Controlling How Others Spend Their Money

Prof. Larry "On Leave" Lessig does not want government control of how the Kochs spend their money. He wants to approve how they do it. That's not tyranny. It is responsible oversight by a morally and intellectually superior Harvard Law School professor. Who could object to that? George Soros can spend his money however he wants, without anyone's approval.
"On Leave" Lessig did not learn from the current Harvard Law School graduate, President, who does not need to convince congress to support his common sense reforms. He just needs to issue executive orders. Then he can resign as originally planned. No need to spend one's time in dusty, dirty Washington, District of Criminals, when he can be in upscale Cambridge, MA.

[From article]
I will work with Congress to assure they are implemented. I will defend them against legislative or legal attack.”

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2015/10/19/lessig-alter-campaign-strategy/

In Change of Plan, Lessig Says He Would Stay on As President
By MEG P. BERNHARD
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
October 19, 2015

FBI Merges Civil And Criminal Data Bases For Control of Population

[From article]

For years the FBI maintained it had no interest in scanning fingerprints collected by employers — teachers, lawyers, state and federal workers, even bike messengers now routinely submit fingerprints for employment — but that has now changed.



“For the first time, fingerprints and biographical information sent to the FBI for a background check will be stored and searched right along with fingerprints taken for criminal purposes,” reports the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization dedicated to protecting rights online.



The change, which the FBI revealed quietly in a February 2015 Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), means that if you ever have your fingerprints taken for licensing or for a background check, they will most likely end up living indefinitely in the FBI’s NGI database. They’ll be searched thousands of times a day by law enforcement agencies across the country—even if your prints didn’t match any criminal records when they were first submitted to the system.
The EFF believes the change is “part of an ever-growing movement toward cataloguing information on everyone in America—and a movement that won’t end with fingerprints.”
Now that the FBI has added a face recognition component to its database, employers and state and local governments will be urged to submit photographs along with fingerprints.
A database of photos will make it easier for the agency and the government to track people as they move about, the EFF explains.
[. . .]



The government’s expanding biometric database — coupled with the NSA’s effort to surveil all personal communication — will further enable the technocratic police state now going into place.
The government is less interested in catching criminals than it is in controlling the populace, especially a politically active populace that may threaten its monopoly of power.

http://www.infowars.com/fbi-merges-criminal-and-civil-fingerprint-database/

by KURT NIMMO

INFOWARS.COM

SEPTEMBER 22, 2015
FBI MERGES CRIMINAL AND CIVIL FINGERPRINT DATABASE
Feds building huge biometric database on all citizens

WFXT-TV School Psychologist Petition

http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/28986945/schools-struggling-with-psychologist-shortage

School's struggling with psychologist shortage
Posted: May 05, 2015 8:13 PM EDT
Updated: May 05, 2015 8:26 PM EDT

Boston News, Weather, Sports | FOX 25 | MyFoxBoston

SPECIAL REPORT (MyFoxBoston.com) -- With continued concerns of school violence, the front line to preventing the next tragedy could be school psychologists, identifying serious issues and working with children before it's too late, but FOX25's Sorboni Banerjee investigated and found that schools in Massachusetts are not even close to having the recommended number of psychologists present.
Schools struggle to meet the mental health needs of students and heartbreaking scenes after school shootings often leave parents wondering how that could happen.
Andria Amador is assistant director of Behavioral Health Services for Boston Public Schools, and president of the Massachusetts School Psychologists Association. She says schools are "always struggling to meet the needs of students."
Massachusetts falling short
With a million Massachusetts students and approximately 900 school psychologists, there's only one psychologist per 1,100 students, which is well below the national guideline of one per 500- to 700 students.
"All districts are obligated to have special education services to meet the needs of students with specialized needs. That could range across academic, behavioral health motor needs so each district has those to care for the needs of those students," Amador said.
The numbers may be even worse depending on the district, in some cases, staff members are working in administrative roles and not giving direct care to kids. In addition to tight budgets, finding child psychiatrists isn't easy, there are only 7,000 in the entire country.
Dr. Ellen Braaten, who is the director of the Learning and Emotional Assessment Program at Mass. General said, "It's critical because one out of four people will have a lifetime prevalence of mental health issue and half of those cases start before the age of 14.”
She'll be the first to tell you that staffing at schools isn't the only issue.
or example, in the clinic I direct at Mass. General, it's a 6 to 12 month wait to get seen," she said.

A mother desperate for help
Jackie Johnson was desperate for help. Her son has a complex history of problems, which included uncontrollable anger from as young as the age of four, and it surged as soon as he woke up each day.
"It was stressful every aspect hour after hour after hour an explosion an insult fighting it was exhausting so sigh and it would start all over again the next day,” she said.
At school, she says he was just labeled a trouble maker and it took the family years to realize he needed professional help.
Experts say that's typical, a lack of education and resources adds up. And even when trouble's spotted, because of the long waits for clinical treatment, many families are forced to just go to the emergency room.
"It's kind of a patchwork system of going to the emergency room getting prescription short term help crisis management and then hoping to get in to see someone,” Braaten said.
Therefore, families are left dealing with psychotic episodes one meltdown at a time and their kids and potentially others are left in danger. But parents like Johnson are not ready to give up.
“The process was so painful, when you send your child to treatment, something in your DNA changes, it is so emotional and painful and scary and yet the overwhelming hope that there's a better day ahead," she said.
Schools are trying to get creative: Boston Public Schools tell FOX25 they have already created a framework in some districts using their partnerships with hospitals and mental health organizations to augment resources, so they may better address the needs of all students before a tragedy occurs

If you are a parent and would like more information on finding help for your child, visit: www.Mghclaycenter.org

Real World Is Not Physical, All Is Energy

This explains how police, crime families, Communists can use devices which emit electromagnetic radiation to influence thoughts and emotions, to inflict pain and imitate body functions and ailments. Who can tell the difference between real thoughts, real emotions, and those generated from directed energy devices? Psychiatrists say only humans can generate thoughts and emotions. But they also say that experiencing emotions is mental illness. For the high priests of the psychiatric industry, it is all about control and business. For police it is all about control and keeping their high tech surveillance devices, secret. 

