.
L'Autre Monde 6 novembre 2013 : Nanotechnologie et État policier, santé et fraudes financières
Pour écouter, ou pour télécharger, simplement cliquer sur le lien ici:
L'Autre Monde 6 novembre 2013
90 min / Radio de l'UQAM, CHOQ FM
 |
Nombre d'émission: 248
Diffusion en direct :
Mercredi à 14:00h
|
|
|
Au programme cette semaine:
Nous poursuivons le dossier santé cette semaine, particulièrement avec le volet vaccination et celui des OGM. Nous discutons aussi de l'appareil à la Big Brother sur stéroïdes et la nanotechnologie qui menace d'anéantir la notion de vie privée à tout jamais. À cela s'ajoute quelques nouvelles de l'actualité et de l'économie.
C'est en rendez-vous le mercredi 14h sur les ondes de CHOQ FM, la radio officielle de
l'Université du Québec à Montréal !
***Hyperliens vers les sources des informations discutées sur l'émission d'aujourd'hui:
Publié le 27 octobre 2013
Écrit par folamour
Quand je vous parlais de ma peur des nanos, eh bien, c’est bien parce
que j’avais en tête ce projet fou d’Hewlett Packard de créer de la « poussière
intelligente » ou « smart dust », composée de milliards de
milliards de petites sondes de tailles nanos reliées entre elles par les ondes…
qui pourront tout capter, sons, vidéos, etc.
Vous pensez que c’est de la science-fiction… ? Détrompez-vous… Voici où
nous en étions en 2009 :
Alors imaginez de nos jours, ou pire, dans 10 ans…
Et c’est maintenant qu’il faut réagir et légiférer… S'il n’est pas déjà
trop tard… Avant de perdre totalement le contrôle sur cette technologie....
Informations complémentaires :
Publié le 23 septembre 2011
Écrit par folamour
Alors que d’ores et déjà on nous promet un « Intranet » géant pour la France (et le
monde !), les propos d’Alex Türk (qui a été débarqué de la CNIL) prennent
tout leurs sens. La seconde partie de la vidéo traite de ce sujet, ainsi que
l’article du Nouvel Obs de l’époque retrouvé par Chalouette.
Dans son livre "la Vie
privée en péril" (éd. Odile Jacob), le président de la Cnil Alex Türk
s'inquiète de la multiplication des outils de surveillance, souvent invisibles,
difficiles à contrôler. Une atteinte à notre intimité. Entretien.
Article publié dans "le Nouvel
Observateur" du 7 avril 2011.
Les citoyens "sont aujourd'hui sous contrôle", écrivez-vous.
Un constat sombre pour un homme chargé de veiller au respect de la fameuse loi
informatique et libertés, censée protéger chacun d'entre nous contre le fichage
abusif...
- J'ai voulu lancer un cri d'alarme : soyons clairs, il y a un danger
mortel pour les libertés individuelles. Les gens n'imaginent pas à quel point
ils sont surveillés, profilés, leurs goûts analysés, leurs habitudes
disséquées... Des milliards d'informations ont été collectées, et ce phénomène
croît à une vitesse insensée. On a longtemps redouté Big Brother, mais on peut se
rebeller contre un système centralisé. Or ce qui nous attend est bien pire.
Nous assistons à la multiplication des nano-Brothers - capteurs, puces
électroniques dans les cartes et les portables... -, beaucoup plus redoutables
car les outils de surveillance sont multiples, disséminés, parfois invisibles,
donc bien plus difficiles à contrôler. On ne sait pas qui collecte les données,
où elles sont entreposées, pour combien de temps, ni dans quel but. La
biométrie (empreintes électroniques digitales, oculaires...), la
vidéosurveillance, la géolocalisation, la collecte des données en ligne, c'est
un cocktail explosif.
Quelle est cette menace concrètement ?
- Je suis président de la Cnil depuis sept ans. A mon arrivée, le
principal problème était la multiplication des fichiers régaliens liés à la
sécurité après le 11-Septembre. Aujourd'hui, nous ne sommes plus à l'ère du
casier judiciaire et des fichiers de police, mais dans celle du fichage de
masse et du flicage ludique. Avec internet et les applications de la téléphonie
mobile, les gens donnent spontanément un tas d'informations qui s'ajoutent à
toutes celles déjà collectées sans cesse dans leur vie quotidienne.
