Showing posts with label Abdullah Al Andalusi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abdullah Al Andalusi. Show all posts

Sunday, 19 July 2015

Christian Polemicist David Wood Attracted to Deception like a Fly is to Dung - Re Abdullah Al Andalusi and Taqiya


I feel sorry for Christians who empty their pockets of cash for David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics. This man has been cashing in on hating Muslims and Islam for a few years now. You'd think he would have found proper employment by now and given up on the hate campaign.

What's he done now? Well he's only just posted Andrew Gilligan's article, which has been roundly denounced as misleading.

To see how deceptive Gilligan's article was see:

1. Chairman of Atheist Ireland, Michael Nugent, runs through Mr Gilligan's betrayal of journalistic integrity:http://www.michaelnugent.com/2015/07/14/gilligan-misrepresents-abdullah-al-andalusi/

2. Mr Andalusi himself offers a responses which sheds further light on Mr Gilligan's lack of journalistic scruples:
http://abdullahalandalusi.com/2015/07/12/a-response-to-andrew-gilligans-disingenuious-distortion-of-my-views/

Is it any wonder David Wood reposted it while banging on about something that he wrote five years ago (I did not bother wasting my time clicking and reading what he wrote five years ago - I kind of know Dave's modus operandi pretty well. Well enough to know the truth and accuracy are regular casualties at his hands)

Oh and David Wood also tries hard to prop up the old adage of  'you can't teach an old dog new tricks' as he appends a video at the end of the post about Taqiya. Erm, Dave's already been refuted and rebuked on his propaganda regarding the concept of Taqiya previously. That did not stop him from sounding like a stuck record and presenting the same misinformation to those who encounter his recent blog.

Seen as Deception Dave presents the same spiel on Taqiya, I was obliged to offer a similar rebuke to the previous one.

Christians, stop giving this man cash to pervert truth and blur the lines of accuracy.





Taqiyah: The Lie they made against Islam - Shadid Lewis:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/taqiyah-lie-they-made-against-islam.html

Article explaining what Taqiyyah is:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/know-truth-about-muslims-and-taqiyah.html

Nabeel Qureshi section

ABN, Sam Shamoun and David Wood Plus 'Stupid' Christians

Is David Wood of Answering Muslims the Most Ignorant Paid Islamophobe?

Sam Shamoun and David Wood Caught Using a Forgery

What Does Jesus is the Word of God Mean According to Muslims? Dr Shabir Ally

Response to Muhammad and the Death of Kinana ibn al-Rabi ABN

James White Exposes Dishonesty of AnsweringIslam and AnsweringMuslims

James White: Show Me Where Prophet Muhammad Said He was the Last Prophet p

James R. White Proven Wrong by his Buddy Shamoun

[QURAN MIRACLES] The Miracles of the Number 19 in Quran | Dr. Shabir Ally

 

 

Saturday, 18 July 2015

Why Muslims Should Complain About Andrew Gilligan


Muslims should scare journalists like the Jewish community do

I have sent a complaint off to the Telegraph about Andrew Gilligan's recent article. Other Muslims should do this too. Don't allow inertia to suppress your actions.

In a piece on the 18th of July, Andrew Gilligan labelled a Muslim activist with a history of condemning terrorism as ' one of Britain’s most notorious Islamic extremists'.

Of course it was all untrue and propped up by disingenuous quoting and an appeal to binary thinking such as appealing to Abdullah Al-Andalusi's description of ISIS as “no different to Western armies”. The fact that Al-Andalusi condemns both ISIS and Western armies is lost on Gilligan...it is possible to equate both ISIS and Western armies without siding with either. Gilligan is not stupid he knows all this, rather he banks on the stupidity of his readers and the inability of Muslims to organise and lobby like the Jewish community in the West.

I guarantee you, Andrew Gilligan would not have dared to present such a dishonest smear job on a Jewish activist. The opprobrium of the Jewish lobby would come down on him like a ton of bricks in next to no time.

So silent are we that the likes of Andrew Gilligan unfairly attack Muslims regularly, as Mehdi Hasan pointed out:

Gilligan is a journalist who makes lots of money from "outing" as many British Muslims as he can as "Islamists" or "extremists", often on deeply dubious grounds, and with the aid of selective quotation

What does that say about Muslims and what does it say about folk such as Gilligan who feels he can (without much in the way of impunity) smear Muslim activists?

