Showing posts with label ANN COULTER IS ONE SMART GAL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANN COULTER IS ONE SMART GAL. Show all posts

Fwd: Fw: A Reminder of How Wrong they Were...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrpkxl4DXtk

Fw: Liberal Buffons.........


Subject: Liberal Buffons......... 

 
 
 
 
WARNING: this entertainment should cause these people to be embarrassed by  their own stupid statements!
 
So feel free to forward it to conservatives and liberals, young and old, who  got the election of Trump so wrong.
 

Fw: Fw: Diversity our greatest asset????

Diversity our greatest asset????

COMMENTS BY ANN COULTER..SHE MAY BE ABRASIVE BUT SHE DARN SURE HIT THIS ONE

It cannot be said often enough that the chief of staff of the United States Army, Gen. George Casey, responded to a massacre of 13 Americans in which the suspect is a Muslim by saying: "Our diversity ... is a strength."


As long as the general has brought it up: Never in recorded history has diversity been anything but a problem. Look at Ireland with its Protestant and Catholic populations, Canada with its French and English populations, Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.

Or consider the warring factions in India , Sri Lanka , China , Iraq , Czechoslovakia (until it happily split up), the Balkans and Chechnya . Also look at the festering hotbeds of tribal warfare -- I mean the beautiful mosaics -- in Third World hellholes like Afghanistan, Rwanda and South Central, L.A.

"Diversity" is a difficulty to be overcome, not an advantage to be sought.. True, America does a better job than most at accommodating a diverse population. We also do a better job at curing cancer and containing pollution. But no one goes around mindlessly exclaiming: "Cancer is a strength!" "Pollution is our greatest asset!"

Fwd: quote of the day

QUOTE OF THE DAY?





In a time where so much is being made about our first alleged black president, Ann Coulter made the following observation in her column on 2/25/2009:


"But as long as the nation is obsessed with historic milestones, is no one going to remark on what a great country it is where a mentally retarded woman can become speaker of the house?"

Fw: Coulter on Biden

> BIDEN SECRET SERVICE CODE NAME: 'ASSASSINATION INSURANCE'
> by Ann Coulter
> October 1, 2008
>
> While Gov. Sarah Palin is being grilled on her position on mark-to-
> market
> accounting rules, the press can't bother to ask Joe Biden if he
> could give
> us a ballpark estimate on when Franklin D. Roosevelt was president
> -- or
> maybe take a stab at guessing the decade when televisions were first
> available to the public.
>
> Being interviewed by Katie Couric on the "CBS Evening News," Biden
> said:
> "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the
> television
> and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He
> said,
> 'Look, here's what happened.'"
>
> For those of you who aren't hard-core history buffs, Biden not only
> named
> the wrong president during the 1929 stock market crash, he also
> claimed a
> president who wasn't president during the stock market crash went on
> TV
> before Americans had TVs.
>
> Other than that, the statement holds up pretty well. At least Biden
> managed
> to avoid mentioning any "clean" Negroes he had met.
>
> Couric was nearly moved to tears by the brilliance of Biden's brain-
> damaged
> remark. She was especially intrigued by Biden's claim that FDR had
> said the
> new iPhone was the bomb!
>
> Here is Couric's full response to Biden's bizarre outburst about FDR
> (a)
> being president and (b) going on TV in 1929: "Relating to the fears
> of the
> average American is one of Biden's strong suits."
>
> But when our beauteous Sarah said that John McCain was a better
> leader on
> the economy than Barack Obama, Couric relentlessly badgered her for
> evidence. "Why do you say that?" Couric demanded. "Why are they
> waiting for
> John McCain and not Barack Obama? ... Can you give us any more
> examples of
> his leading the charge for more oversight?"
>
> The beauteous Sarah had cited McCain's prescient warnings about
> Fannie Mae
> and Freddie Mac. But Couric, the crackerjack journalist who didn't
> know FDR
> wasn't president in 1929, demanded more examples from Palin.
>
> We are currently in the middle of a massive financial crisis brought
> on by
> Fannie Mae. McCain was right on Fannie Mae; Obama was wrong. That's
> not
> enough?
>
> Not for the affable Eva Braun of evening TV! "I'm just going to ask
> you one
> more time," Couric snipped, "not to belabor the point. Specific
> examples in
> his 26 years of pushing for more regulation?"
>
> This would be like responding to someone who predicted the 9/11
> attacks by
> saying: OK, you got one thing right. Not to belabor the point, but
> what
> else?
>
> Obama was not merely wrong on Fannie Mae: He is owned by Fannie Mae.
> Somehow Obama managed to become the second biggest all-time
> recipient of
> Fannie Mae political money after only three years in the Senate. The
> biggest beneficiary, Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, had a 30-year head
> start
> on receiving loot from Fannie Mae -- the government-backed institution
> behind our current crisis.
>
> How does the Democratic ticket stack up on other major issues facing
> the
> nation, say, gas prices?
>
> Shockingly, Sen. Joe Biden was one of only five senators to vote
> against
> the first Alaskan pipeline bill in 1973. This is like having been a
> Nazi
> sympathizer during World War II. If Sarah Palin does nothing else,
> she has
> got to tie that idiotic pipeline vote around Biden's neck.
>
> The Senate passed the 1973 Alaskan pipeline bill by an overwhelming
> 80-5
> vote. Only five senators voted against the pipeline on final
> passage. Sen.
> Biden is the only one who is still in the Senate -- the other four
> having
> been confined to mental institutions long ago.
>
> The stakes were clear: This was in the midst of the first Arab oil
> embargo.
> Liberal Democrats, such as senators Robert Byrd, Mike Mansfield, Frank
> Church and Hubert Humphrey, all voted for the pipeline.
>
> But Biden cast one of only five votes against the pipeline that has
> produced more than 15 billion barrels of oil, supplied nearly 20
> percent of
> this nation's oil, created tens of thousands of jobs, added hundreds
> of
> billions of dollars to the U.S. economy and reduced money transfers
> to the
> nation's enemies by about the same amount.
>
> The only argument against the pipeline was that it would harm the
> caribou,
> an argument that was both trivial and wrong. The caribou population
> near
> the pipeline increased from 5,000 in the 1970s to 32,000 by 2002.
>
> It would have been bad enough to vote against the pipeline bill even
> if it
> had hurt the caribou. A sane person would still say: Our enemies
> have us in
> a vice grip. Sorry, caribou, you've got to take one for the team.
> But when
> the pipeline goes through and the caribou population sextuples in
> the next
> 20 years, you really look like a moron.
>
> We couldn't possibly expect Couric to ask Biden about a vote that is
> the
> equivalent of voting against the invention of the wheel. But
> couldn't she
> have come up with just one follow-up question for Biden on FDR's
> magnificent handling of the 1929 stock market crash?
>
> Or here's a question the public is dying to know: "If Obama wanted a
> historically delusional vice president, why not Lyndon LaRouche?" At
> least
> LaRouche didn't vote against the Alaskan pipeline.

Fw: Fwd: Another Coulter

>
> THEY GAVE YOUR MORTGAGE TO A LESS QUALIFIED MINORITY
> by Ann Coulter
> September 24, 2008
>
> On MSNBC this week, Newsweek's Jonathan Alter tried to connect John
> McCain
> to the current financial disaster, saying: "If you remember the
> Keating
> Five scandal that (McCain) was a part of. ... He's really getting a
> free
> ride on the fact that he was in the middle of the last great financial
> scandal in our country."
>
> McCain was "in the middle of" the Keating Five case in the sense
> that he
> was "exonerated." The lawyer for the Senate Ethics Committee wanted
> McCain
> removed from the investigation altogether, but, as The New York Times
> reported: "Sen. McCain was the only Republican embroiled in the
> affair, and
> Democrats on the panel would not release him."
>
> So John McCain has been held hostage by both the Viet Cong and the
> Democrats.
>
> Alter couldn't be expected to know that: As usual, he was lifting
> material
> directly from Kausfiles. What is unusual was that he was stealing a
> random
> thought sent in by Kausfiles' mother, who, the day before, had e-
> mailed:
> "It's time to bring up the Keating Five. Let McCain explain that
> scandal
> away."
>
> The Senate Ethics Committee lawyer who investigated McCain already had
> explained that scandal away -- repeatedly. It was celebrated lawyer
> Robert
> Bennett, most famous for defending a certain horny hick president a
> few
> years ago.
>
> In February this year, on Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes," Bennett
> said, for
> the eight billionth time:
>
> "First, I should tell your listeners I'm a registered Democrat, so
> I'm not
> on (McCain's) side of a lot of issues. But I investigated John
> McCain for a
> year and a half, at least, when I was special counsel to the Senate
> Ethics
> Committee in the Keating Five. ... And if there is one thing I am
> absolutely confident of, it is John McCain is an honest man. I
> recommended
> to the Senate Ethics Committee that he be cut out of the case, that
> there
> was no evidence against him."
>
> It's bad enough for Alter to be constantly ripping off Kausfiles.
> Now he's
> so devoid of his own ideas, he's ripping off the idle musings of
> Kausfiles'
> mother.
>
> Even if McCain had been implicated in the Keating Five scandal --
> and he
> wasn't -- that would still have absolutely nothing to do with the
> subprime
> mortgage crisis currently roiling the financial markets. This crisis
> was
> caused by political correctness being forced on the mortgage lending
> industry in the Clinton era.
>
> Before the Democrats' affirmative action lending policies became an
> embarrassment, the Los Angeles Times reported that, starting in
> 1992, a
> majority-Democratic Congress "mandated that Fannie and Freddie
> increase
> their purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income
> borrowers.
> Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been
> aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains."
>
> Under Clinton, the entire federal government put massive pressure on
> banks
> to grant more mortgages to the poor and minorities. Clinton's
> secretary of
> Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, investigated Fannie Mae
> for
> racial discrimination and proposed that 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and
> Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low- to moderate-income
> borrowers by the year 2001.
>
> Instead of looking at "outdated criteria," such as the mortgage
> applicant's
> credit history and ability to make a down payment, banks were
> encouraged to
> consider nontraditional measures of credit-worthiness, such as
> having a
> good jump shot or having a missing child named "Caylee."
>
> Threatening lawsuits, Clinton's Federal Reserve demanded that banks
> treat
> welfare payments and unemployment benefits as valid income sources to
> qualify for a mortgage. That isn't a joke -- it's a fact.
>
> When Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches,
> political correctness was given a veto over sound business practices.
>
> In 1999, liberals were bragging about extending affirmative action
> to the
> financial sector. Los Angeles Times reporter Ron Brownstein hailed the
> Clinton administration's affirmative action lending policies as one
> of the
> "hidden success stories" of the Clinton administration, saying that
> "black
> and Latino homeownership has surged to the highest level ever
> recorded."
>
> Meanwhile, economists were screaming from the rooftops that the
> Democrats
> were forcing mortgage lenders to issue loans that would fail the
> moment the
> housing market slowed and deadbeat borrowers couldn't get out of their
> loans by selling their houses.
>
> A decade later, the housing bubble burst and, as predicted,
> food-stamp-backed mortgages collapsed. Democrats set an affirmative
> action
> time-bomb and now it's gone off.
>
> In Bush's first year in office, the White House chief economist, N.
> Gregory
> Mankiw, warned that the government's "implicit subsidy" of Fannie
> Mae and
> Freddie Mac, combined with loans to unqualified borrowers, was
> creating a
> huge risk for the entire financial system.
>
> Rep. Barney Frank denounced Mankiw, saying he had no "concern about
> housing." How dare you oppose suicidal loans to people who can't repay
> them! The New York Times reported that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were
> "under heavy assault by the Republicans," but these entities still had
> "important political allies" in the Democrats.
>
> Now, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars, middle-class
> taxpayers
> are going to be forced to bail out the Democrats' two most important
> constituent groups: rich Wall Street bankers and welfare recipients.
>
> Political correctness had already ruined education, sports, science
> and
> entertainment. But it took a Democratic president with a Democratic
> congress for political correctness to wreck the financial industry.
>
>

Fw: Fwd: Ann's Latest

Here's "Ann's latest" forward. Um. I don't get the point exactly, but enjoy.
-m

------- begin forward ---------


From: ##########@$$$$$$$.com
Sent: 08/16/2008 05:19 PM MST
Subject: Fwd: Ann's Lates


EVEN BY TRIAL LAWYER STANDARDS, EDWARDS A REAL SLEAZEBAG
by Ann Coulter
August 13, 2008

The good news: DNA testing has confirmed that John Edwards is not the
father of Rielle Hunter's baby.

The bad news: The father is Bill Clinton.

Ha ha -- just kidding! It's almost impossible to get pregnant by having the
type of sex Bill Clinton prefers.

Also, by now, everyone has heard the news that Edwards' mistress, Rielle
Hunter, has refused to grant a paternity test.

I wonder if Edwards knew that when he was making his chesty offer to take a
paternity test? Edwards gushed to ABC's Bob Woodruff: "I would welcome
participating in a paternity test, be happy to participate in one ... happy
to take a paternity test and would love to see it happen."

As Edwards knows, our paternity laws were written by Gloria Steinem, so if
the mother doesn't want a paternity test, it can't happen. So when Woodruff
asked if he was going to actually take the paternity test soon, Edwards
quickly noted, "I'm only one side of the test."

With Rielle in on the scam, Edwards could boldly demand a paternity test
and then self-righteously defend his mistress's decision to refuse a
paternity test. How dare you gainsay this woman's right to her privacy!
Because if there's one person who's gone the extra mile to keep Hunter from
becoming a public figure, it's John Edwards.

Edwards is closely following the Kennedy model of responding to charges of
misconduct. First, admit only as much as can be currently proved. Second,
get the other party to block any further investigation. I guess he really
is "Kennedy-esque"!

For example, when the cops found DNA on the murdered body of Martha Moxley
in Greenwich, Conn., the Kennedy suspect, Michael Skakel, suddenly
remembered he had been up in a tree that night masturbating! (Talk about a
tree-hugger.) You can see how something like that could slip your mind.

After Teddy Kennedy plunged his car off the Chappaquiddick Bridge with Mary
Jo Kopechne in it and then failed to report the accident for nine hours,
Kennedy admitted he had driven off the bridge -- but said he was in a state
of shock for the next nine hours, preventing him from reporting the
submerged car with a woman trapped in it.

Indeed, Kennedy was so disoriented he was barely able to dream up a highly
unlikely alibi.

The historical parallel to Edwards' pincer move with Rielle Hunter is that
Kennedy ostentatiously demanded a full investigation –- while the Kopechne
family stoutly objected to an autopsy of their daughter.

According to Senatorial Privilege: The Chappaquiddick Cover-up"" by Leo
Damore, the evidence suggested that Kopechne died gasping for breath in the
car while Teddy Kennedy was busy trying to convince various people to say
that they were driving his car.

There were lots of houses nearby with lights on, but Kennedy avoided them
after he escaped from the car, so he could sneak back to his hotel
undetected and begin establishing an alibi. Evidently, Kennedy is better
than Edwards at sneaking into and out of hotels.

If Mary Jo had suffocated, then she had been alive for hours after the car
plunged into the water. But an autopsy was required to determine whether
Kopechne had drowned or suffocated.

Both the coroner and the diver who retrieved Mary Jo's body from the car
believed Mary Jo had suffocated, not drowned. The diver found her body
contorted in the back of the submerged car as if she had been trying to
press her face into the last air pocket in the car. The coroner concluded
there wasn't enough water in Mary Jo's body to indicate a drowning.

But for the first time in Massachusetts history, no autopsy was performed
in a possible manslaughter case. Mary Jo was buried within about an hour of
her body being pulled out of the channel under the Chappaquiddick Bridge.

Naturally, Kennedy wanted a thorough investigation -- to clear his name! --
but the Kopechnes absolutely refused to consent to an autopsy of their
daughter. What more could he do? The Kopechnes' lawyer, Joseph Flanagan,
refused to say who was paying him to fight the autopsy.

Similarly, Edwards aggressively offered to take a paternity test, knowing
that the New Age hippie chick who still thinks she's going to marry him
would not hurt him by allowing a paternity test. Edwards certainly is adept
at reading stupid women, or as his campaign called them, "the base."

Democrats are always claiming to have the Kennedy magic, but, once again,
another Kennedy-wannabe falls short. To be a real Kennedy, John, you have
to kill her.

COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111

 
Creative Commons License
MyRightWingDad.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.