Showing posts with label Chicago. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chicago. Show all posts

Thursday, October 22, 2009

A lesson in political geography and organizing



You might have seen Syron Smith in a post on The Capitol Fax blog earlier this month as the subject of a "Question of the Day". At this moment we look at Syron Smith as he runs for state representative for the 32nd District. He is to run against Andre Thapedi who currently holds that seat. Thapedi is a "rookie" having assume the seat of Milt Patterson who stood down at the end of his term having not run for re-election.

He ran against Thapedi last year in the primary and was forced to run as a write-in candidate after his petitions were successfully challenged by Thapedi. If your petitions to run for election are rejected then that only means that you won't be on the ballot, but most of us already know that right. All the same this time Mr. Smith is coming to this election ready!

This video is by CAN-TV personality Marc Sims. Also watch part 2 & part 3.

Read more...

Thursday, February 12, 2009

The extraordinary life of a Chicago neighborhood's Abraham Lincoln statue.

A story about a bust of President Abraham Lincoln located in Chicago's Englewood neighborhood from Slate:
In 1926, Phil Blomquist erected an inexpensive bust of Abraham Lincoln in front of the Lincoln Gas Station at South Wolcott Avenue and 69th Street in the Englewood section of Chicago's South Side. At the time, Englewood was Irish, German, and Italian. By the 1970s, it was a mostly African-American neighborhood and had become one of the worst ghettos in the city.
Read the whole thing and check out the slideshow. You will see that this bust has suffered from general neglect to defacement. Perhaps since Lincoln's 200th birthday is today it might get the attention it deserves. Hopefully.

Via Gaper's Block!

You can even find this story on Instapundit!

Read more...

Saturday, December 13, 2008

State Street - That Great Street At Christmas

I think it's time that we find ourselves back in the Christmas spirit especially now that there are many big decision to be made. Those decisions will likely affect the future of this state. Inspite of the stories that have broken out this week we might want to remember a festive season

I won't rehash because we all know what happened this week, but allow me the opportunity to give you a look backwards in time. A tourism commercial for State Street provided by FuzzyMemories. And let's remember to have a festive mood even in these difficult times. Hopefully the future will be better!




Read more...

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Washington Wins…Everyone Else (except maybe Chicago) Loses

I just wonder why Chicago and Washington is the big winner and most other cities do not from NewGeography:


What could prove to be the worst economic decline since 1929 may also have the unintended consequence of creating a booming real estate market for the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area over the next few years. Ironically this has been brought on not, as one might expect, by Democrats – traditionally the party of Washington – but by the often fervently anti-DC Republicans.

This process was set in motion by the Bush Administration’s $700 billion financial bailout. This has caused a potential geographic shift in power from Wall Street to Pennsylvania Avenue. By concentrating decision-making power and institutional ownership in the Nation’s Capital, the Administration has essentially drained power away from financial institutions historically headquartered in New York City. The local real estate market impacts of this shift in the locus of private-sector financial power will only be accelerated by the impact in that real estate market by the changing of the guard in Washington following the November 4th election.
We have to wait until the end of this piece to see why Chicago is going to benefit...

But then there are questions of whether this is good for the country. Most metropolitan areas are suffering (some, like Miami, Las Vegas, and Phoenix are hemorrhaging) while only perhaps Chicago – the geographic power base of President-Elect Obama – seems well-positioned to gather in the spoils of the new political order. Meanwhile DHL’s recently announced layoffs in Wilmington, Ohio, may impact an estimated one-third of the employable residents in that community. By way of this stark contrast, there’s something truly unseemly in the notion that the very place fundamentally responsible for many of our current economic woes should benefit from being both the cause and the cure of the economic maladies plaguing the country.
Things are about to get interesting aren't they?

Read more...

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

WTF??? Banning ice cream trucks???

I would certainly call this a very busybody move. Aren't there more important issues to tackle than an ice cream truck. At least they can prove was small plastic baggies can be used for, but this is the floppiest reasons for banning ice cream trucks. From the Chicago Reader blog, The Food Chain:

Lane's explanation? Suspected ne'er-do-wells. She related a story of one dodgy truck. "The truck arrived down the block and its playing the regular ice cream music," she told me. "The kids left the truck and he left the end of the block, and it was like a cul-de-sac where you have to come back around and come back up the same block. And when he got down there he started playing a different tune of music. And I'm sitting down there but I'm writing this. And so then there were guys--people coming out of homes that were going to the truck coming back with something. You see them exchange something at the window of the truck but they didn't have any ice cream. So I assumed that they were dealing drugs. I'm not saying every truck is doing that but I prefer them not to be in the 18th Ward. That way we're sure that they are not."
Because she thought they were dealing drugs? You know shouldn't you prove something before you just plain take action like it's really happening.