[From article]
It has been written about before, over and over again, but cannot be emphasized enough. The world of quantum physics is an eerie one, one that sheds light on the truth about our world in ways that challenge the existing framework of accepted knowledge.
[. . .]
At the turn of the nineteenth century, physicists started to explore the relationship between energy and the structure of matter. In doing so, the belief that a physical, Newtonian material universe that was at the very heart of scientific knowing was dropped, and the realization that matter is nothing but an illusion replaced it. Scientists began to recognize that everything in the Universe is made out of energy.
[. . .]
Quantum physicists discovered that physical atoms are made up of vortices of energy that are constantly spinning and vibrating, each one radiating its own unique energy signature. Therefore, if we really want to observe ourselves and find out what we are, we are really beings of energy and vibration, radiating our own unique energy signature -this is fact and is what quantum physics has shown us time and time again. We are much more than what we perceive ourselves to be, and it’s time we begin to see ourselves in that light. If you observed the composition of an atom with a microscope you would see a small, invisible tornado-like vortex, with a number of infinitely small energy vortices called quarks and photons. These are what make up the structure of the atom. As you focused in closer and closer on the structure of the atom, you would see nothing, you would observe a physical void. The atom has no physical structure, we have no physical structure, physical things really don’t have any physical structure! Atoms are made out of invisible energy, not tangible matter.
[. . .]
The significance of this information is for us to wake up, and realize that we are all energy, radiating our own unique energy signature. Feelings, thoughts and emotions play a vital role, quantum physics helps us see the significance of how we all feel. If all of us are in a peaceful loving state inside, it will no doubt impact the external world around us, and influence how others feel as well.
[. . .]
Fortunately, many scientists have already taken the leap, and have already questioned the meaning and implications of what we’ve discovered with quantum physics. One of these potential revelations is that “the observer creates the reality.”
[. . .]
Studies have shown that positive emotions and operating from a place of peace within oneself can lead to a very different experience for the person emitting those emotions and for those around them. At our subatomic level, does the vibrational frequency change the manifestation of physical reality? If so, in what way? We know that when an atom changes its state, it absorbs or emits electromagnetic frequencies, which are responsible for changing its state. Do different states of emotion, perception and feelings result in different electromagnetic frequencies? Yes! This has been proven.
[link to proof of effects of electromagnetic radiation]http://www.heartmath.org/research/research-publications/energetic-heart-bioelectromagnetic-communication-within-and-between-people.html Energetics Research The Energetic Heart: Bioelectromagnetic Communication Within and Between People
Rollin McCraty, Ph.D.
Chapter published in: Clinical Applications of Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, edited by P. J. Rosch and M. S. Markov. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2004: 541-562.
Markov. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2004: 541-562.

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/09/27/this-is-the-world-of-quantum-physics-nothing-is-solid-and-everything-is-energy/

Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy – Scientists Explain The World of Quantum Physics
September 27, 2014
by Arjun Walia

George Soros, Ford Foundation Fund Campaign for Government Control of Internet, Curbing Free Speech

George Soros 

[From article]
Liberal philanthropist George Soros and the Ford Foundation have lavished groups supporting the administration’s “net neutrality” agenda, donating $196 million and landing proponents on the White House staff, according to a new report.
And now, as the Federal Communications Commission nears approving a type of government control over the Internet, the groups are poised to declare victory in the years-long fight, according to the report from MRC Business, an arm of the conservative media watchdog, the Media Research Center.
“The Ford Foundation, which claims to be the second-largest private foundation in the U.S., and Open Society Foundations, founded by far-left billionaire George Soros, have given more than $196 million to pro-net neutrality groups between 2000 and 2013,” said the report, authored by Media Research Center’s Joseph Rossell, and provided to Secrets.
“These left-wing groups not only impacted the public debate and funded top liberal think tanks from the Center for American Progress to Free Press. They also have direct ties to the White House and regulatory agencies. At least five individuals from these groups have ascended to key positions at the White House and FCC,” said the report which included funding details to pro-net neutrality advocates.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702

Soros, Ford shovel $196 million to 'net neutrality' groups, staff to White House
BY PAUL BEDARD

FEBRUARY 25, 2015 | 2:22 PM

Study Shows Psychiatric Drugs Destroy Human Will

Disturbingly, researchers found participants often exhibited 'a culture of hopelessness' where acceptance was dominant, which they warn can destroy an individual's will to recover. 

Credit: Charlotte Spencer
More evidence that psychiatry is a method of controlling humans, not curing, not healing not freeing or empowering. 

[From article]
Interviews with community members who are taking antipsychotic medication for mental health problems have added to growing concerns about how the drugs are administered, their effectiveness against placebo and the severity of their side-effects.
[. . .]
The recent research also touches on how stigma can lead individuals to 'just put up with the drugs' despite not believing they help.
While their sample size is limited, Murdoch University and the University of Queensland researchers say insight into lived experience is invaluable.
"People using antipsychotic medications experience adverse side-effects that reach into their physical, social and emotional lives, and cause a level of fear and suffering that is difficult for anyone else to fully comprehend," Murdoch Professor Paul Morrison says.

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-02-antipsychotic-meds-prompt-zombie-like-state.html

Antipsychotic meds prompt zombie-like state among patients
by Rob Payne
February 5, 2015

Government Control Freaks Take Freedom From Advocate for Persons With Disabilities, They Discredit Her and Diminish Her Spirit

Left: Alison Hymes attends a friend's wedding in Washington in 1984. (Courtesy of Alison Hymes) Right: Hymes is seen at the entrance of Riverdale Assisted Living on Dec. 17, 2014. (Evelyn Hockstein/For The Washington Post)
Contrary to its image of love and compassion, psychiatry is a means of social control with no due process protections. Among the misguided standards is if a person denies the entire concept of mental illness that too is a mental illness. Human emotions, ordinary protected speech and behavior are classified as illnesses. Using arbitrary standards psychiatrists take a person's freedom for speech and behavior which they do not like or do not understand.  