Aujourd'hui, un citoyen est forcément fiché quelque part. Et souvent dans de
multiples bases. Le danger, c'est que, potentiellement, tout peut être
interconnecté. Avec le risque de la fin de l'anonymat, un cauchemar absolu.
C'est le flicage "invisible" qui vous tourmente le plus.
- Depuis deux ans, je constate que la géolocalisation se développe à une
vitesse affolante. Les outils de traçage ont proliféré avec la miniaturisation
des technologies, notamment les téléphones 3G. Nous allons vers un monde de la
surveillance invisible. Dans la poche, nous avons désormais des mini-ordinateurs
dont la puissance est égale à ceux qui tenaient dans une grande pièce il y a
vingt-cinq ans ! Téléphoner n'est plus qu'une fonction annexe de ces nouveaux
appareils dont le but est de vous ficher et de vous localiser à tout moment. La
totale transparence, c'est le rêve des multinationales, obsédées par idée de
profiler leurs clients. Quand j'étais jeune, on souhaitait échapper au regard
des parents, ne jamais dire où l'on était. Aujourd'hui, il faut s'afficher.
C'est tendance. Les sociétés en profitent pour récupérer des infos personnelles
: vos goûts, des photos, des vidéos... Elles ont inventé le Big Brother
convivial, le capitalisme copain : elles ont besoin de ces données pour
prospérer, mais vous amènent à les leur donner en vous faisant croire que c'est
dans votre intérêt. C'est le modèle Facebook. Ce système ingénieux ne serait
pas blâmable s'il était lisible et contrôlé. Mais ce n'est pas le cas. La
notion de consentement est floue, et vous n'avez pas de droit de suite : fermer
votre compte ne garantit pas la disparition des données. Les grandes
entreprises du numérique vantent la transparence, mais agissent derrière un
rideau de fumée.
Mais vous avez pour mission de contrôler leurs activités... La Cnil ne
vient-elle pas de condamner Google à 100.000 euros d'amende pour avoir collecté
des données sur les réseaux Wi-Fi via ses systèmes de géolocalisation Google
Street View, Maps et Latitude ?
- C'est une amende record. Et bien la preuve que nous agissons, même si
nous n'avons évidemment pas accès aux millions de fichiers stockés partout dans
le monde. Dans cette affaire, Google France plaide l'erreur, mais je n'y crois
guère. Cela fait des années que cette entreprise recueille des infos privées
(e-mails, historiques de navigation...), transitant par les bornes Wi-Fi. Elle
a pu le faire grâce aux véhicules lui permettant de prendre des photos des rues
pour les cartographies. Si c'est une erreur, comment ne s'en est-elle pas
aperçue avant ? J'ai l'impression que les Google & co ont un sentiment d'impunité.
Nous devons leur faire comprendre que nous savons ce qu'ils font. La Cnil doit
être en vigilance permanente. Elle est aujourd'hui la seule autorité du monde à
avoir un service d'expertise technologique. Depuis quatre ans, il observe le
fonctionnement des sites web et sera bientôt doté d'un laboratoire permettant
de tester tous les nouveaux matériels. Pour être vraiment efficace, il faudrait
que nos moyens soient doublés. Je propose une taxe d'environ 60 euros sur les
entreprises et collectivités locales. Il faudrait aussi augmenter le contrôle
et adapter les textes, aujourd'hui totalement dépassés par les nouvelles
technologies. Le droit à l'oubli numérique, par exemple, doit être enfin
consacré. Évidemment, il convient que la législation soit mondiale. La plupart
des données personnelles sont en effet collectées et conservées par de grandes
entreprises étrangères, souvent américaines. Il faut que l'Europe ait le
courage de convaincre les États-Unis d'instaurer des règles. Elle doit prendre
les devants lors du G8 du numérique, qui aura lieu en mai. Il y a urgence, car
si l'on n'agit pas maintenant la notion d'intimité ne sera bientôt plus qu'un
lointain souvenir.
Interview d'Alex Türk, sénateur du Nord et président de la Cnil, par
Stéphane Arteta.
Article publié dans "le Nouvel
Observateur" du 7 avril 2011.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' distrust in the media hit a new high this
year, with 60% saying they have little or no trust in the mass media to report
the news fully, accurately, and fairly. Distrust is up from the past few years,
when Americans were already more negative about the media than they had been in
years prior to 2004.