SILLY!!!

Crossposted on the brand new Gaper's Block blog Mechanics.

Read more...

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Chicago To Eliminate Mini Drug Bags

Remember this headline, "Ban on tiny plastic bags sandbagged"?

Well the Chicago City Council's Health Committee has followed thru on it...

Aldermen have given preliminary approval to an ordinance that would ban the sale or possession of tiny plastic bags often used by drug dealers.
...
The bags are two-inch, sealable, plastic and stamped with little logos, like hearts, spiders or superhero symbols. And 2nd Ward Alderman Bob Fioretti says, in his area, they’re used to hold crack cocaine and heroin. Many are decorated with little logos that police say identify the kind of drugs contained within.
Hmmm, shouldn't the city council find ways to maximize revenue since the Mayor is talking about a partial city government shutdown or laying off workers?

Hat-tip Uptown Update!

Read more...

Monday, August 18, 2008

What Does Omar López Represent?

Omar López is the Green Party candidate for Congress in the 4th Congressional District of Illinois.

López is running against incumbent Democratic Party candidate Luis Gutierrez and Republican Party candidate Daniel Cunningham, who does not yet appear to have a campaign website.

The 4th Congressional District of Illinois is located in Cook County and includes parts of Chicago as well as several other municipalities. The district is 74.5% Hispanic and split into two sections, connected by a piece of I-294.

López was recently invited to give a keynote speech at the Green Party National Convention, which was held in Chicago in 2008. Posted in two parts below is video coverage of his complete speech, in which he makes reference to Chicago politics and the role of the parties in the Hispanic community.





It is my opinion that candidates like López represent a new breed of Green Party member--a new wave of Greens reaching out more strongly than ever to minority communities. López is one significant local representation of a larger movement within the Green Party of the United States, which also includes figures such as Cynthia McKinney, Rosa Clemente, George Martin, Malik Rahim, Aaron Dixon, and many others.

*** UPDATE *** I wasn't aware of it when I published this post; but the Chicago Reader actually did a big feature story on Omar López and the "Browning of the Greens" only a few days ago. Take a look.

Read more...

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Chicago aldermen: Who's got what

With a hat-tip to Newsalert. The Sun-Times lists the campaign fund totals of all Chicago aldermen. Ranging from between $8 Million to $0. The man on top is Ald. Ed Burke of the 14th.

Last year when I covered the municipal elections on my own blog, I noted in this post at that time...

Why does Burke have over $6.5 million in his campaign fund when he doesn't even have an opponent?
Ultimately he did have an opponent whom he failed to keep off the ballot and that election turned into what might referred to in wrestling as a "sqaush" match. That race was incredibly one sided.

Still I have to wonder why should an alderman have $8 million in their campaign fund? I suppose for a local office even in a city the size of Chicago to be able to either win or hold a seat shouldn't require that much money, unless we go back to that post at Newsalert...
Very interesting.With $8 million that substantially more money than Mayor Daley's got. Alderman Burke has never had a real campaign opponent. Why would so many connected individuals contribute money to a single Alderman? Here is the proof that Ed Burke is the real boss of The Chicago Democratic Machine. He slates the judges and controls Chicago's tax code. Burke passes out the money and it appears many people want to give him some money.
So all that money has little to do with his position as an alderman. Perhaps it might be his role as the chair of the city council finance committee? Perhaps it might be related to his role as a Democratic committeeman?

Read more...

Saturday, July 19, 2008

The Dark Knight--and my critique of an idiotic Chicago Reader review

It measures up to the hype.

Last night, Mrs. Marathon Pundit and I drove to the nearest multiplex to see the latest Batman film, The Dark Knight. It's a masterpiece. I could do a full-blown review, but I don't think many people come to my blog for movie appraisals. Also, unlike a certain film reviewer--I'll get to him later--I don't take myself so seriously.

Chicago has never looked better--or more menacing--in this film. Oops, did I say Chicago? I meant Gotham City. But most of The Dark Knight was filmed in Chicago, much of it inside and outside the old downtown post office in the city's West Loop. I used to work across the street from the art-deco monolith.