[From article]
Hymes was no ordinary patient. Before landing at Western, she spent years urging others with mental illness and their families not to let doctors, judges and social workers make decisions for them. She was part of a state task force charged with reforming civil commitment laws at the time of the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre, serving alongside doctors, academics, and law enforcement officials.
The daughter of a prominent University of Virginia linguist, Hymes argued vehemently — and unsuccessfully — against loosening the state’s commitment criteria.
[. . .]
Anyone who knew Hymes from her days on the state’s commitment task force would not have recognized the timid woman in the hospital waiting room.
She had been a fixture at public meetings on mental health issues for years, with a reputation for challenging anyone, no matter how important.
[. . .]
Author Pete Earley, who served with Hymes on the state panel, described her as the loudest, fiercest voice against involuntary hospitalization and forced medication. “She wouldn’t give an inch and celebrated being an outsider,” he said. “She was relentless if you disagreed with her.”
[. . .]
Years of taking lithium had ruined Hymes’s kidneys. She was on a transplant waiting list as she served on the task force, spending much of her free time going to dialysis.
[. . .]
More significant for Hymes, the state adopted the approach to involuntary hospitalization recommended by the task force. It no longer required that people pose an “imminent danger” to themselves or others before they could be committed, but it also allowed involuntary hospitalization of those who showed a “substantial likelihood” of harm because of an inability to protect themselves from harm or to provide for their basic human needs.
[. . .]
When asked whether she was mentally ill, she replied, “I don’t really believe in mental disability.”
To clinicians, her answer was a sign of her illness, and they sent her to Western for what became a one-year stay. To her friends in what’s called “the psychiatric survivors movement,” her statement was a sign of sanity. She shared their view of involuntary hospitalization, forced medication and the use of restraints as traumatizing and a violation of civil rights. To them, she was not a patient but a political prisoner.
[. . .]
When outside pressure against her hospital commitment did not work, Hymes grew dejected. A doctor described her as “feeling hopeless and helpless” and saying, “ ‘I give up.’ ”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/she-fought-for-patients-rights-then-she-was-put-in-a-hospital-against-her-will/2015/01/31/c306f01c-a1b0-11e4-903f-9f2faf7cd9fe_story.html

She fought for patients’ rights, then she was put in a hospital against her will
By Annys Shin

January 31, 2015 at 8:15 PM

Washington Post 

Marxism, Islamist Terror, and Psychopaths

[From article]
Barack Hussein Obama is but the latest of a long line of Marxist heroes that were expected to usher in the new Utopia, and Obama with all his shortcomings is failing and degrading the USA more rapidly than any other president in memory. Granted, the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave is not fertile ground for establishing a Marxist system. Yet many millions of dollars were invested in making Obama president of the USA, and the Hope and Change were palpable that finally -- finally! -- the hard work and dreams of Marx and his followers would be realized.
[. . .]
in the 2014 election cycle, Obama is only marginally more popular than Ebola.
[. . .]



Marxists collect enablers, supporters, followers, useful idiots, useless idiots, college students, and voters by buying support (social programs), by indoctrinating the young, and by creating and exploiting social, economic, and ethnic divisions, much as did the Soviet Union and Fascist Germany. Marxism's followers are not sophisticated enough to realize that they are being defrauded, and the fraud has been ongoing for a century in widely scattered areas of the globe.
[. . .]
the black demographic comprises Obama's strongest supporters, yet black jobs, income, and wealth are now in greater decline than elsewhere, and black dependency grows. It is ever thus for Marxist states, but the elitist nomenclatura always does well. Gross corruption is typical of Marxist states and of other psychopathic states (militant Islam), and is becoming an ever larger factor in the USA.
[. . .]



Without a conscience to restrain them, psychopaths become predatory, and the personality, intelligence, and social background of the individual psychopath determines the object of his predation: money, sex, political power, whatever. Intelligent psychopaths can do major damage in a financial or political organization as their unrestrained ambition propels them toward the top. With no moral restraints, psychopaths have no limits on their acquisitiveness and seek to gain the most they can by controlling other people, which is the ultimate "ego trip" for a psychopath. Political psychopaths cultivate ignorance and dependency in their followers, the better to control these followers.
[. . .]
The attraction of Marxism is that it gives Marxists control over others. Marxism is the primary element in the psychopathic mask of Marxists, and provides a false rationale for Marxist control of all aspects of a state and its citizens. Marxism is not about economics; Marxism is about the psychopath's control of other people -- their finances, their behaviors, their ways of thinking, their lives. True believers in economic Marxism are gullible psychopath enablers and followers, and are not commonly themselves psychopathic.
[. . .]
But these supporters are certainly susceptible to the charming and horrific nonsense spouted by destructive psychopaths.
You may take this thesis, make minor adjustments for culture and geography, substitute "militant Islam" for "Marxism," and the premise remains equally valid.

http://americanthinker.com/2014/10/the_politics_of_psychopathology.html

October 22, 2014
The Politics of Psychopathology
By James G. Long

Control Freaks Run Government, Take Lessons From Psychiatrists

Here is unsolicited testimony from award winning syndicated writer, author, and corruption fighter Michelle Malkin. For several years I explain to anyone who asks that a range of organizations including but not limited to police, FBI informants, and associates of crime families harass me with the objective of controlling me. They are assisted by psychologists and psychiatrists, professional control freaks. They try to have me arrested using women as bait and other nefarious means. They provoke me disturbing my sleep every one or two hours, and cause my computer to crash every one or two minutes. They insult, ridicule, and humiliate me. The end is to control my life, after 44 years of relentless character assassination and harassment. Not much left for them to control. Lacking common sense does not deter them from their continuing criminal harassment. 