The record distrust in the media, based on a
survey conducted Sept. 6-9,
2012, also means that negativity toward the media is at an all-time high for a
presidential election year. This reflects the continuation of a pattern in
which negativity increases every election year compared with the year prior.
The current gap between negative and positive views -- 20 percentage points --
is by far the highest Gallup has recorded since it began regularly asking the
question in the 1990s. Trust in the media was much higher, and more positive
than negative, in the years prior to 2004 -- as high as 72% when Gallup asked
this question three times in the 1970s.
Reporting the NSA story hasn't been easy, but it's always been fulfilling.
It's what journalism at its crux is about, and we must protect that. I'm
leaving the
Guardian in order to work
with Pierre Omidyar, Laura Poitras, Jeremy Scahill and soon-to-be-identified
others on building a new media organization. Leaving the Guardian was not an
easy choice, but this was a dream opportunity that was impossible to decline.
The new site will be up and running reasonably soon. I'll also periodically
post on my personal blog –
here – with an active comment section, as well as on our
pre-launch temporary blog. Reporting the NSA story has
never been easy, but it's always been invigorating and fulfilling. It's exactly
why one goes into journalism and, in my view, is what journalism at its crux is
about.
I really urge everyone to take note of, and stand against, [the]
sustained and unprecedented attack on press freedoms and the news gathering
process in the US. That same menacing climate is now manifest in the UK as
well. There are extremist though influential factions in both countries which
want to criminalize not only whistleblowing but the act of journalism itself.
I'm not leaving because of those threats – if anything, they make me want to
stay and continue to publish here – but I do believe it's urgent that everyone
who believes in basic press freedoms unite against this. Allowing journalism to
be criminalized is in nobody's interest other than the states which are trying
to achieve that.
Note: For confirmation of Glenn Greenwald's warnings of
immediate government threats to press freedom in the UK,
click here.
Rabobank Groep, the co-operative formed in 1898 to
lend to Dutch farmers, was fined 774 million euros ($1.1 billion) and the
chairman resigned as the scandal over the rigging of benchmark interest rates
ensnared a fifth firm. The Utrecht, Netherlands-based lender entered into an
agreement with the Justice Department to accept responsibility for manipulation
of Libor and Euribor to avoid prosecution. The fines are the largest-ever
against the bank and second-largest over manipulation of the London interbank
offered rate. Global investigations into banks’ attempts to manipulate the
benchmarks for profit have led to fines and settlements for Barclays, Royal
Bank of Scotland, UBS and ICAP. Rabobank derivatives and money-market
traders influenced the lender’s submissions to benefit their positions linked
to Libor and conspired with employees of other banks to rig rates from May 2005
to January 2011. More than 500 attempts were made by Rabobank to manipulate
Libor, according to the regulator. Thirty current and former employees of
the Dutch lender were involved, Rabobank executive board member Sipko Schat
said today. Five of them were fired, he said, while 14 are still working for
the bank. The lender is also clawing back 4.2 million euros in bonuses,
Rabobank said in a statement. The manipulation “directly affected the rates
referenced by financial products held by and on behalf of companies and
investors around the world,” Valerie Parlave, Assistant Director in Charge of
the FBI’s Washington field office, said in a statement.
Note: For more on financial corruption, see the deeply
revealing reports from reliable major media sources available here.
The widespread surveillance of Spanish citizens by
the US National Security Agency, which caused outrage when it was reported this
week, was the product of a collaboration with Spain's intelligence services,
according to one Spanish newspaper. Spanish agents not only knew about the work
of the NSA but also facilitated it, El Mundo reports. An NSA document
entitled "Sharing computer network operations cryptologic information with
foreign partners" reportedly shows how the US relies on the collaboration
of many countries to give it access to intelligence information, including
electronic metadata. According to the document seen by El Mundo, the US
classifies cooperation with various countries on four different levels. In the
first group – "Comprehensive Cooperation" – are the UK, Australia, Canada
and New Zealand. The second group – "Focused Cooperation" – of which
Spain is a member, includes 19 countries, all of them European, apart from
Japan and South Korea. The third group – "Limited cooperation" –
consists of countries such as France, Israel, India and Pakistan; while the
fourth – "Exceptional Cooperation" – is made up of countries that the
US considers to be hostile to its interests. The NSA documents [suggest] the
Spanish intelligence services were working hand in hand with the NSA, as were
other foreign agencies. But if there was any doubt as to who held the upper
hand, the NSA documents make clear that any collaboration was always to serve
the needs of protecting American interests.