Did you like the car chase scene from The Blues Brothers on Lower Wacker Drive? Well, I guarantee you'll enjoy the one in this movie better. (By the way, how did they get that 16-wheeler down there?)

The late Heath Ledger is fabulous as The Joker, and I sound like a homer here, but watching an Australian play a killer clown with a Chicago accent was worth the price of admission for me.

Why so serious? That's one of the best lines from The Joker.

But now it's time for a sour note, albeit one that also has a Chicago accent. A couple of times in the film, The Joker is called a terrorist--an accurate epithet.

J.R. Jones is the chief film critic of The Chicago Reader. Here is the opening paragraph in his Dark Knight review:

As the Bush era drags on, I seem to be developing an irrational hatred of summer blockbusters, those gas-guzzling, road-hogging, radio-blasting Hummers of the entertainment business. The fact that they get worse and worse and still make tons of money doesn't say much for the national character. New York Times columnist Frank Rich recently conjured up an image of Americans flocking to the movies this summer to escape their woes, as if we were all dust bowl farmers hoping to banish the Great Depression from our thoughts with flickering images of Clark Gable and Mickey Mouse. But while our leaders are waging preemptive wars, torturing innocent people to death, tossing out habeas corpus, and gutting the Fourth Amendment, we probably don't need to escape as much as the rest of the world needs to escape from us.

More...

Lest anyone miss the connection to 9/11 and the so-called War on Terror, Nolan has (Note...I edited a bit out for people who haven't seen the movie) an overhead shot shows a building that covers an entire city block collapsing into rubble. The Dark Knight may be a state-of-the-art popcorn movie, but its Gotham City is a fun-house-mirror image of America, its democratic institutions crumbling and its people perched between anarchy and totalitarianism.

Whoah! Who got up on the wrong side of The Daily Kos? Sometimes, J.R., it's just a movie. Let me repeat, sometimes, it's just a movie. Of course you probably call movies "cinema."

In his loathsome review, Jones issues a spoiler alert, but he apparently isn't aware, or just doesn't care, that people sometimes skim articles. Readers skim my blog posts. Jones gives away the ending of The Dark Knight. Sorry Jones-ey, but the world isn't hanging on every one of your words.

Why so serious?

Let me use my best Chicago accent to issue my opinion on Jones:

What a douchebag!

To comment on this post--serious responders only--please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Chicago, city of broad strictures

In posting this Tribune opinion, I suppose I could ask one question. What happened?

Chicago's grit is the stuff of legend. The city's hard-scrabble history conjures images of wind-beaten dock hands; rugged immigrants working punishing factory jobs; and 500 acres of slaughterhouses and their hard-time killing floors.

At the same time, Chicago has always adopted a work-hard/play-hard mentality.

The city drank its way through Prohibition; its brothels became legendary, as author Karen Abbott detailed in a great new book, "Sin in the Second City"; and though Chicago today has a well-earned reputation for fine dining and cutting-edge cuisine, it is more known for sating its hunger with a greasy kielbasa, a thick steak, or an inch-deep slice from Gino's East.

But Chicago seems to have lost a bit of its hard edge. The town that poet Carl Sandburg called "a tall bold slugger set vivid against the little soft cities" has itself gone soft, thanks to meddlesome politicians and public health officials who think Chicagoans aren't capable of making their own decisions about health, risk and vice.
....
The fact is, a lot of "little soft cities" have become brassier and freer and, well, funner than Chicago.

At Reason Magazine, we recently took a look at how the 35 most-populous cities in the United States balance individual freedom with government paternalism. We ranked the cities on how much freedom they afford their residents to indulge in alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex, gambling and food. And, for good measure, we also looked at the cities' gun laws, use of traffic and surveillance cameras, and tossed in an "other" category to catch weird laws such as New York's ban on unlicensed dancing, or Chicago's tax on bottled water.

The sad news, Chicagoans, is that your town came in dead last. And it wasn't even close.

Chicago reigns supreme when it comes to treating its citizens like children (Las Vegas topped our rankings as America's freest city). Chicagoans pay the second-highest cigarette tax in the country, and the sixth-highest tax on alcohol. Chicago has more traffic-light cameras than any city in America (despite studies questioning their effectiveness), restricts cell phone use while driving, and it's quickly moving toward a creepy public surveillance system similar to London's.
What happened to that gritty city of old? The city that was when I suppose my parents left the south to come up north to take advantage of the opportunities available. Of course this isn't necessarily about smoking up a storm at a neighborhood establishment, running a red light, drinking up all that bottled water, owning a gun at home, or even eating fatty foods. How did Chicago become soft?

