There's been much written about the situation in prisons over the last few days and especially regarding the failure to carry through with supposed plans for executive early releases. We hear of staffing shortages, construction of temporary cell blocks, infections and sadly deaths, but this from Inside Time last week is worth mentioning:-
Beyond the Call of Duty
Prisoners thank staff
When prisons moved to “lockdown” to curb the spread of coronavirus there were fears that it would lead to riots. Only a fortnight earlier, disturbances in Italian prisons sparked by anti-virus restrictions had left 12 prisoners dead.
But in the first week of UK prisoners being confined to their cells, there was little sign of trouble – and even an unexpected surge in goodwill. At jails across England, some prisoners wrote notes, drew pictures and made signs thanking officers for coming to work in the face of the health risk. At Low Newton, one prisoner put up a handmade sign in her cell window stating simply: “Thanks staff”. The prison posted a photo on social media and commented: “It’s great to see the women of Low Newton showing support for our staff, despite it being difficult and challenging time for them. We will get through this together.”
A handwritten letter from a prisoner at Nottingham, addressed “To all A wing staff”, read: “Now this is something I would never normally do. I’ve always looked at it as cons vs screws. But I give credit when credit is due. And since the restricted regime came in I feel A wing staff have gone above and beyond the call of duty.
“We as prisoners are sometimes very selfish and forget that behind the uniform there is a normal person who worry about there friends and family who risk getting COVID-19 every day they travel to work, but come in to work to look after us. Yes, you hold the keys to my freedom, but it was my own stupid actions that put me here and lost me my freedom. I want to say a big thank you to all A wing staff, even the ones I thought were shit screws, for getting up each morning and despite your own worries and fears, come in to work and help us prisoners to have time out of our cells and keep us updated and for treating us as equals. I have seen prison officers in a new light.”
Governors at the prison were so moved by the letter that they posted it on social media. The prison’s spokesman said “Staff were genuinely touched to receive this from a prisoner,” adding: “Had a little chuckle at the ‘shit screws’ comment.”
A handwritten letter from a prisoner at Nottingham, addressed “To all A wing staff”, read: “Now this is something I would never normally do. I’ve always looked at it as cons vs screws. But I give credit when credit is due. And since the restricted regime came in I feel A wing staff have gone above and beyond the call of duty.
“We as prisoners are sometimes very selfish and forget that behind the uniform there is a normal person who worry about there friends and family who risk getting COVID-19 every day they travel to work, but come in to work to look after us. Yes, you hold the keys to my freedom, but it was my own stupid actions that put me here and lost me my freedom. I want to say a big thank you to all A wing staff, even the ones I thought were shit screws, for getting up each morning and despite your own worries and fears, come in to work and help us prisoners to have time out of our cells and keep us updated and for treating us as equals. I have seen prison officers in a new light.”
Governors at the prison were so moved by the letter that they posted it on social media. The prison’s spokesman said “Staff were genuinely touched to receive this from a prisoner,” adding: “Had a little chuckle at the ‘shit screws’ comment.”
Nottingham was not alone. At Lowdham Grange, a prisoner wrote a note stating: “Big thank you officers of Lowdham ‘G’. If it wasn’t for you putting yourselves at risk to come and care for us, we would all be in trouble. You may feel unappreciated, but we appreciate you. So thanks again from K-wing inmates – me especially. God bless!”
And at Dovegate one resident wrote: “You should all be commended and recognised for the respectful and professional way you all have contributed to the smooth as possible running of HMP Dovegate. We recognise the selfless act of putting your own health at risk in the protection of others. Just turning up for duty is heroic and bravery of the highest order, crossed compassion and respect … On behalf of us that see your dedication to the care, safety, security and health of others, we stand to attention and salute you one and all.”
At HMP Humber, a prisoner drew a picture of an officer with the caption “Thank you HMP – stay safe”. The prison commented: “In amongst the clouds came a ray of sunshine. This beautiful picture was received yesterday and brightened our day.”
At HMP Humber, a prisoner drew a picture of an officer with the caption “Thank you HMP – stay safe”. The prison commented: “In amongst the clouds came a ray of sunshine. This beautiful picture was received yesterday and brightened our day.”
