Did Zionists Steal Asghar Bukhari's Shoe?

To be honest, I would not be surprised if Zionists did carry this form of intimidation out as they do blame British Muslims for helping to expose Israel and it does seem like MPACUK's Asghar Bukhari may have been targeted previously by a Zionist smear job.

Asghar Bukhari And The Case Of The Missing Shoe #MossadStoleMyShoe



ARE ZIONISTS TRYING TO INTIMIDATE ME: Someone came into my home yesterday, while I was asleep. I dont know how they got in, but they didn't break in - the only thing they took was one shoe. Now think about that, the only thing they took was a single shoe - they left one shoe behind to let me know someone had been there.

Of course I cant prove anything and thats part of the intimidation. The game is simple - to make me feel vulnerable in my own home. Its Psychological. Neither can I do much about it.

It is not the first time I have heard this happening. I have had another Muslim leader call me a year or so ago, in tears - she told me they had been coming into her house and re-arranging things - just to let her know they had been there. There is one good thing that comes out of all oppression however - for those who are smart - from my misfortune, others can learn how they operate. Share this widely, for if it is happening to me, I am sure it happening to many, many others who have not exposed it. Asghar Bukhari And The Case Of The Missing Shoe #MossadStoleMyShoe

Why Muslims Should Complain About Andrew Gilligan

BBC Question Time: A Jew Confirms George Galloway is Not Anti Semitic

Zionist Hypocrisy Over Jews in Finland Who Fought For Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem

Robert Spencer, Should Apostates in America, UK and Australia Be Killed According to Sharia

Statistics: Ethnic Minorities in Bradford District and White Majority

Sharia Law against terrorism

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

MPACUK Exposes Uncle Tom Maajid Nawaz and Western White Supremacy

WHITE PREJUDICE NEEDS EX MUSLIMS & UNCLE TOMS

 The fact that Muslims who attack their own people & ex Muslims are so famous in the West and are invited to glamorous speaking tours and media appearances proves ‪#‎Whiteprejudice‬

You see they need these paid insiders, circus-monkeys to help them justify their bigotry, for they think: "If one 'of their own' is agreeing with our prejudice, then it must be true!"

It re-enforces their prejudice and superiority they have. If they said we are violent, backward people who are savages due to our fanatical faith it might sound they were attacking a vulnerable community due to their racism - so instead they get a brown face, a Muslim to say the exact same thing for them.

Imagine a black man calling other blacks thieves - then surely the white audience was right all along - black people were saying it too!. The difference is Malcolm X and other leaders spotted the trick and called those people out as Uncle Toms or puppets for the white power structure - Muslims have failed to get to the root - failed to call out the puppet master. Just look at the audience of one these events - they are mainly white. Look at the topic - nearly always negative towards Muslims - a stereotype.

See how it works - and see how this white racism creates a need for ex-Muslims and Uncle Toms. They system itself demands they exist - and then it amplifies their voices and legitimises them. Thats how a brown face with no talent but the ability to hate on his own people to re-enforce the racist white narrative, gets rich and famous real quick. {MPACUK}

 

 

Maajid Nawaz needs to break free from the shackles of White Western Liberal Supremacists in order to remove himself from indignity and humiliation - I'd imagine the White Western Liberal Supremacists see Nawaz as not so bright and even less sharp when it comes to self respect. Up your self-respect Nawaz, break free from those shackles!

Did Muslims or Zionists Send Death Threats to Jenny Tonge?

Were Zionists Behind The Asghar Bukhari Homophobe Smear Job?

Israelis Blame Muslims in Britain for Exposing Israel!

Son of former far-right Dutch leader converts to Islam

Who Was Ibn Ishaq and Was His Work Reliable?

Dr Yasir Qadhi: The Distortion that Prophet Muhammad 'Robbed Caravans'

[QURAN MIRACLES] The Miracles of the Number 19 in Quran | Dr. Shabir Ally

Russell Brand Exposes Muslim Terrorism Percentage

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Sharia Law against terrorism

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

Adam Deen Blinded By Sectarian Motives on BBC Panorama?

FYI: I don't describe myself as Sufi nor Salafi. :)

Would it not be a shame if British Muslims were pitching up on national TV and squandering the voice they were being afforded due to desires to self-promote and/or sectarian reasons?

It would be a dereliction of responsibility and trust for a Muslim to do so in the perilous state British Muslims are in as of now.

This is where Adam Deen of the Deen Institute should be questioned. Did Adam Deen misuse his opportunity on BBC's Panorama? Admittedly, I don't have a TV set, I haven't had one for near on a decade so I was made aware of his appearance on the BBC through the internet. What struck me was how Adam Deen was being used by the BBC as a rent-a-quote character to prop up their agenda - you can decide what their agenda was/is.