Hat-tip Newsalert.

Read more...

Sunday, March 23, 2008

DC vs. Heller

I watched C-Span's America and the Courts last night and listened to some of the oral arguments in this case. The case is a challenge of DC's gun control laws. So the only reason this is here is whether or not any of you thinks what a ramification of say a ruling against DC gun laws would have towards any local gun control legislation in the state. I could especially refer to gun control legislation in Chicago.

Here's more information for those of you who are following this US Supreme Court case.

Read more...

Friday, March 14, 2008

No small plan: Public boarding schools for Chicago

This is from the Tribune today...

Public boarding schools where homeless children and those from troubled homes could find the safety and stability to learn are being pursued by Chicago Public Schools officials.

Under the plan, still in the nascent stages, the first pilot residential program could open as soon as fall 2009. District officials hope to launch as many as six such schools in the following years, including at least one that would operate as a year-round school.

The proposal puts Chicago at the forefront of urban school reform, as cities struggle to raise the academic achievement of students hampered by dysfunctional homes and other obstacles outside school.

Some districts, including Chicago, have looked for solutions from small schools to single-sex campuses. But residential schools are a bolder -- and far more expensive -- proposition. Long an option for the affluent, boarding schools are virtually unheard of for the disadvantaged.

Chicago Public Schools chief Arne Duncan said he does not want to be in the "parenting" business, but he worries that some homes and some neighborhoods are unsafe, making education an afterthought.

"Some children should not go home at night; some of them we need 24-7," he told the Tribune. "We want to serve children who are really not getting enough structure at home. There's a certain point where dad is in jail or has disappeared and mom is on crack ... where there isn't a stable grandmother, that child is being raised by the streets."

Chicago school officials are still working through details of the plan, and it's not clear whether the schools would be run by the district, outside agencies or some combination of the two.

It's also not certain how the schools would be funded, who would shoulder the liability of keeping students overnight or how students would be selected.

In April, as part of its Renaissance 2010 new schools program, the district will put out a formal request for boarding school proposals. Officials have already met with interested groups in Chicago.
There are a lot of questions here. Especially how are they going to pay for it. I would hope that private agencies will help run such a school.

Read more...

Sunday, March 02, 2008

The Bench: The Rape of Lawndale


Find this video and thousands of others at vSocial!


Another major Roger's Park blog, The Bench takes aim at eminent domain but this time he takes a look at Lawndale on Chicago's west side. I should warn you not to watch if you don't like the message in this video.

Other posts about eminent domain in Lawndale

Eminent domain protest at Daley's office

South North Lawndale! eminent domain struggle continues

Read more...

Monday, February 18, 2008

Phyliss Schlafly at DePaul on Tuesday


Conservative icon, and onetime Illinois Congressional candidate, Phyllis Shlafly will be speaking at DePaul University on Tuesday. Little Marathon Pundit has a 4:00pm doctor's check up in Glenview, after that's over, I'm heading down to DePaul's Lincoln Park campus to listen in.

Mrs. Schlafly is best known for her leadership of the Eagle Forum, and of course, her successful opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s and 1980s.

The event begins at 7:00pm, and will be held at the Cortelyou Commons is located at 2342 N. Fremont Street, on Chicago's North Side.

After the presentation, Schlafly will sign copies of her books, and she's written a lot of them, that will be available for purchase.

Schafly's appearance is courtesy of the DePaul Conservative Alliance, and coincides with the annual performance at DePaul (this is getting real old) of "The Vagina Monologues."

To comment on this post, or join in with the liberals heckling me, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Monday, February 11, 2008

RezkoWatch: Terrorist donations to Obama campaign?

















Great work again by RezkoWatch's B Merry:

Did former Weather Undeground Terrorist William Ayers, pictured in the 1960s, donate to the Obama campaign?

From Peter Hitchens in the Daily Mail:

It suggests very bad judgment, as do strong, persistent suggestions that Obama also accepted quite small contributions from extreme Left-wing veterans of the terrorist Weather Underground now living in Chicago.