Yep, people do think we are sitting ducks. The only reason why we are perceived this way is due to our unwillingness to put aside theological, personal and cultural differences in order to act as a block. I guarantee you the likes of Gilligan would think twice before smearing a Muslim if that was the case.

And don't fall into the trap of perceived insignificance, just because somebody is smearing Muslims on a national/international stage it does not mean your little Facebook page, blog, website or YouTube channel cannot make any difference. The internet is an equaliser. It may act as a fly in the face of the media monster and better still 100s of Muslims doing the same thing would certainly have a similar affect that the Jewish community have on the media - no journalist wants 100s of flies in his/her face.

The Telegraph's complaints page:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/10831533/Editorial-complaints.html

Here's my complaint I sent to The Telegraph

Hi

I would like to express great concern at a clear breach of your paper's desire for accuracy and integrity.

Mr Andrew Gilligan in the piece has clearly been demonstrated to have embarked on disingenuous quote-mining. Quite how he labels Mr Abdullah Al Andalusi as 'one of Britain's most notorious Islamic extremists' when Mr Andalusi has consistently denounced terrorism is beyond me.
However, what may dismay you more than Mr Gilligan's sensationalist labeling without any supporting evidence is Mr Gilligan's disingenuous quoting. He somehow managed to misuse an anti-ISIS article by Mr Andalusi for the purposes of smearing Mr Andalusi as a supporter of ISIS!

Please do look into these two responses to Mr Gilligan's article to further your investigation.

1. Chairman of Atheist Ireland, Michael Nugent, runs through Mr Gilligan's betrayal of journalistic integrity:
http://www.michaelnugent.com/2015/07/14/gilligan-misrepresents-abdullah-al-andalusi/

2. Mr Andalusi himself offers a responses which sheds further light on Mr Gilligan's lack of journalistic scruples:
http://abdullahalandalusi.com/2015/07/12/a-response-to-andrew-gilligans-disingenuious-distortion-of-my-views/

I would urge you to fully investigate this as Mr Gilligan's article is misleading to say the least.

Another question does arise here, would Mr Gilligan have abandoned honesty in an attempt to smear a Jewish public speaker or is this simply Mr Gilligan feeling standards of consistency and honesty are not so important when attacking Muslim activists in this current climate of Islamophobia.

Kind regards
Yahya Snow

Muslim Complains About BBC The Big Questions - Nicky Campbell

Why Do Sikhs Commit Terrorism, Douglas Murray?
Did Muslims or Zionists Send Death Threats to Jenny Tonge?


Dr. Jonathan Brown's Response to - ISIS - Terrorism - Beheadings!

Noam Chomsky on Barack Obama's Most Extreme Terrorist Campaign in Modern History

Noam Chomsky on How to Stop Terrorism from ISIS etc.

BBC's Andrew Neil Disgusts British Muslims and All Others Who Value Good Journalism

Sharia Law against terrorism

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam


Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk

Friday, 28 March 2014

Maajid Nawaz Exposed by Abdullah Al Andalusi

FEMEN and Feminism

In their vain attempt to distance Feminism from FEMENs actions, some pro-Feminist advocates have dismissed FEMEN as merely being ‘Feminist extremists’, and not representing ‘true’ Feminism.

But who’s to say that FEMEN doesn’t represent feminism? Unlike Islam, Feminism isn’t based upon a holy book, or common reference text, so who decides what is Feminism, and what isn’t?

However, the intellectual tradition of feminism follows a common principle/creed, the ‘liberation of the individual woman’ (e.g. Individualism), and therefore it would naturally conclude that the rules and restrictions of religion, inhibit women’s freedom to define their own morals and values. In fact, the public display of nudity by FEMEN is a protest against the Islamic doctrine of public modesty – which Feminism considers to be an unjust restriction of women’s ‘freedon’. Under Feminism, if women can choose to wear what they want, and ‘their body belongs to them’, how are FEMEN going against Feminism by choosing to go topless?

[Snip from Abdullah Al Andalusi]

Learn about Islam:
http://www.thedeenshow.com