Note: For more on the realities of intelligence agency
activities, see the deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources available here.
Stephen Lendman
Activist Post
Britain's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) operates like NSA.
They work cooperatively. They're out-of-control rogue agencies.
They spy on their own populations. They do it globally. They conduct
espionage. They collect enormous amounts of personal information. They do it
illegally.
Obama wages war on freedom. He targets whistleblowers and investigative
journalists exposing government wrongdoing. So does Britain. It equates doing
so with terrorism.
London's Guardian is threatened. Its offices were raided. Hard drive stored
information was destroyed. Its editor, Alan Rusbridger, was warned. Cease and
desist or else...
From the amount of money spent each year in the United States on law
enforcement, one might assume crime continues to be a growing problem.
But that’s not the case at all.
US terror drones and attack helicopters have killed 31 people in Yemen,
Pakistan, and Afghanistan over the course of 72 hours.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post
How long have you been using your cellphone? Using a mobile device for any
length of time is damaging to some degree, but new research is shedding light
on just how significant of an influence extended cellphone use has on the
brain.
In a newly-released study
conducted
at the Örebro Hospita in Sweden, it was revealed that 10 years of cellphone use
resulted in an average 290% increased risk of brain tumor development.
Interestingly, the tumor development was found on the side of the head in which
the cellphone was most used.
On
the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising
radiation.
Source
Department of Oncology, University Hospital, SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden.
Abstract
We performed two case-control studies on brain tumours diagnosed during 1 January
1997 to 30 June 2000 and 1 July 2000 to 31 December 2003, respectively. Living
cases and controls aged 20-80 years were included. An additional
study was performed on deceased cases with
a malignant brain tumour using deceased controls. Pooled results for glioma
yielded for ipsilateral use of mobile phone odds ratio (OR)=2.9, 95% confidence
interval (CI)=1.8-4.7 in the >10 years latency group. The corresponding
result for cordless phone was OR=3.8, 95% CI=1.8-8.1. OR increased
statistically significant for cumulative use of wireless phones per 100h and
per year of latency. For high-grade glioma ipsilateral use of mobile phone gave
OR=3.9, 95% CI=2.3-6.6 and cordless phone OR=5.5, 95% CI=2.3-13 in the >10
years latency group. Heredity for brain tumour gave OR=3.4, 95% CI=2.1-5.5 for
glioma. There was no interaction with use of wireless phones. X-ray
investigation of the head gave overall OR=1.3, 95% CI=1.1-1.7 for glioma
without interaction with use of wireless phones or heredity. In conclusion use
of mobile and cordless phone increased the risk for glioma with highest OR for
ipsilateral use, latency >10 years and third tertile of cumulative use in hours.
In total, the risk was highest in the age group <20 a="" first="" for="" of="" p="" phone.="" use="" wireless="" years="">
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier
Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PMID:
22939605
[PubMed - as supplied
by publisher]
Glyphosate is assumed to be safe for
humans. As a result, it’s become the world’s best-selling herbicide. However, a
groundbreaking study documents that it may actually be fueling the plague of
chronic & immune diseases, including cancer and autism. This study documents
the underlying systemic damage produced by glyphosate, then discusses how that
damage leads to specific diseases.
by Heidi Stevenson
This article is split into three parts.
This is Part 1, Glyphosate: Chronic Disease Degeneration.
It gives an overview and then goes on to discuss the primary findings of a new
study about the human effects of Monsanto’s herbicide, glyphosate. Part 2,
titled Glyphosate: Disease Creator,
discusses specific diseases, applying the basic harms produced by glyphosate
and showing how they lead to each disease. Part 3, titled Glyphosate:
A Trajectory of Human Misery, discusses
glyphosate’s use throughout the world and then draws conclusions.
Monsanto’s herbicide, glyphosate, has become virtually ubiquitous based on a
presumption of harmlessness in humans. In spite of noxious and aggressive
superweeds that have developed in response and a host of reports citing harm
and potential harm to the environment and farm animals, this premise of
innocence has resulted in its use nearly everywhere. Because of that same image
of innocence, its use has multiplied astronomically.