His list of contributions shows one for $200 from a certain William Ayers. Can this possibly be the same William Ayers, now a Chicago professor, who used to plant bombs in the Seventies and has said: "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough"? His partner, Bernardine Dohrn, once "declared war" on the US government.

It wouldn't be surprising. Those (like me) who know the Left-wing codes notice things about Obama that suggest he is far more radical than he would like us to know.

From RezkoWatch:

To be perfectly clear, the $200 campaign contribution cited by Hitchens is yet to be located. Ayers' name does not appear on any of Obama's political action committee reports—Obama for Illinois, Obama for Congress 2000, Obama 2010, or Obama for America—filed with the Federal Election Commission .

Ayers is married to Bernardine Dohrn, also a former Weather Underground terrorist. Both are tenured professors. Dohrn is a law professor (even though she has no license to practice law) at Northwestern University. Ayers is an education professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago.

During his terror salad days, Ayers said this, "Kill all the rich people. ... Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents." Yes, this man is an education professor.

Of the Charles Manson killings, Dohrn emitted this ghastly comment shortly after the crime, "Dig it! First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them. They even shoved a fork into the victim's stomach! Wild!" And she is a law professor.

RezkoWatch discovers that Obama and the terrorist-twosome have appeared together:

In November 1997, Ayers and Obama participated in a panel at the University of Chicago entitled Should a child ever be called a "super predator?" to debate "the merits of the juvenile justice system".

In April 2002, Ayers, Dohrn, and Obama, then an Illinois state senator, participated together at a conference entitled "Intellectuals: Who Needs Them?" sponsored by The Center for Public Intellectuals and the University of Illinois-Chicago. Ayers and Obama were two of the six members of the "Intellectuals in Times of Crisis" panel.

Ayers, "who in the 1960s was a member of the terrorist group Weatherman and a wanted fugitive for over a decade as a result of the group's bombing campaign," is currently the Board Chairman of the Woods Fund of Chicago and Obama is a former Board member.

Although they've been professors for over a decade, it still angers me that academia opened their arms to these thugs.

That's not all from that blog to report this afternoon:

Thankfully, the RW tipster provided the NYT link as well as information that led to the following:

The RezkoWatch Confidential Tips email inbox brought a chilling surprise posed in the form of a question: Was the Khaleel Ahmed who donated to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.)'s campaign in 2004 the same Khaleel Ahmed who was arrested in February 2007 with his cousin on terrorism charges?

On June 16, 2004, Khaleel Ahmed, 215 Orchard Avenue, Bensenville, Illinois, contributed $2,000 to Obama for Illinois. This was Ahmed's first and only political contribution.

Additionally, a search for his cousin's name, Zubair Ahmed, found this as well: On June 16, 2004, Zubair Ahmed, 907 Polo Lane, Oak Brook, Illinois, contributed $500 to Obama for Illinois. This likewise was Zubair's first and only political contribution.

More on this pair, from the New York Times:

Two cousins were arrested here Wednesday on charges of conspiring to commit terrorist acts against American military personnel in Iraq, as well as others abroad, in an Islamic holy war against the United States and its allies.

The defendants, Zubair A. Ahmed, 27, and Khaleel Ahmed, 26, were taken into custody at their Chicago homes after a federal grand jury in Cleveland returned a fresh indictment in a pending terrorism case in which three Ohio men are already awaiting trial in Toledo.

The new indictment accuses the two Chicago men of plotting with the Ohioans "to kill or maim persons in locations outside of the United States," including members of the armed forces serving in Iraq.

It says the cousins, both United States citizens, sought training in firearms and countersurveillance from a person with an American military background. The indictment identified that person only as the Trainer. It describes the Trainer as an American citizen who communicated extensively with the three original defendants about paramilitary training but who was not engaged in the conspiracy.

This is not the kind of change that I can believe in.

Related Marathon Pundit posts:

University of Illinois at Chicago's Bill Ayers: Not a jarhead

The Weather Underground and Ward Churchill-UPDATED!
Bernardine Dohrn watch
David Horowitz says you should know about Bernardine Dohrn and William Ayers
Moron Professor Bill Ayers
More on Bill Ayers' wife, Bernadine Dohrn
SDS' 1968 Tragical History Tour
Update on another campus radical: Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Hillary snubs Eric & Kathy radio show


Hat tip to Mrs. Marathon Pundit for this one.

