From the Chicago Sun Times:
Federal prosecutors on Friday announced new charges against the suspect in the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, accusing him of killing six people and wounding 13 others who were exercising the fundamental American “right to meet freely, openly and peaceably with their member of Congress.”
U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke called the 49-count indictment returned Thursday against Jared Lee Loughner “comprehensive and is solid, and covers all the murdered and injured victims” who were at the political event held by Giffords outside a Tucson grocery store.
“There are no distinctions at all between the victims,” Burke said, adding that they “were exercising one of the most precious and fundamental rights of American citizens.”
The indictment charged Loughner in the murders of U.S. District Judge John Roll and Giffords aide Gabe Zimmerman. Four other people who were not federal workers also died in the Jan. 8 attack, including a 9-year-old girl, and 13 others were wounded.
He also was charged with causing the death of a participant at a federally provided activity; injuring a participant at a federally provided activity; and using a gun in a crime of violence, stemming from the wounding of 10 people who didn’t work for the federal government.
It is easy to forget, with all of the publicity surrounding Gabby Giffords, that there were actually nineteen victims of Loughner's shooting spree, and that six of them lost their lives that day.
I will be interested to learn exactly what set this damaged individual on a course of mayhem and destruction. We have discussed the possibilities, including possibly hate speech and anti-government rhetoric, but we really do not yet have a definitive answer.
Personally I would like one, even though it will never be a compelling enough reason to explain how somebody could do what he did that terrible day in January.
Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Showing posts with label federal prosecuters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal prosecuters. Show all posts
Friday, March 04, 2011
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Why Sarah Palin owes David Kernell a big sloppy kiss, instead of testifying against him in a Tennessee courtroom.
(Ivey Frye is pictured to the left)
Knoxville:
A longtime friend and one-time employee of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told jurors today of vulgar and threatening e-mails she and others received after news hit that Palin's personal e-mail account had been illegally accessed.
"I received (e-mails) many a day, violent, sexual, threatening ... throughout the course of the (2008 presidential) campaign," Ivey Frye testified in U.S. District Court.
She read from one that said: "You don't know me. Neither do I know you, but we can change that."
She said the e-mails, which were sent to everyone on Palin's e-mail contact list, were anonymously sent.
Later this afternoon, jurors will hear from Palin's oldest daughter, Bristol Palin. Authorities say Bristol Palin also received vulgar and threatening messages after the account was accessed.
It is very unfortunate that Palin's daughter and friend received hateful threatening e-mails, just like it is when people who criticize Plain receive them, but I still don't believe it constitutes anything more than a misdemeanor on David Kernell's behalf.
He may have realized that people would use access to the accounts to send annoying e-mails to the people on the e-mail list, but unless he encouraged people to make those threats, he can hardly be held accountable for what those individuals did with the information he provided.
Knoxville:
A longtime friend and one-time employee of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told jurors today of vulgar and threatening e-mails she and others received after news hit that Palin's personal e-mail account had been illegally accessed.
"I received (e-mails) many a day, violent, sexual, threatening ... throughout the course of the (2008 presidential) campaign," Ivey Frye testified in U.S. District Court.
She read from one that said: "You don't know me. Neither do I know you, but we can change that."
She said the e-mails, which were sent to everyone on Palin's e-mail contact list, were anonymously sent.
Later this afternoon, jurors will hear from Palin's oldest daughter, Bristol Palin. Authorities say Bristol Palin also received vulgar and threatening messages after the account was accessed.
It is very unfortunate that Palin's daughter and friend received hateful threatening e-mails, just like it is when people who criticize Plain receive them, but I still don't believe it constitutes anything more than a misdemeanor on David Kernell's behalf.
He may have realized that people would use access to the accounts to send annoying e-mails to the people on the e-mail list, but unless he encouraged people to make those threats, he can hardly be held accountable for what those individuals did with the information he provided.
Labels:
e-mails,
federal prosecuters,
Sarah Palin
Monday, March 26, 2007
What does it mean when a witness pleads the fifth? It means they have something to hide!
Monica Goodling, a senior Justice Department official involved in the firings of federal prosecutors, will refuse to answer questions at upcoming Senate hearings, citing Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, her lawyer said Monday.
"The potential for legal jeopardy for Ms. Goodling from even her most truthful and accurate testimony under these circumstances is very real," said the lawyer, John Dowd.
"One need look no further than the recent circumstances and proceedings involving Lewis Libby," he said, a reference to the recent conviction of Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff in the CIA leak case.
Am I the only one who realizes that "Scooter" Libby was found guilty of perjury because he lied?
If Monica Gooding does not want to be charged with perjury then all she has to do is to tell the damn truth! How fucking hard is that?
But if she feels she cannot tell the truth then I have to say that there is more here then meets the eye, and the Democrats better keep digging.
"The potential for legal jeopardy for Ms. Goodling from even her most truthful and accurate testimony under these circumstances is very real," said the lawyer, John Dowd.
"One need look no further than the recent circumstances and proceedings involving Lewis Libby," he said, a reference to the recent conviction of Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff in the CIA leak case.
Am I the only one who realizes that "Scooter" Libby was found guilty of perjury because he lied?
If Monica Gooding does not want to be charged with perjury then all she has to do is to tell the damn truth! How fucking hard is that?
But if she feels she cannot tell the truth then I have to say that there is more here then meets the eye, and the Democrats better keep digging.
Labels:
federal prosecuters,
Monica Gooding,
Scooter Libby
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)