However, a new report from the journal
Entropy turns the proposition
of glyphosate’s innocence in human health upside down. An exhaustive review of
existing research in which 287 studies were reviewed, coupled with irrefutable
logic, produces a frightening picture of the reality: Glyphosate may be the
single most devastating substance ever introduced into agribusiness. As the
authors, Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff, concluded:
Glyphosate
is likely to be pervasive in our food supply, and, contrary to being
essentially nontoxic, it may in fact be the most biologically disruptive
chemical in our environment.
The range of diseases that can be associated with glyphosate is frightening.
Its biological effects are so primary that virtually every bodily system—if not
every one—is adversely affected. The authors state:
Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post
Launching a lawsuit against the very company that is responsible for a
farmer
suicide
every 30 minutes, 5 million farmers are now suing Monsanto for as much as
6.2 billion euros (around 7.7 billion US dollars). The reason? As with many
other cases, such as the ones that led certain farming regions to be known as
the ‘suicide belt’, Monsanto has been reportedly taxing the farmers to
financial shambles with ridiculous royalty charges. The farmers state that
Monsanto has been unfairly gathering exorbitant profits each year on a global
scale from “renewal” seed harvests, which are crops planted using seed from the
previous year’s harvest.
The practice of using renewal seeds dates back to ancient times, but
Monsanto seeks to collect massive royalties and put an end to the practice.
Why? Because Monsanto owns the very patent to the genetically modified seed,
and is charging the farmers not only for the original crops, but the later
harvests as well...
William Engdahl wrote in March of 2010 about a USDA funded project to create
a GM corn that sterilizes people. GMO, glyphosate and population reduction.
One long-standing project of the US Government has been to perfect a
genetically-modified variety of corn, the diet staple in Mexico and many other
Latin American countries. The corn has been field tested in tests financed by
the US Department of Agriculture along with a small California bio-tech company
named Epicyte. Announcing his success at a 2001 press conference, the
president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants, announced,
“We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies.”
14
Hein explained that they had taken antibodies from women with a rare
condition known as immune infertility, isolated the genes that regulated the
manufacture of those infertility antibodies, and, using genetic engineering
techniques, had inserted the genes into ordinary corn seeds used to produce
corn plants.
In this manner, they have produced a concealed
contraceptive embedded in corn meant for human consumption.
“Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm,”
said Hein. “They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward.
It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.”
15 Hein claimed it was a possible solution to world
“over-population.” The moral and ethical issues of feeding it to humans in
Third World, poor countries without their knowing could [lead to global
murder.]The questions raised by “[s]permicides hidden in GMO corn provided to
starving Third World populations through the generosity of the Gates’
foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Kofi Annan’s AGRA” are many and
profound.
1. Isn’t GM technology directed beyond third world countries but at all
countries in the world, and first and most heavily in the US?
2. Is there a relationship, since the introduction of GM-crops in the
US, to how steeply birthrates in the US have fallen?
U.S.
birthrates overall are at an all time low. Continuing a 12-year decline,
the U.S. birth rate has dropped to the lowest level since national data have
been available …
Bt-corn was
introduced in the
US in 1996, three years before the dramatic decline began. “Some seven
million acres were planted to Bt corn in 1997 with hybrids primarily from
Mycogen, Novartis (formerly Ciba), and Northrup King. Mycogen and
Novartis both produce pharmaceutical contraceptives.
3. In the US and many other countries, despite consumer demand for
labeling, the corporations involved have exerted tremendous pressure to keep
GMOs unlabeled and are pushing the Codex agenda to keep all GMOs
(internationally) unlabeled?
Until now, scientists and multinational corporations promoting GM crops have
maintained that Bt toxin poses no danger to human health as the protein breaks
down in the human gut. But the presence of this toxin in human blood shows that
this does not happen.
Eating GM corn, soy, and potatoes is perfectly safe, provided you don’t mind
having a powerful toxin swirling in your bloodstream. Oh, and your unborn
baby’s bloodstream as well. So says a debbie-downer peer-reviewed Canadian
study, India Today reports:
Want grandchildren? If so you might want to consider avoiding GMO
(genetically modified organism) foods, which have recently been linked to
long-term sterility, meaning sterility in second and third generations. This
new study, conducted by the Russian equivalent of the US National Association
for Gene Security, has not yet been published, but it’s anticipated that the
details will be published later this summer. Published or not the findings of
this study are scary and strange plus add to an already large collection of
studies noting that GMO foods can cause health problems for children, plus
problems related to fertility, birth weight of offspring and infant mortality.