The Eric & Kathy Show is a popular morning radio talk show in Chicago, broadcasting on WTMX-FM. Earlier today, a Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign representative called the show's producer and asked if they'd like to have the former Chicago area resident appear on the show for a telephone interview at 9:00am. The show accepted the offer, they called the magic telephone number at the agreed upon time, but the hosts were put on hold for 15 minutes, after which the pair was told that the senator would not be available.

I'm listening to the Eric and Kathy now, they're still talking about the snub.

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Friday, February 01, 2008

Chicago Marathon registration begins today


Five months after a race that can only be called a fiasco, registration opens today for the 2008 Chicago Marathon. The race has a new sponsor, the Bank of America.

Last fall's race gained unwanted national attention after thousands of runners, on an unseasonably hot-and-humid day, faced empty water and gatorade tables during their 26.2 mile effort. An estimated 200 runners were taken to hospitals, mostly for heat stroke. One runner died.

A nurse working at a nearby hospital told me that her facility's emergency room exceeded capacity--fallen runners were taken to conference rooms with electric fans hastily brought in to assist their cooling off. She assured me they all ended up fine, however.

Chicago ambulances were in short supply that day, some suburban crews called in to assist got lost, incuding the crew from Niles that transported the runner who later died to the wrong hospital.

A bad day for Chicago and the Chicago Marathon.

I know Carey Pinkoswki, the longtime executive director of the race, and I believe he's the man to fix the problems from last year's event. The City, if it wants its 2016 Summer Olympics bid to succeed, obviously needs to make improvements in its 911 dispatch system.

And as I have every year since 1990, I'll be running this year's Chicago Marathon. As for myself, last year's race wasn't that bad. I slowed down, and I did't let the heat overpower me. I'm at mile 24 in the picture--I was feeling okay there, as I did at the finish line a few minutes later. The signs behind me, "It's Gonna Happen," were correct.

Sadly, I encountered my last collaped runner, of the dozen I saw, four hundred yards from the finish. Damn...he was so close.

Related posts:

A participant's view of the cancelled Chicago Marathon: UPDATED

Water station mayhem at Chicago Marathon

Chicago Marathon: Ambulance driver got lost, took dead runner to wrong hospital

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Thursday, January 10, 2008

On the settlement with Chicago Police Torture victims

The State of..., one of my favorite blogs discusses the news that Chicago's city council settled with the victims of torture by Lt. Jon Burge. Says that Chicago's voters have short memories and that if Mayor Richard Daley (who was State's Attorney in the time period of the torture allegations) could win re-election in a landslide today!

Read more...

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Who's Your Daddy?

Lately we've been hearing an awful lot about lobbyists' influence on elected officials. Senator Barack Obama passed legislation in the Senate late last year that limits lobbyists' influence on elected officials and increases transparency standards for government contractors. Senator Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign has caught a lot of heat from John Edwards and Obama for accepting lobbyists' donations. Edwards decries the influence of large multi-national corporate influence on government and refuses to accept lobbyists' and PAC contributions. Obama seemingly talks out of both sides if his mouth, accepting bundled contributions from lobbyists and appointing a pharmaceutical lobbyist as chairman of his New Hampshire campaign organization. It goes on and on. On the national stage, the discussion about lobbyists' influence on government is impossible to ignore.

When it comes to lobbyists' influence on politics in our own backyard, the view is much murkier. Chicagoans have historically been much more accepting of corruption, even embracing it at times. We tend to romanticize our Fast Eddie Vrdolyaks as modern day Al Capones. When the system is taking care of people and when everyone seems to be sharing in the wealth, Chicagoans have always looked the other way. It's basically democratic corruption. As long as everyone is getting a piece of the pie, nobody's saying nothin'.

But what if there was an elected official who unabashedly surrounded himself with lobbyists every single day and his constituents never saw that piece of the pie? The candidate's father is a lobbyist and shares an office with the son, while a Chicago alderman who happens to also be a lobbyist is located right next door. The candidate's staff moonlights as lobbyists. A tangled web of campaign contributions slither through the father's lobbying interests to the son's campaign committee and back to the father. The father uses a fund set aside for activities for 7th and 8th grade kids to help elect his preferred candidates to office, namely his son. Obama, Clinton and Edwards can go back and forth with the corporate cash accusations all day long. They'll never hold a candle to Rep. Dan Lipinski and his father, former Congressman Bill Lipinski.

