Pro-life activist Jim Pouillon was murdered because the killer was offended by Pouillon's pro-life message.
The murderer sounds like a kook. He apparently killed a businessman because of some perceived grievance and had plans to kill another person before he was arrested.
Nonetheless, if the shoe was on the other foot - well, it has been on the other foot - we would be hearing a week's worth of retrospectives on the victim and listening to musings about the danger of the pro-life movement as a whole.
Speaking of invidious social pathologies, Creative Minority Report did the service of scouring the fever swamp left for its take on the Pouillon murder and came back with the following from Huffington Post:
If somebody is constantly harassing people and the law can do nothing about it, maybe this was the only option.
it fascinates me how these old a** men are so fixation on abortion rights- they probably haven't even had sex in 30 years.
It's sad that he lost his life...That being said, this is a little OT. but has anyone noticed how many of these anti abortion protesters are old men? This guy was 61 years old, why is he worried about what is going on inside the uterus of a woman of child bearing age?
When anti-abortionist are allowed to protest in front of a school; but the President of the United States is censored for fear of indoctrinating children, the rest of the population better pay attention - the right has lost its collective mind and have moved beyond obstructionist to anarchist. They believe in violence and have guns a plenty, they talk of revolt and succussion and show no regard for human life or any one or anything that does not fit into their narrow view of the world.
if he was in jail he would not have been on the wrong end of a bullet!!!!
There's mention in two thousand year old Sanskrit literature of abortions being performed. Abortions are most definitely not some new-fangled 'lefty' innovation, as the lunatic right would have you believe.
Have you seen the horrible graphic posters these sociopaths display? It's not free speech, it's terrorism.
[Via The American Catholic.]
No comments:
Post a Comment