Women Are Control Freaks

[From article]
Convention has it that women are the gentler sex.
But when it comes to relationships they are more likely than men to be controlling and aggressive, a study claims.
Increasing numbers of women can now be classed as ‘intimate terrorists’, meaning that they are verbally and physically violent towards a partner.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2669408/Rise-female-relationship-terrorists-Study-finds-women-controlling-aggressive-partners-men.html

Rise of the female 'relationship terrorists': Study finds women are more controlling and aggressive towards their partners than men
Psychologists found more women are verbally or physically abusive to partner
Within partner relationships, women are just as controlling as men
It suggests 'intimate partner violence' may not be motivated by patriarchal values, as previously thought
By EMINE SINMAZ and SARAH GRIFFITHS
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 10:55 EST, 25 June 2014 | UPDATED: 08:08 EST, 26 June 2014

U.S. Government Studies How To Control Popular Uprisings in America

[From article]
One area of study that’s planned for the 2014-2017 time frame partners Cornell University researchers with the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research to come up with a model for the “dynamics of social movement mobilization and contagions,”
[. . .]
Another aspect of the project partners the University of Washington with the U.S. Army Research Office to “uncover the conditions under which political movements aimed at large-scale political and economic change originate,” as well as their “characteristics and consequences,” through study of 58 difference countries,
[. . .]
Those individuals targeted for questioning include political activists and members of non-governmental organizations
[. . .]
Activism, protest, ‘political movements’ and of course NGOs are a vital element of a healthy civil society and democracy — why is it that the DoD is funding research to investigate such issues?”

Thomas Jefferson would be proud of the people. 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/13/us-defense-department-studying-protesters-prep-mas/

Pentagon studying protesters to prep for ‘mass civil breakdown’
By Cheryl K. Chumley
The Washington Times
Friday, June 13, 2014

Psychiatrists Attack

The psychiatric industry has such a tight hold on public discourse about their business, that anyone who disagrees with them and anyone who criticizes psychiatry is designated a Scientologist. I'm surprised they limit their character assassination to that. Why not just call all critics tin foil hat wearers too? The first rule of propaganda is to discredit critics. How does what the control freak psychiatric industry does differ from what U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy did to alleged Communists? Today (June 9, 2014) as I did errands one more Harvard University employee asked me if I was leafletting for Scientology. It shows how limited the range of thought is on the misguided and dangerous business of the fake science of psychiatry. Ask Peter Breggin what they did to him after he dared to testify in court about psychiatric abuses of children. 

On or about June 3, 2014 the dedicated, thoughtful, imaginative, brutal, arrogant, hateful and hostile, graduate student in psychology at Harvard University Medical School returned to her mission. She resumed her monotonous, relentless, daily sleep disturbances every one or two hours, and her high tech remote tampering with my computer to cause it to crash, with concurrent character assassination. 

On June 8, 2014 a thoughtful couple, one man one woman, took time from their busy lives, shot dead two Las Vegas police officers, who were having lunch. They went on to shoot a civilian and then they killed themselves. No one was watching them. They were free to roam the land and plan their depraved violence. Las Vegas does not share the same public safety priorities as Cambridge MA and Harvard University campus police, who stalk, harass, provoke, insult, threaten, ridicule, humiliate and slander me every day all day. 

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/jun/09/neighbors-couple-suspected-las-vegas-killing-spree/

It makes any attempt to enjoy life or to pursue happiness, a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, impossible. In early June 2014, PBS re-broadcast a special called, Happy. It described some of the ways that people enjoy their lives and live long ones. Being harassed every day, isolated from friendly people, and surrounded by hateful and hostile people, does not encourage happiness, nor does it enable long life. But that is what this charming Harvard University employee is doing every day in the name of some misguided good. Likely the good is covering up many years of criminal abuses by her, and her associates. It is a campaign which local, state and U.S. officials and human services professionals in Massachusetts ignore, and encourage by default.

For about one week during the last few days of May and the first few days of June 2014 a group of police psychiatrists took control of the surveillance and harassment, giving the graduate student a needed respite. The following events added to the reasons why my opinion of psychiatry changed from skepticism to outright hostility and fear. I was always skeptical of psychiatry after reading Thomas Szasz's and Peter R. Breggin's books, and listening to Dr. Fred Baughman speak before Congressional committees. Here's a link to some anti-psychiatry resources

http://www.antipsychiatry.org/
Psychiatry is an arbitrary discipline with an undeserved image as benevolent and scientific. It is a method of social control with no Due Process protections, masquerading as a healing profession. 




60 Minutes broadcasts regular features promoting the psychiatric industry. The show has extensive funding from drug companies so it is not surprising. They never note that they get a lot of their advertising from the drug industry. On Sunday June 8, 2014 Steve Kroft hosted another one of these promos for drug treatment for persons accused of mental illness. As usual his expert was E. Fuller Torrey a well known hater of persons with disabilities, who he describes as dangerous and in need of forced psychiatric drugs. Nowhere on the feature did Kroft mention the role of psychiatric drugs as a cause of violence. He blamed the usual suspect, a fantasy illness made up by consensus. They used to blame a chemical imbalance of the brain, for mental illness. Until they were challenged by some disabled persons. The American Psychiatric Association was unable to provide any evidence for that elusive chemical imbalance. Like the dedicated propagandists that they are, now they show pretty images of the brain and say there is evidence of the illnesses we made up by consensus. They do not establish any connection between the images and the illness. They just say it and it is broadcast by the obedient, conformist, useful idiots among the journalism elite.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/untreated-mental-illness-an-imminent-danger-2/

A group of computer professionals held a three-day meeting (May 30, to June 1, 2014) to encourage and to facilitate making government information accessible to voters and taxpayers online. During the course of my visit I encountered a young man wearing sunglasses. He was speaking with another young man who enthusiastically boasted about his new job. He worked as a web designer and then took a new position working for the City of Somerville. He described his duties which included answering calls from citizens and residents about problems with city services.

At some point I related some of my experiences with local governments, Somerville, MA and Cambridge, MA. After adding details about speaking to the city council, writing bills for the state house (one about regulating use of human subjects in medical research) and hosting a local cable access TV show, I expressed what I thought of as the way to interact with public officials. I said they do not listen. Instead of getting upset, or banging one's head against the wall I take my lesson from Jessica Mitford. She allegedly said, "You can't change the world. But you can embarrass the guilty." I said, "That works." 