In 2004, Rep. William Lipinski won the Democratic primary only to immediately resign after 20 years of service. In what was widely considered a gross act of nepotism, Bill was able to convince the Democratic committeemen to slate his son Dan to run in his place. So Junior, who had been living out of state for years, was immediately shuttled in to claim the throne in Illinois' 3rd Congressional district. The district is solidly Democratic and voters had been voting for a Lipinski for 20 years. Needless to say, Bill Lipinski's heir apparent won the general election handily.

It took two years of internal lobbying before Rep. Dan Lipinski was appointed to the Transportation Committee, just as his father had been for many years. Upon retiring from Congress, Bill Lipinski promptly started a new life as a transportation lobbyist. He has unapologetically worked side by side with his son ever since.

On Oct. 7, 2007, Chicago Suntimes columnist Mark Brown reported on former Congressman Bill Lipinski's unscrupulous activities pretending to raise money for his All-American Eagles youth program. Though the program is meant to support extracurricular activities for 7th and 8th grade kids, the fund is actually an Illinois political action committee with the stated purpose "to elect the candidates for public office endorsed by the organization and support or oppose questions of public policy endorsed by the organization." The fund hasn't actually spent any money on activities for kids lately, unless we're talking about Bill Lipinski's kid. The fund has been used heavily as a fundraising tool for Rep. Dan Lipinski's campaign committee.

It's interesting to note that Rep. Lipinski's close alliances with lobbyists and family member's financial interests would be illegal if he was in the U.S. Senate. If Dan Lipinski were a senator, his father would not be able to interact with staff, attend constituent events or travel with his son. Since he's in the House and doesn't have much to worry about it in that regard, he doesn't think it's a problem to break all of the rules U.S. senators must abide by.

Rep. Lipinski unapologetically shares political office space with his father's lobbying firm, Blue Chip Consulting. 5838 S. Archer Ave. also houses the notorious All-American Eagles; the political offices of Alderman (and lobbyist) Michael Zalewski of the 23rd Ward, the 23rd Ward Democratic Organization and state Rep. Bob Molaro D-21st; and Rose Marie Lipinski's State of Illinois Court of Claims office. It also houses a mortgage firm and a security firm. That's an awful lot to fit into four office suites!

If you wanted to volunteer at Dan Lipinski's Chicago campaign offices, you would have a hard time finding it without an address. "The Bunker," as the Lipinski's call it, is located in the back of a building that resembles many along Archer Avenue. From the road, it looks like the generic, two-story building is just an Herbalife weight loss clinic. There are no requisite campaign signs in the windows. There's no buzzer or signage on the doorway. Its appearance would leave most people to think that the Lipinskis "don't want nobody, nobody sent." And, perhaps, that they don't feel that it would be prudent to flaunt these ties in public.

The Lipinskis have the staff interaction bit covered as well. Bill Lipinski not only interacts with Rep. Lipinski's staff, he pays them as well! Rep. Lipinski's chief of staff, Jerry Hurckes, as been paid consulting fees by Bill through the All-American Eagles program, as has Rep. Lipinski's former communications director, Chris Ganschow. The younger Lipinski has also funneled cash to Daddy by paying out consulting fees to Blue Chip Consulting.

The blatancy with which Rep. Lipinski and his father operate working on transportation issues and trading cash is stunning, even by Chicago's corrupt standards. Dan has pledged to build a Central Avenue underpass in Bedford Park while serving on the House Transportation Committee, while Bill was paid by Bedford Park to lobby specifically for the underpass. Additionally, Bill is registered as a railroad lobbyist while Dan works on these issues in committee. So, Rep. Lipinski pushes transportation bills in Congress that benefit Bill Lipinski's clients, who then pay Bill big bucks.

But the scam wouldn't work too well if the kid can't stay in office, right? For that, he'll need cash, and the elder Lipinski's lobbying clients have plenty. They include Burlington Northern Santa Fe, United Airlines and the Association of American Railroads — all of who happen to be large donors to Rep. Lipinski's reelection campaign.

It has been widely speculated that Bill Lipinski is acting as Rep. Lipinski's campaign manager for his reelection bid, just as he did in 2004 when he stated to the Chicago Tribune, "I have a perfect right to run my son's campaign." Bill Lipinski routinely takes it upon himself to make sure his little prince gets what he wants, so why would this be any different?

(As of press time, the Lipinski campaign had not supplied comment.)

###

Revenge of the Second City
GAPERS BLOCK

Read more...