However, Adam Deen is not a useful idiot. Sure he sounded foolish to anybody willing to scratch the surface and actually think about matters. This was a symbiotic relationship we witnessed. Both parties were using each other, so no, Adam's not a useful idiot.

The BBC were pushing their agenda but rest assured Adam had an agenda of his own to push:

1. Adam appeared as though he was looking to help proscribe his rivals. His sectarian rivals. For those unaware, British Muslim speakers/apologists along with their respective supporters haven't been shy in getting embroiled in embarrassing and immature spats. Adam Deen and his little gang of sectarian supporters aren't too enamoured with the Salafi iERA so it came as no surprise that Adam Deen would allow his sectarian anti-Salafi views to override the common sense narrative that inculcates foreign policy as a motor behind many forms of terrorism. Adam, sensing the opportunity, used the BBC platform to introduce himself to the nation as a Muslim who follows the Whitehall policy of remaining silent of its complicity in the problem of Muslim terrorism all the while over-playing the role of 'toxic theology' and 'puritanical Islam'. Adam spoke like a true sectarian bigot and the BBC did the rest.

Adam got a result for his narrow-minded cause which puts pressure on Salafis such as Haitham al Haddad, iERA and folk at the Green Lane mosque in Birmingham amongst many others.

These poor Muslims all oppose violence yet the scrutiny is well and truly on them now. Not everybody acts in a fair fashion, isn't that right Adam?

2. Self-promotion. Adam, by design or not, wound up pushing himself as the voice of moderation amongst British Muslims. I mean here he is on national TV condemning a bunch of other Muslims (who I repeat have consistently taught against violence and terrorism) and shoving them under the bus. It's like the guy in the office who makes his colleagues look bad in front of his manager. Office politics. It's hard to get a gig on the Beeb, I guess you don't do your credentials any harm in the quest for further air-time by following a sensationalist agenda and towing an agenda-laden line. Sober talk of unjust foreign policy and disaffected youth through unsavoury socio-economic conditions does not cut the mustard when it comes to sensationalism. People want to see bogeymen. Adam pointed at his sectarian enemies. The BBC producers aren't stupid, they expected him to do so. Predictable. Predictable because they knew of his sectarian bias.


Adam effectively used his platform to settle a few sectarian rivalries, self promote himself (knowingly or unknowingly) as the voice plus face of moderation and to curry favour from the establishment - through hiding the very real and obvious influence of foreign policy on radicalising already-disaffected young men and women.

Now you tell me, how in the world did ANY of Adam's air-time on the BBC help the average Muslim youth in Britain? In fact, it made matters worse for many Muslims as his rampant sectarian bigotry led him to amplify the calls to proscribe and label many Muslim leaders in the UK who are railing against terrorism as 'non violent extremists' following 'toxic theology' and 'puritanical Islam'.

What an absolute disaster Adam was. Adam, next time, do us all a favour and just ask your wife to take your spot or better still just ask them to get real scholars and intellectuals such as Hamza Yusuf and Dr Yasir Qadhi. It's more in the interest of British Muslims. I think I can safely assume the rest of us British Muslims would rather have less testosterone fuelled sectarian bigotry, less self-focus and more wisdom, common sense and cohesion...please!

Adam Deen vs Asghar Bukhari, George Galloway,  Experts (and possibly vs his wife too!!!)




Is 'toxic theology' behind 98% of terrorist attacks, Adam?

When asked about his motive by an eyewitness, ‎one of the men responded, “because he has killed Muslim people in Muslim countries”, “I killed ‎him because he killed Muslims and I am fed up with people killing Muslims in Afghanistan”. He ‎added: “You will never be safe. Remove your government”. What’s more the style of the attack, ‎undertaken and filmed in full public view with the objective of publicising the actions to a wider ‎audience, is reminiscent of a strategy employed by the media savvy loose network, often referred ‎to as Al Qaida. While there is evidence to suggest Michael Adebolajo became radicalised through ‎the now-banned al-Muhijaroun, the group is well known to security services who monitor it closely ‎and it treads a fine line between espousing hate and undertaking violent actions. Though the ‎group may have laid the foundations for a binary and simplistic worldview, it is likely other ‎inspiration was involved in the move to action. [Myriam Francois-Cerrah]

Extremists point to western foreign policy to explain their acts. Why do we ignore them?

Often, the likes of Michael Adebowale and Michael Adebolajo, who used violence to make “points” about the Muslim world in Woolwich, aren’t “religious fanatics”. The trigger we refuse to see is our foreign policy.

Did you know that the alleged ringleader in the 11 September 2001 attacks had originally planned to land one of the hijacked US airliners and give a speech to the assembled press corps? Can you guess what he wanted to rant about, live on Fox News? Seventy-two virgins in heaven? Nope. The need for sharia law? Guess again. According to the report of the official 9/11 commission, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had intended to “deliver a speech excoriating US support for Israel . . . and repressive governments in the Arab world”.

In the vexed discussion about extremism and radicalisation, foreign policy is the issue that dare not speak its name. Our leaders zealously police the parameters of the debate, pre-emptively warning off those who might dare connect the dots between wars abroad and terror at home.

...Yet establishment figures continue to denounce those of us who cite the radicalising role of foreign policy as (to quote the former US state department spokesman James Rubin) “excuse-makers” for al-Qaeda. To explain is not to excuse. The inconvenient truth for Rubin, Johnson et al is that Muslim extremists usually cite political, not theological, justifications for their horrendous crimes.

Asked by the judge at his trial in 2010 how he could justify planting a bomb in a crowded public place, the “Times Square bomber”, Faisal Shahzad, raised the impact of US drone strikes in his native Pakistan that “kill women, children, they kill everybody”. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the “underwear bomber” who tried to blow up a US-bound airliner in December 2009, told the judge in his trial that he had worn an explosive device “to avenge the killing of my Muslim brothers and sisters” against “the tyranny of the United States”. Then there is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 19-year-old suspect in the Bos - ton Marathon bombings. According to the Washington Post, Tsarnaev “told interrogators that the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan motivated him and his brother to carry out the attack”. Ah, say the critics, but 9/11 preceded both the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and Obama’s drone war in Pakistan. They did – but the west’s support for Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians preceded 9/11. As did the murderous Anglo-American sanctions against Iraq. What did the mastermind of the first al-Qaeda attack on the Twin Towers in 1993, Ramzi Yousef, say at his trial in 1998? “You have [a] so-called economic embargo [on Iraq] which kills nobody other than children and elderly people.” [Mehdi Hasan]


Why Do Sikhs Commit Terrorism, Douglas Murray?

Israelis Blame Muslims in Britain for Exposing Israel!

 

Growing Problem of Islamophobia in Britain

Muslim Complains About BBC The Big Questions - Nicky Campbell

About 20% of British Muslim Women Feel Unsafe in Britain

Bradford Man Fooled by ISIS (Terrorist Group)

Britain First's Jayda Fransen and Paul Golding Learn About Anti-Semitism and Christianity

British Muslims in Preston Helping to Save Lives

Sharia Law against terrorism

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

Tags: MPACUK, British Muslims, London Muslims, Muslim Debate Initiative, George Galloway, Mehdi Hasan, iERA, Paul Williams, BBC, Haitham al Hadad, EDL, Tommy Robinson,

Muslim Response: Texas Shooting at Islamophobe Drawing Event and Pamela Geller Exposed

Dr Yasir Qadhi speaks about this incident, from his FB:

I have absolutely no sympathy or love for Islamophobes like Pamella Geller or Geert Wilders and their ilk. I do not wish them any success in this world, and have full certainty that if they continue down their paths, Allah will deal with them in the next world. But by attacking their Islamophobic event, all of a sudden these bigots have emerged as 'freedom fighters' and have had their credentials boosted in many circles.

 If we had just ignored them as they deserve, their event would have gone unnoticed, and they would have slithered back to where they came from without any attention being given to them. Instead, they will now be given international attention and put in the limelight. Muslims need to stop reacting emotionally, and let knowledge reign them in. Such foolish and un-Islamic acts contradict the Shariah, and any scholar of Islam will know this.

Ignoramuses who quote a Hadith or incident from the Seerah are even more dangerous than a high schooler who opens a page of a neurosurgery book and then starts operating based on his reading of one paragraph. Those who want to kill in the name of defending the Prophet (salla Allahu Alayhi wa sallam) harm the followers of the Prophet (saw), and distort the beautiful image and reputation of the Prophet (saw), a million times more than those who mock him could ever do. We gain nothing by such attempted murder, and we lose everything.

Of course we can and should verbally engage them (and you are aware that I do this as well). But the question is: should the event have been targeted? In fact I say that Muslims shouldn't even have protested outside the event but rather written about the double standards and the reality of these bigots in op-eds and other news outlets. There is a wise way to defend, and there are foolish and counterproductive ways.

Asghar Bukhari of MPACUK discusses Islamophobes such as Pam Geller and the shootings at the Islamohobic event



Pamela Geller section

Robert Spencer section

Russell Brand - Muslims Treated Like Jews in Germany in the 30s

Did Muslims or Zionists Send Death Threats to Jenny Tonge?

QURAN MIRACLES] The Miracles of the Number 19 in Quran | Dr. Shabir Ally

 

Russell Brand Exposes Muslim Terrorism Percentage

 

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam
 

Sharia Law against terrorism

 

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

Deceiver: Abul Taher of the Daily Mail

Only Ignorant People Will Believe Moazzam Begg Trained Jihadi John

Abul Taher of the Mail on Sunday is exposed. This man throws accuracy and good journalistic standards away just to smear Moazzam Begg with a ridiculous suggestion that he trained Jihadi John (Mohammed Emzawi).

How this 'journalist' can present this shoddy material with a straight face is beyond me. I call Abul Taher of the MoS to a public apology. Come clean Abul Taher, have some dignity.

Abul Taher and the Mail on Sunday have well and truly been exposed for their misguided, deceptive and insulting hit piece on Moazzam Begg

MPACUK's Raza Nadim and Asghar Bukhari Expose Abul Taher's Nonsense in the Mail on Sunday about Moazzam Begg Training Jihadi John


Were Zionists Behind The Asghar Bukhari Homophobe Smear Job?

Israelis Blame Muslims in Britain for Exposing Israel!

BBC Question Time: A Jew Confirms George Galloway is Not Anti Semitic

Zionist Hypocrisy Over Jews in Finland Who Fought For Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem

Robert Spencer, Should Apostates in America, UK and Australia Be Killed According to Sharia

Statistics: Ethnic Minorities in Bradford District and White Majority

Sharia Law against terrorism

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

Tags: Douglas Murray, Breitbart, Milo Yiannopoulas, daily mail, Maajid Nawaz

Maajid Nawaz, Learn From Asghar Bukhari

They want me to hate my people, look down on them, be ashamed of them, that's why they demonise us - to embarrass us. But I don't buy their trash, Muslims are a great people, the more I learn about their history, their bravery, their struggle for equality and justice in today's world, the more I realise how great they are. Our men are great and our women greater - Asghar Bukhari

Maajid Nawaz Lacking Self Respect

Why Do Sikhs Commit Terrorism, Douglas Murray?

Noam Chomsky on Barack Obama's Most Extreme Terrorist Campaign in Modern History

Noam Chomsky on How to Stop Terrorism from ISIS etc.

BBC's Andrew Neil Disgusts British Muslims and All Others Who Value Good Journalism

Sharia Law against terrorism

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk

Asghar Bukhari on Demonization

Demonisation destroys a people better than any bullet, for it makes people hate them and eventually they turn to hating themselves.

Noam Chomsky on How to Stop Terrorism from ISIS etc.

Were Zionists Behind The Asghar Bukhari Homophobe Smear Job?

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

Were Zionists Behind The Asghar Bukhari Homophobe Smear Job?

Some things just don't surprise me. Somebody like MPACUK's Asghar Bukhari has been shouting from the roof tops about Western foreign policies and Israeli aggression and oppression towards the Palestinians.

You'd think, OK, that's fair game. Asghar Bukhari is only doing want the average human is expected to do - speak up against injustices around the world.

However, not everybody sees it such a way. Asghar is a British Muslim who has been shattering the myths spun by the Zionists for a while now. What we also know is, Zionists within Israel have BLAMED European Muslims for the increased awareness of Israel's oppression and criminal acts towards Palestinan people and subsequent shift in public opinion AWAY from supporting Israel. As can be seen here:

Israelis Blame Muslims in Britain for Exposing Israel!

So what's all this smearing of Asghar Bukhari about? Well some journalist made up a Twitter account and tried to frame Asghar Bukahri for it. Perhaps it was the doing of somebody on the pay roll of the Israeli government

Watch Asghar Bukhari and Raza Nadim address the failed attempt to smear MPACUK's Asghar Bukhari as a 'homophobe':

Exposed! Anti-Muslim journalist harasses Muslim activist with fake homophobia story  



BBC Question Time: A Jew Confirms George Galloway is Not Anti Semitic

Zionist Hypocrisy Over Jews in Finland Who Fought For Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem

Robert Spencer, Should Apostates in America, UK and Australia Be Killed According to Sharia

Statistics: Ethnic Minorities in Bradford District and White Majority

Sharia Law against terrorism

Christians having dreams and converting to Islam

Learn about Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk 

Tags: Douglas Murray, Breitbart, Milo Yiannopoulas, Maajid Nawaz