The man with the sunglasses expressed his horror at someone having such opinions. He became hostile and aggressive. He asked me what I meant about use of human subjects in experiments. I said usually people accuse me of being against research. I told of one research misadventure I saw in the Boston Globe. Four people died in gene therapy trials at two Harvard University Medical School teaching hospitals in Boston. He kept interrupting me asking questions as if I was a witness at a trial. "How do you know that? They were desperate," he said.

I said "I know they were desperate. But that did not justify using them without informed consent." I called the Boston police to ask if they investigated the deaths. The spokesman for the police told me "They do their own investigations."

"Oh," I said, "If I was arrested for homicide could I do my own investigation too?" She told me not to call there any more and hung up.

It is a First Amendment right to make inquiries of the police, a prominent division of the government. I called the next day and explained the First Amendment to the woman. She again told me not to call them. Then I called to the state Medical Examiner and to the District Attorney. State law requires that deaths in hospitals must be reported to one or the other. Neither office received reports of the deaths. The penalty for not reporting the deaths was $50. Not much of an incentive, especially for Harvard University Medical School researchers. They always act in the name of good.

One of eleven bills I wrote in 2001 and had eleven hearings at the state house, was to increase penalties for not reporting deaths in hospitals. I realized that if a person was used as a human subject (or if medical researchers said he was a human subject) for medical research and someone decided to kill him, the killer would never be found. Because the police and the state agencies do not investigate such deaths. Convenient way to kill, I thought. Negligent homicide is still homicide. I learned later that 90,000 to 100,000 persons die each year in American hospitals due to medical negligence. That is seldom mentioned by dedicated journalists.

This was met with hostility by Sunglass Man. I was careful not to say anything that would upset him more. I did not know if he was easily provoked to violence or just angry at me. He acted as if he knew me. He seemed to be extremely angry with what I was saying. When I told him of Jessica Mitford's doctrine, he walked away and said. "I'm done."

Done? What was he doing? This was a computer professional meetup. In retrospect I think he was a police employee doing an evaluation. Evaluations without consent violate state and U.S. privacy laws. One problem is due to the extreme arrogance of psychiatrists and especially Harvard University affiliated psychiatrists. They believe that laws do not apply to them. I think Mr. Sunglasses was a psychiatrist or worked with them. How many people react to discussion about use of human subjects in research passionately? Most people lose interest immediately. This guy was upset. 

His antagonism was like that of the people who harass me every day. Control freaks get upset when they are unable to get and keep control of another human. They react violently in cases of domestic assault some of which lead to homicide. Maybe he was one of the temporary replacements conducting harassment for the usual graduate student?

It took me a few days to connect the dots between the recent reaction to a comment I posted about Harvard University's former Provost, psychiatrist Steven Hyman. He is the task force chairman to make Harvard University compliant with the requirements of Title IX of the Education Act of 1972. His statements attracted my attention for two reasons. He is a psychiatrist. Why is he chairman of that task force? What knowledge does he bring to address the issue? I realized it was two. Spineless leaders attribute extraordinary knowledge, omniscience, to psychiatrists. Second he was the Provost and knows about obtaining U.S. taxpayer grants. Non compliance with Title IX jeopardizes those grants. Harvard University gets about $175 million each year, not chump change. Hyman is also a prominent researcher in psychiatry in Cambridge.

So I made a comment which you can see, at this link.

http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2014/05/solution-to-harvard-universitys.html

You will also see some reactions to it.

Then there was another related series of events described at this link

http://enoughroom.blogspot.com/2014/06/erasing-history-again.html

My question, "Is Sunglass Man more of that?" On June 2, 2014 I ate at home, and began to feel groggy. I realized that someone had placed drugs in my food. That is a violation of the poisoning statute, a felony. It happened several times to me during the past 43 years of brutal criminal harassment in mostly three states. Psychiatrists believe that they know what a person needs--drugs. And if the person refuses to take the drugs the control freaks force them on the person. One way is to provoke the person and have him arrested and held in a mental hospital. Then they can force drugs freely with no opposition or protection from the abuse.

They try to do that to me. I do not react to their constant provocations. Psychiatric proactive arrogance then implements Plan B. Harvard University administration, i.e., building superintendents can provide access to the apartment. Someone placed psychiatric drugs in my bottled water which I purchase because the tap water was occasionally polluted. Thwarting them at one entry caused them to commit a burglary to poison my food supply. Charming, no? Not the first time. Was it the same Sunglass Man? Was he working for Professor Hyman? I have no evidence. But I have my suspicions. It is not surprising to me because it's been done too often previously. I am not under the care of any psychiatrist or any psychologist. There is no court order to allow placing drugs in my food. It is three felonies. If there was enforcement of laws against psychiatrists for offenses like this the professional might lose his license. Or it could have been one more of those wannabes, crime family or police employees who once worked as a guard at a mental hospital and thinks he is psychiatrist.

That explains my hostility, my antagonism and fear of psychiatrists. Police agencies will not address such criminal abuses even though they are felonies. Psychiatrists get a pass and Harvard University employees, have a de facto exemption from criminal liability. That is a Massachusetts problem.

From about 1960 to 1974, two large organizations of criminals, politicians, government officials were engaged in a national war for power. I call them the Kennedy Cult and the California Syndicate. I was adopted by the Kennedy Cult when I was student in college. They admired the skills I showed during the student protests in 1968 at Columbia University. Without me knowing it, the California Syndicate began harassing me. To them I was the enemy. I was clueless about the war and these organizations at the time. I loved everyone and treated everyone with respect. I avoided unpleasant people. I attended law school and the attacks continued. Still I was clueless why people would harass me and insult me. I did nothing to provoke them. In retrospect I now understand what was going on. It was war and they saw me as a leader of the Kennedy cult. I was important to both organizations. One supported me the other attacked me.