Thursday, January 03, 2008

CHA's Lost Voters: What Kind of Problem Is This?

Once upon a time, Chicago's enormous public housing complexes were cited as symbols of everything that was wrong with so-called Great Society liberalism. Crippled by high crime rates, rife with gang warfare and unemployment, public housing as implemented in the sixties and seventies had clearly failed by the 1990s. But the political will for real solutions to the problem wasn't there. And what alderman was willing to swallow the political poison of "mixed income housing, evenly distributed"?

The more cynical observers pointed out that the huge, high-density complexes like the Robert Taylor homes, Cabrini-Green/Marshall Field Gardens, Altgeld Gardens and the rest were too useful as "vote banks" for bossist politicians to ever break them up for a more humane and practical system of public housing. And the public housing residents, aware of their potential political power, were reasonably well organized as a voting bloc, paradoxically giving the political establishment another incentive to leave public housing as it was.

The federally pushed Plan for Transformation, of course, changed those calculi. Status quo no longer being an option, the great decentralization began.

Now, the Chicago Reporter tells us, those once politically active public housing members are dropping out of the political system. Given that there is a generally recognized need for public housing (and, in any case, it is a reality), this can be a cause for alarm: whenever political bosses make decisions FOR a constituency, rather than WITH them, you'll probably end up with something deformed.

How are public housing residents falling out of the political system? Let the Reporter tell you:

[N]early eight years after the Chicago Housing Authority embarked upon its $1.6 billion “Plan for Transformation,” public housing’s political base has been all but erased, according to a Reporter analysis of voter registration at nearly two dozen CHA family developments.

In November 2000, there were more than 22,000 people registered to vote in the developments analyzed by the Reporter. By September 2007, less than 37 percent---about 7,800---were still registered to vote in Cook County, compared with 57 percent of voters citywide, according to the Reporter’s analysis.


So, is breaking up the "vote banks" a good thing or a bad thing? Clearly, the Reporter story raises a good point: "public housing" has a constituency who, if not politically empowered, are highly at risk for abuse or exploitation. And yet, we surely cannot view the breaking up these de facto ghettos as bad because (somewhat) powerful voting blocs were eliminated. Particularly when you consider that decentralization of public housing appears to be the most reasonable solution to the ghettoization of public housing residents.

The problem the Reporter is pointing out seems to be that residents are not re-registering to vote when they move somewhere else (if indeed they were able to find housing elsewhere at all). But even if they had remained registered to vote, their semi-random dispersal across wards would have the same impact: lack of centralization in one political administrative unit (ward, in this case) would have erased their ability to influence politicians generally, and to cultivate legislative "champions" in particular.

The failure in this instance seems to be that the CHA's service providers have not done a good job of following up and making sure people are registered to vote when they move; but beyond registering people, the CHA cannot (and should not) take a role in politicizing residents. That is the work of organizers--but no matter how well organized they become, it is a fact that without physical centers, public housing residents can never hope to recapture whatever political power as a voting bloc they once had.

The Plan for Transformation, like Renaissance 2010, presents a challenge for the Left, because of the disconnect of the principles and their application. Public and affordable housing is a key element in allowing for the resurgence of a self-sufficient working class. Spreading public housing across different communities to normalize access to city services and other resources (like education) is certainly good. But the problems have arisen out of the implementation of this general idea. Transition services have flopped; building of new publicly owned units has been far outpaced by their destruction. Conditions for returning to public housing have been overly restrictive and have simply pushed people into vile tenement housing, often in neighborhoods similar to the ones they just left. One study found that the vast majority of public housing residents are ending up in neighborhoods just as segregated as the one they left.

Decentralization, in other words, has turned into decimation, and the unraveling of a once-significant political bloc will only turn decimation into obliteration.

But who wants to be the one to advocate for a policy of re-ghettoization? We may accept that public housing is good policy, and the Left does accept this, but if those who benefit directly from it are unable (or unwilling) to effectively defend it as a policy and an institution, how long does it have before it is also shredded by the thousand cuts of privatization?

Which is really to ask, how long before another affordable housing crisis rocks the city and seriously disrupts its race and class relations?

From the Reporter story:

“The influence of poor people has already diminished significantly compared with the ‘60s and … the interests of the middle class are much more catered to,” Fischer said. “The Plan for Transformation, with the elimination of these concentrated voters, probably made the situation even more that way.”

Read more...

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP