.

There are many questions that deserve answers. So many pieces of the puzzle do not fit. Simply by reading the mainstream media reports, we can see that mere incompetence doesn't explain what happened to Bush on that day. For instance, it makes no sense that Bush would listen to a story about a goat long after being told the US was under attack, and even after the Secret Service decided to immediately evacuate him from the school. It defies explanation that Air Force One's fighter escort took two hours to appear. And it is mind-boggling that there are seven different versions of how Bush learned about the first crash.

It's doubtful that the Independent Commission investigation will look critically at what Bush did on 9/11 and why he did it. Despite the contradictory reports, no one in the mainstream media has yet demanded clarification of the many obvious inconsistencies and problems of the official version. Anyone even asking questions has been quickly insulted as anti-American, accused of bashing the president in a time of war, or branded a conspiracy nut. Only a few relatives of the 9/11 attacks have been able to raise these issues publicly. For instance, Kristen Breitweiser told Phil Donahue: "It was clear that we were under attack. Why didn't the Secret Service whisk [Bush] out of that school? . . . [H]e is the commander-in-chief of the United States of America, our country was clearly under attack, it was after the second building was hit. I want to know why he sat there for 25 minutes." [Donahue, 8/13/02] But so far, few have listened to their concerns.

Because the media has failed in its role to ask these questions, much less attempt to answer them, it is now the responsibility of ordinary Americans – of you, of me, and the people we know – to gather the information, look for answers, and sound the alarm.

* * *

Also: Lindsay Koshgarian, 9/11 at 20: Two Decades of Missed Opportunities (emphasis added):
In a new report I co-authored with my colleagues at the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, we found that the federal government has spent $21 trillion on war and militarization both inside the U.S. and around the world over the past 20 years. That's roughly the size of the entire U.S. economy.

Even while politicians have written blank checks for militarism year after year, they've said we can't afford to address our most urgent issues. No wonder these past 20 years have been rough on U.S. families and communities.

After strong growth from 1970 to 2000, household incomes have stagnated for 20 years as Americans struggled through two recessions in the years leading up to the pandemic. As pandemic eviction moratoriums end, millions are at risk of homelessness.

Our public health systems have also been chronically underfunded, leaving the U.S. helpless to enact the testing, tracing, and quarantining that helped other countries limit the pandemic's damage. Over 650,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 — the equivalent of a 9/11 every day for over seven months. The opioid epidemic claims another 50,000 lives a year.

Meanwhile extreme weather events like wildfires, hurricanes, and floods have grown in frequency over the past 20 years. The U.S. hasn't invested nearly enough in either renewable energy or climate resiliency to deal with the increasing effects climate change has on our communities. . . .

Around the world, the forever wars have cost 900,000 lives and left 38 million homeless — and as the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan has shown us, they were a massive failure.

Our militarized spending has helped deport 5 million people over the past 20 years, often taking parents from their children. . . .

And it has paid for the government to listen in on our phone calls and target communities for harassment and surveillance without any evidence of crime or wrongdoing . . .

We've found that for just a fraction of what we've spent on militarization these last 20 years, we could start to make life much better.

For $4.5 trillion, we could build a renewable, upgraded energy grid for the whole country. For $2.3 trillion, we could create 5 million $15-an-hour jobs with benefits — for 10 years. For just $25 billion, we could vaccinate low-income countries against COVID-19, saving lives and stopping the march of new and more threatening virus variants.

We could do all that and more for less than half of what we've spent on wars and militarization in the last 20 years. With communities across the country in dire need of investment, the case for avoiding more pointless, deadly wars couldn't be clearer.

The best time for those investments would have been during the past 20 years. The next best time is now.