--oo00oo--
Meanwhile Rob Allen in his latest blog post muses on the whole thorny issue of oversight and accountability during times of crisis like this:-
Meanwhile Rob Allen in his latest blog post muses on the whole thorny issue of oversight and accountability during times of crisis like this:-
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Update on Scrutiny of Criminal Justice in a Time of Crisis
In these extraordinary times, everyone is having to adapt to the requirements of social distancing - not least the institutions that hold the authorities to account. There’s been much talk today of the need for Parliament to resume as soon and as effectively as possible. Although it’s in recess for another week - normally a period in which neither House meets to conduct business - work has continued not least in relation to criminal justice.
Four emergency Statutory Instruments (SIs) came into force last week; to allow prison governors to release prisoners temporarily; to allow those prisoners to be accommodated in Probation hostels and to access means tested benefits during the period of their release. The fourth enables the increased demand for electronic tagging to be met by a new provider – Attenti .
There was no opportunity for MPs to debate the measures – and disappointingly no impact assessments attached to the SI’s despite an assurance in the explanatory memoranda that there would be. The Justice Committee were however able to ask questions of Justice Secretary Robert Buckland and Prison and Probation Chief Jo Farrar on Tuesday. They concentrated on the early release provisions, asking for estimates of the numbers and rates of release, why low risk Category D prisoners were not being prioritised for release, whether all prisoners really need to be tagged.
The session seems to have formed part of a belatedly established inquiry into the impact of Coronavirus on prison probation and courts, announced on 31 March – three weeks after the Home Affairs Committee announced their inquiry into Home Office preparedness for Covid19. But at least the Justice Committee has been able to hold two meetings with Buckland and will question prison and probation minister Lucy Frazer this week.
As well as focusing on how probation is managing to operate in the current climate, Tuesdays’ hearing should also look at three questions that were neglected in last week’s meeting with Buckland.
The first is staffing. Prisons are really struggling with staff either sick or self-isolating. Some staff have been redeployed from HQ into jails and Operation Quickthorn could be activated to allow troops to backfill "non facing" roles . But under what circumstances would the military be involved, what exactly would they do and under whose authority. Could they assist probation as well?
The second question relates to the 500 new prison places being created, how they will be used and what physical conditions they will provide. There’s been concern expressed by reformers that expanding capacity in this way will mean that prisoners eligible for temporary release may be kept in prison instead and that the numbers freed will not reach the estimated 4,000 let alone the 15,000 reportedly recommended by Public Health England.
Third, the Justice Committee should ask about the work of the bodies charged with monitoring prisons and probation. Independent Monitoring Boards are continuing to monitor both prisons and immigration detention during the pandemic, though “much of this will necessarily be remote monitoring”. The Prison and Probation Ombudsman cannot read and reply to letters from prisoners who wish to make complaints. The PPO has also ceased all visits to prisons so their investigation of fatal incidents – including deaths of prisoners from Coronavirus is affected. They “will continue to be informed of all deaths and will open new investigations as normal, but it is likely that we will need to extend our timetables and/or suspend cases until we are able to gather information and investigate safely”.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons announced this week that they have created – in collaboration with HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and the Ministry of Justice -an adapted approach for the Coronavirus period, involving short scrutiny visits to prisons. These will focus on core issues such as healthcare, nutrition and hygiene; contact with families, friends and the outside world; legal rights; use of time and the need for meaningful human contact; support for those at risk of self-harm and suicide; and support and risk management for those being released.
What looks like a pragmatic approach from the Inspectorate received short shrift from the Prison Governors Association who consider that the visits are not needed and will put undue pressure on governors and their staff. Somewhat disturbingly, the PGA’s strongly worded response talked of the "fear of inspection"some of their members have, and the likelihood that no tangible benefits will result from any inspection report.
Whatever the Governors say, there is no doubt that some form of monitoring must take place. The UN and WHO have stated that monitoring bodies, should continue to have access to places of detention. The Council of Europe’s (CoE) Committee for the Prevention of Torture has said that monitoring by independent bodies remains an essential safeguard against ill-treatment. The question must be not whether inspection visits take place but how.
The CoE Commissioner for Human Rights argued this week that prisons need a humane and comprehensive crisis plan which should be formulated “in consultation and co-operation with relevant human rights stakeholders, in particular National Preventive Mechanisms, other independent monitoring bodies, national human rights structures and human rights NGOs”.
MPs should ask Miss Frazer whether this is the approach that is being adopted in England and Wales - as a concrete example, are the plans for new build accommodation being discussed in advance with inspectors to check they meet minimum standards?
This would indicate the kind of collaborative approach which is likely to serve the system best during the crisis and protect the health of those involved in it.