I strongly believe that one of the most obvious clues about the danger of
GMO foods are that just about EVERY species of animal that is offered a GMO
food versus a non-GMO food will avoid the GMO one. Many times they will do this
to the point of starvation, as they have an intuitive sense of the danger of
this food.
Is it possible that the foods you eat are actually affecting your fertility
and inhibiting your chances of getting pregnant? The answer is a resounding,
“Yes,” according to dozens of research groups worldwide who have been studying
the effects of Genetically Modified Organisms found in many of today’s most
common foods.
Yet another study showing that genetically modified foods cause sterility —
this one in humans instead of just animals.
“Health and medical experts in New Zealand have called for a ban on
soy-based infant formula after a recent mouse study suggested soy damages the
reproductive tract and immune system. The US research, published in The Society
for the Study of Reproduction, suggested that exposure to low levels of
phytoestrogen during sensitive development stages of the female foetus through
to puberty can [adversely] affect fertility in later years.”
For nearly a decade, various state and federal agencies have been looking
into Johnson & Johnson’s marketing of the drugs Risperdal, Invega,
Natrecor, and others, claiming the company was putting consumers at risk by
paying kickbacks to doctors and pharmacists to suggest these drugs to patients
and for pushing unapproved uses for these medications. Today, the Justice Dept.
announced that J&J will pay out more than $2.2 billion to settle these
claims.
http://www.naturalnews.com/042770_Guillain-Barre_syndrome_H1N1_vaccines_toxic_effects.html#
A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
(JAMA) admits that the vaccine widely administered for H1N1, also known as
"swine flu," is linked to causing neurological damage in the form of
Guillain-Barre syndrome. The findings confirm several earlier studies in both
the U.S. and U.K. that also linked the H1N1 vaccine to severe neurological
damage.
Reuters Health
reports that, for the new study, Philippe De Wals of Laval University in
Quebec City and his colleagues evaluated rates of Guillain-Barre in Canadians
during the six months following the initial roll out of H1N1 in Quebec. Upon
review, the team says it observed a definite increase in Guillain-Barre cases
associated with the vaccine.
For those who are unaware of what Guillain-Barre actually is, the condition is
marked by an autoimmune reaction where the body's immune system mistakenly
attacks the nervous system as if it is a foreign invader, which can cause
severe nerve inflammation, muscle weakness, paralysis, and even death.
Guillain-Barre was also widely observed following the mass vaccination
campaigns for swine flu back in 1976.
The Canadian study confirms what the U.K.'s Medicines and Healthcare
products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) determined about the H1N1 vaccine back in
2010. The agency, which is akin to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) in the U.S., issued a public statement at that time admitting that the
H1N1 vaccine is linked to "a slightly elevated risk of GBS." (http://www.naturalnews.com/030266_vaccines_nerve_disease.html)
The U.K.'s Health Protection Agency (HPA) also reportedly sent a
confidential letter to roughly 600 senior neurologists back in 2009 warning
them about the H1N1 vaccine's definitive link to Guillain-Barre. None of this
important information, which was clearly meant to remain a secret, was distributed
for public health purposes during that time. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk)
However, data gathered by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) following the massive roll out of H1N1 vaccines in the
U.S. back in 2009 also linked the jab to Guillain-Barre. Though scientists and
government authorities tried to downplay the findings and make them appear as
though the risk of Guillain-Barre was inconsequential (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100413151906.htm),
the cat was out of the bag, as there was no denying that the H1N1 vaccine is
clearly linked to neurological damage.
Just ask 14-year-old Jordan McFarland, a high school athlete from Alexandria,
Virginia, who developed Guillain-Barre syndrome
just hours after getting his H1N1 jab. Jordan reportedly suffered extreme
weakness and inability to walk following the vaccine, and developed severe
headaches and muscle spasms. The young boy even had to use a walker for several
months in order to maintain some kind of mobility. (http://vactruth.com)
Sources for this article include:
http://www.reuters.com
Pentagon hopes for
a pill to erase memories
"We need zombies"
The
Pentagon is looking for a drug that will erase bad memories.
The estimate is over over 300,000 soldiers are living with some form of PTSD,
that's approximately 20% of vets.
What is the Pentagon looking for exactly?
They want to be able to expose people to murder and mayhem without any
psychological consequences. - See more at: http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/health-and-medical-1/pentagon-hopes-for-a-pill-to-erase-memories.html#sthash.NuDyyW1W.dpuf
The King's team looked at white blood cells, which tend to experience faster
rates of turnover - and faster shortening of telomeres - when the body's
tissues are suffering more inflammation.
They looked at a total of 2,160 women aged between 18 and 79, and took a
snapshot measurement of the levels of vitamin D in their bloodstream, comparing
this to the length of the telomeres in their white blood cells.
They found that, after adjusting the results for the age of the volunteer,
women with higher levels of vitamin D were more likely to have longer telomeres
in these cells, and vice versa.
Research using polls and questionnaires continue to show that 3 of every 4
doctors and scientists would refuse chemotherapy for themselves due to its
devastating effects on the entire body and the immune system, and because of
its extremely low success rate. On top of that, only 2 to 4% of all cancers
even respond to chemotherapy or prove to be "life extending," yet it
is prescribed across the board for just about every kind of cancer.
On the heels of a reported chemical attack committed by the death squads on
the Syria/Turkey border, a massive explosion has completely destroyed a Syrian
air defense base in Snobar Jableh, Syria which is located near Latakia, a port
city on the coast of the Mediterranean. Snobar Jableh is just south of Latakia.
The attacks allegedly were to have taken place on Wednesday night.
Although no one has publicly claimed responsibility for the explosion, both
Syrian and Lebanese media are attributing the attack to Israeli forces.
Jerusalem considers administration’s
confirmation of Israeli air attack on missile stores to be ‘scandalous’; TV
analyst warns US risks starting ‘major flare-up’
By Times
of Israel staff and Yifa Yaakov
November 1, 2013
Israel is fuming with the White House for confirming that it was the Israeli
Air Force that struck a military base near the Syrian port city of Latakia on
Wednesday, hitting weaponry that was set to be transferred to Hezbollah.
Israel has not acknowledged carrying out the strike, one of half a dozen
such attacks widely ascribed to Israel in recent months, but
an Obama administration official told CNN on Thursday
that Israeli warplanes had indeed attacked the Syrian base, and that the target
was “missiles and related equipment” set for delivery to Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Israel’s Channel 10 TV on Friday night quoted Israeli officials branding the
American leak as “scandalous.” For Israel’s ally to be acting in this way was
“unthinkable,” the officials were quoted as saying.
A second TV report, on Israel’s Channel 2, said the leak “came directly from
the White House,” and noted that “this is not the first time” that the
administration has compromised Israel by leaking information on such Israeli
Air Force raids on Syrian targets.
It said some previous leaks were believed to have come from the Pentagon,
and that consideration had been given at one point to establishing a panel to
investigate the sources.
Channel 2′s military analyst, Roni Daniel, said the Obama administration’s
behavior in leaking the information was unfathomable.
Daniel noted that by keeping silent on whether it carried out such attacks,
Israel was maintaining plausible deniability, so that Syria’s President Bashar
Assad did not feel pressured to respond to the attacks.
But the US leaks “are pushing Assad closer to the point where he can’t
swallow these attacks, and will respond.” This in turn would inevitably draw
further Israeli action, Daniel posited, and added bitterly: “Then perhaps the
US will clap its hands because it will have started a very major flare-up.”
Satellite footage of alleged missile base in Latakia,
Syria (photo credit: Wikimapia)
Channel 2 speculated that the US might have leaked word of Israel’s attack
as a warning to Israel to desist from such actions. Alternately, it might be
seeking to signal that it was part of the tough policy designed to prevent a
flow of sophisticated weaponry to Assad. But these and other possible
explanations simply didn’t justify the leak, which the TV report described as “illogical”
and “foolish.”
Jerusalem’s reported anger with the White House over the leak coincided with
efforts by the Administration to assure Israel that it is holding to a tough
line on Syria and in the effort to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, and is
maintaining its robust military partnership with Israel.
Libya should be a lesson. Although Syria met its deadline by destroying
their chemical weapons building capabilities, Western powers in collaboration
with Israel and Saudi Arabia will continue to destabilize the Syrian
government. Washington is preparing for a military strike on Syria if President
Bashir al-Assad and his government remain in power. Many in Washington
including President Barack Obama and possible future Presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton along with Secretary of State John Kerry have publicly stated
that “Assad Must Go”.
Messages
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://library.vu.edu.pk/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/000100A/http/www.kitconet.com/images/quotes_special.gif)