When the war ended the two organizations continued their conflicting relationships with me. It continues today but takes different forms. At some point the Kennedy Cult changed their efforts defending me and created a false profile so that they could reduce the amount of resources spent defending me from the California Syndicate. One of their operatives said to me, "If you're not a lawyer you're nobody." The new profile included but was not limited to "a retired drug dealer," and an "Italian American homosexual." Previously the profile was "black, Jewish, homosexual from New York." The California Syndicate added "He's a racist. He's homeless and mentally ill." Fast forward to 2014 the Kennedy cult employs psychiatrists and psychologists, some from Harvard University Medical School. They do evaluations without consent, a violation of state and U.S. privacy statutes. But no problem. Psychiatrists and Harvard University affiliates are above the laws. These sociopaths have exemptions. So why not give some drugs to this unfortunate man? They seldom know any history beyond he is "mentally ill, and poor."

After several years (20 or more) of complaining to city, state and U.S. officials about criminal abuses by police employees and crime family associates, this is what transpired in June 2014. The Kennedy Cult which adopted me during their war, and made me a target, declared that none of the previous 43 years of criminal abuses happened. They simply erased it from history! How convenient. If I disagree, they simply say, "He's mentally ill and needs treatment, preferably drug treatment." But they know I will never willingly ingest psychiatric drugs, known toxic chemicals with a propaganda image of benevolence. 

On or about June 1-3, 2014 I came home and had dinner. When I began to feel groggy I knew someone had placed drugs in my foods. There is no evidence of a break-in. That means someone gave the drug carrier entry to my apartment, where he put the drugs in my foods, in violation of the state poisoning statute, a felony. It is not the first time that happened. There are psychiatrists and some omniscient chumps who worked as guards in mental hospitals who designate themselves psychiatrists who know how to get needy persons to take the drugs in order to cure them of their illnesses made up by consensus. The Kennedy Cult treats people without consent. "Who needs consent? We know what you need. We are psychiatrists and know everything. And we are morally superior. Our genes have been cleansed of mendacity, greed and sadism."

Moving along into June 2014, I was joined in my life journey by some thoughtful gentlemen from New Hampshire once again. Whenever the team of control freaks in Massachusetts that annoys me each day runs out of useful idiots to harass me they reach into neighboring New Hampshire where there are plenty more who anxiously join in harassing a 70-year-old white man they say is disabled, mentally ill. I was surprised to learn how many police, human services professionals, politicians, and ordinary folks, as limousine liberals refer to ordinary civilians, have a strong urge to harass, belittle, ridicule, intimidate people they believe are weaker than they are. The fundamental flaw among the public is that government thugs only harass strong, wealthy and powerful people. It is the complete opposite. They focus only on weak people. As explained by Roger Morris in his book, Partners in Power, about the Clintons, the preferred leaders are weak with relaxed rectitude. They fear targeting strong people who are capable of returning fire and doing harm to the fragile image of the weak leader. Thus they only target weak people who cannot fight back, or at least are perceived as unable to do so.

Persons with disabilities are likely targets for these control freaks, predators, bullies and sadists. The New Hampshire team arrived and began intense harassment as per the usual pattern when a new team of lawyer, psychiatrist, and thugs begin their efforts. They try to recreate the police frame-up from 1990 when the California Syndicate hired Cambridge and Somerville police to provoke me and to arrest me after I complained to the chiefs of both police agencies. They paid seven lawyers not to put on a defense. Of the five judges involved, one threatened to have me put into a hospital if I testified about what happened to me. Another judge refused to appoint any more lawyers and ordered me to appear and represent myself.

So much for erasing history and declaring me mentally ill because I do not trust either of these criminal organizations. I am not certain that a third national organization is now trying to provoke me as the previous two organizations did. I suspect that the Midwestern Outfit has now begun the same kind of harassment and provocation as the California Syndicate did before them.

Threats To Freedom In U.S.

[From article]
Though the Holocaust ranks high among the great human tragedies, most people never consider the most important question: How did Adolf Hitler and the Nazis gain the power that they needed to commit such horror? Focusing solely on the evil of the Holocaust won't get us very far toward the goal of the Jewish slogan "Never Again."
[. . .]
Through the Enabling Act (1933), whose formal name was "A Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich," Hitler gained the power to enact laws with neither the involvement nor the approval of the Reichstag, Germany's parliament. The Enabling Act destroyed any remaining local autonomy.
[. . .]
Rudolph J. Rummel, professor of political science at the University of Hawaii and author of "Death by Government," estimated that since the beginning of the 20th century, governments have killed 170 million of their own citizens. Top government killers were the Soviet Union, which, between 1917 and 1987, killed 62 million of its own citizens, and the People's Republic of China, which, between 1949 and 1987, was responsible for the deaths of 35 million to 40 million of its citizens. In a distant third place were the Nazis, who murdered about 16 million Jews, Slavs, Serbs, Czechs, Poles, Ukrainians and others deemed misfits, such as homosexuals and the mentally ill.
[. . .]
We Americans ought to keep the fact in mind that Hitler, Stalin and Mao would have had more success in their reign of terror if they had the kind of control and information about their citizens that agencies such as the NSA, the IRS and the ATF have about us. You might ask, "What are you saying, Williams?" Just put it this way: No German who died before 1930 would have believed the Holocaust possible.

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/williamns040914.php3#.UUIpY-LMg

Jewish World Review April 9, 2014 / 9 Nissan, 5774
How to Assist Evil
By Walter Williams

New High Tech Weapons For Police

[From article]
Troopers will also have direct access to sophisticated biometric information that will make hiding one’s identity nearly impossible.”
[. . .]
Crime-fighting tools tailored for crowd control, conflict management and improved safety for officers and citizens alike are now making waves among lawmen, including so-called GPS bullets and the Acoustic Warning Signal Projector, or A-WASP, which emits a “highly directional” beam of intense sound to stun a suspect in a less-lethal fashion than conventional methods.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/27/cop-future-will-crooks-have-chance-against-smart-bullets-crowd-stun-cannons-and/

The cop of the future: Will crooks have a chance against smart bullets, crowd-stun cannons and eyes everywhere?
By Joshua Rhett Miller

Published January 27, 2014

FoxNews.com

Being Right Leads To Happiness

[From article]
“It seems that being right, however, is a cause of happiness, and agreeing with what one disagrees with is a cause of unhappiness,” they wrote. They also noted that “the availability of unbridled power adversely affects the quality of life of those on the receiving end.”