In these extraordinary times, everyone is having to adapt to the requirements of social distancing - not least the institutions that hold the authorities to account. There’s been much talk today of the need for Parliament to resume as soon and as effectively as possible. Although it’s in recess for another week - normally a period in which neither House meets to conduct business - work has continued not least in relation to criminal justice.
Four emergency Statutory Instruments (SIs) came into force last week; to allow prison governors to release prisoners temporarily; to allow those prisoners to be accommodated in Probation hostels and to access means tested benefits during the period of their release. The fourth enables the increased demand for electronic tagging to be met by a new provider – Attenti .
There was no opportunity for MPs to debate the measures – and disappointingly no impact assessments attached to the SI’s despite an assurance in the explanatory memoranda that there would be. The Justice Committee were however able to ask questions of Justice Secretary Robert Buckland and Prison and Probation Chief Jo Farrar on Tuesday. They concentrated on the early release provisions, asking for estimates of the numbers and rates of release, why low risk Category D prisoners were not being prioritised for release, whether all prisoners really need to be tagged.
The session seems to have formed part of a belatedly established inquiry into the impact of Coronavirus on prison probation and courts, announced on 31 March – three weeks after the Home Affairs Committee announced their inquiry into Home Office preparedness for Covid19. But at least the Justice Committee has been able to hold two meetings with Buckland and will question prison and probation minister Lucy Frazer this week.
As well as focusing on how probation is managing to operate in the current climate, Tuesdays’ hearing should also look at three questions that were neglected in last week’s meeting with Buckland.
The first is staffing. Prisons are really struggling with staff either sick or self-isolating. Some staff have been redeployed from HQ into jails and Operation Quickthorn could be activated to allow troops to backfill "non facing" roles . But under what circumstances would the military be involved, what exactly would they do and under whose authority. Could they assist probation as well?
The second question relates to the 500 new prison places being created, how they will be used and what physical conditions they will provide. There’s been concern expressed by reformers that expanding capacity in this way will mean that prisoners eligible for temporary release may be kept in prison instead and that the numbers freed will not reach the estimated 4,000 let alone the 15,000 reportedly recommended by Public Health England.
Third, the Justice Committee should ask about the work of the bodies charged with monitoring prisons and probation. Independent Monitoring Boards are continuing to monitor both prisons and immigration detention during the pandemic, though “much of this will necessarily be remote monitoring”. The Prison and Probation Ombudsman cannot read and reply to letters from prisoners who wish to make complaints. The PPO has also ceased all visits to prisons so their investigation of fatal incidents – including deaths of prisoners from Coronavirus is affected. They “will continue to be informed of all deaths and will open new investigations as normal, but it is likely that we will need to extend our timetables and/or suspend cases until we are able to gather information and investigate safely”.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons announced this week that they have created – in collaboration with HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and the Ministry of Justice -an adapted approach for the Coronavirus period, involving short scrutiny visits to prisons. These will focus on core issues such as healthcare, nutrition and hygiene; contact with families, friends and the outside world; legal rights; use of time and the need for meaningful human contact; support for those at risk of self-harm and suicide; and support and risk management for those being released.
What looks like a pragmatic approach from the Inspectorate received short shrift from the Prison Governors Association who consider that the visits are not needed and will put undue pressure on governors and their staff. Somewhat disturbingly, the PGA’s strongly worded response talked of the "fear of inspection"some of their members have, and the likelihood that no tangible benefits will result from any inspection report.
Whatever the Governors say, there is no doubt that some form of monitoring must take place. The UN and WHO have stated that monitoring bodies, should continue to have access to places of detention. The Council of Europe’s (CoE) Committee for the Prevention of Torture has said that monitoring by independent bodies remains an essential safeguard against ill-treatment. The question must be not whether inspection visits take place but how.
The CoE Commissioner for Human Rights argued this week that prisons need a humane and comprehensive crisis plan which should be formulated “in consultation and co-operation with relevant human rights stakeholders, in particular National Preventive Mechanisms, other independent monitoring bodies, national human rights structures and human rights NGOs”.
MPs should ask Miss Frazer whether this is the approach that is being adopted in England and Wales - as a concrete example, are the plans for new build accommodation being discussed in advance with inspectors to check they meet minimum standards?
This would indicate the kind of collaborative approach which is likely to serve the system best during the crisis and protect the health of those involved in it.
Rob Allen