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-better-to-be-right-than-happy-20131217,0,5791072.story#axzz2noFoJyrq

Happiness is overrated: It's better to be right, study finds
By Karen Kaplan
December 17, 2013, 4:34 p.m.

Misguided Control Freaks In White House, Washington DC

[From article]
The biggest challenges in any system, whether it's an economic, biological or ecological system, are information, communication and control.
[. . .]
Oblivious to the huge information problem in the allocation of resources, the people in Washington have great confidence that they can run our health care system better than we, our physicians and hospitals. Charles Darwin wisely noted more than a century and a half ago that "ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." Congress exudes confidence.
[. . .]
Politicians really don't care about what Joe thinks is best, because they arrogantly think they know what's best and have the power to coerce.
Hayek said, "The curious task of economics is to illustrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design." We economists have failed miserably in that task.

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/williamns111313.php3#.Uoisut00jDo

Jewish World Review
Nov. 13, 2013/ 10 Kislev, 5774
Does Washington Know Best?
By Walter Williams

Scientists Claim They Know Part of Brain That Defies Obeying Government

How long will it take to incarcerate all government critics eliminating any and all dissent? If only supporters and obedient slaves to government authority remain free there will be no need for police. All of this will done in the name of good. Thought crime laws will be enforced strictly.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2444019/Could-electric-shock-therapy-reduce-CRIME-Scientists-claim-procedure-makes-people-likely-offend.html

Could electric shock therapy reduce CRIME? Scientists claim procedure makes people less likely to offend
Scientists pinpointed area of brain that makes people obey social norms
They found these neurons could be controlled by sending a weak, painless electric current through the skull via electrodes on the scalp
The technique could be developed to improve the behaviour of offenders
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 11:21 EST, 4 October 2013 | UPDATED: 11:27 EST, 4 October 2013

Cambridge City Council Wants More Persons With a History of Mental Illness

E. Denise Simmons, Cambridge City Councilor introduced a "Late Order" (No. 7 on April 22, 2013) to direct city agencies to broadcast what mental health care is available in the City. This was one week  after two fellas (as Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick calls them), who lived in Cambridge set off bombs killing three, shot and killed a MIT Police Officer and wounded 178 others including one Transit Officer. Simmons did not say that she admires Hitler and Stalin who employed psychiatry to control, and to incarcerate an unruly population. Campaign contributions from drug companies and psychiatrists are not always identified. The City Council voted to increase awareness of diversity in the city, while maintaining their intolerance for diverse opinions in Cambridge. Instead of allowing open discussion and notice to citizens and preventing them from speaking on this order, long term City officials like Simmons use this legal technique to pass orders without any scrutiny from citizens. Using the complicated technique of suspending the rules, (all in favor say aye, the rules are suspended) Mayor Davis who chaired the meeting allowed discussion of this late order at the beginning of the meeting. They are usually voted on at the end of the meetings. Is the US Congress imitating the City Council? Or is the City Council imitating the US Congress keeping the herd bewildered, as Noam Chomsky says?


Cambridge MA City Councilor, Henrietta Davis agrees that more psychiatry is needed in the city after two fellas (as Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick calls them), who lived in Cambridge set off bombs killing three, shot and killed a MIT Police Officer and wounded 178 others including one Transit Officer. Davis did not say that she admires Hitler and Stalin who employed psychiatry to control, and to incarcerate an unruly population. Campaign contributions from drug companies and psychiatrists are not always identified. The City Council voted to increase awareness of diversity in the city, while maintaining their intolerance for diverse opinions in Cambridge.  


Longest serving City Councilor Ken Reeves spoke after passing the late order. He said, "For the nine of us, ah, it's important that we don't assume that we're all OK. And it's important that we understand that as human beings, uh, we have frailties too and vulnerabilities and [. . .] I was not allowed to leave my house. [. . .] I think I'm gonna be fine, but I'm not sure. [. . .] I think we should try to access the best supports we can too." Does that mean he was under house arrest? What was he convicted of? Does it mean Councilor Reeves seeks mental health treatment? Will that mean that he has a history of mental illness?  


The Cambridge City Council "Nine of Us."


Marjorie Decker, City Councilor and State Representative spoke about Late Order Number 7 after it was passed. She recognized the importance of "a hug" giggling as she said it. She reported what her in-laws told her about the action in Watertown.
"One of my husband's aunts said she was so incredibly touched that, um, a lot of people came in with the wedding on Saturday, (giggle) but they were so touched that the determination of the, um, the FBI and the Task Force and all the police that were just, that came in, to the neighborhood, this was before we sort of knew what was going on, and they looked out their windows and realized something serious was happening, and the, um, the SWAT teams came into the house, and were so determined and so comforting, people, they, they felt so incredibly safe. And they also felt cared for. So in this incredibly intense moment of not knowing what's gonna happening, and knowing the danger that has already occurred, and, and that could occur, um, the determination of, we are here to help you, we are here to keep you safe, and, and literally the physical care of getting people out of houses to insure that, um, they weren't going to be stepping on anything that they didn't know that could be harmful. I mean, it just, but at the same time, the, the law enforcement were so gentle and sensitive with them as they moved them out, um, both in their words, and in their physical actions. For me it's just really, it, it's, . . . ah, I don't think we really appreciate who is, um, who makes up our first responders, and, and, what it is that they bring to this job, and, um, in so many ways. So, um, I, I'm just, I'm really happy to be part of this community, and we will be a community that grieves together and heals together."


No Second Amendment Rights For You, Now That You Have a History of Mental Illness

"representatives from the various Cambridge public health agencies visited the Cambridge Rindge and Latin School [. . .] to inform students and faculty about the mental health services available to them." Did these caring and loving professionals inform the students that after they enjoy some psychiatric love, they will no longer be allowed to exercise their Second Amendment rights, and if they are arrested they will be described by police and prosecutors as having "a history of mental illness?" Spineless, clueless, self serving, greedy politicians will keep increasing membership in the group of persons with a history of mental illness. As long as they remain unidentified as social deviants.

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/4/23/city_council_supports_mental_health/

City Council: Increased Demand for Mental Health Services Following Bombings
By SONALI Y. SALGADO,
Harvard CRIMSON STAFF WRITER
April 23, 2013

Learning to Exercise More Control Over Individuals

Has there ever been a discovery that has not been used to harm humans, in the name of good? Who will be the first political control freak to use whatever is learned about how the brain operates to control humans? Aren't there enough misguided psychiatrists and psychologists running loose using their knowledge to control and to manipulate humans? Obama typically says this is investing in "the best ideas" when it is an example of wasting taxpayer funds on the worst ideas. He is one of the most obsessed officials to use his position to increase government control over others by using deception. Francis S. Collins moderated a town hall meeting on sequestering taxpayer funds. He sounded like a shop steward for public sector unions. Not quite an inspiration for human freedom. Regarding getting more bang for the buck, in what way is that? In controlling humans? Will the future bring court ordered humans walking around with metal probes sticking out of their brains so that scientists can calculate how their neurons fire? Don't brain "observatories" already exist? Aren't they called mental hospitals?  

[From article]

Leslie Vosshall, a neurobiologist at Rockefeller University, tweeted: 'Baffled by the NIH Brain Activity Map Project. We don't understand the fly brain yet. How will this come to anything?'
Michael Eisen, a biologist at Berkeley, added: 'Someone has to go to congress and explain why basic research is so important, not pander to them with big science c**p.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2280707/Obama-wants-map-human-brain-Administration-plans-huge-3BILLION-year-research-project.html

Obama wants to map the human brain: Administration plans huge $3BILLION ten-year research project
The Brain Activity Map could cost over $300 million a year for a decade
Advocates say it could help scientists understand mental illness
Critics say the study lacks clear goals
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 17:45 EST, 18 February 2013 | UPDATED: 02:56 EST, 19 February 2013


* * *
[From article]
In his State of the Union address, President Obama cited brain research as an example of how the government should “invest in the best ideas.”
[. . .]
Francis S. Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, may have inadvertently confirmed the plan
[. . .]
George M. Church, a Harvard University molecular biologist who helped create that project and said he was helping to plan the Brain Activity Map project. “If you look at the total spending in neuroscience and nanoscience that might be relative to this today, we are already spending more than that. We probably won’t spend less money, but we will probably get a lot more bang for the buck.”
[. . .]
 the human brain is so complex that scientists have not yet found a way to record the activity of more than a small number of neurons at once, and in most cases that is done invasively with physical probes.
[. . .]
They also said that a series of national brain “observatories” should be created as part of the project, like astronomical observatories.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/science/project-seeks-to-build-map-of-human-brain.html?hp&_r=0

Obama Seeking to Boost Study of Human Brain
By JOHN MARKOFF
Published: February 17, 2013
New York Times

Academic Lapdogs Approve Blaming Victims of Psychiatric Abuses

NBC quotes Paul Appelbaum, who is now a titled expert on ethics. He wrote an essay published in 1995, 
http://psychrights.org/research/Digest/Decisionmaking/MacArthuCompetencestudy1.pdf
"Mental Illness and Competence to Consent to Treatment" in which he concluded that mental patients have lucid moments when they can give informed consent to being used for medical research. But they are unable to exercise rational thought when it comes to owning guns. Isn't that convenient? And isn't that a troubling opinion to quote on this attempt by government to demonize all persons accused of mental illness? Margaret Hagan Professor of Psychology at Boston University exposed the fraud of mental illnesses in her delightful tome, "Whores of the Court." 

Appelbaum and others quoted by NBC share the interests of the drug industry. Appelbaum is affiliated with the New York Psychiatric Institute which conducted extreme experiments on patients without consent. Columbia University is enormously invested in the pharmaceutical industry. They place the blame on persons who are often forced to ingest psychiatric drugs which are a known cause of suicidal thoughts and violence. Even the drug-company controlled FDA requires a black box warning label on those drugs. Yet over paid misguided journalists and spineless politicians continue to divert attention from the cause of violence. It is the drugs not the troubled persons who are taking them that is the problem. So much for informing the electorate who favors more abuses of humans. More psychiatry will only increase the amount of violence. This is one more example of the upside down arguments by the misguided and misdirected control freaks who seek to eliminate individual freedom in the name of security.

Hitler and Stalin both took guns from the population, and used psychiatry to take freedom from others who did not comport with the wishes of the leaders. Journalists indicate their beliefs that American psychiatrists have had their genes cleansed of mendacity, greed and sadism. Appelbaum demonstrated his duplicity in published articles. Yet he is now a "respected ethicist?" How very comforting to drug industry interests. That is what passes for watch dogs in contemporary society. The watch dogs in the media and among academics have become lap dogs. 

NBC says, "If there’s one thing Republicans and Democrats can agree on, it’s that mentally ill people should not have access to firearms." Republicans and Democrats are unable to manage the budget. Now they are experts on predicting who is violent? Not even the omniscient and morally superior mental health priests can accurately predict the future. But that does not mean they are ever held accountable for their errors. Mental illness is now a political issue. It has never been a scientific discipline and perhaps enough scrutiny will expose it for the fraud that it is. Petitioning for more taxpayer funds is just exacerbating the waste and abuse of taxpayer funds. 

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/18/16588357-anger-violent-thoughts-are-you-too-sick-to-own-a-gun?lite

Anger, violent thoughts: Are you too sick to own a gun?
By Matthew DeLuca, Staff Writer,
NBC News
January 19, 2013

* * *
On conflict of interest between psychiatry and drug companies.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/09/health/psychiatry-professional-suicide/index.html

Is psychiatry committing 'professional suicide'?
By Maia Szalavitz,
TIME.com
updated 10:09 AM EDT, Tue October 9, 2012